Magnetic resonance imaging in radiotherapy treatment target volumes definition for brain tumours: a systematic review and meta-analysis

The role and potential of using quantitative MRI biomarkers for imaging guidance in brain cancer radiotherapy treatment planning: A systematic review

Background and purpose

Improving the accuracy of brain tumour radiotherapy (RT) treatment planning is important to optimise patient outcomes. This systematic review investigates primary studies providing clinical evidence for the integration of quantitative magnetic resonance imaging (qMRI) biomarkers and MRI radiomics to optimise brain tumour RT planning.

Materials and methods

PubMed, Scopus, Embase and Web of Science databases were searched for all years until June 21, 2022. The search identified original articles demonstrating clinical evidence for the use of qMRI biomarkers and MRI radiomics for the optimization of brain cancer RT planning. Relevant information was extracted and tabulated, including qMRI metrics and techniques, impact on RT plan optimization and changes in target and normal tissue contouring and dose distribution.

Results

Nineteen articles met the inclusion criteria. Studies were grouped according to the qMRI biomarkers into: 1) diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) and perfusion-weighted imaging (PWI; five studies); 2) diffusion tensor imaging (DTI; seven studies); and 3) MR spectroscopic imaging (MRSI; seven studies). No relevant MRI-based radiomics studies were identified. Integration of DTI maps offers the potential for improved organs at risk (OAR) sparing. MRSI metabolic maps are a promising technique for improving delineation accuracy in terms of heterogeneity and infiltration, with OAR sparing. No firm conclusions could be drawn regarding the integration of DWI metrics and PWI maps.

Conclusions

Integration of qMRI metrics into RT planning offers the potential to improve delineation and OAR sparing. Clinical trials and consensus guidelines are required to demonstrate the clinical benefits of such approaches.

Automated algorithm for calculation of setup corrections and planning target volume margins for offline image-guided radiotherapy protocols

Purpose

Each radiotherapy center should have a site‐specific planning target volume (PTV) margins and image‐guided (IG) radiotherapy (IGRT) correction protocols to compensate for the geometric errors that can occur during treatment. This study developed an automated algorithm for the calculation and evaluation of these parameters from cone beam computed tomography (CBCT)‐based IG‐intensity modulated radiotherapy (IG‐IMRT) treatment.

Methods and materials

A MATLAB algorithm was developed to extract the setup errors in three translational directions (x, y, and z) from the data logged by the CBCT system during treatment delivery. The algorithm also calculates the resulted population setup error and PTV margin based on the van Herk margin recipe and subsequently estimates their respective values for no action level (NAL) and extended no action level (eNAL) offline correction protocols. The algorithm was tested on 25 head and neck cancer (HNC) patients treated using IG‐IMRT.

Results

The algorithms calculated that the HNC patients require a PTV margin of 3.1, 2.7, and 3.2 mm in the x‐, y‐, and z‐direction, respectively, without IGRT. The margin can be reduced to 2.0, 2.2, and 3.0 mm in the x‐, y‐, and z‐direction, respectively, with NAL and 1.6, 1.7, and 2.2 mm in the x‐, y‐, and z‐direction, respectively, with eNAL protocol. The results obtained were verified to be the same with the margins calculated using an Excel spreadsheet. The algorithm calculates the weekly offline setup error correction values automatically and reduces the risk of input data error observed in the spreadsheet.

Conclusions

In conclusion, the algorithm provides an automated method for optimization and reduction of PTV margin using logged setup errors from CBCT‐based IGRT.

Role of Radiological Intervention in Brain Tumor: A Meta-Analysis

Background

This meta-analysis highlights the diagnostic efficacy of computed tomography (CT), computed tomography angiography (CTA), magnetic resonance image (MRI), as well as magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS). This paper assesses the detection of the primary outcome comprising choline/creatine ratio, relative cerebral blood volume (rCBV), as well as choline/N-acetyl aspartate. Cochrane, Medline, ScienceDirect, Google Scholar, and EMBASE databases were searched for extracting the relevant studies.

Methods

A sample of 12 studies on radiologic assessment of brain tumors was selected.

Results

The evidence provides that the heterogeneity exists concerning the CBV of 311.623, I2 = 96.12%, with a significance value of P < 0.001. The pooled difference showed rCBV mean (as 2.18, 95% confidence interval = 0.85 to 3.50) substantially enhances lesion.

Conclusion

The study concluded that radiological interventions, particularly the combination of MRS and MRI, help in the brain patient's precise diagnosis and treatment.