ITScore-NL: An Iterative Knowledge-Based Scoring Function for Nucleic Acid-Ligand Interactions

SPRank─A Knowledge-Based Scoring Function for RNA-Ligand Pose Prediction and Virtual Screening

The growing interest in RNA-targeted drugs underscores the need for computational modeling of interactions between RNA molecules and small compounds. Having a reliable scoring function for RNA-ligand interactions is essential for effective computational drug screening. An ideal scoring function should not only predict the native pose for ligand binding but also rank the affinity of the binding for different ligands. However, existing scoring functions are primarily designed to predict the native binding modes for a given RNA-ligand pair and have not been thoroughly assessed for virtual screening purposes. In this paper, we introduce SPRank, a combination of machine-learning and knowledge-based scoring functions developed through a weighted iterative approach, specifically designed to tackle both binding mode prediction and virtual screening challenges. Our approach incorporates third-party docking software, such as rDock and AutoDock Vina, to sample flexible ligands against an ensemble of RNA structures, capturing the conformational flexibility of both the RNA and the ligand. Through rigorous testing, SPRank demonstrates improved performance compared to the tested scoring functions across four test sets comprising 122, 42, 55, and 71 nucleic acid-ligand complexes. Furthermore, SPRank exhibits improved performance in virtual screening tests targeting the HIV-1 TAR ensemble, which highlights its advantage in drug discovery. These results underscore the advantages of SPRank as a potentially promising tool for the RNA-targeted drug design. The source code of SPRank and the data sets are freely accessible at https://github.com/Vfold-RNA/SPRank.

Structure-based virtual screening of unbiased and RNA-focused libraries to identify new ligands for the HCV IRES model system

Targeting RNA including viral RNAs with small molecules is an emerging field. The hepatitis C virus internal ribosome entry site (HCV IRES) is a potential target for translation inhibitor development to raise drug resistance mutation preparedness. Using RNA-focused and unbiased molecule libraries, a structure-based virtual screening (VS) by molecular docking and pharmacophore analysis was performed against the HCV IRES subdomain IIa. VS hits were validated by a microscale thermophoresis (MST) binding assay and a Förster resonance energy transfer (FRET) assay elucidating ligand-induced conformational changes. Ten hit molecules were identified with potencies in the high to medium micromolar range proving the suitability of structure-based virtual screenings against RNA-targets. Hit compounds from a 2-guanidino-quinazoline series, like the strongest binder, compound 8b with an EC50 of 61 μM, show low molecular weight, moderate lipophilicity and reduced basicity compared to previously reported IRES ligands. Therefore, it can be considered as a potential starting point for further optimization by chemical derivatization.

Contrastive pre-training and 3D convolution neural network for RNA and small molecule binding affinity prediction

MOTIVATION

The diverse structures and functions inherent in RNAs present a wealth of potential drug targets. Some small molecules are anticipated to serve as leading compounds, providing guidance for the development of novel RNA-targeted therapeutics. Consequently, the determination of RNA-small molecule binding affinity is a critical undertaking in the landscape of RNA-targeted drug discovery and development. Nevertheless, to date, only one computational method for RNA-small molecule binding affinity prediction has been proposed. The prediction of RNA-small molecule binding affinity remains a significant challenge. The development of a computational model is deemed essential to effectively extract relevant features and predict RNA-small molecule binding affinity accurately.

RESULTS

In this study, we introduced RLaffinity, a novel deep learning model designed for the prediction of RNA-small molecule binding affinity based on 3D structures. RLaffinity integrated information from RNA pockets and small molecules, utilizing a 3D convolutional neural network (3D-CNN) coupled with a contrastive learning-based self-supervised pre-training model. To the best of our knowledge, RLaffinity was the first deep learning based method for the prediction of RNA-small molecule binding affinity. Our experimental results exhibited RLaffinity's superior performance compared to baseline methods, revealed by all metrics. The efficacy of RLaffinity underscores the capability of 3D-CNN to accurately extract both global pocket information and local neighbor nucleotide information within RNAs. Notably, the integration of a self-supervised pre-training model significantly enhanced predictive performance. Ultimately, RLaffinity was also proved as a potential tool for RNA-targeted drugs virtual screening.

AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION

https://github.com/SaisaiSun/RLaffinity.

