Most Influential Physicochemical and In Vitro Assay Descriptors for Hepatotoxicity and Nephrotoxicity Prediction

Nonclinical Safety Signals in PharmaPendium Improve the Predictability of Human Drug-Induced Liver Injury

Drug-induced liver injury (DILI) is a leading cause of candidate attrition during drug development in the pharmaceutical industry. This study evaluated liver toxicity signals for 249 approved drugs (114 of "most-DILI concern" and 135 of "no-DILI concern") using PharmaPendium and assessed the association between nonclinical and clinical injuries using contingency table analysis. All animal liver findings were combined into eight toxicity categories based on nature and severity. Together, these analyses revealed that cholestasis [odds ratio (OR): 5.02; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.04-24.03] or liver aminotransferase increases (OR: 1.86; 95% CI 1.09-3.09) in rats and steatosis (OR-1.9; 95% CI 1.03-3.49) or liver aminotransferase increases (OR-2.57; 95% CI 1.4-4.7) in dogs were significant predictors of human liver injury. The predictive value further improved when the liver injury categories were combined into less severe (steatosis, cholestasis, liver aminotransferase increase, hyperbilirubinemia, or jaundice) and more-severe (liver necrosis, acute liver failure, or hepatotoxicity) injuries. In particular, less-severe liver injuries in the following pairs of species predicted human hepatotoxicity {[dog and mouse] (OR: 2.70; 95% CI 1.25-5.84), [dog and rat] (OR-2.61; 95% CI 1.48-4.59), [monkey and mouse] (OR-4.22; 95% CI 1.33-13.32), and [monkey and rat] (OR-2.45; 95% CI 1.15-5.21)} were predictive of human hepatotoxicity. Meanwhile, severe liver injuries in both [dog and rat] (OR-1.9; 95% CI 1.04-3.49) were significant predictors of human liver toxicity. Therefore, we concluded that the occurrence of DILI in humans is highly likely if liver injuries are observed in one rodent and one nonrodent species and that liver aminotransferase increases in dogs and rats can predict DILI in humans. Together, these findings indicate that the liver safety signals observed in animal toxicity studies indicate potential DILI risk in humans and could therefore be used to prioritize small molecules with less potential to cause DILI in humans.

Latest impact of engineered human liver platforms on drug development

Drug-induced liver injury (DILI) is a leading cause of drug attrition, which is partly due to differences between preclinical animals and humans in metabolic pathways. Therefore, in vitro human liver models are utilized in biopharmaceutical practice to mitigate DILI risk and assess related mechanisms of drug transport and metabolism. However, liver cells lose phenotypic functions within 1–3 days in two-dimensional monocultures on collagen-coated polystyrene/glass, which precludes their use to model the chronic effects of drugs and disease stimuli. To mitigate such a limitation, bioengineers have adapted tools from the semiconductor industry and additive manufacturing to precisely control the microenvironment of liver cells. Such tools have led to the fabrication of advanced two-dimensional and three-dimensional human liver platforms for different throughput needs and assay endpoints (e.g., micropatterned cocultures, spheroids, organoids, bioprinted tissues, and microfluidic devices); such platforms have significantly enhanced liver functions closer to physiologic levels and improved functional lifetime to >4 weeks, which has translated to higher sensitivity for predicting drug outcomes and enabling modeling of diseased phenotypes for novel drug discovery. Here, we focus on commercialized engineered liver platforms and case studies from the biopharmaceutical industry showcasing their impact on drug development. We also discuss emerging multi-organ microfluidic devices containing a liver compartment that allow modeling of inter-tissue crosstalk following drug exposure. Finally, we end with key requirements for engineered liver platforms to become routine fixtures in the biopharmaceutical industry toward reducing animal usage and providing patients with safe and efficacious drugs with unprecedented speed and reduced cost.

Why All the Fuss about Oxidative Phosphorylation (OXPHOS)?

Certain subtypes of cancer cells require oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS) to survive. Increased OXPHOS dependency is frequently a hallmark of cancer stem cells and cells resistant to chemotherapy and targeted therapies. Suppressing the OXPHOS function might also influence the tumor microenvironment by alleviating hypoxia and improving the antitumor immune response. Thus, targeting OXPHOS is a promising strategy to treat various cancers. A growing arsenal of therapeutic agents is under development to inhibit this biological process. This Perspective provides an overview of the structure and function of OXPHOS complexes, their biological functions in cancer, relevant research tools and models, as well as the limitations of OXPHOS as drug targets. We also focus on the current development status of OXPHOS inhibitors and potential therapeutic strategies to strengthen their clinical applications.