Tracheostomy decision-making for children with medical complexity: What supports and resources do caregivers need?

Symptom and Technology Management Intervention Usefulness for Caregivers of Children With Tracheostomies and Feeding Tubes

BACKGROUND

Caregivers of children who require medical technology of tracheostomies and feeding tubes provide intensive and specialized care at home. They have extensive training in the hospital prior to their child's discharge; however, there is limited education about their child's care once they are at home. The Creating Opportunities for Personal Empowerment: Symptom and Technology Management Resources intervention focused on commonly experienced symptoms and technology used at home by caregivers.

OBJECTIVE

We present the findings from the intervention exit interviews to gain insight about the intervention from caregiver perspectives, notably their perceptions of usefulness, ease of use, and acceptability.

METHODS

A qualitative descriptive design was used to examine caregivers' perceptions of the intervention in exit interviews. These interviews were conducted upon completion of the intervention as part of feasibility testing.

RESULTS

Sixteen caregivers completed the study and participated in exit interviews. Caregivers described the themes of the best that you can do, a reminder that I am doing it the right way, and I wish I had these when my child first had the tracheostomy and feeding tube. Caregivers also provided feedback about the intervention's usefulness and suggestions for further refinement and future adaptations of the intervention.

CONCLUSIONS

Caregivers provided valuable insights about the intervention, describing its usefulness to them, the potential for usefulness for other caregivers of these children, and their experiences with care of their children at home. Future plans include efficacy testing and modifications to enhance the intervention based on caregiver feedback.

Parents' experiences of their children's medical journeys with tracheostomies: A Focus Group Study

Objectives

Children living with a tracheostomy have among the most complex medical care needs in Canada. The focus of this study was to gain a contemporary understanding of key aspects of these children's medical journeys.

Methods

We conducted a qualitative constructivist grounded theory study using semi-structured focus groups with parents whose children are living in the community with a tracheostomy. Parents were recruited from the Stollery Children's Hospital Tracheostomy Clinic, which serves a geographically wide and diverse population.

Results

Three focus groups were completed, including a total of 12 participants. Key themes leading up to tracheostomy related to contextual understanding, experiences of inclusion, and perceptions of proportionality. Parents discussed the preparedness for how a tracheostomy would affect their child, their own involvement in recovery, and the education needed for their child's medical care. Navigating hospital units related to inconsistencies in care, accommodations of families' needs, and confidence in care received. Finally, living in the community was the focus of much of the participants' discussions including coping with system-related issues, limited homecare and medical support, cost of care, and connections with the broader community of parents of children with complex medical needs. All themes encircled the family's deeply felt responsibility to care for their child.

Conclusions

From both patient- and family-centered care perspectives, there exist individual and systemic issues related to the care delivery for children with a tracheostomy. It is in particular in the community where there is a severe deficiency of support afforded to these children and their families.

Management of Discharge Instructions for Children With Medical Complexity: A Systematic Review

CONTEXT

Children with medical complexity (CMC) are at risk for adverse outcomes after discharge. Difficulties with comprehension of and adherence to discharge instructions contribute to these errors. Comprehensive reviews of patient-, caregiver-, provider-, and system-level characteristics and interventions associated with discharge instruction comprehension and adherence for CMC are lacking.

OBJECTIVE

To systematically review the literature related to factors associated with comprehension of and adherence to discharge instructions for CMC.

DATA SOURCES

PubMed/Medline, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, PsycInfo, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Web of Science (database initiation until March 2023), and OAIster (gray literature) were searched.

STUDY SELECTION

Original studies examining caregiver comprehension of and adherence to discharge instructions for CMC (Patient Medical Complexity Algorithm) were evaluated.

DATA EXTRACTION

Two authors independently screened titles/abstracts and reviewed full-text articles. Two authors extracted data related to study characteristics, methodology, subjects, and results.