Assessing the performance of MM/PBSA and MM/GBSA methods. 10. Prediction reliability of binding affinities and binding poses for RNA-ligand complexes

Ribonucleic acid (RNA)-ligand interactions play a pivotal role in a wide spectrum of biological processes, ranging from protein biosynthesis to cellular reproduction. This recognition has prompted the broader acceptance of RNA as a viable candidate for drug targets. Delving into the atomic-scale understanding of RNA-ligand interactions holds paramount importance in unraveling intricate molecular mechanisms and further contributing to RNA-based drug discovery. Computational approaches, particularly molecular docking, offer an efficient way of predicting the interactions between RNA and small molecules. However, the accuracy and reliability of these predictions heavily depend on the performance of scoring functions (SFs). In contrast to the majority of SFs used in RNA-ligand docking, the end-point binding free energy calculation methods, such as molecular mechanics/generalized Born surface area (MM/GBSA) and molecular mechanics/Poisson Boltzmann surface area (MM/PBSA), stand as theoretically more rigorous approaches. Yet, the evaluation of their effectiveness in predicting both binding affinities and binding poses within RNA-ligand systems remains unexplored. This study first reported the performance of MM/PBSA and MM/GBSA with diverse solvation models, interior dielectric constants (εin) and force fields in the context of binding affinity prediction for 29 RNA-ligand complexes. MM/GBSA is based on short (5 ns) molecular dynamics (MD) simulations in an explicit solvent with the YIL force field; the GBGBn2 model with higher interior dielectric constant (εin = 12, 16 or 20) yields the best correlation (Rp = -0.513), which outperforms the best correlation (Rp = -0.317, rDock) offered by various docking programs. Then, the efficacy of MM/GBSA in identifying the near-native binding poses from the decoys was assessed based on 56 RNA-ligand complexes. However, it is evident that MM/GBSA has limitations in accurately predicting binding poses for RNA-ligand systems, particularly compared with notably proficient docking programs like rDock and PLANTS. The best top-1 success rate achieved by MM/GBSA rescoring is 39.3%, which falls below the best results given by docking programs (50%, PLNATS). This study represents the first evaluation of MM/PBSA and MM/GBSA for RNA-ligand systems and is expected to provide valuable insights into their successful application to RNA targets.

RmsdXNA: RMSD prediction of nucleic acid-ligand docking poses using machine-learning method

Small molecule drugs can be used to target nucleic acids (NA) to regulate biological processes. Computational modeling methods, such as molecular docking or scoring functions, are commonly employed to facilitate drug design. However, the accuracy of the scoring function in predicting the closest-to-native docking pose is often suboptimal. To overcome this problem, a machine learning model, RmsdXNA, was developed to predict the root-mean-square-deviation (RMSD) of ligand docking poses in NA complexes. The versatility of RmsdXNA has been demonstrated by its successful application to various complexes involving different types of NA receptors and ligands, including metal complexes and short peptides. The predicted RMSD by RmsdXNA was strongly correlated with the actual RMSD of the docked poses. RmsdXNA also outperformed the rDock scoring function in ranking and identifying closest-to-native docking poses across different structural groups and on the testing dataset. Using experimental validated results conducted on polyadenylated nuclear element for nuclear expression triplex, RmsdXNA demonstrated better screening power for the RNA-small molecule complex compared to rDock. Molecular dynamics simulations were subsequently employed to validate the binding of top-scoring ligand candidates selected by RmsdXNA and rDock on MALAT1. The results showed that RmsdXNA has a higher success rate in identifying promising ligands that can bind well to the receptor. The development of an accurate docking score for a NA-ligand complex can aid in drug discovery and development advancements. The code to use RmsdXNA is available at the GitHub repository https://github.com/laiheng001/RmsdXNA.

Frontiers and Challenges of Computing ncRNAs Biogenesis, Function and Modulation

Non-coding RNAs (ncRNAs), generated from nonprotein coding DNA sequences, constitute 98-99% of the human genome. Non-coding RNAs encompass diverse functional classes, including microRNAs, small interfering RNAs, PIWI-interacting RNAs, small nuclear RNAs, small nucleolar RNAs, and long non-coding RNAs. With critical involvement in gene expression and regulation across various biological and physiopathological contexts, such as neuronal disorders, immune responses, cardiovascular diseases, and cancer, non-coding RNAs are emerging as disease biomarkers and therapeutic targets. In this review, after providing an overview of non-coding RNAs' role in cell homeostasis, we illustrate the potential and the challenges of state-of-the-art computational methods exploited to study non-coding RNAs biogenesis, function, and modulation. This can be done by directly targeting them with small molecules or by altering their expression by targeting the cellular engines underlying their biosynthesis. Drawing from applications, also taken from our work, we showcase the significance and role of computer simulations in uncovering fundamental facets of ncRNA mechanisms and modulation. This information may set the basis to advance gene modulation tools and therapeutic strategies to address unmet medical needs.

