1
|
Ngune I, Myers H, Cole A, Palamara P, Redknap R, Roche M, Twigg D. Developing nurse-sensitive outcomes in acute inpatient mental health settings-A systematic review. J Clin Nurs 2023; 32:6254-6267. [PMID: 36915223 DOI: 10.1111/jocn.16679] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/19/2022] [Revised: 12/14/2022] [Accepted: 01/30/2023] [Indexed: 03/15/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND While nurse-sensitive outcomes (NSOs) are well established in numerous health settings, to date there is no indicator suite of NSOs for inpatient mental health settings. AIM To assess the relationship between nursing variables and patient outcomes in acute inpatient mental health settings to determine which outcomes can be used as indicators of the quality of nursing care. METHODS Databases accessed were CINAHL, MEDLINE, PsycINFO and EMBASE, last searched in May 2022. The review followed the 2020 PRISMA checklist for systematic reviews. Papers published between 1995 and 2022, conducted in acute mental health care units were included. The quality of the studies was assessed using the Effective Public Health Practice Project Quality Assessment Tool. A meta-analysis was not possible because of the large number of variables and measurement inconsistencies. RESULTS A total of 57 studies were reviewed. Studies were categorised according to whether they found a significant or non-significant relationship between nurse variables and patient outcomes. Seven outcomes-aggression, seclusion, restraint, absconding, pro-re-nata medications, special observations and self-harm-were identified. For each outcome, there were significant findings for several nurse variables indicating that all included outcomes could be used as NSOs. However, evidence for aggression, seclusion and restraint use as suitable NSOs was more robust than the evidence for self-harm, absconding, pro-re-nata medications and special observations. CONCLUSION All the seven outcomes can all be used to develop an NSO indicator suite in mental health inpatient settings. More work is needed to establish high-quality studies to clearly demonstrate the relationship between these outcome measures and changes in nurse variables such as nurse staffing, skill mix, work environment, nurse education and nurse experience. PATIENT AND PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION Patient or public contribution was not possible because of the type of the variables being explored.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Irene Ngune
- School of Nursing and Midwifery, Edith Cowan University, Joondalup, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Helen Myers
- School of Nursing and Midwifery, Edith Cowan University, Joondalup, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Amanda Cole
- School of Nursing and Midwifery, Edith Cowan University, Joondalup, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Peter Palamara
- School of Nursing and Midwifery, Edith Cowan University, Joondalup, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Robina Redknap
- Western Australia Department of Health, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Michael Roche
- University of Canberra, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia
| | - Diane Twigg
- School of Nursing and Midwifery, Edith Cowan University, Joondalup, Western Australia, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Nursing staff composition and its influence on seclusion in an adult forensic mental health inpatient setting: The truth about numbers. Arch Psychiatr Nurs 2022; 41:333-340. [PMID: 36428068 DOI: 10.1016/j.apnu.2022.09.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/14/2021] [Revised: 09/19/2022] [Accepted: 09/19/2022] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Research on the influence of nursing staff composition and use of seclusion in the forensic mental health inpatient settings is sparse. Nursing staff composition refers to staffing levels, roles, gender ratio and skill mix of the ward teams. Internationally, the rates of seclusion in some forensic mental health inpatient settings have increased over the past 10 years despite global efforts to reduce and eliminate its use. AIM To examine whether the use of seclusion in a forensic mental health inpatient setting can be attributed to staffing composition or to contextual factors such as day of the week, month or other clinical factors. METHOD Retrospective data collection was conducted using seclusion data, daily ward reports and staff rosters. Data were collected for all shifts in the hospital over a six-month period. RESULTS Three staffing variables were identified as having an influence on the use of seclusion: the number of registered nurses on duty, the presence of the shift coordinator and having a lead nurse on shift. DISCUSSION Senior nurse oversight and guidance are important factors in assisting staff to identify clinical deterioration and intervene early which may assist services reduce the use of seclusion. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE As staffing levels and composition are modifiable, the results of this study may assist nurse leaders to consider workforce improvements to reduce seclusion use.
