Assessment of Antipiperacillin IgG Binding to Structurally Related Drug Protein Adducts

Protein Haptenation and Its Role in Allergy

Humans are exposed to numerous electrophilic chemicals either as medicines, in the workplace, in nature, or through use of many common cosmetic and household products. Covalent modification of human proteins by such chemicals, or protein haptenation, is a common occurrence in cells and may result in generation of antigenic species, leading to development of hypersensitivity reactions. Ranging in severity of symptoms from local cutaneous reactions and rhinitis to potentially life-threatening anaphylaxis and severe hypersensitivity reactions such as Stephen-Johnson syndrome (SJS) and toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN), all these reactions have the same Molecular Initiating Event (MIE), i.e. haptenation. However, not all individuals who are exposed to electrophilic chemicals develop symptoms of hypersensitivity. In the present review, we examine common chemistry behind the haptenation reactions leading to formation of neoantigens. We explore simple reactions involving single molecule additions to a nucleophilic side chain of proteins and complex reactions involving multiple electrophilic centers on a single molecule or involving more than one electrophilic molecule as well as the generation of reactive molecules from the interaction with cellular detoxification mechanisms. Besides generation of antigenic species and enabling activation of the immune system, we explore additional events which result directly from the presence of electrophilic chemicals in cells, including activation of key defense mechanisms and immediate consequences of those reactions, and explore their potential effects. We discuss the factors that work in concert with haptenation leading to the development of hypersensitivity reactions and those that may act to prevent it from developing. We also review the potential harnessing of the specificity of haptenation in the design of potent covalent therapeutic inhibitors.

Lymphocyte transformation tests predict delayed-type allergy to piperacillin/tazobactam in patients with cystic fibrosis

BACKGROUND

Antibiotic treatment is crucial for patients with chronic bacterial infections. Suspected drug allergies often lead to inconsistent therapies and challenging clinical management for patients and caregivers. The objective of this study was to evaluate the value of lymphocyte transformation tests in comparison to skin tests for the prediction of delayed-type allergic reactions.

METHODS

This prospective, observational study tested the diagnostic value of skin prick tests, intradermal tests (reading: 15 min and 72 h) and lymphocyte transformations tests for the prediction of allergic reactions in CF patients with physician reported allergy to piperacillin/tazobactam, meropenem and ceftazidime. The tests were performed directly before a 14d intravenous drug challenge.

RESULTS

We performed 33 drug challenges in 29 subjects. 21 drug challenges were negative (63 %); 12 lead to a reaction (37 %), of those 2 were immediate and 10 were delayed-type. 100 % of the skin prick tests were negative. 97 % (33/34) of the intradermal tests with early reading and 100 % of the intradermal tests with late reading yielded negative results. 5/11 patients who experienced a delayed-type reaction during the drug challenge had a positive lymphocyte transformations test. All 17 patients who did not react had a negative lymphocyte transformations test. For piperacillin/tazobactam, 4/5 patients who experienced a delayed-type reaction during the drug challenge had positive lymphocyte transformations tests. Hence, for piperacillin/tazobactam, the sensitivity of the lymphocyte transformation test for prediction of reactions was 80.0 % and the specificity 100 %.

CONCLUSION

We demonstrate that the lymphocyte transformation test predicts delayed-type allergy to piperacillin/tazobactam in contrast to skin tests.

Piperacillin-Tazobactam Hypersensitivity: A Large, Multicenter Analysis

BACKGROUND

Piperacillin/tazobactam is a broad-spectrum penicillin. Hypersensitivity reactions are less commonly reported than with other penicillins except in patients with cystic fibrosis.

OBJECTIVE

Detailed clinical characterization of a patient cohort referred with suspected piperacillin-tazobactam hypersensitivity.

METHODS

Retrospective analysis of the demographic characteristics, clinical presentation, investigation, and management of 87 patients presenting to 5 European allergy centers. Patients underwent skin prick and intradermal testing with piperacillin/tazobactam, major (penicilloyl-polylysine) and minor (sodium penilloate) determinants, amoxicillin, benzylpenicillin, flucloxacillin, co-amoxiclav, clavulanic acid, and meropenem with immediate and, where appropriate, delayed reading of tests. Skin test-negative patients underwent drug provocation to piperacillin/tazobactam and/or other penicillins. A multistep protocol was used, depending on risk assessment.

