1
|
Huang Y, Wang N, Wang J, Ji X, Li A, Zhao H, Song W, Huang X, Wang T, Hao H. Unveiling the Factors Influencing Different Nucleation Pathways and Liquid-Liquid Phase Separation. LANGMUIR : THE ACS JOURNAL OF SURFACES AND COLLOIDS 2024; 40:17786-17795. [PMID: 39120944 DOI: 10.1021/acs.langmuir.4c02276] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/11/2024]
Abstract
Exploring nucleation pathways has been a research hot spot in the fields of crystal engineering. In this work, vanillin as a model compound was utilized to explore the factors influencing different nucleation pathways with or without liquid-liquid phase separation (LLPS). A thermodynamic phase diagram of vanillin in the mixed solvent system of water and acetone from 10 to 55 °C was determined. It was found that the occurrence of LLPS might be related to different nucleation pathways. Under the guidance of a thermodynamic phase diagram, Raman spectroscopy and molecular simulation were applied to investigate the influencing factors of different nucleation paths. It was found that the degree of solvation is a key factor determining the nucleation path, and strong solvation could lead to LLPS. Additionally, the molecular self-assembly evolution during the crystallization process was further investigated by using small-angle X-ray scattering (SAXS) and dynamic light scattering (DLS). The findings indicate that larger clusters with a diffuse transition layer may lead to LLPS during the nucleation process.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yunhai Huang
- National Engineering Research Center of Industrial Crystallization Technology, School of Chemical Engineering and Technology, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, People's Republic of China
| | - Na Wang
- National Engineering Research Center of Industrial Crystallization Technology, School of Chemical Engineering and Technology, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, People's Republic of China
- Collaborative Innovation Center of Chemical Science and Engineering (Tianjin), Tianjin 300072, People's Republic of China
| | - Jingkang Wang
- National Engineering Research Center of Industrial Crystallization Technology, School of Chemical Engineering and Technology, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, People's Republic of China
| | - Xiongtao Ji
- National Engineering Research Center of Industrial Crystallization Technology, School of Chemical Engineering and Technology, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, People's Republic of China
| | - Ao Li
- National Engineering Research Center of Industrial Crystallization Technology, School of Chemical Engineering and Technology, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, People's Republic of China
| | - Hongtu Zhao
- National Engineering Research Center of Industrial Crystallization Technology, School of Chemical Engineering and Technology, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, People's Republic of China
| | - Wenxi Song
- National Engineering Research Center of Industrial Crystallization Technology, School of Chemical Engineering and Technology, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, People's Republic of China
| | - Xin Huang
- National Engineering Research Center of Industrial Crystallization Technology, School of Chemical Engineering and Technology, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, People's Republic of China
- Collaborative Innovation Center of Chemical Science and Engineering (Tianjin), Tianjin 300072, People's Republic of China
| | - Ting Wang
- National Engineering Research Center of Industrial Crystallization Technology, School of Chemical Engineering and Technology, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, People's Republic of China
- Collaborative Innovation Center of Chemical Science and Engineering (Tianjin), Tianjin 300072, People's Republic of China
| | - Hongxun Hao
- National Engineering Research Center of Industrial Crystallization Technology, School of Chemical Engineering and Technology, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, People's Republic of China
- Collaborative Innovation Center of Chemical Science and Engineering (Tianjin), Tianjin 300072, People's Republic of China
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Yang DH, Ricci F, Nordstrom FL, Li N. Complex oiling-out behavior of procaine with stable and metastable liquid phases. Phys Chem Chem Phys 2024; 26:808-821. [PMID: 38095117 DOI: 10.1039/d3cp04622b] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/04/2024]
Abstract
During the crystallization of a solute from solvent(s), spontaneous liquid-liquid phase separation (LLPS) might occur, under certain conditions. This phenomenon, colloquially referred to as "oiling-out" in the pharmaceutical industry, often leads to undesired outcomes, including undesired particle properties, encrustation, ineffective impurity rejection, and excessively long process time. Therefore, it is critical to understand the thermodynamic driving force and phase boundaries of this phenomenon, such that rational strategies can be developed to avoid oiling-out or minimize its negative impact. In this study, we systematically evaluated the oiling-out behavior of procaine, a low melting point drug, in the solvent systems heptane, and ethanol-heptane as a function of temperature and solvent composition. In the procaine-heptane binary system, we observed a region where the LLPS is metastable with respect to crystallization, which is most commonly observed in the crystallization of modern active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs); however, we also identified a region of the phase diagram where the LLPS is stable with respect to crystallization, and therefore will persist indefinitely. In the procaine-ethanol-heptane ternary system we identified five different regions, including a homogeneous liquid (L) region, two solid-liquid (SLI and SLII) regions, a liquid-liquid (LILII) region, and a solid-liquid-liquid (SLILII) region. The binary and ternary phase diagrams were also predicted using a state-of-the-art thermodynamic model: the SAFT-γ-Mie equation of state, and the results were compared with experimental data. Our findings highlight the complexity of oiling-out behavior. This work also represents a combined modeling and experimental platform to identify phase boundaries that will enable rational selection of strategies to crystallize active pharmaceutical ingredients with oiling-out risks.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Da Hye Yang
- Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT 06269, USA.
| | - Francesco Ricci
- Material & Analytical Sciences, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Ridgefield, CT 06877, USA
| | - Fredrik L Nordstrom
- Material & Analytical Sciences, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Ridgefield, CT 06877, USA
| | - Na Li
- Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT 06269, USA.
- Institute of Material Science, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT 06269, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Tian W, Li W, Yang H. Protein Nucleation and Crystallization Process with Process Analytical Technologies in a Batch Crystallizer. CRYSTAL GROWTH & DESIGN 2023; 23:5181-5193. [PMID: 37426550 PMCID: PMC10326882 DOI: 10.1021/acs.cgd.3c00411] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/04/2023] [Revised: 06/01/2023] [Indexed: 07/11/2023]
Abstract
Protein crystallization has drawn great attention to replacing the traditional downstream processing for protein-based pharmaceuticals due to its advantages in stability, storage, and delivery. Limited understanding of the protein crystallization processes requires essential information based on real-time tracking during the crystallization process. A batch crystallizer of 100 mL fitted with a focused beam reflectance measurement (FBRM) probe and a thermocouple was designed for in situ monitoring of the protein crystallization process, with simutaneously record of off-line concentrations and crystal images. Three stages in the protein batch crystallization process were identified: long-period slow nucleation, rapid crystallization, and slow growth and breakage. The induction time was estimated by FBRM, i.e., increasing numbers of particles in the solution, which could be half of the time required for detecting the decrease of the concentration, by offline measurement. The induction time decreased with an increase in supersaturation within the same salt concentration. The interfacial energy for nucleation was analyzed based on each experimental group with equal salt concentration and different concentrations of lysozyme. The interfacial energy reduced with an increase in salt concentration in the solution. The yield of the experiments was significantly affected by the protein and salt concentrations and could achieve up to 99% yield with a 26.5 μm median crystal size upon stabilized concentration readings.
Collapse
|