Collapse
|
3
|
Yurtbasi MK, Melvin G, Pavlou C, Gordon M. Nurse and patient factors: Predicting seclusion in adolescent psychiatric units. JOURNAL OF CHILD AND ADOLESCENT PSYCHIATRIC NURSING 2021; 34:112-119. [PMID: 33393691 DOI: 10.1111/jcap.12306] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/12/2020] [Accepted: 12/13/2020] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
PROBLEM Seclusion is considered a necessity when alternatives have failed. There is a consensus that seclusion has no therapeutic benefit, which justifies efforts to reduce the practice. This study aimed to identify nurse and patient variables that are predictive of seclusion on a large adolescent inpatient unit. METHODS Nested case controls were used to compare 72 afternoon shifts on which seclusion occurred to 216 afternoon shifts on which no seclusion occurred, between 2010 and 2013, at an Adolescent Psychiatric Inpatient Unit. FINDINGS Increased seclusion was predicted by a lower nurse to patient ratio, more male nurses on shift, fewer female nurses on shift, the presence of agency/temporary nurses on shift, greater combined years of mental health experience, and lower total HoNOSCA behavior subscale score. Unique predictors that increased risk of seclusion included greater number of male nurses and the presence of agency/temporary nurses, while a greater number of female nurses decreased risk of seclusion. CONCLUSIONS Nurses play a unique role in seclusion outcomes that are separate to patient-factors and act as both protective and risk factors for seclusion. Changes can be made to staffing to reduce seclusion and future research should investigate why these nurse-factors contribute to seclusion.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Miriam K Yurtbasi
- Department of Psychiatry, Centre for Developmental Psychiatry and Psychology, School of Clinical Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, Australia
| | - Glenn Melvin
- School of Psychology, Faculty of Health, Deakin University, Burwood, Australia
| | - Christine Pavlou
- Psychiatric Services at Monash Health, Early in Life Mental Health Service, Monash Children's Hospital, Clayton, Australia
| | - Michael Gordon
- Department of Psychiatry, Centre for Developmental Psychiatry and Psychology, School of Clinical Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, Australia.,Psychiatric Services at Monash Health, Early in Life Mental Health Service, Monash Children's Hospital, Clayton, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Doedens P, Vermeulen J, Boyette LL, Latour C, de Haan L. Influence of nursing staff attitudes and characteristics on the use of coercive measures in acute mental health services-A systematic review. J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs 2020; 27:446-459. [PMID: 31876970 PMCID: PMC7508163 DOI: 10.1111/jpm.12586] [Citation(s) in RCA: 50] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/12/2019] [Revised: 12/20/2019] [Accepted: 12/21/2019] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
WHAT IS KNOWN ON THE SUBJECT?: Aggressive behaviour is a major problem in clinical practice of mental health care and can result in the use of coercive measures. Coercive measures are dangerous for psychiatric patients and international mental healthcare works on the elimination of these interventions. There is no previous review that summarizes the attitude of nursing staff towards coercive measures and the influence of nursing staff characteristics on attitude towards and the use of coercive measures. WHAT THE PAPER ADDS TO EXISTING KNOWLEDGE?: The attitude of nurses shifted from a therapeutic paradigm (coercive measures have positive effects on patients) to a safety paradigm (coercive measures are undesirable, but necessary for the wards' safety). Nurses express the need for less coercive interventions to prevent seclusion and restraint, but their perception of intrusiveness is influenced by how often they use specific coercive measures. The knowledge from scientific literature on the influence of nursing staff on coercive measures is highly inconclusive, although the feeling of safety of nurses might prove to be promising for further research. WHAT ARE THE IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE?: There is need for increased attention specifically for the feeling of safety of nurses, to better equip nurses for their difficult work on acute mental health wards. ABSTRACT: Introduction The use of coercive measures generally has negative effects on patients. To help prevent its use, professionals need insight into what nurses believe about coercion and which staff determinants may influence its application. There is need for an integrated review on both attitude and influence of nurses on the use of coercion. Aim To summarize literature concerning attitude of nurses towards coercive measures and the influence of staff characteristics on the use of coercive measures. Method Systematic review. Results The attitude of nurses changed during the last two decades from a therapeutic to a safety paradigm. Nurses currently view coercive measures as undesirable, but necessary to deal with aggression. Nurses express the need for less intrusive interventions, although familiarity probably influences its perceived intrusiveness. Literature on the relation between staff characteristics and coercive measures is inconclusive. Discussion Nurses perceive coercive measures as unwanted but still necessary to maintain safety on psychiatric wards. Focussing on the determinants of perception of safety might be a promising direction for future research. Implications for practice Mental health care could improve the focus on the constructs of perceived safety and familiarity with alternative interventions to protect patients from unnecessary use of coercive interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paul Doedens
