Specific Binding of snoRNAs to PARP-1 Promotes NAD+-Dependent Catalytic Activation

Multifaceted Role of PARP1 in Maintaining Genome Stability Through Its Binding to Alternative DNA Structures

Alternative DNA structures that differ from the canonical B-form of DNA can arise from repetitive sequences and play beneficial roles in many cellular processes such as gene regulation and chromatin organization. However, they also threaten genomic stability in several ways including mutagenesis and collisions with replication and/or transcription machinery, which lead to genomic instability that is associated with human disease. Thus, the careful regulation of non-B-DNA structure formation and resolution is crucial for the maintenance of genome integrity. Several protein factors have been demonstrated to associate with alternative DNA structures to facilitate their removal, one of which is the ADP-ribose transferase (ART) PARP1 (also called ADP-ribosyltransferase diphtheria toxin-like 1 or ARTD1), a multifaceted DNA repair enzyme that recognizes single- and double-stranded DNA breaks and synthesizes chains of poly (ADP-ribose) (PAR) to recruit DNA repair proteins. It is now well appreciated that PARP1 recognizes several nucleic acid structures beyond DNA lesions, including stalled replication forks, DNA hairpins and cruciforms, R-loops, and DNA G-quadruplexes (G4 DNA). In this review, we summarize the current evidence of a direct association of PARP1 with each of these aforementioned alternative DNA structures, as well as discuss the role of PARP1 in the prevention of non-B-DNA structure-induced genetic instability. We will focus on the mechanisms of the recognition and binding by PARP1 to each alternative structure and the structure-based stimulation of PARP1 catalytic activity upon binding. Finally, we will discuss some of the outstanding gaps in the literature and offer speculative insight for questions that remain to be experimentally addressed.

Exploring the interplay between PARP1 and circRNA biogenesis and function

PARP1 (poly-ADP-ribose polymerase 1) is a multidomain protein with a flexible and self-folding structure that allows it to interact with a wide range of biomolecules, including nucleic acids and target proteins. PARP1 interacts with its target molecules either covalently via PARylation or non-covalently through its PAR moieties induced by auto-PARylation. These diverse interactions allow PARP1 to participate in complex regulatory circuits and cellular functions. Although the most studied PARP1-mediated functions are associated with DNA repair and cellular stress response, subsequent discoveries have revealed additional biological functions. Based on these findings, PARP1 is now recognized as a major modulator of gene expression. Several discoveries show that this multifunctional protein has been intimately connected to several steps of mRNA biogenesis, from transcription initiation to mRNA splicing, polyadenylation, export, and translation of mRNA to proteins. Nevertheless, our understanding of PARP1's involvement in the biogenesis of both coding and noncoding RNA, notably circular RNA (circRNA), remains restricted. In this review, we outline the possible roles of PARP1 in circRNA biogenesis. A full examination of the regulatory roles of PARP1 in nuclear processes with an emphasis on circRNA may reveal new avenues to control dysregulation implicated in the pathogenesis of several diseases such as neurodegenerative disorders and cancers. This article is categorized under: RNA Interactions with Proteins and Other Molecules > Protein-RNA Interactions: Functional Implications Regulatory RNAs/RNAi/Riboswitches > Regulatory RNAs RNA Processing > Splicing Regulation/Alternative Splicing.

PARPs and ADP-ribosylation: Deciphering the complexity with molecular tools

PARPs catalyze ADP-ribosylation-a post-translational modification that plays crucial roles in biological processes, including DNA repair, transcription, immune regulation, and condensate formation. ADP-ribosylation can be added to a wide range of amino acids with varying lengths and chemical structures, making it a complex and diverse modification. Despite this complexity, significant progress has been made in developing chemical biology methods to analyze ADP-ribosylated molecules and their binding proteins on a proteome-wide scale. Additionally, high-throughput assays have been developed to measure the activity of enzymes that add or remove ADP-ribosylation, leading to the development of inhibitors and new avenues for therapy. Real-time monitoring of ADP-ribosylation dynamics can be achieved using genetically encoded reporters, and next-generation detection reagents have improved the precision of immunoassays for specific forms of ADP-ribosylation. Further development and refinement of these tools will continue to advance our understanding of the functions and mechanisms of ADP-ribosylation in health and disease.

