Pediatric appendicitis: pathophysiology and appropriate use of diagnostic imaging

Finding Waldo: Sonographic systematic approach to localize the appendix in children

OBJECTIVES

To describe a systematic scanning approach using anatomical landmarks followed by an assessment of radiology trainees' ability to identify the normal appendix in healthy children.

METHODS

Uncontrolled pre and post study assessing radiology residents' sonographic skills in detecting the normal appendix in healthy children. Initial questionnaire for the trainees' demographics, perceptions and experiences in detecting the appendix with ultrasound in children followed by a precourse test on healthy volunteers. Hands-on training was conducted by describing a systematic sonographic approach to identify the appendix using anatomical landmarks, and then a postcourse test was carried out. The primary outcome was unprompted ability to identify the appendix. Subjective self-scoring of confidence was also recorded.

RESULTS

A three-hour hands-on workshop was conducted. Sixteen radiology trainees participated and were randomly distributed to four stations, each with different ultrasound machines and healthy volunteers. Fifteen had a precourse assessment, and 12 completed the postcourse assessment. Before the course, 3/15 (20%) identified the appendix, while 10/12 (83%) identified the appendix afterward. After the course, participants perceived finding the appendix easier than before. There was no statistically significant difference in the participants' perceived confidence in detecting the appendix.

CONCLUSIONS

With the described scanning technique, most of the participants were able to identify the normal appendix after receiving short hands-on training. This highlights the importance of targeted training of radiology trainees and nonradiologists.

A prospective study to evaluate the contribution of the pediatric appendicitis score in the decision process

BACKGROUND

The objective of this study was to assess the likelihood of acute appendicitis (AA) in children presenting with abdominal symptoms at the emergency department (ED), based on their prior primary care (PC) consultation history.

METHODS

Between February and June 2021, we prospectively enrolled all children presenting at the ED with acute abdominal pain indicative of possible acute appendicitis (AA). Subsequently, they were categorized into three groups: those assessed by a PC physician (PG), those brought in by their family without a prior consultation (FG), and those admitted after a PC consultation without being assessed as such. The primary objective was to assess the probability of AA diagnosis using the Pediatric Appendicitis Score (PAS). Secondary objectives included analyzing PAS and C-reactive protein (CRP) levels based on the duration of pain and final diagnoses.

RESULTS

124 children were enrolled in the study (PG, n = 56; FG, n = 55; NG, n = 13). Among them, 29 patients (23.4%) were diagnosed with AA, with 13 cases (23.2%) from the PG and 14 cases (25.4%) from the FG. The mean PAS scores for AA cases from the PG and FG were 6.69 ± 1.75 and 7.57 ± 1.6, respectively, (p = 0.3340). Both PAS scores and CRP levels showed a significant correlation with AA severity. No cases of AA were observed with PAS scores < 4.

CONCLUSIONS

There was no significant difference in PAS scores between patients addressed by PG and FG, even though PAS scores tended to be higher for patients with AA. We propose a new decision-making algorithm for PC practice, which incorporates inflammatory markers and pain duration.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Institutional Ethics Committee registration number: 447-2021-103 (10/01/2021).

CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION NUMBER

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04885335 (Registered on 13/05/2021).

Bacterial peritonitis in paediatric appendicitis; microbial epidemiology and antimicrobial management

BACKGROUND

Appendicitis remains a common surgical emergency in children. Empirical antibacterial treatment is indicated to reduce infective complications. We investigate the bacterial pathogens identified intra-operatively during appendectomies in children to guide empirical surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis options.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of patients (< 18 years old) undergoing an appendectomy across a multisite London hospital (Nov 2019-March 2022) was undertaken. Patient-related outcomes including length of hospital stay (LOS), days of antibacterial therapy (DOT), intra-operative microbiology and post-operative radiology reports were interrogated.

RESULTS

304 patients underwent an appendectomy during this period; 39.1% of patients had intraoperative samples cultured. Bacterial pathogens were found in 73/119 (61.3%) cases; the most common isolates being Escherichia coli (42.0%), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (21.0%), milleri Streptococcus spp. (14.3%) and Bacteroides fragilis (5.9%). Polymicrobial infection was common (32/73). Isolation of Pseudomonas spp. from intra-operative sampling was associated with a greater LOS (7.0 vs. 5.0 days; p = 0.011) but nil effect on the incidence of postoperative collections. Presence of milleri Streptococcus spp. was associated with longer LOS (7.0 vs. 5.0 day; p = 0.007), DOT (12.0 vs. 8.5 day; p = 0.007) but had no observed outcome on postoperative collections (29.4% vs. 18.6%; p = 0.330). 48% of E. coli positive cultures were co-amoxiclav resistant and prolonged LOS compared to the non-resistant group (7.0 vs. 5.0 days; p = 0.040) but had no difference in post-operative collections (29.2% vs. 17.9%; p = 0.260).

CONCLUSION

A high proportion of children with appendicitis have Pseudomonas spp. isolated, leading to a prolonged LOS. Evolving Enterobacterales resistance and the presence of Pseudomonas spp. necessitate extended antibacterial coverage for paediatric appendectomies with evidence of peritonitis.

Radiation-Free Diagnosis of Pediatric Appendicitis: Accuracy of Point-of-Care Ultrasonography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging

INTRODUCTION

Appendicitis is a common pediatric surgical emergency, and it can often be difficult to diagnose. Computed tomography is commonly used as a diagnostic criterion standard, but herein, we describe the accuracy of a "radiation-free" diagnostic algorithm using point-of-care ultrasonography (POCUS) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to diagnose pediatric appendicitis.

