Altering the Enantioselectivity of Tyrosyl-tRNA Synthetase by Insertion of a Stereospecific Editing Domain

Enzyme redesign and genetic code expansion

Enzyme design is an important application of computational protein design (CPD). It can benefit enormously from the additional chemistries provided by noncanonical amino acids (ncAAs). These can be incorporated into an 'expanded' genetic code, and introduced in vivo into target proteins. The key step for genetic code expansion is to engineer an aminoacyl-transfer RNA (tRNA) synthetase (aaRS) and an associated tRNA that handles the ncAA. Experimental directed evolution has been successfully used to engineer aaRSs and incorporate over 200 ncAAs into expanded codes. But directed evolution has severe limits, and is not yet applicable to noncanonical AA backbones. CPD can help address several of its limitations, and has begun to be applied to this problem. We review efforts to redesign aaRSs, studies that designed new proteins and functionalities with the help of ncAAs, and some of the method developments that have been used, such as adaptive landscape flattening Monte Carlo, which allows an enzyme to be redesigned with substrate or transition state binding as the design target.

Engineering aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases for use in synthetic biology

Within the broad field of synthetic biology, genetic code expansion (GCE) techniques enable creation of proteins with an expanded set of amino acids. This may be invaluable for applications in therapeutics, bioremediation, and biocatalysis. Central to GCE are aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases (aaRSs) as they link a non-canonical amino acid (ncAA) to their cognate tRNA, allowing ncAA incorporation into proteins on the ribosome. The ncAA-acylating aaRSs and their tRNAs should not cross-react with 20 natural aaRSs and tRNAs in the host, i.e., they need to function as an orthogonal translating system. All current orthogonal aaRS•tRNA pairs have been engineered from naturally occurring molecules to change the aaRS's amino acid specificity or assign the tRNA to a liberated codon of choice. Here we discuss the importance of orthogonality in GCE, laboratory techniques employed to create designer aaRSs and tRNAs, and provide an overview of orthogonal aaRS•tRNA pairs for GCE purposes.

Plasticity and Constraints of tRNA Aminoacylation Define Directed Evolution of Aminoacyl-tRNA Synthetases

Genetic incorporation of noncanonical amino acids (ncAAs) has become a powerful tool to enhance existing functions or introduce new ones into proteins through expanded chemistry. This technology relies on the process of nonsense suppression, which is made possible by directing aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases (aaRSs) to attach an ncAA onto a cognate suppressor tRNA. However, different mechanisms govern aaRS specificity toward its natural amino acid (AA) substrate and hinder the engineering of aaRSs for applications beyond the incorporation of a single l-α-AA. Directed evolution of aaRSs therefore faces two interlinked challenges: the removal of the affinity for cognate AA and improvement of ncAA acylation. Here we review aspects of AA recognition that directly influence the feasibility and success of aaRS engineering toward d- and β-AAs incorporation into proteins in vivo. Emerging directed evolution methods are described and evaluated on the basis of aaRS active site plasticity and its inherent constraints.

Mechanistic insights into the slow peptide bond formation with D-amino acids in the ribosomal active site

During protein synthesis, ribosomes discriminate chirality of amino acids and prevent incorporation of D-amino acids into nascent proteins by slowing down the rate of peptide bond formation. Despite this phenomenon being known for nearly forty years, no structures have ever been reported that would explain the poor reactivity of D-amino acids. Here we report a 3.7Å-resolution crystal structure of a bacterial ribosome in complex with a D-aminoacyl-tRNA analog bound to the A site. Although at this resolution we could not observe individual chemical groups, we could unambiguously define the positions of the D-amino acid side chain and the amino group based on chemical restraints. The structure reveals that similarly to L-amino acids, the D-amino acid binds the ribosome by inserting its side chain into the ribosomal A-site cleft. This binding mode does not allow optimal nucleophilic attack of the peptidyl-tRNA by the reactive α-amino group of a D-amino acid. Also, our structure suggests that the D-amino acid cannot participate in hydrogen-bonding with the P-site tRNA that is required for the efficient proton transfer during peptide bond formation. Overall, our work provides the first mechanistic insight into the ancient mechanism that helps living cells ensure the stereochemistry of protein synthesis.

