1
|
Upadhyay V, Bandi S, Panja S, Saba L, Mallela KMG. Tissue-Specificity of Dystrophin-Actin Interactions: Isoform-Specific Thermodynamic Stability and Actin-Binding Function of Tandem Calponin-Homology Domains. ACS OMEGA 2020; 5:2159-2168. [PMID: 32064376 PMCID: PMC7016916 DOI: 10.1021/acsomega.9b02911] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/06/2019] [Accepted: 12/24/2019] [Indexed: 06/10/2023]
Abstract
Genetic mutations in Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) gene affecting the expression of dystrophin protein lead to a number of muscle disorders collectively called dystrophinopathies. In addition to muscle dystrophin, mutations in brain-specific dystrophin isoforms, in particular those that are expressed in the brain cortex and Purkinje neurons, result in cognitive impairment associated with DMD. These isoforms carry minor variations in the flanking region of the N-terminal actin-binding domain (ABD1) of dystrophin, which is composed of two calponin-homology (CH) domains in tandem. Determining the effect of these sequence variations is critical for understanding the mechanisms that govern varied symptoms of the disease. We studied the impact of differences in the N-terminal flanking region on the structure and function of dystrophin tandem CH domain isoforms. The amino acid changes did not affect the global structure of the protein but drastically affected the thermodynamic stability, with the muscle isoform more stable than the brain and Purkinje isoforms. Actin binding investigated with actin from different sources (skeletal muscle, smooth muscle, cardiac muscle, and platelets) revealed that the muscle isoform binds to filamentous actin (F-actin) with a lower affinity compared to the brain and Purkinje isoforms, and a similar trend was observed with actin from different sources. In addition, all isoforms showed a higher affinity to smooth muscle actin in comparison to actin from other sources. In conclusion, tandem CH domain isoforms might be using minor sequence variations in the N-terminal flanking regions to modulate their thermodynamic stability and actin-binding function, thus leading to specificity in dystrophin-actin interactions in various tissues.
Collapse
|
2
|
Fealey ME, Horn B, Coffman C, Miller R, Lin AY, Thompson AR, Schramel J, Groth E, Hinderliter A, Cembran A, Thomas DD. Dynamics of Dystrophin's Actin-Binding Domain. Biophys J 2018; 115:445-454. [PMID: 30007583 DOI: 10.1016/j.bpj.2018.05.039] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/30/2018] [Revised: 05/25/2018] [Accepted: 05/31/2018] [Indexed: 01/30/2023] Open
Abstract
We have used pulsed electron paramagnetic resonance, calorimetry, and molecular dynamics simulations to examine the structural mechanism of binding for dystrophin's N-terminal actin-binding domain (ABD1) and compare it to utrophin's ABD1. Like other members of the spectrin superfamily, dystrophin's ABD1 consists of two calponin-homology (CH) domains, CH1 and CH2. Several mutations within dystrophin's ABD1 are associated with the development of severe degenerative muscle disorders Duchenne and Becker muscular dystrophies, highlighting the importance of understanding its structural biology. To investigate structural changes within dystrophin ABD1 upon binding to actin, we labeled the protein with spin probes and measured changes in inter-CH domain distance using double-electron electron resonance. Previous studies on the homologous protein utrophin showed that actin binding induces a complete structural opening of the CH domains, resulting in a highly ordered ABD1-actin complex. In this study, double-electron electron resonance shows that dystrophin ABD1 also undergoes a conformational opening upon binding F-actin, but this change is less complete and significantly more structurally disordered than observed for utrophin. Using molecular dynamics simulations, we identified a hinge in the linker region between the two CH domains that grants conformational flexibility to ABD1. The conformational dynamics of both dystrophin's and utrophin's ABD1 showed that compact conformations driven by hydrophobic interactions are preferred and that extended conformations are energetically accessible through a flat free-energy surface. Considering that the binding free energy of ABD1 to actin is on the order of 6-7 kcal/mole, our data are compatible with a mechanism in which binding to actin is largely dictated by specific interactions with CH1, but fine tuning of the binding affinity is achieved by the overlap between conformational ensembles of ABD1 free and bound to actin.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael E Fealey
- Department of Biochemistry, Molecular Biology & Biophysics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota
| | - Benjamin Horn
- Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of Minnesota Duluth, Duluth, Minnesota
| | - Christian Coffman
- Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of Minnesota Duluth, Duluth, Minnesota
| | - Robert Miller
- Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of Minnesota Duluth, Duluth, Minnesota
| | - Ava Y Lin
- Department of Biochemistry, Molecular Biology & Biophysics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota
| | - Andrew R Thompson
- Department of Biochemistry, Molecular Biology & Biophysics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota
| | - Justine Schramel
- Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of Minnesota Duluth, Duluth, Minnesota
| | - Erin Groth
- Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of Minnesota Duluth, Duluth, Minnesota
| | - Anne Hinderliter
- Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of Minnesota Duluth, Duluth, Minnesota
| | - Alessandro Cembran
- Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of Minnesota Duluth, Duluth, Minnesota
| | - David D Thomas
- Department of Biochemistry, Molecular Biology & Biophysics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Singh SM, Bandi S, Mallela KMG. The N-Terminal Flanking Region Modulates the Actin Binding Affinity of the Utrophin Tandem Calponin-Homology Domain. Biochemistry 2017; 56:2627-2636. [PMID: 28443334 DOI: 10.1021/acs.biochem.6b01117] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/10/2023]
Abstract
Despite sharing a high degree of sequence similarity, the tandem calponin-homology (CH) domain of utrophin binds to actin 30 times stronger than that of dystrophin. We have previously shown that this difference in actin binding affinity could not be ascribed to the differences in inter-CH-domain linkers [Bandi, S., et al. (2015) Biochemistry 54, 5480-5488]. Here, we examined the role of the N-terminal flanking region. The utrophin tandem CH domain contains a 27-residue flanking region before its CH1 domain. We examined its effect by comparing the structure and function of full-length utrophin tandem CH domain Utr(1-261) and its truncated Utr(28-261) construct. Both full-length and truncated constructs are monomers in solution, with no significant differences in their secondary or tertiary structures. Truncated construct Utr(28-261) binds to actin 30 times weaker than that of the full-length Utr(1-261), similar to that of the dystrophin tandem CH domain with a much shorter flanking region. Deletion of the N-terminal flanking region stabilizes the CH1 domain. The magnitude of the change in binding free energy upon truncation is similar to that of the change in thermodynamic stability. The isolated N-terminal peptide by itself is significantly random coil and does not bind to F-actin in the affinity range of Utr(1-261) and Utr(28-261). These results indicate that the N-terminal flanking region significantly affects the actin binding affinity of tandem CH domains. This observation further stresses that protein regions other than the three actin-binding surfaces identified earlier, irrespective of whether they directly bind to actin, also contribute to the actin binding affinity of tandem CH domains.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Surinder M Singh
- Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Skaggs School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, and ‡Program in Structural Biology and Biochemistry, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus , 12850 East Montview Boulevard, MS C238, Aurora, Colorado 80045, United States
| | - Swati Bandi
- Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Skaggs School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, and ‡Program in Structural Biology and Biochemistry, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus , 12850 East Montview Boulevard, MS C238, Aurora, Colorado 80045, United States
| | - Krishna M G Mallela
- Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Skaggs School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, and ‡Program in Structural Biology and Biochemistry, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus , 12850 East Montview Boulevard, MS C238, Aurora, Colorado 80045, United States
| |
Collapse
|