Gong Y, Ding W, Wang P, Wu Q, Yao X, Yang Q. Evaluating Machine Learning Methods of Analyzing Multiclass Metabolomics.
J Chem Inf Model 2023;
63:7628-7641. [PMID:
38079572 DOI:
10.1021/acs.jcim.3c01525]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/26/2023]
Abstract
Multiclass metabolomic studies have become popular for revealing the differences in multiple stages of complex diseases, various lifestyles, or the effects of specific treatments. In multiclass metabolomics, there are multiple data manipulation steps for analyzing raw data, which consist of data filtering, the imputation of missing values, data normalization, marker identification, sample separation, classification, and so on. In each step, several to dozens of machine learning methods can be chosen for the given data set, with potentially hundreds or thousands of method combinations in the whole data processing chain. Therefore, a clear understanding of these machine learning methods is helpful for selecting an appropriate method combination for obtaining stable and reliable analytical results of specific data. However, there has rarely been an overall introduction or evaluation of these methods based on multiclass metabolomic data. Herein, detailed descriptions of these machine learning methods in multiple data manipulation steps are reviewed. Moreover, an assessment of these methods was performed using a benchmark data set for multiclass metabolomics. First, 12 imputation methods for imputing missing values were evaluated based on the PSS (Procrustes statistical shape analysis) and NRMSE (normalized root-mean-square error) values. Second, 17 normalization methods for processing multiclass metabolomic data were evaluated by applying the PMAD (pooled median absolute deviation) value. Third, different methods of identifying markers of multiclass metabolomics were evaluated based on the CWrel (relative weighted consistency) value. Fourth, nine classification methods for constructing multiclass models were assessed using the AUC (area under the curve) value. Performance evaluations of machine learning methods are highly recommended to select the most appropriate method combination before performing the final analysis of the given data. Overall, detailed descriptions and evaluation of various machine learning methods are expected to improve analyses of multiclass metabolomic data.
Collapse