Matrix Effect of Human Reconstructed Epidermis on the Chemoselectivity of a Skin Sensitizing α-Methylene-γ-Butyrolactone: Consequences for the Development of in Chemico Alternative Methods

Protein Haptenation and Its Role in Allergy

Humans are exposed to numerous electrophilic chemicals either as medicines, in the workplace, in nature, or through use of many common cosmetic and household products. Covalent modification of human proteins by such chemicals, or protein haptenation, is a common occurrence in cells and may result in generation of antigenic species, leading to development of hypersensitivity reactions. Ranging in severity of symptoms from local cutaneous reactions and rhinitis to potentially life-threatening anaphylaxis and severe hypersensitivity reactions such as Stephen-Johnson syndrome (SJS) and toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN), all these reactions have the same Molecular Initiating Event (MIE), i.e. haptenation. However, not all individuals who are exposed to electrophilic chemicals develop symptoms of hypersensitivity. In the present review, we examine common chemistry behind the haptenation reactions leading to formation of neoantigens. We explore simple reactions involving single molecule additions to a nucleophilic side chain of proteins and complex reactions involving multiple electrophilic centers on a single molecule or involving more than one electrophilic molecule as well as the generation of reactive molecules from the interaction with cellular detoxification mechanisms. Besides generation of antigenic species and enabling activation of the immune system, we explore additional events which result directly from the presence of electrophilic chemicals in cells, including activation of key defense mechanisms and immediate consequences of those reactions, and explore their potential effects. We discuss the factors that work in concert with haptenation leading to the development of hypersensitivity reactions and those that may act to prevent it from developing. We also review the potential harnessing of the specificity of haptenation in the design of potent covalent therapeutic inhibitors.

The skin sensitization adverse outcome pathway: exploring the role of mechanistic understanding for higher tier risk assessment

For over a decade, the skin sensitization Adverse Outcome Pathway (AOP) has served as a useful framework for development of novel in chemico and in vitro assays for use in skin sensitization hazard and risk assessment. Since its establishment, the AOP framework further fueled the existing efforts in new assay development and stimulated a plethora of activities with particular focus on validation, reproducibility and interpretation of individual assays and combination of assay outputs for use in hazard/risk assessment. In parallel, research efforts have also accelerated in pace, providing new molecular and dynamic insight into key events leading to sensitization. In light of novel hypotheses emerging from over a decade of focused research effort, mechanistic evidence relating to the key events in the skin sensitization AOP may complement the tools currently used in risk assessment. We reviewed the recent advances unraveling the complexity of molecular events in sensitization and signpost the most promising avenues for further exploration and development of useful assays.

Amino Chemoassay Profiling of Aromatic Aldehydes-Unraveling Drivers of Their Skin Sensitization Potency

Aromatic aldehydes are ubiquitous in humans' everyday life. As aldehydes, they can form imines (Schiff bases) with amino groups of skin proteins, leading to immune response-triggered allergic contact dermatitis. Many known aromatic aldehydes are considered as weak or nonsensitizers, but others like atranol and chloratranol, two components of the fragrance oak moss absolute, show strong sensitization potency. This large discrepancy in potency and, in particular, the underlying reaction mechanisms are only little understood so far. To reduce this knowledge gap, our chemoassay employing glycine-para-nitroanilide (Gly-pNA) as an amino model nucleophile was applied to 23 aromatic aldehydes. The determined Gly-pNA second-order rate constants for imine formation (k₁ ≤ 2.85 L·mol^-1·min^-1) and the imine stability constant (K ≤ 333 L·mol^-1) are on the lower end of the known amino reactivity scale for aldehydes, confirming many aromatic aldehydes as less potent sensitizers in line with animal and human data. The substantially higher sensitization potency of atranol and chloratranol, in turn, is reflected by their unique reaction chemistry profiles, inter alia, identifying them as cross-linkers able to form thermodynamically more stable epitopes with skin proteins (despite low formation kinetics, k₁). The discussion further includes a comparison of experimentally determined k₁ values with computed reactivity data (Taft σ*), the impact of the substitution pattern of the aryl ring on the reactivity with Gly-pNA, and analytically determined adduct patterns. Overall, this work provides new insights into the reaction of aromatic aldehydes with amino groups under aqueous conditions and fosters a better understanding of the chemistry underlying skin sensitization.