Functional Analysis of Histone ADP-Ribosylation In Vitro and in Cells

Gene regulation in the nucleus requires precise control of the molecular processes that dictate how, when, and which genes are transcribed. The posttranslational modification (PTM) of histones in chromatin is an effective means to link cellular signaling to gene expression outcomes. The repertoire of histone PTMs includes phosphorylation, acetylation, methylation, ubiquitylation, and ADP-ribosylation (ADPRylation). ADPRylation is a reversible PTM that results in the covalent transfer of ADP-ribose units derived from NAD+ to substrate proteins on glutamate, aspartate, serine, and other amino acids. Histones were the first substrate proteins identified for ADPRylation, over five decades ago. Since that time, histone ADPRylation has been shown to be a widespread and critical regulator of chromatin structure and function during transcription, DNA repair, and replication. Here, we describe a set of protocols that allow the user to investigate site-specific histone ADPRylation and its functional consequences in biochemical assays and in cells in a variety of biological systems. With the recent discovery that some cancer-causing histone mutations (i.e., oncohistone mutations) occur at functional sites of regulatory ADPRylation, these protocols may have additional utility in studies of oncology.

The synthetic lethality of targeting cell cycle checkpoints and PARPs in cancer treatment

Continuous cell division is a hallmark of cancer, and the underlying mechanism is tumor genomics instability. Cell cycle checkpoints are critical for enabling an orderly cell cycle and maintaining genome stability during cell division. Based on their distinct functions in cell cycle control, cell cycle checkpoints are classified into two groups: DNA damage checkpoints and DNA replication stress checkpoints. The DNA damage checkpoints (ATM-CHK2-p53) primarily monitor genetic errors and arrest cell cycle progression to facilitate DNA repair. Unfortunately, genes involved in DNA damage checkpoints are frequently mutated in human malignancies. In contrast, genes associated with DNA replication stress checkpoints (ATR-CHK1-WEE1) are rarely mutated in tumors, and cancer cells are highly dependent on these genes to prevent replication catastrophe and secure genome integrity. At present, poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARPi) operate through “synthetic lethality” mechanism with mutant DNA repair pathways genes in cancer cells. However, an increasing number of patients are acquiring PARP inhibitor resistance after prolonged treatment. Recent work suggests that a combination therapy of targeting cell cycle checkpoints and PARPs act synergistically to increase the number of DNA errors, compromise the DNA repair machinery, and disrupt the cell cycle, thereby increasing the death rate of cancer cells with DNA repair deficiency or PARP inhibitor resistance. We highlight a combinational strategy involving PARP inhibitors and inhibition of two major cell cycle checkpoint pathways, ATM-CHK2-TP53 and ATR-CHK1-WEE1. The biological functions, resistance mechanisms against PARP inhibitors, advances in preclinical research, and clinical trials are also reviewed.

The effect of PARP inhibitors in homologous recombination proficient ovarian cancer: meta-analysis

