Site-Specific Quantification of Protein Ubiquitination on MS2 Fragment Ion Level via Isobaric Peptide Labeling

Chemical isotope labeling for quantitative proteomics

Advancements in liquid chromatography and mass spectrometry over the last decades have led to a significant development in mass spectrometry-based proteome quantification approaches. An increasingly attractive strategy is multiplex isotope labeling, which significantly improves the accuracy, precision and throughput of quantitative proteomics in the data-dependent acquisition mode. Isotope labeling-based approaches can be classified into MS1-based and MS2-based quantification. In this review, we give an overview of approaches based on chemical isotope labeling and discuss their principles, benefits, and limitations with the goal to give insights into fundamental questions and provide a useful reference for choosing a method for quantitative proteomics. As a perspective, we discuss the current possibilities and limitations of multiplex, isotope labeling approaches for the data-independent acquisition mode, which is increasing in popularity.

Recent advances in isobaric labeling and applications in quantitative proteomics

Mass spectrometry (MS) has emerged at the forefront of quantitative proteomic techniques. Liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS) can be used to determine abundances of proteins and peptides in complex biological samples. Several methods have been developed and adapted for accurate quantification based on chemical isotopic labeling. Among various chemical isotopic labeling techniques, isobaric tagging approaches rely on the analysis of peptides from MS2-based quantification rather than MS1-based quantification. In this review, we will provide an overview of several isobaric tags along with some recent developments including complementary ion tags, improvements in sensitive quantitation of analytes with lower abundance, strategies to increase multiplexing capabilities, and targeted analysis strategies. We will also discuss limitations of isobaric tags and approaches to alleviate these restrictions through bioinformatic tools and data acquisition methods. This review will highlight several applications of isobaric tags, including biomarker discovery and validation, thermal proteome profiling, cross-linking for structural investigations, single-cell analysis, top-down proteomics, along with applications to different molecules including neuropeptides, glycans, metabolites, and lipids, while providing considerations and evaluations to each application.

Affinity capture in bottom-up protein analysis - Overview of current status of proteolytic peptide capture using antibodies and molecularly imprinted polymers

Antibody-based affinity capture has become the gold standard in sample preparation for determination of low-abundance protein biomarkers in biological matrices prior to liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS) determination. This comprises both capture of intact proteins prior to the digestion step and capture of proteolytic peptides after digestion of the sample. The latter can be performed both using antibodies specifically developed to capture target proteolytic peptides, as well as by the less explored use of anti-protein antibodies to capture the proteolytic epitope peptide. Molecularly imprinted polymers (MIPs), also called plastic antibodies are another affinity-based approach emerging as sample preparation technique in LC-MS based protein biomarker analysis. The current review gives a critical and comprehensive overview of proteolytic peptide capture using antibodies and MIPs in LC-MS based protein biomarker determination during the last five years. The main emphasis is on capture of non-modified peptides, while a brief overview of affinity capture of peptides containing post-translational modifications (PTMs) is provided.

An Approach for Triplex-IPTL

Isobaric peptide termini labeling (IPTL) is an approach for quantitative proteomics based on crosswise isotopic labeling of peptides at the N- and C-terminus. The labeling reagents are chosen in isotopic variations that the resulting mass of all labels per peptide is isobaric, but the individual label on each peptide terminus is different. Therefore, the quantitative difference of the peptide signal can be determined by the fragment ions of the corresponding MS2 spectra. Here, we describe an approach for triplex-IPTL to allow the comparison of three proteomes. This approach is based on digestion of the proteins by endoproteinase Lys-C, followed by three combinations of selective dimethylation of the peptide N-termini and subsequent dimethylation of the lysine residues at the C-termini. Data analysis is performed using Mascot for database searches and the freely available software package IsobariQ for quantification.

Selective Maleylation-Directed Isobaric Peptide Termini Labeling for Accurate Proteome Quantification

Isobaric peptide termini labeling (IPTL) is an attractive protein quantification method because it provides more accurate and reliable quantification information than traditional isobaric labeling methods (e.g., TMT and iTRAQ) by making use of the entire fragment-ion series instead of only a single reporter ion. The multiplexing capacity of published IPTL implementations is, however, limited to three. Here, we present a selective maleylation-directed isobaric peptide termini labeling (SMD-IPTL) approach for quantitative proteomics of LysC protein digestion. SMD-IPTL extends the multiplexing capacity to 4-plex with the potential for higher levels of multiplexing using commercially available ¹³C/¹⁵N labeled amino acids. SMD-IPTL is achieved in a one-pot reaction in three consecutive steps: (1) selective maleylation at the N-terminus; (2) labeling at the ε-NH₂ group of the C-terminal Lys with isotopically labeled acetyl-alanine; (3) thiol Michael addition of an isotopically labeled acetyl-cysteine at the maleylated N-terminus. The isobarically labeled peptides are fragmented into sets of b- and y-ion clusters upon LC-MS/MS, which convey not only sequence information but also quantitative information for every labeling channel and avoid the issue of ratio distortion observed with reporter-ion-based approaches. We demonstrate the SMD-IPTL approach with a 4-plex labeled sample of bovine serum albumin (BSA) and yeast lysates mixed at different ratios. With the use of SMD-IPTL for labeling and a narrow precursor isolation window of 0.8 Th with an offset of −0.2 Th, accurate ratios were measured across a 10-fold mixing range of BSA in a background of yeast proteome. With the yeast proteins mixed at ratios of 1:5:1:5, BSA was detected at ratios of 0.94:2.46:4.70:9.92 when spiked at 1:2:5:10 ratios with an average standard deviation of peptide ratios of 0.34.

Mass spectrometric approaches for profiling protein folding and stability

Protein stability reports on protein homeostasis, function, and binding interactions, such as to other proteins, metabolites and drugs. As such, there is a pressing need for technologies that can report on protein stability. The ideal technique could be applied in vitro or in vivo systems, proteome-wide, independently of matrix, under native conditions, with residue-level resolution, and on protein at endogenous levels. Mass spectrometry has rapidly become a preferred technology for identifying and quantifying proteins. As such, it has been increasingly incorporated into methodologies for interrogating protein stability and folding. Although no single technology can satisfy all desired applications, several emerging approaches have shown outstanding success at providing biological insight into the stability of the proteome. This chapter outlines some of these recent emerging technologies.