METHODS

This was a retrospective chart review of all patients who had a POCUS ordered for evaluation of pediatric appendicitis. Results of POCUS and MRI were classified as positive, negative, or equivocal using previously described cutoffs and criterion standard of surgery/pathology or clinical follow-up. Diagnostic accuracy was calculated using traditional methods.

RESULTS

We identified 209 patients for inclusion. The sensitivity and specificity of POCUS were 100% and 95.2%, respectively, in addition to 86 equivocal examinations, 6 of which had appendicitis. The sensitivity and specificity of MRI were 94.4% and 96.5%, respectively, in addition to 27 equivocal examinations, 2 of which had appendicitis.

CONCLUSIONS

Using POCUS and MRI for the diagnosis of pediatric appendicitis is a highly accurate way to avoid ionizing radiation in children. In our study, POCUS is as accurate as MRI, although this is limited by being mostly done by a single provider and a high number of equivocal examinations.

Predictors for Acute Appendicitis in Children

BACKGROUND

Acute appendicitis in children is the most common condition requiring urgent evaluation and surgery in the emergency department. At times, despite the appendix being seen on ultrasound (US), there can be discrepancy as to whether a patient has clinical appendicitis. Secondary findings suggestive of appendicitis can be helpful in identifying and evaluating these children.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to determine if specific US findings and/or laboratory results are predictive of appendicitis in children with a visualized appendix on US.

METHODS

A prospective study was conducted on children (birth to 18 years) presenting to the pediatric emergency department with suspected appendicitis who underwent right-lower-quadrant US. Ultrasound findings analyzed appendix diameter, compressibility, increased vascularity, presence of appendicolith, inflammatory changes, right-lower-quadrant fluid near the appendix, lower abdominal fluid, tenderness during US, and lymph nodes. Diagnosis was confirmed via surgical pathology.

RESULTS

There were 1252 patients who enrolled, 60.8 (762) had their appendix visualized, and 39.1 (490) did not. In children where the appendix was seen, 35.2% (268) were diagnosed with appendicitis. Among patients with a visualized appendix, the likelihood of appendicitis was significantly greater if the appendix diameter was 7 mm or greater (odds ratio [OR], 12.4; 95% confidence interval [CI], 4.7-32.7), an appendicolith was present (OR, 3.9; 95% CI, 1.5-10.3), inflammatory changes were seen (OR, 10.2; 95% CI, 3.9-26.1), or the white blood cell (WBC) count was 10,000/μL (OR, 4.8; 95% CI, 2.4-9.7). A duration of abdominal pain of 3 days or more was significantly less likely to be associated with appendicitis (OR, 0.3; 95% CI, 0.08-0.99). The absence of inflammatory changes, WBC count of less than 10,000/μL, and appendix diameter of 7 mm or less had a negative predictive value of 100%.

CONCLUSIONS

When the appendix is seen on US but diagnosis of appendicitis is questioned, the absence of inflammatory changes, WBC count of less than 10,000/μL, and appendix diameter of 7 mm or less should decrease suspicion for appendicitis.

A Systematic Review Comparing Nonoperative Management to Appendectomy for Uncomplicated Appendicitis in Children

More than a century after its introduction, appendectomy has remained the gold standard treatment for acute appendicitis. In adults with acute uncomplicated appendicitis, nonoperative management (NOM) has been shown to be a viable treatment option. To date, there has been relatively limited data on the nonoperative management of acute appendicitis in the pediatric population. The primary objective of this study was to systematically review the available literature in the pediatric population and compare the efficacy and recurrence between initial nonoperative treatment strategy and appendectomy in children with uncomplicated appendicitis. In July 2021, we conducted systematic searches of the PubMed and Google Scholar databases. We only included full-text comparative original studies published within the last decade, and we excluded articles that solely examined NOM without comparing it to appendectomy. Two writers worked independently on the data collection and analysis. It was found that NOM had a high initial success rate and a low rate of recurrent appendicitis. After months of follow-up, the vast majority of patients with uncomplicated acute appendicitis who received initial nonoperative treatment did not require surgical intervention. Furthermore, the rate of complication was comparable in both treatment groups, and NOM did not appear to be associated with an increased risk of complications. The most significant drawback stemmed from the fact that the included articles in this study had a wide range of study designs and inclusion criteria. According to current evidence, NOM is feasible and cost-effective. Antibiotic therapy can be given safely in a small subset of individuals with uncomplicated appendicitis. To optimize outcomes, physicians should evaluate the clinical presentation and the patient's desire when selecting those to be managed nonoperatively. Again, more research, preferably large randomized trials, is required to compare the long-term clinical efficacy of NOM with appendicectomy. Finally, additional research is required to establish the characteristics of patients who are the best candidates for nonoperative treatment.

Negative appendicectomy rates as a quality measure in a regional surgical unit: a retrospective review

INTRODUCTION

Historically, high negative appendicectomy rates (NAR) were acceptable to offset the risks of perforation, previously exceeding 20%. With improved imaging and clinical scoring algorithms, there is growing demand for lower negative appendicectomy rates. The objectives were to (1) establish the NAR in our institution and (2) correlate clinical parameters and imaging modalities with histological findings.

METHODS

Patients undergoing an appendicectomy between January 2012 and June 2018 were identified using a prospectively maintained pathology database. Histology findings were cross referenced against our radiology system, and anonymised data was collected for gender, age, WCC, Neutrophil and CRP level.

RESULTS

One thousand one hundred fifty-three patients met the inclusion criteria. Fifty-three percent were males (n = 610), with 81% (n = 933) of histology reports classified as appendicitis. Sixty patients had a histologically normal appendix equating to a 5.2% NAR. If lymphoid hyperplasia, fibrosis and atrophy are included, it equates to a NAR of 14.57%. (p < 0.0001). Sixty-six percent of patients had no pre-operative imaging. CT imaging demonstrated a higher sensitivity (93.33%) and positive predictive value (99.60%) compared to ultrasonography. WCC and CRP are statistically significant in predicting appendicitis (p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

There is no consensus on defining a negative appendicectomy or for imaging modality utilisation. CT imaging is the most sensitive and should be used in cases of diagnostic uncertainty. A standardised algorithm regarding the workup of patients with RIF pain along with a consensus on the use of imaging will further reduce negative appendicectomy rates.

