Reproducibly Measuring Plasmon-Enhanced Fluorescence in Bulk Solution Across a 20-Fold Range of Optical Densities

Sorting Nanoparticles by Valency with DNA Barcoding

Self-assembly of DNA-labeled nanoparticles is an effective strategy to fabricate new nanocomposite materials and nanoscale devices from the bottom-up. To tailor the properties of the resulting material or device, one requires access to a wide range of nanoparticle sizes and shapes, as well as control over the number (valency) of DNA molecules on the nanoparticle surface. Currently, nanoparticles with a defined DNA valency can only be obtained in a narrow range of sizes, and in small quantities, limiting the properties of the resulting composite structures and their applications. Here, we leverage the digital information encoded in the number and sequence of short DNA barcodes to generate preparatory amounts of nanoparticles bearing a specific number of DNA molecules, irrespective of the identity of the nanocomponent. We show that this DNA valency sorting chromatography, which is driven by the selective affinity of Watson-Crick base pairs, is applicable to arbitrary DNA sequences and a broad range of nanoparticle sizes, shapes, and material compositions. To further demonstrate this fact, we use valency-sorted large gold nanospheres directly in self-assembly schemes to create, in one synthesis step, large amounts of several previously inaccessible molecule-like dimer and trimer nanostructures with unique optical properties. We anticipate that the expanded scope of DNA valency-defined nanoparticle reagents, and the increased scale at which they can be produced, will open new avenues for the molecularly precise manipulation of nanoscale matter.

Back to the Drawing Board: A Unifying First-Principle Model for Correlating Sample UV-Vis Absorption and Fluorescence Emission

The popular textbook and literature model I(λ_x,λ_m) = K(λx,λm)(1-10-Ax) or its variants for correlating the sample absorption and fluorescence often fails even for the simplest samples where the fluorophore is the only light absorber. Reported is a first-principle model I(λ_x,λ_m) = K(λx,λm)Ax,f10-(Ax,sdx+Am,sdm) for correlating the sample fluorescence measured with a conventional spectrofluorometer and its UV-vis absorbance quantified with a conventional UV-vis spectrophotometer. This model can be simplified or expanded for a variety of fluorescence analyses. First, it enables curve-fitting fluorescence intensity as a function of the fluorophore or sample absorbance over a sample concentration range impossible with existing models. Second, it provides the theoretical foundation for an inner-filter-effect (IFE)-correction method developed earlier and explains mathematically the linearity between the IFE-corrected fluorescence and the fluorophore concentration or absorbance. Third, this model can be expanded for quantitative mechanistic studies of fluorescence intensity variations triggered by stimuli treatments. One demonstrated example is to quantify temperature effects on the emission-wavelength-specific and total fluorescence quantum yield of anthracene. We expect that this first-principle model will be broadly adopted for both student education that promotes evidence-based learning and a variety of fluorescence applications where disentangling sample absorption and emission are critical for reliable data analysis.