Comparative Assessment of Pose Prediction Accuracy in RNA-Ligand Docking

Structure-based virtual high-throughput screening is used in early-stage drug discovery. Over the years, docking protocols and scoring functions for protein-ligand complexes have evolved to improve the accuracy in the computation of binding strengths and poses. In the past decade, RNA has also emerged as a target class for new small-molecule drugs. However, most ligand docking programs have been validated and tested for proteins and not RNA. Here, we test the docking power (pose prediction accuracy) of three state-of-the-art docking protocols on 173 RNA-small molecule crystal structures. The programs are AutoDock4 (AD4) and AutoDock Vina (Vina), which were designed for protein targets, and rDock, which was designed for both protein and nucleic acid targets. AD4 performed relatively poorly. For RNA targets for which a crystal structure of a bound ligand used to limit the docking search space is available and for which the goal is to identify new molecules for the same pocket, rDock performs slightly better than Vina, with success rates of 48% and 63%, respectively. However, in the more common type of early-stage drug discovery setting, in which no structure of a ligand-target complex is known and for which a larger search space is defined, rDock performed similarly to Vina, with a low success rate of ∼27%. Vina was found to have bias for ligands with certain physicochemical properties, whereas rDock performs similarly for all ligand properties. Thus, for projects where no ligand-protein structure already exists, Vina and rDock are both applicable. However, the relatively poor performance of all methods relative to protein-target docking illustrates a need for further methods refinement.

Ligand binding affinity prediction with fusion of graph neural networks and 3D structure-based complex graph

Accurate prediction of protein-ligand binding affinity is pivotal for drug design and discovery. Here, we proposed a novel deep fusion graph neural networks framework named FGNN to learn the protein-ligand interactions from the 3D structures of protein-ligand complexes. Unlike 1D sequences for proteins or 2D graphs for ligands, the 3D graph of protein-ligand complex enables the more accurate representations of the protein-ligand interactions. Benchmark studies have shown that our fusion models FGNN can achieve more accurate prediction of binding affinity than any individual algorithm. The advantages of fusion strategies have been demonstrated in terms of expressive power of data, learning efficiency and model interpretability. Our fusion models show satisfactory performances on diverse data sets, demonstrating their generalization ability. Given the good performances in both binding affinity prediction and virtual screening, our fusion models are expected to be practically applied for drug screening and design. Our work highlights the potential of the fusion graph neural network algorithm in solving complex prediction problems in computational biology and chemistry. The fusion graph neural networks (FGNN) model is freely available in https://github.com/LinaDongXMU/FGNN.

How Good Are Current Docking Programs at Nucleic Acid-Ligand Docking? A Comprehensive Evaluation

Nucleic acid (NA)-ligand interactions are of paramount importance in a variety of biological processes, including cellular reproduction and protein biosynthesis, and therefore, NAs have been broadly recognized as potential drug targets. Understanding NA-ligand interactions at the atomic scale is essential for investigating the molecular mechanism and further assisting in NA-targeted drug discovery. Molecular docking is one of the predominant computational approaches for predicting the interactions between NAs and small molecules. Despite the availability of versatile docking programs, their performance profiles for NA-ligand complexes have not been thoroughly characterized. In this study, we first compiled the largest structure-based NA-ligand binding data set to date, containing 800 noncovalent NA-ligand complexes with clearly identified ligands. Based on this extensive data set, eight frequently used docking programs, including six protein-ligand docking programs (LeDock, Surflex-Dock, UCSF Dock6, AutoDock, AutoDock Vina, and PLANTS) and two specific NA-ligand docking programs (rDock and RLDOCK), were systematically evaluated in terms of binding pose and binding affinity predictions. The results demonstrated that some protein-ligand docking programs, specifically PLANTS and LeDock, produced more promising or comparable results compared with the specialized NA-ligand docking programs. Among the programs evaluated, PLANTS, rDock, and LeDock showed the highest performance in binding pose prediction, and their top-1 and best root-mean-square deviation (rmsd) success rates were as follows: PLANTS (35.93 and 76.05%), rDock (27.25 and 72.16%), and LeDock (27.40 and 64.37%). Compared with the moderate level of binding pose prediction, few programs were successful in binding affinity prediction, and the best correlation (Rp = -0.461) was observed with PLANTS. Finally, further comparison with the latest NA-ligand docking program (NLDock) on four well-established data sets revealed that PLANTS and LeDock outperformed NLDock in terms of binding pose prediction on all data sets, demonstrating their significant potential for NA-ligand docking. To the best of our knowledge, this study is the most comprehensive evaluation of popular molecular docking programs for NA-ligand systems.