To determine validity of ultrasound in predicting acute appendicitis among children keeping histopathology as gold standard

Background

To determined the accuracy of ultrasound in diagnosis of acute appendicitis in children keeping histopathology as gold standard.

Methods

A prospective evaluations of all ultrasound for appendicitis from January 1, 2014, to June 15, 2017, was conducted at our hospital. A diagnostic protocol was implemented to reduce radiation exposure employing US as the initial imaging modality followed by CT for non-diagnostic US studies in patients with an equivocal clinical presentation. The imaging, operative findings, and pathology of 223 patients (females 80, males 143, age less than 14years) with diagnosed appendicitis were collected. The sensitivity, specificity, predictive value, and negative appendectomy rate were also analyzed. All those patients which had subjected to surgery were included to evaluate the true result of ultrasound in diagnosis of appendicitis.

Results

Of the 223 pediatric appendectomies performed in this time period, a total of 192 (86%) were diagnosed by ultrasound. The histopathology of 8 was normal (3.6%), CT done in 11 and three was normal. The negative appendectomy rate was 3.6%. US were the sole imaging modality in all patients.

Conclusions

In the diagnosis of acute appendicitis in children, ultrasound is useful and accurate mode, which results in a significant decrease in negative appendectomies with no increase in the number of CT scans. This has important implications in the reduction of childhood radiation exposure.

Study design

cross sectional validation.

•

Total 223 Diagnose as acute appendicitis on initial clinical basis and follow by ultrasound study.

•

All went for surgery, 8 patient negative by histopathology.

•

Diagnosis by ultrasound 192 out of 223, Sensitivity 86%.

•

Accuracy reaches 92% with secondary signs on ultrasound finding.

Revisiting the Appendiceal Diameter via Ultrasound for the Diagnosis of Acute Appendicitis

OBJECTIVES

This study aims to investigate the optimal outer appendiceal diameter via ultrasound for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review was conducted on patients (ages, 2-18 years) presenting to an urban pediatric emergency department between January 1, 2009 and December 31, 2010 with suspected acute appendicitis. Children were considered as having "suspected acute appendicitis" if they (1) presented with acute abdominal pain and had either a surgical consult or an abdominal ultrasound, or (2) presented or transferred with the stated suspicion of acute appendicitis. Pathology reports were used to confirm the diagnosis of appendicitis. The appendiceal diameters were determined by board-certified pediatric radiologists.

RESULTS

A total of 320 patient charts were reviewed (females, 57%; mean age, 10.9; SD, 3.9). Seventy-two percent (N = 230) of the patients screened positive for acute appendicitis via ultrasound, 69% (N = 222) had confirmed acute appendicitis, 75% (N = 239) of the ultrasound reports included an outer appendiceal diameter. Overall, ultrasound was found to be highly sensitive (91%) and moderately specific (74%). With an outer appendiceal diameter of 6 mm as a cutoff, ultrasound had an excellent sensitivity (100%) but poor specificity (43%). With an outer diameter of 7 mm as a cutoff, sensitivity decreased to 94% but specificity increased to 71%. With increasing cutoff size, the sensitivity decreased and specificity increased.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data suggest that the optimal outer appendiceal diameter for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis should be 7 mm instead of the currently used 6 mm.

Diagnostic accuracy of laboratory and ultrasound findings in patients with a non-visualized appendix

Ultrasound (US) and laboratory testing are initial diagnostic tests for acute appendicitis. A diagnostic dilemma develops when the appendix is not visualized on US. Objective: To determine if specific US findings and/or laboratory results predict acute appendicitis when the appendix is not visualized. Methods: A prospective study was conducted on children (birth-18 yrs) presenting to the pediatric emergency department with suspected acute appendicitis who underwent right lower quadrant US. Children with previous appendectomy, US at another facility, or eloped were excluded. US findings analyzed: inflammatory changes, right lower quadrant and lower abdominal fluid, tenderness during US exam and lymph nodes. Diagnoses were confirmed via surgical pathology. Results 1252 subjects were enrolled, 60.8% (762) had appendix visualized and 39.1% (490) did not. In children where the appendix was not seen, 6.7% [33] were diagnosed with appendicitis. Among patients with a non-visualized appendix, the likelihood of appendicitis was significantly greater if: inflammatory changes in the RLQ (OR 18.0, 95% CI 4.5-72.1), CRP >0.5 mg/dL (OR 2.64, 95% CI 1.0-6.8), or WBC > 10 (OR 4.36, 95% CI 1.66-11.58). Duration of abdominal pain >3 days was significantly less likely associated with appendicitis in this model (OR 0.34, 95% CI 0.003-0.395). Combined, the absence inflammatory changes, CRP < 0.5 mg/dL, WBC < 10, and pain, ≤3 days had a NPV of 94.0%. Conclusion When the appendix is not visualized on US, predictors for appendicitis include the presence of inflammatory changes in the RLQ, an elevated WBC/CRP and abdominal pain <3 days.

Sonography of suspected acute appendicitis in children: Evaluation of the progress in performance of senior residents

PURPOSE

The objective of this study was to evaluate the progress in performance of senior residents in diagnosing acute appendicitis.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Results were collected and compared of ultrasound examinations performed for suspected acute appendicitis by three senior residents and two faculty members over a six-month period in a university hospital setting. A grid with the sonographic findings was completed separately by the residents and the faculty members immediately after each examination. The duration of each examination was reported. The final ultrasound diagnosis was compared to the surgical and pathological results and to the clinical follow-up.