RESULTS

Fifty-one studies were included. More than half were qualitative or mixed methods studies. Few interventional studies examined objective outcomes. More than half of studies examined instructions for equipment (eg, tracheostomies). Common issues related to access, care coordination, and stress/anxiety. Facilitators included accounting for family context and using health literacy-informed strategies.

LIMITATIONS

No randomized trials met inclusion criteria. Several groups (eg, oncologic diagnoses, NICU patients) were not examined in this review.

CONCLUSIONS

Multiple factors affect comprehension of and adherence to discharge instructions for CMC. Several areas (eg, appointments, feeding tubes) were understudied. Future work should focus on design of interventions to optimize transitions.

Family-Reflections.com: Creating a parent-to-parent web-based tool regarding pediatric home ventilation

BACKGROUND

The decision to initiate pediatric mechanical ventilation via tracheostomy ("home ventilation") is complex and parents often desire information from other parents who have faced this decision. However, parent-to-parent communication is challenging as it is difficult to connect new families to experienced families in ways that optimize informed, balanced decision-making.

OBJECTIVE

Create a parent-to-parent web-based tool to support decision-making about pediatric home ventilation.

PATIENT INVOLVEMENT

The tool was created based on interviews and feedback from parents.

METHODS

We interviewed parents who previously chose for, or against, home ventilation for their child. Interview themes and family comments guided website development. Viewer feedback was solicited via an embedded survey in the tool.

RESULTS

We created 6 composite character families to communicate 6 themes about home ventilation: 1) Considering treatment options, 2) Talking with medical team, 3) Impact on life at home, 4) Impact on relationships, 5) Experience for the child, and 6) If the child's life is short. Nine families who reviewed the draft tool felt it would have helped with their decision about home ventilation. Specifically, it supported families in thinking through what was "most important about their child's breathing problems" (7 of 9 parents) and feeling "more at peace with the decision" (8 of 9 parents). Between 6/1/20-12/31/22, nearly 5500 viewers have accessed the tool and 56 viewers completed the survey (including 13 families and 39 clinicians). Feedback from experienced families and clinicians reported the tool taught them something new.

DISCUSSION

This novel parent-to-parent tool shows promise for expanding access to balanced, family-centered information about pediatric home ventilation.

PRACTICAL VALUE

The diverse stories and decisions let parents access multiple family perspectives. The tool's focus is on family-centric information that parents reported was usually missing from clinician counseling.

FUNDING

This work was supported by the National Palliative Care Research Center.

Collaborative decision-making: A framework for decision-making about life-sustaining treatments in children with medical complexity

OBJECTIVE

Caregivers of children with medical complexity (CMC) face decisions about life-sustaining treatments (LST) like tracheostomy. We sought to develop a clinically relevant and realistic model for decision-making about tracheostomy placement that might apply to other LST in CMC.

DESIGN

This qualitative study, conducted between 2013 and 2015, consisted of 41 interviews with 56 caregivers of CMC who had received tracheostomies and 5 focus groups of 33 healthcare providers (HCPs) at a tertiary-care children's hospital in North Carolina. Participants were asked about their perspectives on the tracheostomy decision-making process. Data were transcribed, and coded. Using thematic content analysis, we inductively developed a tracheostomy decision-making framework and process.

RESULTS

Many factors influenced caregivers' decisions, including children's well-being and caregivers' values, faith, knowledge, experience, emotional state, and social factors; preserving the child's life was the most important. HCPs consider many clinical and nonclinical factors; recommending tracheostomy for children with limited survival, perceived poor functioning and quality of life, and progressive conditions is ethically difficult. The framework of tracheostomy decision-making has inter-related caregiver- and HCP-level factors that influence the process. The framework contains elements not captured in a shared decision-making model, but better fits a collaborative decision-making (CDM) model. The tracheostomy CDM process that emerged from the data has two nonsequential components that HCPs could use: (1) gaining understanding and (2) holding decision-making conversations.

CONCLUSIONS

CDM could be a useful model for clinicians guiding families about tracheostomy for CMC. The applicability of CDM for decision-making about other LSTs needs further exploration.