Contradictory Impacts of Nitrate on the Dissimilatory Arsenate-Respiring Prokaryotes-Induced Reductive Mobilization of Arsenic from Contaminated Sediments: Mechanism Insight from Metagenomic and Functional Analyses

Can Sb(III)-oxidizing prokaryote also oxidize As(III) under aerobic and anaerobic conditions, and vice versa?

Sb(III) and As(III) share similar chemical features and coexist in the environment. However, their oxidase enzymes have completely different sequences and structures. This raises an intriguing question: Could Sb(III)-oxidizing prokaryotes (SOPs) also oxidize As(III), and vice versa? Regarding this issue, previous investigations have yielded unclear, incorrect and even conflicting data. This work aims to address this matter. First, we prepared an enriched population of SOPs that comprises 55 different AnoA genes, lacking AioAB and ArxAB genes. We found that these SOPs can oxidize both Sb(III) and As(III) with comparable capabilities. To further confirm this finding, we isolated three cultivable SOP strains that have AnoA gene, but lack AioAB and ArxAB genes. We observed that they also oxidize both Sb(III) and As(III) under both anaerobic and aerobic conditions. Secondly, we obtained an enriched population of As(III)-oxidizing prokaryotes (AOPs) from As-contaminated soils, which comprises 69 different AioA genes, lacking AnoA gene. We observed that the AOP population has significant As(III)-oxidizing activities, but lack detectable Sb(III)-oxidizing activities under both aerobic and anaerobic conditions. Therefore, we convincingly show that SOPs can oxidize As(III), but AOPs cannot oxidize Sb(III). These findings clarify the previous ambiguities, confusion, errors or contradictions regarding how SOPs and AOPs oxidize each other's substrate.

Efficient stabilization of arsenic migration and conversion in soil with surfactant-modified iron-manganese oxide: Environmental effects and mechanistic insights

The use of iron-manganese oxide (FMO) as a promising amendment for remediating arsenic (As) contamination in soils has gained attention, but its application is limited owing to agglomeration issues. This study aims to address agglomeration using surfactant-modified FMO and investigate their stabilization behavior towards As and resulting environmental changes upon amendments. The results confirmed the efficacy of surfactants and demonstrated that cetyltrimethylammonium-bromide-modified FMO significantly reduced the leaching concentration of As by 92.5 % and effectively suppressed the uptake of As by 85.8 % compared with the control groups. The ratio of the residual fraction increased from 30.5-41.6 % in unamended soil to 67.9-69.2 %. The number of active sites was through the introduction of surfactants and immobilized As via complexation, ion exchange, and redox reactions. The study also revealed that amendments and the concentration of As influenced the soil physicochemical properties and enriched bacteria associated with As and Fe reduction and changed the distribution of C, N, Fe, and As metabolism genes, which promoted the stabilization of As. The interactions among cetyltrimethylammonium bromide, FMO, and microorganisms were found to have the greatest effect on As immobilization.

Biological oxidation of As(III) and Sb(III) by a novel bacterium with Sb(III) oxidase rather than As(III) oxidase under anaerobic and aerobic conditions

Sb and As are chemically similar, but the sequences and structures of Sb(III) and As(III) oxidase are totally distinct. It is thus interesting to explore whether Sb(III) oxidase oxidizes As(III), and if so, how microbial oxidations of Sb(III) and As(III) influence one another. Previous investigations have yielded ambiguous or even erroneous conclusions. This study aimed to clarify this issue. Firstly, we prepared a consortium of Sb(III)-oxidizing prokaryotes (SOPs) by enrichment cultivation. Metagenomic analysis reveals that SOPs with the Sb(III) oxidase gene, but lacking the As(III) oxidase gene are predominant in the SOP community. Despite this, SOPs exhibit comparable Sb(III) and As(III)-oxidizing activities in both aerobic and anaerobic conditions, indicating that at the microbial community level, Sb(III) oxidase can oxidize As(III). Secondly, we isolated a representative cultivable SOP, Ralstonia sp. SbOX with Sb(III) oxidase gene but without As(III) oxidase gene. Genomic analysis of SbOX reveals that this SOP strain has a complete Sb(III) oxidase (AnoA) gene, but lacks As(III) oxidase (AioAB or ArxAB) gene. It is interesting to discover that, besides its Sb(III) oxidation activities, SbOX also exhibits significant capabilities in oxidizing As(III) under both aerobic and anaerobic conditions. Moreover, under aerobic conditions and in the presence of both Sb(III) and As(III), SbOX exhibited a preference for oxidizing Sb(III). Only after the near complete oxidation of Sb(III) did SbOX initiate rapid oxidation of As(III). In contrast, under anaerobic conditions and in the presence of both Sb(III) and As(III), Sb(III) oxidation notably inhibited the As(III) oxidation pathway in SbOX, while As(III) exhibited minimal effects on the Sb(III) oxidation. These findings suggest that SOPs can oxidize As(III) under both aerobic and anaerobic conditions, exhibiting a strong preference for Sb(III) over As(III) oxidation in the presence of both. This study unveils a novel mechanism of interaction within the Sb and As biogeochemical cycles.