BRCA1/2 mutations and homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) predispose to increased sensitivity to poly(ADP-ribose)polymerase (PARP) inhibitor treatment. Our aim was to evaluate the PARP inhibitors effect on progression free survival (PFS) in a subpopulation with homologous recombination proficient status (HRD-BRCA-). A systematic literature search was performed for all studies reporting on the effect of PARP inhibitors regarding PFS in the HRD-BRCA- subpopulation, in patients with epithelial ovarian, tubal or primary peritoneal cancers (EOC). Five studies were included, enrolling a population of 3413 patients, with 1070 of them being HRD-BRCA-. PARP inhibitors were effective in the treatment of EOC, regardless of HRD and BRCA status or line of therapy. The estimated pooled effect hazard ratio (HR), assessing PFS for PARP inhibitors compared with control, was 0.76 (95% CI: 0.65-0.88, I² = 46%) in the HRD-BRCA- subpopulation. Comparing both subpopulations with HRD positive status (HRD+ BRCA+, HRD+ BRCA-) versus the HRD-BRCA-subpopulation, we have found statistically significant differences in the effect on PFS (P < 0.05 for every interaction test) favouring HRD positive subpopulations (HRD+ BRCA+, HRD+ BRCA-). In the HRD-BRCA- subpopulation of patients, PARP inhibitors used as the second- or later-line of therapy showed more pronounced effect then when given as first line treatment (P = 0.04). Treatment of EOC with PARP inhibitors showed a significant effect regarding PFS in the HRD-BRCA- subpopulation, although a much higher benefit was evident for patients with HRD+ status (HRD+ BRCA+ and HRD+ BRCA-). In the HRD- subpopulation second line PARP inhibitor treatment showed greater benefit compared to first line PARP inhibitor treatment.

Recent Progress of the research on the benzimidazole PARP-1 inhibitors

Poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase-1 (PARP-1) is a multifunctional protein that plays an important role in DNA repair and genome integrity. PARP-1 inhibitors can be used as effective drugs not only to treat BRCA-1/2 deficient cancers because of the effect of synthetically lethal, but also to treat non-BRCA1/2 deficient tumours because of the effect of PARP capture. Therefore, the PARP inhibitors have become a focus of compelling research. Among these inhibitors, substituted benzimidazole derivatives were mainly concerned lead compounds. However, the commercial available benzimidazole PARP-1 inhibitors have some shortcomings such as serious toxicity in combination with chemotherapy drugs, in vivo cardiovascular side effects such as anemia. Therefore it's crucial for scientists to explore more structure-activity relationships of the benzimidazole PARP-1 inhibitors and access safer and more effective PARP inhibitors. As the binding region of PARP-1 and the substrates is usually characterized as NI site and AD site, the modification of benzimidazoles mainly occurs on the benzimidazole skeleton (NI site), and the side chain of benzimidazole on 2-C position (AD site). Herein, the recent progresses of the researches of benzamides PARP inhibitors were introduced. We noticed that even though many efforts were taken to the modification of NI sites, there were still lacks of optimistic and impressive results. However, the structure-activity relationships of the modification of AD sites have not thoroughly discovered yet. We hope that enlightened by the previous researches, more researches of AD site should be occurred and more effective benzimidazole PARP-1 inhibitors could be designed, synthesized, and applied to clinics.

The expanding universe of PARP1-mediated molecular and therapeutic mechanisms

ADP-ribosylation (ADPRylation) is a post-translational modification of proteins catalyzed by ADP-ribosyl transferase (ART) enzymes, including nuclear PARPs (e.g., PARP1 and PARP2). Historically, studies of ADPRylation and PARPs have focused on DNA damage responses in cancers, but more recent studies elucidate diverse roles in a broader array of biological processes. Here, we summarize the expanding array of molecular mechanisms underlying the biological functions of nuclear PARPs with a focus on PARP1, the founding member of the family. This includes roles in DNA repair, chromatin regulation, gene expression, ribosome biogenesis, and RNA biology. We also present new concepts in PARP1-dependent regulation, including PAR-dependent post-translational modifications, "ADPR spray," and PAR-mediated biomolecular condensate formation. Moreover, we review advances in the therapeutic mechanisms of PARP inhibitors (PARPi) as well as the progress on the mechanisms of PARPi resistance. Collectively, the recent progress in the field has yielded new insights into the expanding universe of PARP1-mediated molecular and therapeutic mechanisms in a variety of biological processes.

Lipopolysaccharide induces pyroptosis through regulation of autophagy in cardiomyocytes

Background

Autophagy, a stress response in eukaryotic cells, is closely related to cardiogenic diseases. Pyroptosis, a newly discovered way of programmed cell death, also plays an important role in cardiovascular disease. However, the role and relationship of autophagy and pyroptosis in lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-induced inflammatory response of cardiomyocytes were still unclear.

