Ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm masquerading as isolated hip pain: an unusual presentation

An Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm, Intramural Thrombus and Moderate Leak in an Asian Man Presenting with Acute Gastroenteritis

Introduction

Missing a leaking abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) is common in medical practice because few at-risk patients have a history of AAA and many have an unusual presentation.

Background

AAA is less common among Asians than white Caucasians of the same age. Our patient had no significant risk factors apart from age and sex and had an unusual presentation.

Patient and Methods

A 67-year-old Asian man presented to the emergency room (ER) with a 1-day history of nausea, vomiting, diarrhoea, fever and abdominal pain. He was febrile, dehydrated. and had marked tenderness at the right iliac fossa. Laboratory findings suggested bacterial gastroenteritis but this did not explain the localized tenderness at the right iliac fossa.

Result and Discussion

A CT scan of the abdomen revealed an AAA arising above the origins of the renal arteries, an intramural thrombus, a retroperitoneal haematoma and a leak extending to the right iliac fossa. The patient was transferred to another hospital and underwent exploratory laparotomy, surgical repair of the aneurysm, and aortobi-iliac grafting with removal of the thrombus. The patient was discharged in good shape 3 weeks after surgery. Without the CT scan of the abdomen, the AAA could have been missed and the patient treated for severe gastroenteritis.

LEARNING POINTS

Ruptured Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm: A 7-Year Retrospective Observational Study in an Emergency Department of Hong Kong

Objectives

To review the clinical presentations and outcomes of patients with ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) in a regional hospital and its evaluation in the accident and emergency department (AED).

Methods

This is a retrospective observational study of patients admitted through the AED with the discharge or post-mortem diagnosis of ruptured AAA from 1st January 2002 to 31st December 2008 in a regional pubic hospital of Hong Kong. Their demographic and clinical data were recorded and analysed. The sensitivity of the AED in detecting ruptured AAA or symptomatic AAA was evaluated.

Results

Twenty-six patients were found to have ruptured AAA and included in the study. All were Chinese. Seventeen patients had repair surgery done by open surgical method. Eighteen (69%) patients were diagnosed to have ruptured AAA or found to have symptomatic AAA in the AED. Three (12%) ruptured AAAs were diagnosed at post-mortem. The most common presenting symptoms were abdominal pain (73%) and loss of consciousness (46%). Only five (19%) patients had the classical triad of abdominal pain, haemorrhagic shock and a pulsatile abdominal mass. Ultrasound of aorta was performed in 74% of cases in the group with ruptured AAA or symptomatic AAA diagnosed in the AED but none in the delayed diagnosis group (p=0.001). The former group were 3.7 times more likely to proceed to repair surgery (p=0.188) and had surgical repair operation 40.8 hours earlier than the latter group (p=0.006). Systolic blood pressure less than 90 mmHg at any time point before operation was found to correlate significantly with mortality (p=0.029).

Conclusion

A high index of suspicion and prompt recognition of ruptured AAA is of paramount importance. Emergency physicians should familiarise themselves with the clinical presentation and management of patients with ruptured AAA. Emergency ultrasound performed in the AED helps in the early detection of AAA.

Radiological errors in the Canadian Journal of Emergency Medicine

OBJECTIVES

To systematically evaluate the accuracy of text descriptions and labeling of radiologic images published in the Canadian Journal of Emergency Medicine (CJEM). Error detection by radiologists and emergency physicians and the clinical significance and educational value of these errors were assessed. Errors were also correlated with radiologist involvement in publication and imaging modality.

METHODS

Thirty-three issues of CJEM were examined from January 2003 to May 2008. Electronic copies of all radiologic images published were obtained with their caption and description from the text. Identifying information was removed to present images in an anonymous fashion. Images were presented to two radiologists who, working in consensus, critically appraised each image and accompanying text. Images were then presented to two emergency department physicians who, working in consensus, critically appraised each image and accompanying text. All images with errors detected by either radiology or emergency physicians were then discussed to determine if errors would have affected clinical management or educational value. The emergency physicians also identified "underlabeled" images where it was felt that further labeling would enhance their educational value.

RESULTS

Forty-five articles with 82 images were obtained. At least one error was observed in 18 (40%) articles and 20 (24%) images. Two errors were present in three images, resulting in 23 errors. Of the 23 errors, 17 were image description errors and 6 were labeling errors. Five errors were detected by both radiology and emergency physicians, whereas 15 were detected only by radiologists and 3 were detected only by emergency physicians. Of these errors, 12 (52%) were rated as potentially affecting both clinical management and educational value, 5 (22%) as only affecting educational value, and 6 (26%) as nonsignificant. Radiologists were involved in six articles, including 12 images that contained no errors. There was no official radiologist involvement in 39 articles, including 70 images, 18 (26%) of which contained errors. In addition, 26 images were identified by emergency physicians as potentially benefiting from enhanced labeling to improve educational value.

CONCLUSIONS

Radiologic images published in the CJEM are generally of high quality; however, 23 errors were found in 82 images, 18 (78%) of which were rated as potentially affecting clinical management, educational value, or both. Radiologist involvement in the publication process may be of assistance as no errors were seen in articles that included radiologists as authors.

Acute hip pain and inability to ambulate: a rare presentation for perirectal abscess

A patient with acute hip pain out of proportion to physical findings and inability to weight bear despite negative plain films warrants further in-depth evaluation. Correctly diagnosing the cause of hip pain, a common emergency department (ED) complaint, may be a challenge in the geriatric population (Perron A, Miller M, Brady W. Orthopedic pitfalls in the ED: radiographically occult hip fracture. Am J Emerg Med 2002; 20: 234-7; Cannon J, Silvestri S, Munro M. Imaging choices in occult hip fracture. J Emerg Med 2009; 37: 144-52; Kiu A, Khan S. Radiology of acute hip and femoral injuries. Br J Hosp Med (London) 2010; 71: M22-M24; Zacher J, Gursche A. Regional musculoskeletal conditions: hip pain. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol 2003; 17: 71-85). A perirectal abscess as a cause of acute hip pain and inability to ambulate, with gluteus muscle inflammation but no evidence for bone or joint infection, has not been described, to the authors' knowledge. An 82-year-old woman with a history of diabetes, previously ambulatory, presented to the ED after being found on her apartment floor by a visiting health aide, complaining of acute pain in her left hip. Pain was exacerbated by palpation and range of motion testing, and she was unable to bear weight. There was no report of fever, rectal or abdominal pain, bleeding, or painful defecation. Plain films were negative for fracture or lytic lesion. Computerized tomography (CT) of the hip and pelvis was then obtained, which was negative for boney abnormality but revealed a 5-cm ischiorectal abscess with inflammation of the adjacent gluteus muscle. This case illustrates the potentially subtle nature of a deep perirectal abscess in an elderly patient. The CT imaging, useful for investigating the possibility of occult femoral neck fracture, was fortuitous in leading to the diagnosis. One must consider the possibility of visceral processes causing referred pain, when evaluating the patient with an acutely painful hip (Perron A, Miller M, Brady W. Orthopedic pitfalls in the ED: radiographically occult hip fracture. Am J Emerg Med 2002; 20: 234-7; Zacher J, Gursche A. Regional musculoskeletal conditions: hip pain. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol 2003; 17: 71-85).