RESULTS

The residents and faculty members performed 171 consecutive ultrasound examinations including 49 children with acute appendicitis and 122 with normal appendices. The accuracy of the diagnosis by the residents was 96%, and was similar to that of the faculty members (kappa=0.90) over the six months. The duration of the resident ultrasound examinations was significantly shorter during the second three-month period (p=0.01). No significant differences in diagnostic accuracy were demonstrated by the residents between the first and second three-month periods (p=0.06).

CONCLUSIONS

The residents performed well when using sonography to diagnose acute appendicitis in children, and were faster during the second three-month period.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

I.

Point-of-Care Ultrasound Integrated Into a Staged Diagnostic Algorithm for Pediatric Appendicitis

OBJECTIVES

We hypothesized that point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) is as accurate as radiology-performed ultrasound in evaluating children with clinical concern for appendicitis. As part of a staged approach, we further hypothesized that POCUS could ultimately decrease computed tomography (CT) utilization.

METHODS

This was a prospective, convenience sampling of patients aged 2 to 18 years presenting with abdominal pain to a pediatric emergency department. Those patients with prior abdominal imaging, pregnant, or unable to tolerate the examination were excluded. An algorithm was followed: POCUS was first performed, followed by a radiology-performed ultrasound, and then a CT as necessary. The main outcome measure was the accuracy of the POCUS in diagnosing of appendicitis. This was compared with radiology-performed ultrasound. We also examined whether certain patient or clinical characteristics influenced the performance of POCUS. Lastly, we determined the amount by which CT scans were decreased through this staged algorithm.

RESULTS

Forty patients were enrolled and underwent a POCUS examination. A total of 16 (40%) had pathology-confirmed appendicitis. Point-of-care ultrasound had a sensitivity of 93.8% (95% confidence interval [CI], 69.7%-98.9%) and specificity of 87.5% (95% CI, 67.6%-97.2%). Radiology-performed ultrasound had a sensitivity of 81.25% (95% CI, 54.3%-95.7%) and specificity of 100% (95% CI, 85.6%-100%). The radiology-performed and POCUS examinations had very good agreement (κ = 0.83, P < 0.0005). Patient characteristics including body mass index did not have an affect on the POCUS. However, POCUS identified all patients with an Alvarado score higher than 6. Overall, the reduction in CT examinations was 55%.

CONCLUSIONS

In pediatric patients presenting with clinical concern for acute appendicitis, a staged algorithm that incorporates POCUS is accurate and has the potential to decrease CT scan utilization.

Accuracy of low dose CT in the diagnosis of appendicitis in childhood and comparison with USG and standard dose CT

OBJECTIVES

Computed tomography should be performed after careful consideration due to radiation hazard, which is why interest in low dose CT has increased recently in acute appendicitis. Previous studies have been performed in adult and adolescents populations, but no studies have reported on the efficacy of using low-dose CT in children younger than 10 years.

METHODS

Patients (n=475) younger than 10 years who were examined for acute appendicitis were recruited. Subjects were divided into three groups according to the examinations performed: low-dose CT, ultrasonography, and standard-dose CT. Subjects were categorized according to age and body mass index (BMI).

RESULTS

Low-dose CT was a contributive tool in diagnosing appendicitis, and it was an adequate method, when compared with ultrasonography and standard-dose CT in terms of sensitivity (95.5% vs. 95.0% and 94.5%, p=0.794), specificity (94.9% vs. 80.0% and 98.8%, p=0.024), positive-predictive value (96.4% vs. 92.7% and 97.2%, p=0.019), and negative-predictive value (93.7% vs. 85.7% and 91.3%, p=0.890). Low-dose CT accurately diagnosed patients with a perforated appendix. Acute appendicitis was effectively diagnosed using low-dose CT in both early and middle childhood. BMI did not influence the accuracy of detecting acute appendicitis on low-dose CT.

CONCLUSION

Low-dose CT is effective and accurate for diagnosing acute appendicitis in childhood, as well as in adolescents and young adults. Additionally, low-dose CT was relatively accurate, irrespective of age or BMI, for detecting acute appendicitis. Therefore, low-dose CT is recommended for assessing children with suspected acute appendicitis.

Pediatric Appendicitis

Appendicitis is one of the most common surgical pathologies in children. It can present with right lower quadrant pain. Scoring systems in combination with selective imaging and surgical examination will diagnose most children with appendicitis. Clinical pathways should be used. Most surgical interventions for appendicitis are now almost exclusively laparoscopic, with trials demonstrating better outcomes for children who undergo index hospitalization appendectomies when perforated. Nonoperative management has a role in the treatment of both uncomplicated and complicated appendicitis. This article discusses the workup and management, modes of treatment, and continued areas of controversy in pediatric appendicitis.

Diagnostic Imaging of Appendicitis With Supplementation by Transabdominal and Transvaginal Sonography

Acute appendicitis is a condition that can affect any member of the population. Without timely treatment there is a high likelihood of rupture leading to peritonitis, and early diagnosis is imperative to obtaining treatment. Sonography can be used without fear of radiation exposure to the patient and with relatively little discomfort, ideal for pediatric patients. It can also be used with little patient preparation, with the possibility of a more rapid diagnosis than other imaging modalities. For patients presenting with atypical symptoms, sonography may be used to increase diagnostic accuracy, which will lead to a drop in the surgical removal rate of a healthy appendix. When diagnostic criteria are met, sonography results can be correlated with the patient’s blood test and clinical symptoms to make a positive diagnosis. The addition of the transvaginal approach for female patients has further increased the rate of success of diagnosing acute appendicitis, so that appropriate emergent surgery can be done.

