Patient-physician conversations about life-sustaining treatment: Treatment preferences and participant assessments

Recognizing and acknowledging end-of-life for patients with cancer - a balancing act. A qualitative study of doctors' and nurses' experiences

PURPOSE

Doctors and nurses are central in the challenging task of end-of-life (EOL) care, and this study aims to explore and describe doctors' and nurses' experiences of recognition and acknowledgment of the end of life for patients with cancer.

METHODS

A qualitative, explorative research design with individual interviews was carried out based on a semi-open interview guide. A total of 6 doctors and 6 nurses working in medical or surgical departments at a Norwegian University hospital were interviewed. The interviews were analyzed using qualitative content analysis.

RESULTS

The study's findings highlight that recognizing and acknowledging patients with cancer as being at end-of-life is a challenging process. Three subthemes emerged from the analysis; the significance of being experienced, the significance of organizational structures, and the significance of having a common understanding. A main theme was analyzed further and abstracted from the subthemes; Being safe to manage the balancing act of recognizing and acknowledging the end of life.

CONCLUSIONS

Much is at stake in the EOL setting, and healthcare professionals (HCP) must balance several aspects regarding EOL decisions. Striking the right balance in these situations is challenging. HCPs need a safety net through collaboration with, and support from, colleagues, supporting organizational structures and experience. Strengthening the safety net will have a clear impact on improving clinical practice to reduce futile treatment and provide high-quality EOL care for all dying patients in hospitals.

Disparities in Preoperative Goals of Care Documentation in Veterans

Importance

Preoperative goals of care discussion and documentation are important for patients undergoing surgery, a major health care stressor that incurs risk.

Objective

To assess the association of race, ethnicity, and other factors, including history of mental health disability, with disparities in preoperative goals of care documentation among veterans.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This retrospective cross-sectional study assessed data from the Veterans Healthcare Administration (VHA) of 229 737 veterans who underwent surgical procedures between January 1, 2017, and October 18, 2022.

Exposures

Patient-level (ie, race, ethnicity, medical comorbidities, history of mental health comorbidity) and system-level (ie, facility complexity level) factors.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Preoperative life-sustaining treatment (LST) note documentation or no LST note documentation within 30 days prior to or on day of surgery. The standardized mean differences were calculated to assess the magnitude of differences between groups. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% CIs were estimated with logistic regression.

Results

In this study, 13 408 patients (5.8%) completed preoperative LST from 229 737 VHA patients (209 123 [91.0%] male; 20 614 [9.0%] female; mean [SD] age, 65.5 [11.9] years) who received surgery. Compared with patients who did complete preoperative LST, patients tended to complete preoperative documentation less often if they were female (19 914 [9.2%] vs 700 [5.2%]), Black individuals (42 571 [19.7%] vs 2416 [18.0%]), Hispanic individuals (11 793 [5.5%] vs 631 [4.7%]), or from rural areas (75 637 [35.0%] vs 4273 [31.9%]); had a history of mental health disability (65 974 [30.5%] vs 4053 [30.2%]); or were seen at lowest-complexity (ie, level 3) facilities (7849 [3.6%] vs 78 [0.6%]). Over time, despite the COVID-19 pandemic, patients undergoing surgical procedures completed preoperative LST increasingly more often. Covariate-adjusted estimates of preoperative LST completion demonstrated that patients of racial or ethnic minority background (Black patients: OR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.77-0.80; P <.001; patients selecting other race: OR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.74-0.81; P <.001; Hispanic patients: OR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.76-0.81; P <.001) and patients from rural regions (OR, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.90-0.93; P <.001) had lower likelihoods of completing LST compared with patients who were White or non-Hispanic and patients from urban areas. Patients with any mental health disability history also had lower likelihood of completing preoperative LST than those without a history (OR, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.92-0.94; P = .001).

Conclusions and Relevance

In this cross-sectional study, disparities in documentation rates within a VHA cohort persisted based on race, ethnicity, rurality of patient residence, history of mental health disability, and access to high-volume, high-complexity facilities.

"Gives peace of mind" - Relatives' perspectives of end-of-life conversations

OBJECTIVES

Planning for end-of-life (EOL) and future treatment and care through advance care planning (ACP) is being increasingly implemented in different healthcare settings, and interest in ACP is growing. Several studies have emphasized the importance of relatives participating in conversations about wishes for EOL and being included in the process. Likewise, research has highlighted how relatives can be a valuable resource in an emergency setting. Although relatives have a significant role, few studies have investigated their perspectives of ACP and EOL conversations. This study explores relatives' experiences of the benefits and disadvantages of having conversations about wishes for EOL treatment.

METHODS

Semi-structured telephone interviews were held with 29 relatives who had participated in a conversation about EOL wishes with a patient and physician 2 years prior in a variety of Danish healthcare settings. The relatives were interviewed between September 2020 and June 2022. Content analysis was performed on the qualitative data.

RESULTS

The interviews revealed two themes: "gives peace of mind" and "enables more openness and common understanding of EOL." Relatives found that conversations about EOL could help assure that patients were heard and enhance their autonomy. These conversations relieved the relatives of responsibility by clarifying or confirming the patients' wishes, and they also made the relatives reflect on their own wishes for EOL. Moreover, they helped patients and relatives address other issues regarding EOL and made wishes more visible across settings.

SIGNIFICANCE OF RESULTS

The results indicate that conducting conversations about wishes for EOL treatment and having relatives participate in those conversations were perceived as beneficial for both relatives and patients. Involving relatives in ACP should be prioritized by physicians and healthcare personnel when holding conversations about EOL.