The Dual Role of the 2'-OH Group of A76 tRNATyr in the Prevention of d-tyrosine Mistranslation

Aminoacyl-tRNA-synthetases are crucial enzymes for initiation step of translation. Possessing editing activity, they protect living cells from misincorporation of non-cognate and non-proteinogenic amino acids into proteins. Tyrosyl-tRNA synthetase (TyrRS) does not have such editing properties, but it shares weak stereospecificity in recognition of d-/l-tyrosine (Tyr). Nevertheless, an additional enzyme, d-aminoacyl-tRNA-deacylase (DTD), exists to overcome these deficiencies. The precise catalytic role of hydroxyl groups of the tRNA^Tyr A76 in the catalysis by TyrRS and DTD remained unknown. To address this issue, [³²P]-labeled tRNA^Tyr substrates have been tested in aminoacylation and deacylation assays. TyrRS demonstrates similar activity in charging the 2' and 3'-OH groups of A76 with l-Tyr. This synthetase can effectively use both OH groups as primary sites for aminoacylation with l-Tyr, but demonstrates severe preference toward 2'-OH, in charging with d-Tyr. In both cases, the catalysis is not substrate-assisted: neither the 2'-OH nor the 3'-OH group assists catalysis. In contrast, DTD catalyzes deacylation of d-Tyr-tRNA^Tyr specifically from the 3'-OH group, while the 2'-OH assists in this hydrolysis.

The central role of tRNA in genetic code expansion

BACKGROUND

The development of orthogonal translation systems (OTSs) for genetic code expansion (GCE) has allowed for the incorporation of a diverse array of non-canonical amino acids (ncAA) into proteins. Transfer RNA, the central molecule in the translation of the genetic message into proteins, plays a significant role in the efficiency of ncAA incorporation.

SCOPE OF REVIEW

Here we review the biochemical basis of OTSs for genetic code expansion. We focus on the role of tRNA and discuss strategies used to engineer tRNA for the improvement of ncAA incorporation into proteins.

MAJOR CONCLUSIONS

The engineering of orthogonal tRNAs for GCE has significantly improved the incorporation of ncAAs. However, there are numerous unintended consequences of orthogonal tRNA engineering that cannot be predicted ab initio.

GENERAL SIGNIFICANCE

Genetic code expansion has allowed for the incorporation of a great diversity of ncAAs and novel chemistries into proteins, making significant contributions to our understanding of biological molecules and interactions. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled "Biochemistry of Synthetic Biology - Recent Developments" Guest Editor: Dr. Ilka Heinemann and Dr. Patrick O'Donoghue.

Probing the stereospecificity of tyrosyl- and glutaminyl-tRNA synthetase with molecular dynamics

The stereospecificity of aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases helps exclude d-amino acids from protein synthesis and could perhaps be engineered to allow controlled d-amino acylation of tRNA. We use molecular dynamics simulations to probe the stereospecificity of the class I tyrosyl- and glutaminyl-tRNA synthetases (TyrRS, GlnRS), including wildtype enzymes and three point mutants suggested by three different protein design methods. l/d binding free energy differences are obtained by alchemically and reversibly transforming the ligand from L to D in simulations of the protein-ligand complex. The D81Q mutation in Escherichia coli TyrRS is homologous to the D81R mutant shown earlier to have inverted stereospecificity. D81Q is predicted to lead to a rotated ligand backbone and an increased, not a decreased l-Tyr preference. The E36Q mutation in Methanococcus jannaschii TyrRS has a predicted l/d binding free energy difference ΔΔG of just 0.5±0.9kcal/mol, compared to 3.1±0.8kcal/mol for the wildtype enzyme (favoring l-Tyr). The ligand ammonium position is preserved in the d-Tyr complex, while the carboxylate is shifted. Wildtype GlnRS has a similar preference for l-glutaminyl adenylate; the R260Q mutant has an increased preference, even though Arg260 makes a large contribution to the wildtype ΔΔG value.

Spectrophotometric assays for monitoring tRNA aminoacylation and aminoacyl-tRNA hydrolysis reactions

Aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases play a central role in protein synthesis, catalyzing the attachment of amino acids to their cognate tRNAs. Here, we describe a spectrophotometric assay for tyrosyl-tRNA synthetase in which the Tyr-tRNA product is cleaved, regenerating the tRNA substrate. As tRNA is the limiting substrate in the assay, recycling it substantially increases the sensitivity of the assay while simultaneously reducing its cost. The tRNA aminoacylation reaction is monitored spectrophotometrically by coupling the production of AMP to the conversion of NAD⁺ to NADH. We have adapted the tyrosyl-tRNA synthetase assay to monitor: (1) aminoacylation of tRNA by l- or d-tyrosine, (2) cyclodipeptide formation by cyclodipeptide synthases, (3) hydrolysis of d-aminoacyl-tRNAs by d-tyrosyl-tRNA deacylase, and (4) post-transfer editing by aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases. All of these assays are continuous and homogenous, making them amenable for use in high-throughput screens of chemical libraries. In the case of the cyclodipeptide synthase, d-tyrosyl-tRNA deacylase, and post-transfer editing assays, the aminoacyl-tRNAs are generated in situ, avoiding the need to synthesize and purify aminoacyl-tRNA substrates prior to performing the assays. Lastly, we describe how the tyrosyl-tRNA synthetase assay can be adapted to monitor the activity of other aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases and how the approach to regenerating the tRNA substrate can be used to increase the sensitivity and decrease the cost of commercially available aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase assays.