Retrospective analysis of portal dosimetry pre-treatment quality assurance of intracranial SRS/SRT VMAT treatment plans

Effect of modulation factor and low dose threshold level on gamma pass rates of single isocenter multi-target SRT treatment plans

PURPOSE

SRS MapCHECK (SMC) is a commercially available patient-specific quality assurance (PSQA) tool for stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) applications. This study investigates the effects of degree of modulation, location off-axis, and low dose threshold (LDT) selection on gamma pass rates (GPRs) between SMC and treatment planning system, Analytical Anisotropic Algorithm (AAA), or Vancouver Island Monte Carlo (VMC++ algorithm) system calculated dose distributions.

METHODS

Volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) plans with modulation factors (MFs) ranging from 2.7 to 10.2 MU/cGy were delivered to SMC at isocenter and 6 cm off-axis. SMC measured dose distributions were compared against AAA and VMC++ via gamma analysis (3%/1 mm) with LDT of 10% to 80% using SNC Patient software.

RESULTS

Comparing on-axis SMC dose against AAA and VMC++ with LDT of 10%, all AAA-calculated plans met the acceptance criteria of GPR ≥ 90%, and only one VMC++ calculated plan was marginally outside the acceptance criteria with pass rate of 89.1%. Using LDT of 80% revealed decreasing GPR with increasing MF. For AAA, GPRs reduced from 100% at MF of 2.7 MU/cGy to 57% at MF of 10.2 MU/cGy, and for VMC++ calculated plans, the GPRs reduced from 89% to 60% in the same MF range. Comparison of SMC dose off-axis against AAA and VMC++ showed more pronounced reduction of GPR with increasing MF. For LDT of 10%, AAA GPRs reduced from 100% to 83% in the MF range of 2.7 to 9.8 MU/cGy, and VMC++ GPR reduced from 100% to 91% in the same range. With 80% LDT, GPRs dropped from 100% to 42% for both algorithms.

CONCLUSIONS

MF, dose calculation algorithm, and LDT selections are vital in VMAT-based SRT PSQA. LDT of 80% enhances sensitivity of gamma analysis for detecting dose differences compared to 10% LDT. To achieve better agreement between calculated and SMC dose, it is recommended to limit the MF to 4.6 MU/cGy on-axis and 3.6 MU/cGy off-axis.

Comprehensive stereotactic radiosurgery platform characterization: A novel end-to-end approach with anthropomorphic 3D dosimetry

BACKGROUND

Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is a widely employed strategy for intracranial metastases, utilizing linear accelerators and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT). Ensuring precise linear accelerator performance is crucial, given the small planning target volume (PTV) margins. Rapid dose falloff is vital to minimize brain radiation necrosis. Despite advances in SRS planning, tools for end-to-end testing of SRS treatments are lacking, hindering confidence in the procedure.

PURPOSE

This study introduces a novel end-to-end three-dimensional (3D) anthropomorphic dosimetry system for characterization of a radiosurgery platform, aiming to measure planning metrics, dose gradient index (DGI), brain volumes receiving at least 10 and 12 Gy (V10, V12), as well as assess delivery uncertainties in multitarget treatments. The study also compares metrics from benchmark plans to enhance understanding and confidence in SRS treatments.

METHODS

The developed anthropomorphic 3D dosimetry system includes a modified Stereotactic End-to-End Verification (STEEV) phantom with a customized insert integrating 3D dosimeters and a fiber optic CT scanner. Labview and MATLAB programs handle optical scanning, image preprocessing, and dosimetric analysis. SlicerRT is used for 3D dose visualization and analysis. A film stack insert was used to validate the 3D dosimeter measurements at specific slices. Benchmark plans were developed and measured to investigate off-axis errors, dose spillage, small field dosimetry, and multi-target delivery.