Comparative Assessment of Docking Programs for Docking and Virtual Screening of Ribosomal Oxazolidinone Antibacterial Agents

Oxazolidinones are a broad-spectrum class of synthetic antibiotics that bind to the 50S ribosomal subunit of Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria. Many crystal structures of the ribosomes with oxazolidinone ligands have been reported in the literature, facilitating structure-based design using methods such as molecular docking. It would be of great interest to know in advance how well docking methods can reproduce the correct ligand binding modes and rank these correctly. We examined the performance of five molecular docking programs (AutoDock 4, AutoDock Vina, DOCK 6, rDock, and RLDock) for their ability to model ribosomal–ligand interactions with oxazolidinones. Eleven ribosomal crystal structures with oxazolidinones as the ligands were docked. The accuracy was evaluated by calculating the docked complexes’ root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) and the program’s internal scoring function. The rankings for each program based on the median RMSD between the native and predicted were DOCK 6 > AD4 > Vina > RDOCK >> RLDOCK. Results demonstrate that the top-performing program, DOCK 6, could accurately replicate the ligand binding in only four of the eleven ribosomes due to the poor electron density of said ribosomal structures. In this study, we have further benchmarked the performance of the DOCK 6 docking algorithm and scoring in improving virtual screening (VS) enrichment using the dataset of 285 oxazolidinone derivatives against oxazolidinone binding sites in the S. aureus ribosome. However, there was no clear trend between the structure and activity of the oxazolidinones in VS. Overall, the docking performance indicates that the RNA pocket’s high flexibility does not allow for accurate docking prediction, highlighting the need to validate VS. protocols for ligand-RNA before future use. Later, we developed a re-scoring method incorporating absolute docking scores and molecular descriptors, and the results indicate that the descriptors greatly improve the correlation of docking scores and pMIC values. Morgan fingerprint analysis was also used, suggesting that DOCK 6 underpredicted molecules with tail modifications with acetamide, n-methylacetamide, or n-ethylacetamide and over-predicted molecule derivatives with methylamino bits. Alternatively, a ligand-based approach similar to a field template was taken, indicating that each derivative’s tail groups have strong positive and negative electrostatic potential contributing to microbial activity. These results indicate that one should perform VS. campaigns of ribosomal antibiotics with care and that more comprehensive strategies, including molecular dynamics simulations and relative free energy calculations, might be necessary in conjunction with VS. and docking.

Protein-Based Virtual Screening Tools Applied for RNA-Ligand Docking Identify New Binders of the preQ1-Riboswitch

Targeting RNA with small molecules is an emerging field. While several ligands for different RNA targets are reported, structure-based virtual screenings (VSs) against RNAs are still rare. Here, we elucidated the general capabilities of protein-based docking programs to reproduce native binding modes of small-molecule RNA ligands and to discriminate known binders from decoys by the scoring function. The programs were found to perform similar compared to the RNA-based docking tool rDOCK, and the challenges faced during docking, namely, protomer and tautomer selection, target dynamics, and explicit solvent, do not largely differ from challenges in conventional protein-ligand docking. A prospective VS with the Bacillus subtilis preQ₁-riboswitch aptamer domain performed with FRED, HYBRID, and FlexX followed by microscale thermophoresis assays identified six active compounds out of 23 tested VS hits with potencies between 29.5 nM and 11.0 μM. The hits were selected not solely based on their docking score but for resembling key interactions of the native ligand. Therefore, this study demonstrates the general feasibility to perform structure-based VSs against RNA targets, while at the same time it highlights pitfalls and their potential solutions when executing RNA-ligand docking.