Methods

Western blot was performed to determine the expression of poly ADP-ribosepolmesera-1 (PARP-1), LC3B, NLRP3 and GSDMD in cardiomyocytes after the treatment of LPS. Transfection of si-LC3B, western blot and immunofluorescence (IF) staining were performed to investigate the role of autophagy in LPS-induced pyroptosis. Co-immunoprecipitation (Co-IP) assays and quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR) were conducted to explore whether PARP-1 binding to LC3B and modulating its expression. Transfections of si-PARP-1, western blot and IF were carried out to confirm the role of PARP-1 in the regulation of LPS-induced pyroptosis by autophagy.

Results

LPS induces autophagy and pyroptosis in cardiomyocytes, enhanced the level of autophagy and inhibited the level of pyroptosis in the concentration of 4 µg/mL. We further proved that autophagy inhibits LPS-induced pyroptosis in cardiomyocytes. In addition, PARP-1 binding to LC3B and regulate the expression of LC3B. Finally, we proved that knockdown of PARP-1 rescued the inhibition of autophagy on LPS-induced pyroptosis of cardiomyocytes.

Conclusions

LPS induces pyroptosis through regulation of autophagy via PARP-1 at a specific concentration, above which it causes deposition of autophagy flow to promote pyroptosis. Inhibiting LPS-induced pyroptosis could be a promising therapeutic target in treating cardiovascular diseases.

PARPs in lipid metabolism and related diseases

PARPs and tankyrases (TNKS) represent a family of 17 proteins. PARPs and tankyrases were originally identified as DNA repair factors, nevertheless, recent advances have shed light on their role in lipid metabolism. To date, PARP1, PARP2, PARP3, tankyrases, PARP9, PARP10, PARP14 were reported to have multi-pronged connections to lipid metabolism. The activity of PARP enzymes is fine-tuned by a set of cholesterol-based compounds as oxidized cholesterol derivatives, steroid hormones or bile acids. In turn, PARPs modulate several key processes of lipid homeostasis (lipotoxicity, fatty acid and steroid biosynthesis, lipoprotein homeostasis, fatty acid oxidation, etc.). PARPs are also cofactors of lipid-responsive nuclear receptors and transcription factors through which PARPs regulate lipid metabolism and lipid homeostasis. PARP activation often represents a disruptive signal to (lipid) metabolism, and PARP-dependent changes to lipid metabolism have pathophysiological role in the development of hyperlipidemia, obesity, alcoholic and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease, type II diabetes and its complications, atherosclerosis, cardiovascular aging and skin pathologies, just to name a few. In this synopsis we will review the evidence supporting the beneficial effects of pharmacological PARP inhibitors in these diseases/pathologies and propose repurposing PARP inhibitors already available for the treatment of various malignancies.

Exploiting DNA Endonucleases to Advance Mechanisms of DNA Repair

The earliest methods of genome editing, such as zinc-finger nucleases (ZFN) and transcription activator-like effector nucleases (TALENs), utilize customizable DNA-binding motifs to target the genome at specific loci. While these approaches provided sequence-specific gene-editing capacity, the laborious process of designing and synthesizing recombinant nucleases to recognize a specific target sequence, combined with limited target choices and poor editing efficiency, ultimately minimized the broad utility of these systems. The discovery of clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeat sequences (CRISPR) in Escherichia coli dates to 1987, yet it was another 20 years before CRISPR and the CRISPR-associated (Cas) proteins were identified as part of the microbial adaptive immune system, by targeting phage DNA, to fight bacteriophage reinfection. By 2013, CRISPR/Cas9 systems had been engineered to allow gene editing in mammalian cells. The ease of design, low cytotoxicity, and increased efficiency have made CRISPR/Cas9 and its related systems the designer nucleases of choice for many. In this review, we discuss the various CRISPR systems and their broad utility in genome manipulation. We will explore how CRISPR-controlled modifications have advanced our understanding of the mechanisms of genome stability, using the modulation of DNA repair genes as examples.