Improvement in diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound of the pediatric appendix through the use of equivocal interpretive categories

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this article is to evaluate the diagnostic performance of ultrasound of the pediatric appendix using standardized structured reports that incorporate equivocal interpretive categories.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Standardized structured appendix ultrasound reports using a five-category interpretive scheme were reviewed. Interpretive categories were positive, intermediate likelihood, or negative when the appendix was visualized, and secondary signs or no secondary signs when the appendix was not visualized. Interpretations were compared with clinical and pathologic follow-up. Diagnostic accuracy was compared with the accuracy of a simulated binary interpretive scheme based on the same data.

RESULTS

One thousand three hundred fifty-seven examinations were included, with appendicitis present in 16.9% (230/1357) of cases. The appendix was visualized in 47.2% (641/1357) of cases, with interpretations as follows: positive, 27.5% (176/641); intermediate likelihood, 9.7% (62/641); and normal, 62.9% (403/641). The appendicitis rate in each group was 92.6% (163/176), 25.8% (16/62), and 0.5% (2/403), respectively. The appendix was not visualized in 52.8% (716/1357) of cases, with secondary findings identified in 8.5% (61/716) and no secondary findings in 91.5% (655/716) of cases. The appendicitis rate was 39.3% (24/61) and 3.8% (25/655) in these groups, respectively. Appendicitis was present in 32.5% of equivocal (intermediate likelihood and not visualized, secondary findings) cases and 2.6% of negative (normal and not visualized, no secondary findings) cases. Diagnostic accuracy of a five-category scheme was 96.8% versus 94.1% for a binary scheme.

CONCLUSION

Appendix ultrasound examinations interpreted according to a scheme that incorporates equivocal categories better convey diagnostic certainty and increase diagnostic accuracy compared with a binary interpretive scheme.

Utility of CT after sonography for suspected appendicitis in children: integration of a clinical scoring system with a staged imaging protocol

To improve diagnosis of pediatric appendicitis, many institutions have implemented a staged imaging protocol utilizing ultrasonography (US) first and then computed tomography (CT). A substantial number of children with suspected appendicitis undergo CT after US, and the efficient and accurate diagnosis of pediatric appendicitis continues to be challenging. The objective of the study is to characterize the utility of CT following US for diagnosis of pediatric appendicitis, in conjunction with a clinical appendicitis score (AS). Imaging studies of children with suspected appendicitis who underwent CT after US in an imaging protocol were retrospectively reviewed by three radiologists in consensus. Chart review derived the AS (range 0-10) and obtained the patient diagnosis and disposition, and an AS was applied to each patient. Clinical and radiologic data were analyzed to assess the yield of CT after US. Studies of 211 children (mean age 11.3 years) were included. The positive threshold for AS was determined to be 6 out of 10. When AS and US were concordant (N = 140), the sensitivity and specificity of US were similar to CT. When AS and US were discordant (N = 71) and also when AS ≥ 6 (N = 84), subsequent CT showed superior sensitivity and specificity to US alone. In the subset where US showed neither the appendix nor inflammatory change in the right lower quadrant (126/211, 60 % of scans), when AS < 6 (N = 83), the negative predictive value (NPV) of US was 0.98. However, when AS ≥ 6 (N = 43), NPV of US was 0.58, and the positive predictive value of subsequent CT was 1. There was a significant decrease in depiction of the appendix on US with patient weight-to-age ratio of >6 (kg/year, P < 0.001) and after-hours (1700 -0730 hours) performance of US (P < 0.001). Results suggest that the appendicitis score has utility in guiding an imaging protocol and support the contention that non-visualization of the appendix on US is not intrinsically non-diagnostic. There was little benefit to additional CT when AS < 6 and US did not show the appendix or evidence of inflammation; this would have avoided CT in 140/211 (66 %) patients. CT demonstrated benefit when AS ≥ 6, suggesting that cases with AS ≥ 6 and features that limit depiction of the appendix on US may be triaged to CT.

Radiation exposure - how do CT scans for appendicitis compare between a free standing children's hospital and non-dedicated pediatric facilities?

BACKGROUND

We compare the amount of radiation children receive from CT scans performed at non-dedicated pediatric facilities (OH) versus those at a dedicated children's hospital (CH).

METHODS

Using a retrospective chart review, all children undergoing CT scanning for appendicitis at an OH were compared to children undergoing CT imaging for appendicitis at a CH between January 2011 and November 2012.

RESULTS

One hundred sixty-three children underwent CT scans at 42 different OH. Body mass index was similar between the two groups (21.00±6.49kg/m(2), 19.58±5.18kg/m(2), P=0.07). Dose length product (DLP) was 620±540.3 at OH and 253.78±211.08 at CH (P < 0.001). OH CT scans accurately diagnosed appendicitis in 81%, while CT scans at CH were accurate in 95% (P=0.026). CTDIvol was recorded in 65 patients with subset analysis showing CTDIvol of 16.98±15.58 and 4.89±2.64, a DLP of 586.25±521.59 and 143.54±41.19, and size-specific dose estimate (SSDE) of 26.71±23.1 and 3.81±2.02 at OH and CH, respectively (P<0.001).

CONCLUSION

Using SSDE as a marker for radiation exposure, children received 86% less radiation and had improved diagnostic accuracy when CT scans are performed at a CH.

Reduced use of computed tomography in patients treated with interval appendectomy after implementing a protocol from a prospective, randomized trial

BACKGROUND

In 2009, we instituted a protocol to standardize care for patients undergoing interval appendectomy based on results from a prospective trial that demonstrated a reduction in the mean number of computed tomography (CT) scans performed. The goal of this study was to determine if our current practice now resulted in fewer CT scans as a result of this trial.