Synthesis and In Situ Behavior of 1,4- and 2,5-(13C) Isotopomers of p-Phenylenediamine in Reconstructed Human Epidermis Using High Resolution Magic Angle Spinning NMR

p-Phenylenediamine (PPD) has been classified as a strong skin allergen, but when it comes to toxicological concerns, benzoquinone diamine (BQDI), the primary oxidation derivative of PPD, is frequently considered and was shown to covalently bind nucleophilic residues on model peptides. However, tests in solution are far from providing a reliable model, as the cutaneous metabolism of PPD is not covered. We now report the synthesis of two ¹³C substituted isotopomers of PPD, 1,4-(¹³C)p-phenylenediamine 1 and 2,5-(¹³C)p-phenylenediamine 2, and the investigation of their reactivity in reconstructed human epidermis (RHE) using the high resolution magic angle spinning (HRMAS) NMR technique. RHE samples were first treated with 1 or 2 and incubated for 1 to 48 h. Compared to the control, spectra clearly showed only the signals of 1 or 2 gradually decreasing with time to disappear after 48 h of incubation. However, the culture media of RHE incubated with 1 for 1 and 24 h, respectively, showed the presence of both monoacetylated- and diacetylated-PPD as major products. Therefore, the acetylation reaction catalyzed by N-acetyltransferase (NAT) enzymes appeared to be the main process taking place in RHE. With the aim of increasing the reactivity by oxidation, 1 and 2 were treated with 0.5 equiv of H₂O₂ prior to their application to RHE and incubated for different times. Under these conditions, new peaks having close chemical shifts to those of PPD-cysteine adducts previously observed in solution were detected. Under such oxidative conditions, we were thus able to detect and quantify cysteine adducts in RHE (maximum of 0.2 nmol/mg of RHE at 8 h of incubation) while no reaction with other nucleophilic amino acid residues could be observed.

Chemical Modifications Induced by Phthalic Anhydride, a Respiratory Sensitizer, in Reconstructed Human Epidermis: A Combined HRMAS NMR and LC-MS/MS Proteomic Approach

Chemical skin and respiratory allergies are becoming a major health problem. To date our knowledge on the process of protein haptenation is still limited and mainly derived from studies performed in solution using model nucleophiles. In order to better understand chemical interactions between chemical allergens and the skin, we have investigated the reactivity of phthalic anhydride 1 (PA), a chemical respiratory sensitizer, toward reconstructed human epidermis (RHE). This study was performed using a new approach combining HRMAS NMR to investigate the in situ chemical reactivity and LC-MS/MS to identify modified epidermal proteins. In RHE, the reaction of PA appeared to be quite fast and the major product formed was phthalic acid. Two amide type adducts on lysine residues were observed and after 8h of incubation, we also observed the formation of an imide type cyclized adducts with lysine. In parallel, RHE samples topically exposed to phthalic anhydride (¹³C)-1 were analyzed using the shotgun proteomics method. Thus, 948 different proteins were extracted and identified, 135 of which being modified by PA, i.e., 14.2% of the extracted proteome. A total of 211 amino acids were modified by PA and validated by fragmentation spectra. We thus identified 154 modified lysines, 22 modified histidines, 30 modified tyrosines, and 5 modified arginines. The rate of modified residues, as a proportion of the total number of modifiable nucleophilic residues in RHE, was rather low (1%). At the protein level, modified proteins were mainly type I and type II keratins and other proteins which are abundant in the epidermis such as protein S100A, Caspase 14, annexin A2, serpin B3, fatty-acid binding protein 5, histone H2, H3, H4, etc. However, the most modified protein, mainly on histidine residues, was filaggrin, a protein that is of low abundance (0.0266 mol %) and rich in histidine.