Ubiquitin-Specific Protease 14 (USP14) Aggravates Inflammatory Response and Apoptosis of Lung Epithelial Cells in Pneumonia by Modulating Poly (ADP-Ribose) Polymerase-1 (PARP-1)

Pneumonia is one of the common respiratory diseases in pediatrics. Ubiquitin-specific protease 14 (USP14) contributes the progress of inflammation-associated diseases. Poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase-1 (PARP-1) involves in the signal transduction of inflammatory pulmonary disease. This study aims to identify the precise function and elaborate the regulatory mechanism of USP14/PARP-1 in the injury of lung epithelial cells. Human lung epithelial BEAS-2B cells received lipopolysaccharide (LPS) (0, 1, 5, and 10 mg/L) treatment for 16 h, establishing in vitro pneumonia model. USP14 protein and mRNA levels in LPS-injured lung epithelial cells were separately assessed using western blot and RT-qPCR analysis. Lung epithelial cells were transfected with siRNA-USP14 or OV-USP14 to perform gain- or loss-of-function experiments. CCK-8 assay was applied to assess cell viability. TUNEL staining and western blot analysis were adopted to determine cell apoptosis. In addition, release of inflammatory cytokines and nitric oxide (NO) was detected using the commercial kits. Meanwhile, PARP-1 protein levels in LPS-injured lung epithelial cells were detected by performing western blot assay. Moreover, Co-IP assay was utilized for detection of the interaction between USP14 and PARP-1. The regulatory effects of PARP-1 on USP14 function in LPS-injured lung epithelial cells were also investigated. LPS dose-dependently reduced viability of lung epithelial cells and elevated USP14 protein. USP14 combined with PARP-1 and increased PARP-1 expression. USP14 elevation exacerbated inflammatory injury and boosted the apoptosis of LPS-injured lung epithelial cells, which was reversed upon downregulation of PARP-1. To sum up, USP14 promotion exacerbated inflammatory injury and boosted the apoptosis of LPS-injured lung epithelial cells by upregulating PARP-1 expression. These findings may represent a therapeutic target for clinical intervention in pneumonia.

MARTs and MARylation in the Cytosol: Biological Functions, Mechanisms of Action, and Therapeutic Potential

Mono(ADP-ribosyl)ation (MARylation) is a regulatory post-translational modification of proteins that controls their functions through a variety of mechanisms. MARylation is catalyzed by mono(ADP-ribosyl) transferase (MART) enzymes, a subclass of the poly(ADP-ribosyl) polymerase (PARP) family of enzymes. Although the role of PARPs and poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation (PARylation) in cellular pathways, such as DNA repair and transcription, is well studied, the role of MARylation and MARTs (i.e., the PARP 'monoenzymes') are not well understood. Moreover, compared to PARPs, the development of MART-targeted therapeutics is in its infancy. Recent studies are beginning to shed light on the structural features, catalytic targets, and biological functions of MARTs. The development of new technologies to study MARTs have uncovered essential roles for these enzymes in the regulation of cellular processes, such as RNA metabolism, cellular transport, focal adhesion, and stress responses. These insights have increased our understanding of the biological functions of MARTs in cancers, neuronal development, and immune responses. Furthermore, several novel inhibitors of MARTs have been developed and are nearing clinical utility. In this review, we summarize the biological functions and molecular mechanisms of MARTs and MARylation, as well as recent advances in technology that have enabled detection and inhibition of their activity. We emphasize PARP-7, which is at the forefront of the MART subfamily with respect to understanding its biological roles and the development of therapeutically useful inhibitors. Collectively, the available studies reveal a growing understanding of the biochemistry, chemical biology, physiology, and pathology of MARTs.