RESULTS

Forty-eight of 87 (55%) patients were diagnosed with hypersensitivity to piperacillin/tazobactam with either positive skin or drug provocation test results, of whom 10 (21%) had a diagnosis of cystic fibrosis. Twenty-six (54%) patients presented with immediate and 22 (45%) with nonimmediate hypersensitivity. Patients with cystic fibrosis predominantly presented with nonimmediate hypersensitivity (70%). Reactions were severe in 52% of immediate reactors (Brown's anaphylaxis grade 3) and moderately severe (systemic involvement) in 75% of nonimmediate reactors. The number of patients with negative skin test results tolerating reintroduction was comparable in immediate (80%) and nonimmediate (88%) hypersensitivity. One-third of patients were cross-sensitized to other penicillins. The cross-sensitization pattern raised the possibility of tazobactam allergy in 3 patients. In 21 patients selectively sensitized to piperacillin/tazobactam (12 immediate, 9 nonimmediate), tolerance to other beta-lactams was demonstrated by drug provocation testing.

CONCLUSIONS

Piperacillin-tazobactam caused immediate and nonimmediate hypersensitivity with similar frequency. Most patients were selectively sensitized and tolerated other penicillins. Some patients may be allergic to the beta-lactamase inhibitor only.

Risk of piperacillin-induced hemolytic anemia in patients with cystic fibrosis and antipseudomonal treatment: a prospective observational study

BACKGROUND

Drug-induced immune hemolytic anemia (DIIHA) is a rare but severe side effect caused by numerous drugs. Case reports and case series suggest that piperacillin-related DIIHA may be more common among patients with cystic fibrosis (CF). However, the prevalence is speculative. The aim of this prospective, observational study was determine the prevalence of DIIHA in such affected patients.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Patients with CF hospitalized for parenteral antibiotic therapy at Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, who had previously been exposed to IV antibiotics, were enrolled. Blood samples were collected on Days 3 and 12 of antibiotic treatment courses. Serological studies were performed using standard techniques with gel cards. Screening for drug-dependent antibodies (ddab) was performed in the presence of the drugs and their urinary metabolites.

RESULTS

A total of 52 parenteral antibiotic cycles in 43 patients were investigated. Ddab against piperacillin were detected in two patients (4.7%). The direct AHG was positive with anti-IgG only in both patients. However only one of these patients developed mild immune hemolytic anemia. Both patients had been repeatedly treated with piperacillin without any evident hemolysis. There was no correlation between the exposure to piperacillin and the prevalence of ddab.

CONCLUSION

Our prospective study indicates that piperacillin-induced ddab occur more frequently in patients with CF than previously suggested. The question related to the significance of piperacillin-dependent antibodies may reflect new aspects in this field.

The anti-penicillin antibodies levels in sensitive and insensitive people to intradermal skin test

BACKGROUND

The hypersensitivity reaction to penicillin is a public health problem. Immunological responses to penicillin and other beta-lactam antibiotics can be classified into immediate and non-immediate responses. The immediate hypersensitivity is mediated by IgE; however, the non-immediate sensitivity is facilitated by other isotypes of antibody or T lymphocytes.

OBJECTIVE

This research detected the non-IgE antibody value against penicillin in allergic and normal people.

METHODS

Thirty-eight samples from patients with positive or negative intradermal skin testing results of penicillin allergy were included in this study. The total antibody and IgM levels against penicillin G were defined by in-house ELISA test.

RESULTS

The results showed a significant (P< 0.05) elevation in total immunoglobulin and non-IgM anti-penicillin antibody of sensitive groups; however, the anti-penicillin IgM was significantly greater in non-sensitive peoples.

CONCLUSIONS

Although the sensitized people to penicillin cannot be certainly detected with the total antibody, specific IgG and IgM value against penicillin, these values are good indicators for prediction of immediate and late response of the immune system to penicillin.