- Department of Psychiatry, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, location Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands.,ACHIEVE Centre of Applied Research, Faculty of Health, Amsterdam University of Applied Sciences, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Jentien Vermeulen
- Department of Psychiatry, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, location Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Lindy-Lou Boyette
- Department of Clinical Psychology, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Corine Latour
- ACHIEVE Centre of Applied Research, Faculty of Health, Amsterdam University of Applied Sciences, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Lieuwe de Haan
- Department of Psychiatry, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, location Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Hirsch S, Steinert T. Measures to Avoid Coercion in Psychiatry and Their Efficacy. DEUTSCHES ARZTEBLATT INTERNATIONAL 2020; 116:336-343. [PMID: 31288909 DOI: 10.3238/arztebl.2019.0336] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/20/2018] [Revised: 08/20/2018] [Accepted: 03/12/2019] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Coercive measures such as seclusion and restraint encroach on the patient's human rights and can have serious adverse effects ranging from emotional trauma to physical injury and even death. At the same time, they may be the only way to avert acute danger for the patient and/or the hospital staff. In this article, we provide an overview of the efficacy of the measures that have been studied to date for the avoidance of coercion in psychiatry. METHODS This review is based on publications retrieved by a systematic search in the Medline and Cinahl databases, supplemented by a search in the reference lists of these publications. We provide a narrative synthesis in which we categorize the interventions by content. RESULTS Of the 84 studies included in this review, 16 had a control group; 6 of these 16 were randomized controlled trials (RCTs). The interventions were categorized by seven different types of content: organization, staff training, risk assessment, environment, psychotherapy, debriefings, and advance directives. Most interventions in each category were found to be effective in the respective studies. 38 studies investigated complex treatment programs that incorporated elements from more than one category; 37 of these (including one RCT) revealed effective reduction of the frequency of coercion. Two RCTs on the use of rating instruments to assess the risk of aggressive behavior revealed a relative reduction of the number of seclusion measures by 27% and a reduction of the cumulative duration of seclusion by 45%. CONCLUSION Complex intervention programs to avoid coercive measures, incorporating elements of more than one of the above categories, seem to be particularly effective. In future, cluster-randomized trials to investigate the individual categories of intervention would be desirable.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sophie Hirsch
- ZfP Südwürttemberg, Klinik für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie I der Universität Ulm, Weissenau
| | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Blume A, Snellgrove B, Steinert T. [Staffing levels and patient-related outcomes : Systematic literature review on international evidence]. DER NERVENARZT 2019; 90:40-44. [PMID: 30238232 DOI: 10.1007/s00115-018-0621-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
The objective of this study was to systematically review the international literature with respect to significant links between staffing levels or qualification on the one hand and patient-related outcomes on the other. Of the initial 7778 abstracts identified by means of a complex search strand in PubMed and CINAHL, 51 could finally be included in a qualitative synthesis. A total of nine different patient-related outcome categories with significant associations on an at least ordinally scaled level were distinguished. None of the studies included had a (quasi-)experimental research design. Despite, in some instances, high numbers of cases at multiple sites and efforts to control obvious confounding variables by regression analysis, no evidence-based conclusions for health policy or clinical practice can be drawn from the available observational studies. There is therefore a considerable need for prospective randomized or at least quasi-experimental studies also as accompanying research on novel models of financing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Blume
- Klinik für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie I der Universität Ulm, Weissenau, ZfP Südwürttemberg, Weingartshofer Str. 2, 88214, Ravensburg, Deutschland.