In Situ Alkylation of Reconstructed Human Epidermis by Methyl Methanesulfonate: A Quantitative HRMAS NMR Chemical Reactivity Mapping

Allergic contact dermatitis (ACD) is a reaction of the immune system resulting from skin sensitization to an exogenous hazardous chemical and leading to the activation of antigen-specific T-lymphocytes. The adverse outcome pathway (AOP) for skin sensitization identified four key events (KEs) associated with the mechanisms of this pathology, the first one being the ability of skin chemical sensitizers to modify epidermal proteins to form antigenic structures that will further trigger the immune system. So far, these interactions have been studied in solution using model nucleophiles such as amino acids or peptides. As a part of our efforts to better understand chemistry taking place during the sensitization process, we have developed a method based on the use of high-resolution magic angle spinning (HRMAS) NMR to monitor in situ the reactions of ¹³C substituted chemical sensitizers with nucleophilic amino acids of epidermal proteins in reconstructed human epidermis. A quantitative approach, developed so far for liquid NMR applications, has not been developed to our knowledge in a context of a semisolid nonanisotropic environment like the epidermis. We now report a quantitative chemical reactivity mapping of methyl methanesulfonate (MMS), a sensitizing methylating agent, in reconstructed human epidermis by quantitative HRMAS (qHRMAS) NMR. First, the haptenation process appeared to be much faster in RHE than in solution with a maximum concentration of adducts reached between 4 and 8 h. Second, it was observed that the concentration of cysteine adducts did not significantly increase with the dose (2.07 nmol/mg at 0.4 M and 2.14 nmol/mg at 1 M) nor with the incubation time (maximum of 2.27 nmol/mg at 4 h) compared to other nucleophiles, indicating a fast reaction and a potential saturation of targets. Third, when increasing the exposure dose, we observed an increase of adducts up to 12.5 nmol/mg of RHE, excluding cysteine adducts, for 3112 μg/cm² (1 M solution) of (¹³C)MMS. This methodology applied to other skin sensitizers could allow for better understanding of the potential links between the amount of chemical modifications formed in the epidermis in relation to exposure and the sensitization potency.

The underlying factors that explain why nucleophilic reagents rarely co-elute with test chemicals in the ADRA

The Amino acid Derivative Reactivity Assay (ADRA) is an in chemico alternative to animal testing for skin sensitization potential that uses two different nucleophilic reagents and it is known that ADRA hardly exhibts co-elution compared with the Direct Peptide Reactivity Assay (DPRA) based on the same scientific principles. In this study, we have analyzed the factors underlying why co-elution, which is sometimes an issue during DPRA testing, virtually never occurs during ADRA testing. Chloramine T and dimethyl isophthalate both exhibited co-elution during DPRA testing, but when quantified at both DPRA's 220 nm and ADRA's 281 nm, we found that when the later detection wavelength was used, these test chemicals produced extremely small peaks that did not interfere with quantification of the peptides. And although both salicylic acid and penicillin G exhibited co-elution during DPRA testing, when tested at a concentration just 1% of that used in DPRA, the very broad peak produced at the higher concentration was reduced significantly. However, both these test chemicals exhibited very sharp peaks when the pH of the injection sample was adjusted to be acidic. Based on these results, we were able to clarify that the reasons why nucleophlic reagents hardly co-elute with test chemicals during ADRA testing are depend on the following three major reasons: (1)differences in the detection wavelength, (2)differences in test chemical concentrations in the injection sample, (3)differences in composition of the injection solvent.

In Situ Metabolism of Cinnamyl Alcohol in Reconstructed Human Epidermis: New Insights into the Activation of This Fragrance Skin Sensitizer

Chemical modification of epidermal proteins by skin sensitizers is the molecular event which initiates the induction of contact allergy. However, not all chemical skin allergens react directly as haptens with epidermal proteins but need either a chemical (prehaptens) or metabolic (prohaptens) activation step to become reactive. Cinnamyl alcohol has been considered a model prohapten, as this skin sensitizer has no intrinsic reactivity. Therefore, the prevailing theory is that cinnamyl alcohol is enzymatically oxidized into the protein-reactive cinnamaldehyde, which is the sensitizing agent. Knowing that reconstructed human epidermis (RHE) models have been demonstrated to be quite similar to the normal human epidermis in terms of metabolic enzymes, use of RHE may be useful to investigate the in situ metabolism/activation of cinnamyl alcohol, particularly when coupled with high-resolution magic angle spinning nuclear magnetic resonance. Incubation of carbon-13 substituted cinnamyl derivatives with RHE did not result in the formation of cinnamaldehyde. The metabolites formed suggest the formation of an epoxy-alcohol and an allylic sulfate as potential electrophiles. These data suggest that cinnamyl alcohol is inducing skin sensitization through a route independent of the one involving cinnamaldehyde and should therefore be considered as a skin sensitizer on its own.