METHODS

A retrospective review of all patients undergoing interval appendectomy for perforated appendicitis from March 2009 to March 2011 was performed. Demographics and outcomes were compared to previously collected data from a retrospective study prior to institution of the protocol and to the prospective trial.

RESULTS

During the study period, 45 patients underwent interval appendectomy. There were no differences in demographics among the three studies. Similar numbers of patients underwent aspiration or percutaneous drainage. There continues to be a significant reduction in the number of CT scans (3.5 ± 2.0 vs. 2.1 ± 1.3, P = 0.0001) and health care visits (7.6 ± 2.8 vs. 4.5 ± 1.4, P = 0.0001) when comparing management prior to the prospective trial to management since its completion.

CONCLUSION

A protocol for management of patients undergoing interval appendectomy care results in fewer health care visits and CT scans.

Paediatric GI emergencies

Paediatric GI emergencies constitute a wide range of gut pathologies ranging from those that are common, easily diagnosed and treated to conditions that are rarer, often more severe and challenging to manage. Among a myriad of ordinary clinical symptoms and signs physicians have to identify the child with a serious, life-threatening pathology and initiate the appropriate diagnostic and therapeutic pathway. The aim of the review is to present and discuss a selection of key paediatric GI emergencies that provide challenges in diagnosis and treatment. These conditions are classified by their presentation or pathogenesis and include inflammatory conditions, those presenting with GI obstruction or haemorrhage and the ingestion of foreign bodies or caustic substances. The most recent advances regarding the management of these entities are discussed along with key areas of clinical practice and future research.

Performance of ultrasound in the diagnosis of appendicitis in children in a multicenter cohort

OBJECTIVES

The objectives were to assess the test characteristics of ultrasound (US) in diagnosing appendicitis in children and to evaluate site-related variations based on the frequency of its use. Additionally, the authors assessed the test characteristics of US when the appendix was clearly visualized.

METHODS

This was a secondary analysis of a prospective, 10-center observational study. Children aged 3 to 18 years with acute abdominal pain concerning for appendicitis were enrolled. US was performed at the discretion of the treating physician.

RESULTS

Of 2,625 patients enrolled, 965 (36.8%) underwent abdominal US. US had an overall sensitivity of 72.5% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 58.8% to 86.3%) and specificity 97.0% (95% CI = 96.2% to 97.9%) in diagnosing appendicitis. US sensitivity was 77.7% at the three sites (combined) that used it in 90% of cases, 51.6% at a site that used it in 50% of cases, and 35% at the four remaining sites (combined) that used it in 9% of cases. US retained a high specificity of 96% to 99% at all sites. Of the 469 (48.6%) cases across sites where the appendix was clearly visualized on US, its sensitivity was 97.9% (95% CI = 95.2% to 99.9%), with a specificity of 91.7% (95% CI = 86.7% to 96.7%).

CONCLUSIONS

Ultrasound sensitivity and the rate of visualization of the appendix on US varied across sites and appeared to improve with more frequent use. US had universally high sensitivity and specificity when the appendix was clearly identified. Other diagnostic modalities should be considered when the appendix is not definitively visualized by US.

Diagnosis and management of pediatric appendicitis, intussusception, and Meckel diverticulum

Three of the most common causes of surgical abdominal pain in pediatric patients include appendicitis, Meckel diverticulum, and intussusception. All 3 can present with right lower quadrant pain, and can lead to significant morbidity and even mortality. Although ultrasound is the preferred method of diagnosis with appendicitis and intussusception, considerable variety exists in the modalities needed in the diagnosis of Meckel diverticulum. This article discusses the pathways to diagnosis, the modes of treatment, and the continued areas of controversy.

A critical evaluation of US for the diagnosis of pediatric acute appendicitis in a real-life setting: how can we improve the diagnostic value of sonography?

BACKGROUND

We have observed that day-to-day use of US for acute appendicitis does not perform as well as described in the literature.

OBJECTIVE

Review the diagnostic performance of US in acute appendicitis with attention to factors that influence performance.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Retrospective review of all sonograms for acute appendicitis in children from May 2005 to May 2010 with attention to the rate of identification of the appendix, training of personnel involved and diagnostic accuracy.

RESULTS

The appendix was identified in 246/1,009 cases (24.4%), with identification increasing over time. The accuracy of US was 85-91% with 35 false-positives and 54 false-negatives. Pediatric sonographers were significantly better at identifying the appendix than non-pediatric sonographers (P < 0.0001). Increased weight was the only patient factor that influenced identification of the appendix (P = 0.006). CT use was stable over the 5 years but declined in cases where the appendix was identified by US.

CONCLUSION

In day-to-day use, US does not perform as purported in the literature. We do not visualize the appendix as often as we should and false-negative and false-positive exams are too common. To improve the diagnostic performance of this modality, involvement by experienced personnel and/or additional training is needed.

Advanced radiologic imaging for pediatric appendicitis, 2005-2009: trends and outcomes

OBJECTIVES

To examine the variability in the use of computed tomography (CT) and ultrasound (US) for children with appendicitis and identify associations with clinical outcomes, and to demonstrate any trends in diagnostic imaging between 2005 and 2009.

STUDY DESIGN

This was a retrospective review of children evaluated for appendicitis in an emergency department between 2005 and 2009 using an administrative database of 40 pediatric institutions in the United States. Imaging utilization by institutions was studied for association with 3 clinical outcomes.

RESULTS

A total of 55 238 children with appendicitis were studied. Utilization of CT and US varied widely across institutions, with medians of 34% (IQR, 21%-49%) for CT and 6% (IQR, 2%-26%) for US. Increased use of US or a combination of CT and US (but not of CT use alone) was associated with a lower negative appendectomy rate. Imaging was not associated with other clinical outcomes. In children with appendicitis, the use of US has increased since 2007, whereas that of CT has decreased.