| | - B Snellgrove
- Klinik für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie I der Universität Ulm, Weissenau, ZfP Südwürttemberg, Weingartshofer Str. 2, 88214, Ravensburg, Deutschland
| | - T Steinert
- Klinik für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie I der Universität Ulm, Weissenau, ZfP Südwürttemberg, Weingartshofer Str. 2, 88214, Ravensburg, Deutschland
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Allan JA, Hanson GD, Schroder NL, O'Mahony AJ, Foster RMP, Sara GE. Six years of national mental health seclusion data: the Australian experience. Australas Psychiatry 2017; 25:277-281. [PMID: 28375028 DOI: 10.1177/1039856217700298] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Reducing or eliminating seclusion from mental health care settings has been a national priority for Australia since 2005. This paper describes Australia's national seclusion data collection, and summarises changes in seclusion rates in Australian public mental health services. METHODS Seclusion events per 1000 patient days were calculated from 2009-2010 to 2014-2015 utilising state and territory administrative data sources. Combined national data were used to calculate results for a number of service characteristics, such as target population and location of the service. RESULTS The rate of seclusion events decreased by 43% over the 6 years. Child and adolescent services reported consistently higher rates of seclusion, but a shorter duration of seclusion episodes, compared with other service types. There is high variation in seclusion rates between individual services (range 0.0-53.0 seclusion events per 1000 bed days in 2014-2015). CONCLUSIONS Seclusion event rates in Australia's specialised public acute mental health hospital services are declining. The use of existing administrative data was instrumental in establishing a national data source to facilitate the monitoring and reporting of progress of seclusion reduction strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John A Allan
- Chief Psychiatrist, Department of Health Queensland and Chair, Safety and Quality Partnership Standing Committee, Herston, QLD, Australia
| | - Gary D Hanson
- Unit Head, Australian Institute of Health and Welfare, Canberra, ACT, Australia
| | - Nicole L Schroder
- Australian Institute of Health and Welfare, Canberra, ACT, Australia
| | - Anna J O'Mahony
- Australian Institute of Health and Welfare, Canberra, ACT, Australia
| | | | - Grant E Sara
- Sydney Medical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, and; Chair, Mental Health Information Strategy Standing Committee, NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Boumans CE, Egger JIM, Souren PM, Mann-Poll PS, Hutschemaekers GJM. Nurses' decision on seclusion: patient characteristics, contextual factors and reflexivity in teams. J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs 2012; 19:264-70. [PMID: 22074324 DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2850.2011.01777.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
While many characteristics of patients, professionals and facilities with relevance to seclusion rates have been investigated, their relative importance is unclear. Virtually no attention has been paid to team processes and reflexivity in relation to decision making on seclusion. The aim of this paper is to estimate the effects of these factors on nurse decision making on seclusion. Sixty Dutch psychiatric nurses of four closed wards reported team reflexivity and their tendency to seclude a theoretical patient. Approachability (whether there was a good or hardly any possibility to communicate with the patient), staffing level and confidence within the team had the greatest impact on the decision to seclude. Intra class correlation was 0.30. There was a large interaction effect of reflexivity with team 4, and team reflexivity was highly correlated with team tendency to avoid seclusion. In nurses' decision on seclusion, the effects of 'pure' patient characteristics are small as compared with the effects of interpersonal and contextual factors, and nurses vary widely in their judgement. Team reflexivity is related to the tendency to prevent seclusion.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C E Boumans
- Vincent van Gogh Institute for Psychiatry, Venray and Behavioural Science Institute, Radboud University Nijmegen, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|