Computational and Experimental Characterization of NF023, A Candidate Anticancer Compound Inhibiting cIAP2/TRAF2 Assembly

Purinergic signaling: Diverse effects and therapeutic potential in cancer

Regardless of improved biological insights and therapeutic advances, cancer is consuming multiple lives worldwide. Cancer is a complex disease with diverse cellular, metabolic, and physiological parameters as its hallmarks. This instigates a need to uncover the latest therapeutic targets to advance the treatment of cancer patients. Purines are building blocks of nucleic acids but also function as metabolic intermediates and messengers, as part of a signaling pathway known as purinergic signaling. Purinergic signaling comprises primarily adenosine triphosphate (ATP) and adenosine (ADO), their analogous membrane receptors, and a set of ectonucleotidases, and has both short- and long-term (trophic) effects. Cells release ATP and ADO to modulate cellular function in an autocrine or paracrine manner by activating membrane-localized purinergic receptors (purinoceptors, P1 and P2). P1 receptors are selective for ADO and have four recognized subtypes-A1, A2A, A2B, and A3. Purines and pyrimidines activate P2 receptors, and the P2X subtype is ligand-gated ion channel receptors. P2X has seven subtypes (P2X1-7) and forms homo- and heterotrimers. The P2Y subtype is a G protein-coupled receptor with eight subtypes (P2Y1/2/4/6/11/12/13/14). ATP, its derivatives, and purinoceptors are widely distributed in all cell types for cellular communication, and any imbalance compromises the homeostasis of the cell. Neurotransmission, neuromodulation, and secretion employ fast purinergic signaling, while trophic purinergic signaling regulates cell metabolism, proliferation, differentiation, survival, migration, invasion, and immune response during tumor progression. Thus, purinergic signaling is a prospective therapeutic target in cancer and therapy resistance.

Head or tail? A molecular dynamics approach to the complex structure of TNF-associated factor TRAF2

Tumor necrosis factor receptor-associated factor proteins (TRAFs) are trimeric proteins that play a fundamental role in signaling, acting as intermediaries between the tumor necrosis factor (TNF) receptors and the proteins that transmit the downstream signal. The monomeric subunits of all the TRAF family members share a common tridimensional structure: a C-terminal globular domain and a long coiled-coil tail characterizing the N-terminal section. In this study, the dependence of the TRAF2 dynamics on the length of its tail was analyzed in silico. In particular, we used the available crystallographic structure of a C-terminal fragment of TRAF2 (168 out of 501 a.a.), TRAF2-C, and that of a longer construct, addressed as TRAF2-plus, that we have re-constructed using the AlphaFold2 code. The results indicate that the longer N-terminal tail of TRAF2-plus has a strong influence on the dynamics of the globular regions in the protein C-terminal head. In fact, the quaternary interactions among the TRAF2-C subunits change asymmetrically in time, while the movements of TRAF2-plus monomers are rather limited and more ordered than those of the shorter construct. Such findings shed a new light on the dynamics of TRAF subunits and on the protein mechanism in vivo, since TRAF monomer-trimer equilibrium is crucial for several reasons (receptor recognition, membrane binding, hetero-oligomerization).

Structure-based identification of a new IAP-targeting compound that induces cancer cell death inducing NF-κB pathway

•

Virtual docking vs type I BIRs of IAPs identified FC2 as a modulator of NF-kB.

•

FC2 is active as a single agent with no toxicity in normal cells.

•

The cytotoxic activity of FC2 is enhanced by TNF and by the Smac-mimetic SM83.

•

FC2 stabilizes XIAP/TAB1 interaction, prolonging the activation of NF-κB.

Inhibitors of apoptosis proteins (IAPs) are validated onco-targets, as their overexpression correlates with cancer onset, progression, diffusion and chemoresistance. IAPs regulate cell death survival pathways, inflammation, and immunity. Targeting IAPs, by impairing their protein–protein interaction surfaces, can affect events occurring at different stages of cancer development.

To this purpose, we employed a rational virtual screening approach to identify compounds predicted to interfere with the assembly of pro-survival macromolecular complexes. One of the candidates, FC2, was shown to bind in vitro the BIR1 domains of both XIAP and cIAP2. Moreover, we demonstrated that FC2 can induce cancer cell death as a single agent and, more potently, in combination with the Smac-mimetic SM83 or with the cytokine TNF. FC2 determined a prolonged activation of the NF-κB pathway, accompanied to a stabilization of XIAP-TAB1 complex. This candidate molecule represents a valuable lead compound for the development of a new class of IAP-antagonists for cancer treatment.