1
|
Pallardy M, Bechara R, Whritenour J, Mitchell-Ryan S, Herzyk D, Lebrec H, Merk H, Gourley I, Komocsar WJ, Piccotti JR, Balazs M, Sharma A, Walker DB, Weinstock D. Drug hypersensitivity reactions: review of the state of the science for prediction and diagnosis. Toxicol Sci 2024; 200:11-30. [PMID: 38588579 PMCID: PMC11199923 DOI: 10.1093/toxsci/kfae046] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/10/2024] Open
Abstract
Drug hypersensitivity reactions (DHRs) are a type of adverse drug reaction that can occur with different classes of drugs and affect multiple organ systems and patient populations. DHRs can be classified as allergic or non-allergic based on the cellular mechanisms involved. Whereas nonallergic reactions rely mainly on the innate immune system, allergic reactions involve the generation of an adaptive immune response. Consequently, drug allergies are DHRs for which an immunological mechanism, with antibody and/or T cell, is demonstrated. Despite decades of research, methods to predict the potential for a new chemical entity to cause DHRs or to correctly attribute DHRs to a specific mechanism and a specific molecule are not well-established. This review will focus on allergic reactions induced by systemically administered low-molecular weight drugs with an emphasis on drug- and patient-specific factors that could influence the development of DHRs. Strategies for predicting and diagnosing DHRs, including potential tools based on the current state of the science, will also be discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marc Pallardy
- Université Paris-Saclay, INSERM, Inflammation Microbiome Immunosurveillance, Orsay, 91400, France
| | - Rami Bechara
- Université Paris-Saclay, INSERM, CEA, Center for Research in Immunology of Viral, Autoimmune, Hematological and Bacterial Diseases (IMVA-HB), Le Kremlin Bicêtre, 94270, France
| | - Jessica Whritenour
- Pfizer Worldwide Research, Development and Medical, Groton, Connecticut 06340, USA
| | - Shermaine Mitchell-Ryan
- The Health and Environmental Science Institute, Immunosafety Technical Committee, Washington, District of Columbia 20005, USA
| | - Danuta Herzyk
- Merck & Co., Inc, West Point, Pennsylvania 19486, USA
| | - Herve Lebrec
- Amgen Inc., Translational Safety and Bioanalytical Sciences, South San Francisco, California 94080, USA
| | - Hans Merk
- Department of Dermatology and Allergology, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, 52062, Germany
| | - Ian Gourley
- Janssen Research & Development, LLC, Immunology Clinical Development, Spring House, Pennsylvania 19002, USA
| | - Wendy J Komocsar
- Immunology Business Unit, Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, Indiana 46225, USA
| | | | - Mercedesz Balazs
- Genentech, Biochemical and Cellular Pharmacology, South San Francisco, California 94080, USA
| | - Amy Sharma
- Pfizer, Drug Safety Research & Development, New York 10017, USA
| | - Dana B Walker
- Novartis Institute for Biomedical Research, Preclinical Safety-Translational Immunology and Clinical Pathology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139, USA
| | - Daniel Weinstock
- Janssen Research & Development, LLC, Preclinical Sciences Translational Safety, Spring House, Pennsylvania 19002, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Aleksic M, Rajagopal R, de-Ávila R, Spriggs S, Gilmour N. The skin sensitization adverse outcome pathway: exploring the role of mechanistic understanding for higher tier risk assessment. Crit Rev Toxicol 2024; 54:69-91. [PMID: 38385441 DOI: 10.1080/10408444.2024.2308816] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2023] [Accepted: 12/19/2023] [Indexed: 02/23/2024]
Abstract
For over a decade, the skin sensitization Adverse Outcome Pathway (AOP) has served as a useful framework for development of novel in chemico and in vitro assays for use in skin sensitization hazard and risk assessment. Since its establishment, the AOP framework further fueled the existing efforts in new assay development and stimulated a plethora of activities with particular focus on validation, reproducibility and interpretation of individual assays and combination of assay outputs for use in hazard/risk assessment. In parallel, research efforts have also accelerated in pace, providing new molecular and dynamic insight into key events leading to sensitization. In light of novel hypotheses emerging from over a decade of focused research effort, mechanistic evidence relating to the key events in the skin sensitization AOP may complement the tools currently used in risk assessment. We reviewed the recent advances unraveling the complexity of molecular events in sensitization and signpost the most promising avenues for further exploration and development of useful assays.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maja Aleksic
- Safety and Environmental Assurance Centre, Unilever, Sharnbrook, UK
| | - Ramya Rajagopal
- Safety and Environmental Assurance Centre, Unilever, Sharnbrook, UK
| | - Renato de-Ávila
- Safety and Environmental Assurance Centre, Unilever, Sharnbrook, UK
| | - Sandrine Spriggs
- Safety and Environmental Assurance Centre, Unilever, Sharnbrook, UK
| | - Nicola Gilmour
- Safety and Environmental Assurance Centre, Unilever, Sharnbrook, UK
| |
Collapse
|