Functional features of a novel Sb(III)- and As(III)-oxidizing bacterium: Implications for the interactions between bacterial Sb(III) and As(III) oxidation pathways

Antimony (Sb) and arsenic (As) share similar chemical characteristics and commonly coexist in contaminated environments. It has been reported that the biogeochemical cycles of antimony and arsenic affect each other. However, there is limited understanding regarding microbial coupling between the biogeochemical processes of antimony and arsenic. Here, we aimed to solve this issue. We successfully isolated a novel bacterium, Shinella sp. SbAsOP1, which possesses both Sb(III) and As(III) oxidase, and can effectively oxidize both Sb(III) and As(III) under aerobic and anaerobic conditions. SbAsOP1 exhibits greater aerobic oxidation activity for the oxidation of As(III) or Sb(III) compared to its anaerobic activity. SbAsOP1 also significantly catalyzes the oxidative mobilization of solid-phase Sb(III) under aerobic conditions. The activity of SbAsOP1 in oxidizing solid Sb(III) is 3 times lower than its activity in oxidizing soluble form. It is noteworthy that, in the presence of both Sb(III) and As(III) under aerobic conditions, either As(III) or Sb(III) significantly inhibits the oxidation of Sb(III) or As(III), respectively. In comparison, under anaerobic conditions and in the coexistence of Sb(III) and As(III), As(III) significantly inhibits Sb(III) oxidation, whereas Sb(III) almost completely inhibits As(III) oxidation. These findings suggest that under both aerobic and anaerobic conditions, SbAsOP1 demonstrates a partial preference for Sb(III) oxidation. Additionally, bacterial oxidations of Sb(III) and As(III) mutually inhibit each other to varying degrees. These observations gain a novel understanding of the interplay between the biogeochemical processes of antimony and arsenic.

Relationships between arsenic biotransformation genes, antibiotic resistance genes, and microbial function under different arsenic stresses during composting

Although the arsenic contamination and antibiotic resistance genes (ARGs) during composting have been studied separately, there is limited information on their interactions, particularly, the relationship between arsenic biotransformation genes (ABGs) and ARGs. Therefore, the present study used different forms of arsenic stress (organic and inorganic arsenic at 10 and 50 mg/kg) in pig manure and straw co-composting, to evaluate the effects of arsenic stress on microbial community structures, metabolic function, ABGs, and ARGs. The results showed that arsenic stress had different effects on different parameters and promoted the microbial formation of humic acid and the biodegradation of fulvic acid. Inorganic arsenic showed more rapid effects on microbial community structure, visible within about 20 days, while the effects of organic arsenic were later (about 45 days) due to the necessity of transformation. Moreover, the addition of organic roxarsone and inorganic arsenic resulted in higher expression of ABGs and ARGs, respectively. Arsenic addition also caused increased expression of genes associated with replication and repair. A significant relationship was observed between ABG and ARG expression, for instance, genes involved in arsenic reduction and oxidation were influenced by genes involved in aminoglycoside and chloramphenicol resistance genes (p < 0.05). These complex interactions among microorganisms, functional genes, and external parameters contribute to the understanding of the mechanisms underlying cross-contamination.