Small-Grain Cover Crops Have Limited Effect on Neonicotinoid Contamination from Seed Coatings

Evaluating neonicotinoid insecticide uptake by plants used as buffers and cover crops

Runoff and drainage from fields planted with neonicotinoid-coated seeds often contain insecticides that adversely affect aquatic life and other non-target organisms. Management practices such as in-field cover cropping and edge-of-field buffer strips may reduce insecticide mobility, making it important to understand the ability of different plants used in these interventions to absorb neonicotinoids. In this greenhouse study we evaluated uptake of thiamethoxam, a commonly used neonicotinoid, in six plant species - crimson clover, fescue, oxeye sunflower, Maximillian sunflower, common milkweed, and butterfly milkweed - along with a native forb mixture and a native grass plus native forb mixture. All plants were irrigated with water containing 100 or 500 μg/L of thiamethoxam for 60 days, then plant tissues and soils were analyzed for thiamethoxam and its metabolite clothianidin. Crimson clover accumulated up to 50% of the applied thiamethoxam, which was significantly more than other plants and indicates this species may be a hyper-accumulator that can sequester thiamethoxam. In contrast, milkweed plants had relatively low neonicotinoid uptake (<0.5%), meaning that those species may not pose excessive risk to beneficial insects that feed on them. In all plants, accumulated masses of thiamethoxam and clothianidin were greater in above-ground tissues (leaves and stems) than in below-ground roots, with more accrual in leaves than stems. Plants treated with the higher thiamethoxam concentration retained proportionally more of the insecticides. Because thiamethoxam primarily accumulates in above-ground tissues, management strategies that include biomass removal may reduce the input of such insecticides into the environment.

Early-season plant cover supports more effective pest control than insecticide applications

Growing evidence suggests that conservation agricultural practices, like no-till and cover crops, help protect annual crops from insect pests by supporting populations of resident arthropod predators. While adoption of conservation practices is growing, most field crop producers are also using more insecticides, including neonicotinoid seed coatings, as insurance against early-season insect pests. This tactic may disrupt benefits associated with conservation practices by reducing arthropods that contribute to biological control. We investigated the interaction between preventive pest management (PPM) and the conservation practice of cover cropping. We also investigated an alternative pest management approach, integrated pest management (IPM), which responds to insect pest risk, rather than using insecticides prophylactically. In a 3-year corn (Zea mays mays L.)-soy (Glycine max L.) rotation, we measured the response of invertebrate pests and predators to PPM and IPM with and without a cover crop. Using any insecticide provided some small reduction to plant damage in soy, but no yield benefit. In corn, vegetative cover early in the season was key to reducing pest density and damage, likely by increasing the abundance of arthropod predators. Further, PPM in year 1 decreased predation compared to a no-pest-management control. Contrary to our expectation, the IPM strategy, which required just one insecticide application, was more disruptive to the predator community than PPM, likely because the applied pyrethroid was more acutely toxic to a wider range of arthropods than neonicotinoids. Promoting early-season cover was more effective at reducing pest density and damage than either intervention-based strategy. Our results suggest that the best pest management outcomes may occur when biological control is encouraged by planting cover crops and avoiding broad-spectrum insecticides as much as possible. As part of a conservation-based approach to farming, cover crops can promote natural-enemy populations that can help provide biological effective control of insect pest populations.

Twenty-four hours of Thiamethoxam: In vivo and molecular dynamics simulation study on the toxicokinetic and underlying mechanisms in quails (Coturnix japonica)

Neonicotinoids is the most widely used insecticide, its contamination has led to sustained bird population declines. However, the toxicokinetic and underlying mechanisms of neonicotinoid toxicity in birds are largely unknown. Thiamethoxam (TMX), as a representative neonicotinoid insecticide, is now widely detected in most environmental medium and animal bodies. In this study, 5 mg/kg body weight TMX (potential environmental intake level) were orally administrated to male Japanese quails (Coturnix japonica). We found a rapid absorption, distribution, metabolism and elimination of TMX in quails in a period of 24 h, with the main metabolite, clothianidin (CLO), being extensively distributed and rapidly eliminated from tissues as well. The maximum plasm concentration of CLO was consistent with wild birds. Metabolomics analysis and followed determination of liver enzymes mRNA expression indicated the rapid metabolism was mediated mainly by CYPs and GSTs that involved riboflavin metabolism and glutathione metabolism pathways upon TMX exposure. Molecular dynamic simulation showed the strongest binding interaction in quail CYP2H1-TMX and CYP3A12-CLO complexes among a set of CYPs-substrate. The present study elucidated toxicokinetic and underlying metabolic mechanisms of TMX in quails at environmentally-relevant concentration, the findings would facilitate the understanding of potential risks of TMX and its metabolites to birds.