CONCLUSION

There is considerable variation in the use of CT and US for children with appendicitis at major pediatric institutions. At the institutional level, increased use of US or combined US and CT is associated with a lower negative appendectomy rate. Despite the better diagnostic accuracy of CT compared with US, the use of CT is decreasing.

Diagnostic imaging and negative appendectomy rates in children: effects of age and gender

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Diagnostic imaging is often used in the evaluation of children with possible appendicitis. The utility of imaging may vary according to a patient's age and gender. The objectives of this study were (1) to examine the use of computed tomography (CT) and ultrasound for age and gender subgroups of children undergoing an appendectomy; and (2) to study the association between imaging and negative appendectomy rates (NARs) among these subgroups.

METHODS

Retrospective review of children presenting to 40 US pediatric emergency departments from 2005 to 2009 (Pediatric Health Information Systems database). Children undergoing an appendectomy were stratified by age and gender for measuring the association between ultrasound and CT use and the outcome of negative appendectomy.

RESULTS

A total of 8 959 155 visits at 40 pediatric emergency departments were investigated; 55 227 children had appendicitis. The NAR was 3.6%. NARs were highest for children younger than 5 years (boys 16.8%, girls 14.6%) and girls older than 10 years (4.8%). At the institutional level, increased rates of diagnostic imaging (ultrasound and/or CT) were associated with lower NARs for all age and gender subgroups other than children younger than 5 years, The NAR was 1.2% for boys older than 5 years without any diagnostic imaging.

CONCLUSIONS

The impact of diagnostic imaging on negative appendectomy rate varies by age and gender. Diagnostic imaging for boys older than 5 years with suspected appendicitis has no meaningful impact on NAR. Diagnostic strategies for possible appendicitis should incorporate the risk of negative appendectomy by age and gender.

Increased levels of deleted in malignant brain tumours 1 (DMBT1) in active bacteria-related appendicitis

AIMS

Deleted in malignant brain tumours 1 (DMBT1; gp340) is a secreted glycoprotein which is found in the surface lining epithelia of human small and large intestine. DMBT1 is suggested to play a role in enterocyte differentiation and surface protection from intestinal bacteria. The aim of this study was to elucidate DMBT1 expression in bacteria-related active intestinal inflammation such as appendicitis.

METHODS AND RESULTS

mRNA and protein levels of DMBT1 were analysed in surgical resections of 50 appendices (active inflammation: n = 25). In non-actively inflamed appendices, inter-individual differences in basal DMBT1 levels of enterocytes and some non-epithelial cells were found. In active appendicitis, enterocytic DMBT1 mRNA expression was increased approximately fivefold, which was paralleled by a corresponding increase of cytoplasmic and secreted DMBT1 protein levels. Increased DMBT1 expression was predominant in enterocytes adjacent to erosive lesions or ulcers.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data demonstrate that bacteria-related active inflammation results in a sharp increase of DMBT1 levels in enterocytes. These findings substantiate the view that DMBT1 is of functional relevance for host defence and modulation of the course of intestinal bacteria-related inflammatory responses.

Revised ultrasound criteria for appendicitis in children improve diagnostic accuracy

BACKGROUND

Use of CT in the evaluation of suspected appendicitis in children is common. Expanding the use of US would eliminate the radiation exposure associated with CT.

OBJECTIVE

We describe new criteria that improve US's diagnostic accuracy for appendicitis, making it more comparable to CT in terms of sensitivity and specificity.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We conducted a retrospective review of 304 consecutive patients undergoing US for the diagnosis of appendicitis in our institution during 2006. The sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of the maximal outer diameter (MOD) at various measurements was calculated and compared to pathology results. Additional variables (appendiceal wall thickness, fecalith, hyperemia, fat stranding, free fluid, age and weight) were also evaluated.

RESULTS

The highest sensitivity (98.7%) and specificity (95.4%) were identified when MOD was ≥7 mm or wall thickness was >1.7 mm. These values resulted in correctly classifying 96.6% of cases, with 1 (0.5%) false-negative and 6 (2.9%) false-positive studies. Incorporating secondary signs of appendicitis, age or weight did not alter accuracy.

CONCLUSION

These findings identify new US criteria that compare favorably to CT. In children with suspected appendicitis, using US as the initial imaging study will ultimately lead to improved accuracy, lower cost and the elimination of ionizing radiation exposure.

Abdominal pain in children

Abdominal pain is one of the most common reasons pediatric patients seek emergency care. The emergency physician must be able to distinguish diagnoses requiring immediate attention from self-limiting processes. Pediatric patients can be challenging, particularly those who are preverbal, and therefore, the clinician must rely on a detailed history from a parent or caregiver as well as a careful physical examination in order to narrow the differential diagnosis. This article highlights several pediatric diagnoses presenting as abdominal pain, including surgical emergencies, nonsurgical diagnoses, and extraabdominal processes, and reviews the clinical presentation, diagnostic evaluation, and management of each.

Transumbilical laparoscopically assisted appendectomy: an alternative minimally invasive technique in pediatric patients

INTRODUCTION

Transumbilical laparoscopically assisted appendectomy (TULAA) has been reported in the literature as an alternative to traditional three-port laparoscopic appendectomy (LA). Our study compares outcomes between LA and the one-trocar transumbilical technique in a single institution over a concurrent time frame for all cases of pediatric appendicitis.

METHODS

An Institutional Review Board-approved retrospective chart review of all appendectomies from July 2007 through June 2009 was performed. All appendectomies were performed either laparoscopically or transumbilically. One surgeon predominantly used the TULAA method, whereas the other 2 surgeons used strictly the LA method. No cases were converted to open. Categorization of specimens as normal, acute, or ruptured was based on pathology reports. Outcomes analyzed for each group included surgical duration, cost, length of stay, fever (>101.5F), wound infection, ileus, and postoperative abdominal-pelvic abscess.