Alternate therapeutic pathways for PARP inhibitors and potential mechanisms of resistance

Homologous recombination (HR) repair deficiency impairs the proper maintenance of genomic stability, thus rendering cancer cells vulnerable to loss or inhibition of DNA repair proteins, such as poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase-1 (PARP-1). Inhibitors of nuclear PARPs are effective therapeutics for a number of different types of cancers. Here we review key concepts and current progress on the therapeutic use of PARP inhibitors (PARPi). PARPi selectively induce synthetic lethality in cancer cells with homologous recombination deficiencies (HRDs), the most notable being cancer cells harboring mutations in the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes. Recent clinical evidence, however, shows that PARPi can be effective as cancer therapeutics regardless of BRCA1/2 or HRD status, suggesting that a broader population of patients might benefit from PARPi therapy. Currently, four PARPi have been approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the treatment of advanced ovarian and breast cancer with deleterious BRCA mutations. Although PARPi have been shown to improve progression-free survival, cancer cells inevitably develop resistance, which poses a significant obstacle to the prolonged use of PARP inhibitors. For example, somatic BRCA1/2 reversion mutations are often identified in patients with BRCA1/2-mutated cancers after treatment with platinum-based therapy, causing restoration of HR capacity and thus conferring PARPi resistance. Accordingly, PARPi have been studied in combination with other targeted therapies to overcome PARPi resistance, enhance PARPi efficacy, and sensitize tumors to PARP inhibition. Moreover, multiple clinical trials are now actively underway to evaluate novel combinations of PARPi with other anticancer therapies for the treatment of PARPi-resistant cancer. In this review, we highlight the mechanisms of action of PARP inhibitors with or without BRCA1/2 defects and provide an overview of the ongoing clinical trials of PARPi. We also review the current progress on PARPi-based combination strategies and PARP inhibitor resistance.

Mechanisms governing PARP expression, localization, and activity in cells

Poly-(ADP)-ribose polymerases (PARPs) are a family of 17 enzymes in humans that have diverse roles in cell physiology including DNA damage repair, transcription, innate immunity, and regulation of signaling pathways. The modular domain architecture of PARPs gives rise to this functional diversity. PARPs catalyze the transfer of ADP-ribose from nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NAD⁺) to targets-proteins and poly-nucleic acids. This enigmatic post-translational modification comes in two varieties: the transfer of a single unit of ADP-ribose, known as mono-ADP-ribosylation (MARylation) or the transfer of multiple units of ADP-ribose, known as poly-ADP-ribosylation (PARylation). Emerging data shows that PARPs are regulated at multiple levels to control when and where PARP-mediated M/PARylation occurs in cells. In this review, we will discuss the latest knowledge regarding the regulation of PARPs in cells: from transcription and protein stability to subcellular localization and modulation of catalytic activity.

PARP-1 Flips the Epigenetic Switch on Obesity

PARP enzymes are increasingly taking on important roles beyond DNA repair. Huang et al. (2020b) report how the NAD⁺-dependent ADP-ribosylation of histone H2B by PARP-1 in complex with a metabolic enzyme suppresses the phosphorylation of an adjacent residue, impacting adipogenesis.

Functional Interplay between Histone H2B ADP-Ribosylation and Phosphorylation Controls Adipogenesis

Although ADP-ribosylation of histones by PARP-1 has been linked to genotoxic stress responses, its role in physiological processes and gene expression has remained elusive. We found that NAD⁺-dependent ADP-ribosylation of histone H2B-Glu35 by small nucleolar RNA (snoRNA)-activated PARP-1 inhibits AMP kinase-mediated phosphorylation of adjacent H2B-Ser36, which is required for the proadipogenic gene expression program. The activity of PARP-1 on H2B requires NMNAT-1, a nuclear NAD⁺ synthase, which directs PARP-1 catalytic activity to Glu and Asp residues. ADP-ribosylation of Glu35 and the subsequent reduction of H2B-Ser36 phosphorylation inhibits the differentiation of adipocyte precursors in cultured cells. Parp1 knockout in preadipocytes in a mouse lineage-tracing genetic model increases adipogenesis, leading to obesity. Collectively, our results demonstrate a functional interplay between H2B-Glu35 ADP-ribosylation and H2B-Ser36 phosphorylation that controls adipogenesis.