RESULTS

The accuracy of the developed 3D dosimetry system was rigorously assessed using radiochromic films. Two two-dimensional (2D) dose planes, extracted from the 3D dose distribution, were compared with film measurements, resulting in high passing rates of 99.9% and 99.6% in gamma tests. The mean relative dose difference between film and 3D dosimeter measurements was -1%, with a standard deviation of 2.2%, well within dosimeter uncertainties. In the first module, evaluating single-isocenter multitarget treatments, a 1.5 mm dose distribution shift was observed when targets were 7 cm off-axis. This shift was attributed to machine mechanical errors and image-guided system uncertainties, indicating potential limitations in conventional gamma tests. The second module investigated discrepancies in intermediate-to-low dose spillage, revealing higher measured doses in the connecting region between closely positioned targets. This discrepancy was linked to uncertainties in treatment planning system (TPS) modeling of out-of-field dose and multileaf collimator (MLC) characteristics, resulting in lower DGI values and higher V10 and V12 values compared to TPS calculations. In the third module, irradiating multiple targets showed consistent V10 and V12 values within 1 cm3 agreement with dose calculations. However, lower DGI values from measurements compared to calculations suggested intricacies in the treatment process. Conducting vital end-to-end testing demonstrated the anthropomorphic 3D dosimetry system's capacity to assess overall treatment uncertainty, offering a valuable tool for enhancing treatment accuracy in radiosurgery platforms.

CONCLUSIONS

The study introduces a novel anthropomorphic 3D dosimetry system for end-to-end testing of a radiosurgery platform. The system effectively measures plan quality metrics, captures mechanical errors, and visualizes dose discrepancies in 3D space. The comprehensive evaluation capability enhances confidence in the commissioning and verification process, ensuring patient safety. The system is recommended for commissioning new radiosurgery platforms and remote auditing of existing programs.

A hybrid method to improve efficiency of patient specific SRS and SBRT QA using 3D secondary dose verification

PURPOSE

Patient Specific QA (PSQA) by direct phantom measurement for all intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) cases is labor intensive and an inefficient use of the Medical Physicist's time. The purpose of this work was to develop a hybrid quality assurance (QA) technique utilizing 3D dose verification as a screening tool to determine if a measurement is necessary.

METHODS

This study utilized Sun Nuclear DoseCHECK (DC), a 3D secondary verification software, and Fraction 0, a trajectory log IMRT QA software. Twenty-two Lung stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) and thirty single isocentre multi-lesion SRS (MLSRS) plans were retrospectively analysed in DC. Agreement of DC and the TPS dose for selected dosimetric criteria was recorded. Calculated 95% confidence limits (CL) were used to establish action limits. All cases were delivered and measured using the Sun Nuclear stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) MapCheck. Trajectory logs of the delivery were used to calculate Fraction 0 results for the same criteria calculated by DC. Correlation of DC and Fraction 0 results were calculated. Phantom measured QA was compared to Fraction 0 QA results for the cases which had DC criteria action limits exceeded.

RESULTS

Correlation of DC and Fraction 0 results were excellent, demonstrating the same action limits could be used for both and DC can predict Fraction 0 results. Based on the calculated action limits, zero lung SBRT cases and six MLSRS cases were identified as requiring a measurement. All plans that passed the DC screening had a passing measurement based PSQA and agreed with Fraction 0 results.

CONCLUSION

Using 95% CL action limits of dosimetric criteria, a 3D secondary dose verification can be used to determine if a measurement is required for PSQA. This method is efficient for it is part of the normal clinical workflow when verifying any clinical treatment. In addition, it can drastically reduce the number of measurements needed for PSQA.

Portal dosimetry correction method for validation of single isocenter VMAT plans for multiple brain metastases

Portal dosimetry is one option for verification of volumetric‐modulated arc therapy (VMAT) planning for multiple brain metastases. However, due to the changing response of the portal imager with photon beam energy, the dose transmitted through closed multileaf collimator (MLC) leaves or narrow MLC gaps may be underestimated by the imager.

We present a simple method for correcting for these effects that may be implemented within the Eclipse treatment planning system. We recalculated the predicted portal dose with and without this correction for 20 multiple brain met VMAT plans. Before the correction, 3/20 composite plan fields passed our standard quality assurance (QA) criteria (54/80 individual fields); the average gamma passing rate for the composite plans was 76.9 ± 16.6%, and the average gamma value across the composite plans was 0.67 ± 0.23. After correction, 20/20 composite plan fields passed the QA criteria (80/80 individual fields); the average gamma passing rate for composite plans was 99.2 ± 1.4%, the average gamma value across the composite plans was 0.33 ± 0.90. A measure of plan complexity, the average leaf pair opening could be correlated to the gamma analysis results for the uncorrected plans but not for the corrected plans.