RESULTS

A total of 131 appendectomies were performed by 3 surgeons, 83 were LA and 48 were TULAA. For all stages of appendicitis, outcomes differed significantly only for operating room cost, with the TULAA being significantly less expensive. All other outcomes were similar between the two techniques.

CONCLUSION

Our study suggests that TULAA is a reasonable alternative to the standard minimally invasive technique for appendicitis in both acute and ruptured situations. All analyzed complications were similar between the groups, suggesting that TULAA is an acceptable surgical method in pediatric patients for all stages of appendicitis.

Incidence and significance of inconclusive results in ultrasound for appendicitis in children and teenagers

PURPOSE

Frustratingly, sonography to assess for appendicitis in children often leads to an inconclusive report (eg, "suspicious for appendicitis") or nonvisualization of the appendix. To aid in planning who to image and how to interpret the results, we investigated whether these 2 results were more frequent in teenagers than preteens and the prevalence of appendicitis associated with each result.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed sonographic and surgical findings in patients <18 years (n = 189) referred with clinical suspicion of appendicitis over a 12-month period. Children (≤12.0 years old; n = 86) and teens (>12.0 years old; n = 103) were compared.

RESULTS

Prevalence of appendicitis was 34% in each group, similar to other centres; 0% for those with negative ultrasound reports (0/35), 10% for nonvisualized appendix (8/84), 68% for inconclusive report (15/22), and 85% for positive ultrasound (41/48). Teens were significantly more likely to have an inconclusive ultrasound. Inconclusive reports were because of borderline findings (eg, appendix size near 6 mm; 9/22), body habitus, bowel gas, or unusual findings due in retrospect to perforation. The rate of nonvisualization of the appendix did not vary significantly with age (42% vs 47%).

CONCLUSION

An inconclusive result of ultrasound for appendicitis was significantly more frequent in teens than in preteens and carried a high (68%) likelihood of appendicitis. Conversely, a nonvisualized appendix was equally frequent in teens and preteens, and had a low likelihood of appendicitis (only 10% positive). These findings encourage the use of ultrasound in preteens in particular and can assist interpretation of these common results.

Initial laparoscopic appendectomy versus initial nonoperative management and interval appendectomy for perforated appendicitis with abscess: a prospective, randomized trial

INTRODUCTION

Perforated appendicitis is a common condition in children, which, in a small number of patients, may be complicated by a well-formed abscess. Initial nonoperative management with percutaneous drainage/aspiration of the abscess followed by intravenous antibiotics usually allows for an uneventful interval appendectomy. Although this strategy has become well accepted, there are no published data comparing initial nonoperative management (drainage/interval appendectomy) to appendectomy upon presentation with an abscess. Therefore, we conducted a randomized trial comparing these 2 management strategies.

METHODS

After internal review board approval (#06 11-164), children who presented with a well-defined abdominal abscess by computed tomographic imaging were randomized on admission to laparoscopic appendectomy or intravenous antibiotics with percutaneous drainage of the abscess (when possible), followed by interval laparoscopic appendectomy approximately 10 weeks later. This was a pilot study with a sample size of 40, which was based on our recent volume of patients presenting with appendicitis and abscess.

RESULTS

On presentation, there were no differences between the 2 groups regarding age, weight, body mass index, sex distribution, temperature, leukocyte count, number of abscesses, or greatest 2-dimensional area of abscess in the axial view. Regarding outcomes, there were no differences in length of total hospitalization, recurrent abscess rates, or overall charges. There was a trend toward a longer operating time in patients undergoing initial appendectomy (61 minutes versus 42 minutes mean, P = .06).

CONCLUSIONS

Although initial laparoscopic appendectomy trends toward a requiring longer operative time, there seems to be no advantages between these strategies in terms of total hospitalization, recurrent abscess rate, or total charges.

Evaluation of optimized inversion-recovery fat-suppression techniques for T2-weighted abdominal MR imaging

PURPOSE

To test the theoretical benefits of a spectral attenuated inversion-recovery (SPAIR) fat-suppression (FS) technique in clinical abdominal MRI by comparison to conventional inversion-recovery (IR) FS combined with T2-weighted (T2W) partial Fourier single shot fast spin echo (SSFSE).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

1.5T MRI studies of the abdomen were performed in 28 patients with liver lesions (hemangiomas n = 14; metastases n = 14). T2W sequences were acquired using IR and SPAIR SSFSE. Measurements included retroperitoneal and mesenteric fat signal-to-noise (SNR) to evaluate FS; liver lesion contrast-to-noise (CNR) to evaluate bulk water signal recovery effects; and bowel wall delineation to evaluate susceptibility and physiological motion effects.

RESULTS

SPAIR-SSFSE images produce significantly improved FS and liver lesion CNR. The mean SNR of the retroperitoneal and mesenteric fat for SPAIR SSFSE was 20.5 +/- 10.2 (+/-1 SD) and 12.7 +/- 6.2, compared to 43.2 +/- 24.1 (P = 0.000006) and 29.3 +/- 16.8 (P = 0.0000005) for IR-SSFSE. SPAIR-SSFSE images produced higher CNR for both hemangiomas CNR = 164 +/- 88 vs. 126 +/- 83 (P = 0.00005) and metastases CNR = 75 +/- 27 vs. 53 +/- 19 (P = 0.007). Bowel wall visualization was significantly improved using SPAIR-SSFSE (P = 0.002).

CONCLUSION

The theoretical benefits of SPAIR over conventional IR FS translate into significant multiple improvements that can be measured on clinical abdominal MRI scans.