1
|
Singh U, Dunn JB. Shale Gas Decarbonization in the Permian Basin: Is It Possible? ACS ENGINEERING AU 2022; 2:248-256. [PMID: 35781934 PMCID: PMC9242523 DOI: 10.1021/acsengineeringau.2c00001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/03/2022] [Revised: 03/15/2022] [Accepted: 03/16/2022] [Indexed: 12/03/2022]
Abstract
![]()
The United States
is unique in the energy reserves held in shale
gas fields, which coproduce natural gas and natural gas liquids. Use
of this resource, however, contributes to greenhouse gas emissions
and, correspondingly, climate change. We explore how natural gas and
natural gas liquids might build bridges toward low-carbon transportation
fuels. For example, as petroleum refineries produce less gasoline
in response to widespread electrification, natural gas liquids can
be converted to fuel. We consider whether the greenhouse gas emissions
from production and use of these fuels might be offset through three
potential outcomes of converting coproduced natural gas to CO2 through steam methane reforming. First, the CO2 could be injected into conventional oil formations for enhanced
oil recovery. Second, it could be sequestered into saline aquifers
to avoid CO2 emissions from the produced oil combustion.
Third, it could be injected into unconventional gas formations in
the form of CO2-based fracturing fluids. Simultaneously,
the coproduced hydrogen from steam methane reforming could be used
to support the expansion of the hydrogen economy. The region of study
is the Permian Basin. The results show sizeable emission benefits
by decreasing net emissions of natural gas production and use to 28
from 88 g-CO2e/MJ. For revenue generating pathways, a partial
decarbonization of 3.4 TCF/year is possible. All of the natural gas
can be partially decarbonized if the CO2 is sequestered
in saline aquifers. Overall, the results show that while greenhouse
gas emissions can be reduced through decarbonization approaches relying
on subsurface sequestration, full natural gas decarbonization is not
achieved but must be pursued through other approaches.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Udayan Singh
- Department of Chemical and Biological Engineering, Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois 60208, United States
| | - Jennifer B. Dunn
- Department of Chemical and Biological Engineering, Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois 60208, United States
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Xing L, Wei K, Li Y, Fang Z, Li Q, Qi T, An S, Zhang S, Wang L. TiO 2 Coating Strategy for Robust Catalysis of the Metal-Organic Framework toward Energy-Efficient CO 2 Capture. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY 2021; 55:11216-11224. [PMID: 34324324 DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.1c02452] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/13/2023]
Abstract
High energy duty restricts the application of amine-based absorption in CO2 capture and limits the achievement of carbon neutrality. Although regenerating the amine solvent with solid acid catalysts can increase energy efficiency, inactivation of the catalyst must be addressed. Here, we report a robust metal-organic framework (MOF)-derived hybrid solid acid catalyst (SO42-/ZIF-67-C@TiO2) with improved acidity for promoting amine regeneration. The TiO2 coating effectively prevented the active components stripping from the surface of the catalyst, thus prolonging its lifespan. The well-protected Co-Nx sites and protonated groups introduced onto the TiO2 surface increased the amount and rate of CO2 desorption by more than 64.5 and 153%, respectively. Consequently, the energy consumption decreased by approximately 36%. The catalyzed N-C bond rupture and proton transfer mechanisms are proposed. This work provides an effective protection strategy for robust acid catalysts, thus advancing the CO2 capture with less energy duty.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lei Xing
- MOE Key Laboratory of Resources and Environmental Systems Optimization, College of Environmental Science and Engineering, North China Electric Power University, Beijing 102206, P. R. China
- Hebei Key Lab of Power Plant Flue Gas Multi-Pollutants Control, Department of Environmental Science and Engineering, North China Electric Power University, Baoding 071003, China
| | - Kexin Wei
- MOE Key Laboratory of Resources and Environmental Systems Optimization, College of Environmental Science and Engineering, North China Electric Power University, Beijing 102206, P. R. China
- Hebei Key Lab of Power Plant Flue Gas Multi-Pollutants Control, Department of Environmental Science and Engineering, North China Electric Power University, Baoding 071003, China
| | - Yuchen Li
- MOE Key Laboratory of Resources and Environmental Systems Optimization, College of Environmental Science and Engineering, North China Electric Power University, Beijing 102206, P. R. China
- Hebei Key Lab of Power Plant Flue Gas Multi-Pollutants Control, Department of Environmental Science and Engineering, North China Electric Power University, Baoding 071003, China
| | - Zhimo Fang
- MOE Key Laboratory of Resources and Environmental Systems Optimization, College of Environmental Science and Engineering, North China Electric Power University, Beijing 102206, P. R. China
- Hebei Key Lab of Power Plant Flue Gas Multi-Pollutants Control, Department of Environmental Science and Engineering, North China Electric Power University, Baoding 071003, China
| | - Qiangwei Li
- MOE Key Laboratory of Resources and Environmental Systems Optimization, College of Environmental Science and Engineering, North China Electric Power University, Beijing 102206, P. R. China
- Hebei Key Lab of Power Plant Flue Gas Multi-Pollutants Control, Department of Environmental Science and Engineering, North China Electric Power University, Baoding 071003, China
| | - Tieyue Qi
- MOE Key Laboratory of Resources and Environmental Systems Optimization, College of Environmental Science and Engineering, North China Electric Power University, Beijing 102206, P. R. China
- Hebei Key Lab of Power Plant Flue Gas Multi-Pollutants Control, Department of Environmental Science and Engineering, North China Electric Power University, Baoding 071003, China
| | - Shanlong An
- MOE Key Laboratory of Resources and Environmental Systems Optimization, College of Environmental Science and Engineering, North China Electric Power University, Beijing 102206, P. R. China
- Hebei Key Lab of Power Plant Flue Gas Multi-Pollutants Control, Department of Environmental Science and Engineering, North China Electric Power University, Baoding 071003, China
| | - Shihan Zhang
- Key Laboratory of Microbial Technology for Industrial Pollution Control of Zhejiang Province, College of Environment, Zhejiang University of Technology, Hangzhou 310014, China
| | - Lidong Wang
- MOE Key Laboratory of Resources and Environmental Systems Optimization, College of Environmental Science and Engineering, North China Electric Power University, Beijing 102206, P. R. China
- Hebei Key Lab of Power Plant Flue Gas Multi-Pollutants Control, Department of Environmental Science and Engineering, North China Electric Power University, Baoding 071003, China
| |
Collapse
|