Hutchings JL, Grey C, Brewer KM, Aspden TJ. How pharmacist-led health services are tailored to minoritized populations, their acceptability and effectiveness: A scoping literature review.
Res Social Adm Pharm 2023:S1551-7411(23)00278-4. [PMID:
37301642 DOI:
10.1016/j.sapharm.2023.05.014]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/22/2023] [Revised: 05/27/2023] [Accepted: 05/28/2023] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND
Worldwide, minoritized populations experience inequitable health risks and outcomes. The importance of offering tailored services to meet the specific needs of target populations should be addressed during service development. Within healthcare systems, pharmacists play a crucial role in supporting patients to manage their medicines and health conditions.
OBJECTIVES
This scoping review aims to identify, collate and analyse literature describing pharmacist-led services tailored for minoritized populations in order to strengthen the knowledge base and support for achieving health equity.
METHODS
A scoping review was guided by the PRISMA-ScR checklist and the five-stage process outlined by Arksey and O'Malley. Medline, EMBASE, Scopus, CINAHL Plus, International Pharmaceutical Abstracts, and Google Scholar databases, plus grey literature were searched to identify relevant studies published up to October 2022. Texts were included if they reported on a pharmacist-led health service tailored to meet the needs of a minoritized population. The review protocol was registered with the Open Science Framework (https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/E8B7D).
RESULTS
Of the 566 records initially identified, 16 full-text articles were assessed for eligibility and 9 articles describing 6 unique services met the criteria and were included in the review. Three services were non-health-condition-specific, 2 targeted type two diabetes and 1 focussed on opioid dependency disorders. Service acceptability was consistently explored, and all services ensured that pharmacists' views were considered. However, only 4 consulted with the people from the group that the service targeted. Where reported, the effectiveness was not comprehensively evaluated.
CONCLUSION
There is limited literature in this area and a critical need for more evidence on the effectiveness of pharmacist-led services for minoritized populations. We need a better understanding of how pharmacists contribute to health equity pathways and how to expand this. Doing so will inform future services and contribute towards achieving equitable health outcomes.
Collapse