Using Selectively Scaled Molecular Dynamics Simulations to Assess Ligand Poses in RNA Aptamers

Predicting the structure (or pose) of RNA-ligand complexes is an important problem in RNA structural biology. Although one could use computational docking to rapidly sample putative poses of RNA-ligand complexes, accurately discriminating the native-like poses from non-native, decoy poses remains a formidable challenge. Here, we started from the assumption that native-like RNA-ligand poses are less likely to dissociate during molecular dynamics simulations, and then we used enhanced simulations to promote ligand unbinding for diverse poses of a handful of RNA aptamer-ligand complexes. By fitting unbinding profiles obtained from the simulations to a single exponential, we identified the characteristic decay time (τ) as particularly effective at resolving native poses from decoys. We also found that a simple regression model trained to predict the simulation-derived parameters directly from structure could also discriminate ligand poses for similar RNA aptamers. Characterizing the unbinding properties of individual poses may thus be an effective strategy for enhancing pose prediction for ligands interacting with RNA aptamers. A similar strategy might be applicable to other ligandable RNAs; however, further analysis will be required to confirm this hypothesis.

RNA-ligand molecular docking: advances and challenges

With rapid advances in computer algorithms and hardware, fast and accurate virtual screening has led to a drastic acceleration in selecting potent small molecules as drug candidates. Computational modeling of RNA-small molecule interactions has become an indispensable tool for RNA-targeted drug discovery. The current models for RNA-ligand binding have mainly focused on the docking-and-scoring method. Accurate docking and scoring should tackle four crucial problems: (1) conformational flexibility of ligand, (2) conformational flexibility of RNA, (3) efficient sampling of binding sites and binding poses, and (4) accurate scoring of different binding modes. Moreover, compared with the problem of protein-ligand docking, predicting ligand binding to RNA, a negatively charged polymer, is further complicated by additional effects such as metal ion effects. Thermodynamic models based on physics-based and knowledge-based scoring functions have shown highly encouraging success in predicting ligand binding poses and binding affinities. Recently, kinetic models for ligand binding have further suggested that including dissociation kinetics (residence time) in ligand docking would result in improved performance in estimating in vivo drug efficacy. More recently, the rise of deep-learning approaches has led to new tools for predicting RNA-small molecule binding. In this review, we present an overview of the recently developed computational methods for RNA-ligand docking and their advantages and disadvantages.

Docking and scoring for nucleic acid-ligand interactions: Principles and current status

Nucleic acid (NA)-ligand interactions have crucial roles in many cellular processes and, thus, are increasingly attracting therapeutic interest in drug discovery. Molecular docking is a valuable tool for studying molecular interactions. However, because NAs differ significantly from proteins in both their physical and chemical properties, traditional docking algorithms and scoring functions for protein-ligand interactions might not be applicable to NA-ligand docking. Therefore, various sampling strategies and scoring functions for NA-ligand interactions have been developed. Here, we review the basic principles and current status of docking algorithms and scoring functions for DNA/RNA-ligand interactions. We also discuss challenges and limitations of current docking and scoring approaches.

NLDock: a Fast Nucleic Acid-Ligand Docking Algorithm for Modeling RNA/DNA-Ligand Complexes

Nucleic acid-ligand interactions play an important role in numerous cellular processes such as gene function expression and regulation. Therefore, nucleic acids such as RNAs have become more and more important drug targets, where the structural determination of nucleic acid-ligand complexes is pivotal for understanding their functions and thus developing therapeutic interventions. Molecular docking has been a useful computational tool in predicting the complex structure between molecules. However, although a number of docking algorithms have been developed for protein-ligand interactions, only a few docking programs were presented for nucleic acid-ligand interactions. Here, we have developed a fast nucleic acid-ligand docking algorithm, named NLDock, by implementing our intrinsic scoring function ITScoreNL for nucleic acid-ligand interactions into a modified version of the MDock program. NLDock was extensively evaluated on four test sets and compared with five other state-of-the-art docking algorithms including AutoDock, DOCK 6, rDock, GOLD, and Glide. It was shown that our NLDock algorithm obtained a significantly better performance than the other docking programs in binding mode predictions and achieved the success rates of 73%, 36%, and 32% on the largest test set of 77 complexes for local rigid-, local flexible-, and global flexible-ligand docking, respectively. In addition, our NLDock approach is also computationally efficient and consumed an average of as short as 0.97 and 2.08 min for a local flexible-ligand docking job and a global flexible-ligand docking job, respectively. These results suggest the good performance of our NLDock in both docking accuracy and computational efficiency.