Bending of Canonical and G/T Mismatched DNAs

Molecular dynamics of mismatch detection-How MutS uses indirect readout to find errors in DNA

The mismatch repair protein MutS safeguards genomic integrity by finding and initiating repair of basepairing errors in DNA. Single-molecule studies show MutS diffusing on DNA, presumably scanning for mispaired/unpaired bases, and crystal structures show a characteristic "mismatch-recognition" complex with DNA enclosed within MutS and kinked at the site of error. But how MutS goes from scanning thousands of Watson-Crick basepairs to recognizing rare mismatches remains unanswered, largely because atomic-resolution data on the search process are lacking. Here, 10 μs all-atom molecular dynamics simulations of Thermus aquaticus MutS bound to homoduplex DNA and T-bulge DNA illuminate the structural dynamics underlying the search mechanism. MutS-DNA interactions constitute a multistep mechanism to check DNA over two helical turns for its 1) shape, through contacts with the sugar-phosphate backbone, 2) conformational flexibility, through bending/unbending engineered by large-scale motions of the clamp domain, and 3) local deformability, through basepair destabilizing contacts. Thus, MutS can localize a potential target by indirect readout due to lower energetic costs of bending mismatched DNA and identify a site that distorts easily due to weaker base stacking and pairing as a mismatch. The MutS signature Phe-X-Glu motif can then lock in the mismatch-recognition complex to initiate repair.

Computational Modeling of DNA 3D Structures: From Dynamics and Mechanics to Folding

DNA carries the genetic information required for the synthesis of RNA and proteins and plays an important role in many processes of biological development. Understanding the three-dimensional (3D) structures and dynamics of DNA is crucial for understanding their biological functions and guiding the development of novel materials. In this review, we discuss the recent advancements in computer methods for studying DNA 3D structures. This includes molecular dynamics simulations to analyze DNA dynamics, flexibility, and ion binding. We also explore various coarse-grained models used for DNA structure prediction or folding, along with fragment assembly methods for constructing DNA 3D structures. Furthermore, we also discuss the advantages and disadvantages of these methods and highlight their differences.

The Importance of Charge Transfer and Solvent Screening in the Interactions of Backbones and Functional Groups in Amino Acid Residues and Nucleotides

Quantum mechanical (QM) calculations at the level of density-functional tight-binding are applied to a protein–DNA complex (PDB: 2o8b) consisting of 3763 atoms, averaging 100 snapshots from molecular dynamics simulations. A detailed comparison of QM and force field (Amber) results is presented. It is shown that, when solvent screening is taken into account, the contributions of the backbones are small, and the binding of nucleotides in the double helix is governed by the base–base interactions. On the other hand, the backbones can make a substantial contribution to the binding of amino acid residues to nucleotides and other residues. The effect of charge transfer on the interactions is also analyzed, revealing that the actual charge of nucleotides and amino acid residues can differ by as much as 6 and 8% from the formal integer charge, respectively. The effect of interactions on topological models (protein -residue networks) is elucidated.