Integrative analysis of transcriptomics and metabolomics reveals the hepatotoxic mechanism of thiamethoxam on male Coturnix japonica

Thiamethoxam (TMX), a representative neonicotinoids, is widely used for seed coating. The consumption of TMX-coated seeds posed threat to birds during crop sowing. The hepatotoxicity of TMX has been reported in mammals, however, no clear evidence showed TMX-induced toxic effects on bird liver. In this study, male Japanese quails (Coturnix japonica) were exposed to 20 or 200 mg/kg TMX-treated bird feed for 28 days. Results showed that Clothianidin (CLO), a TMX metabolite preferred to accumulate in quail plasma and liver, and inflammatory cell infiltration was found in quail livers. Oxidative stress-related biological processes were significantly enriched in both TMX treatment groups through transcriptomics analysis. Moreover, integrative analysis of transcriptomics and metabolomics indicated ferroptosis and DNA damage was implicated in hepatotoxicity caused by high- and low-concentration of TMX exposure, respectively. High-dose TMX treatment decreased CAT activity and GSH concentration and increased expression of the ferroptosis-related gene. In addition, the up-regulation of 8-OHdG concentration and DNA repair-related genes expression demonstrated low-dose TMX triggered oxidative DNA damage. The present results highlight the toxicity of TMX to bird livers and contribute to a better understanding of the TMX toxic mechanism in birds.

Toxicity of clothianidin to common Eastern North American fireflies

Background

Previous research suggests that fireflies (Coleoptera: Lampyridae) are susceptible to commonly used insecticides. In the United States, there has been a rapid and widespread adoption of neonicotinoid insecticides, predominantly used as seed coatings on large-acreage crops like corn, soy, and cotton. Neonicotinoid insecticides are persistent in soil yet mobile in water, so they have potential to contaminate firefly habitats both in and adjacent to application sites. As a result, fireflies may be at high risk of exposure to neonicotinoids, possibly jeopardizing this already at-risk group of charismatic insects.

Methods

To assess the sensitivity of fireflies to neonicotinoids, we exposed larvae of Photuris versicolor complex and Photinus pyralis to multiple levels of clothianidin-treated soil and monitored feeding behavior, protective soil chamber formation, intoxication, and mortality.

Results

Pt. versicolor and Pn. pyralis larvae exhibited long-term intoxication and mortality at concentrations above 1,000 ng g^-1 soil (1 ppm). Under sub-lethal clothianidin exposure, firefly larvae fed less and spent less time in protective soil chambers, two behavioral changes that could decrease larval survival in the wild.

Discussion

Both firefly species demonstrated sub-lethal responses in the lab to clothianidin exposure at field-realistic concentrations, although Pt. versicolor and Pn. pyralis appeared to tolerate higher clothianidin exposure relative to other soil invertebrates and beetle species. While these two firefly species, which are relatively widespread in North America, appear somewhat tolerant of neonicotinoid exposure in a laboratory setting, further work is needed to extend this conclusion to wild populations, especially in rare or declining taxa.

Insecticide-contaminated honeydew: risks for beneficial insects

Honeydew is the sugar-rich excretion of phloem-feeding hemipteran insects such as aphids, mealybugs, whiteflies, and psyllids, and can be a main carbohydrate source for beneficial insects in some ecosystems. Recent research has revealed that water-soluble, systemic insecticides contaminate honeydew excreted by hemipterans that feed on plants treated with these insecticides. This contaminated honeydew can be toxic to beneficial insects, such as pollinators, parasitic wasps and generalist predators that feed on it. This route of exposure has now been demonstrated in three plant species, for five systemic insecticides and four hemipteran species; therefore, we expect this route to be widely available in some ecosystems. In this perspective paper, we highlight the importance of this route of exposure by exploring: (i) potential pathways through which honeydew might be contaminated with insecticides; (ii) hemipteran families that are more likely to excrete contaminated honeydew; and (iii) systemic insecticides with different modes of action that might contaminate honeydew through the plant. Furthermore, we analyse several model scenarios in Europe and/or the USA where contaminated honeydew could be problematic for beneficial organisms that feed on this ubiquitous carbohydrate source. Finally, we explain why this route of exposure might be important when exotic, invasive, honeydew-producing species are treated with systemic insecticides. Overall, this review opens a new area of research in the field of ecotoxicology to understand how insecticides can reach non-target beneficial insects. In addition, we aim to shed light on potential undescribed causes of insect declines in ecosystems where honeydew is an important carbohydrate source for insects, and advocate for this route of exposure to be included in future environmental risk assessments.