1
|
Habeck M. Bayesian methods in integrative structure modeling. Biol Chem 2023; 404:741-754. [PMID: 37505205 DOI: 10.1515/hsz-2023-0145] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/27/2023] [Accepted: 07/07/2023] [Indexed: 07/29/2023]
Abstract
There is a growing interest in characterizing the structure and dynamics of large biomolecular assemblies and their interactions within the cellular environment. A diverse array of experimental techniques allows us to study biomolecular systems on a variety of length and time scales. These techniques range from imaging with light, X-rays or electrons, to spectroscopic methods, cross-linking mass spectrometry and functional genomics approaches, and are complemented by AI-assisted protein structure prediction methods. A challenge is to integrate all of these data into a model of the system and its functional dynamics. This review focuses on Bayesian approaches to integrative structure modeling. We sketch the principles of Bayesian inference, highlight recent applications to integrative modeling and conclude with a discussion of current challenges and future perspectives.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Habeck
- Microscopic Image Analysis Group, Jena University Hospital, D-07743 Jena, Germany
- Max Planck Institute for Multidisciplinary Sciences, d-37077 Göttingen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Bieniek M, Wade AD, Bhati AP, Wan S, Coveney PV. TIES 2.0: A Dual-Topology Open Source Relative Binding Free Energy Builder with Web Portal. J Chem Inf Model 2023; 63:718-724. [PMID: 36719676 PMCID: PMC9930115 DOI: 10.1021/acs.jcim.2c01596] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
Relative binding free energy (RBFE) calculations are widely used to aid the process of drug discovery. TIES, Thermodynamic Integration with Enhanced Sampling, is a dual-topology approach to RBFE calculations with support for NAMD and OpenMM molecular dynamics engines. The software has been thoroughly validated on publicly available datasets. Here we describe the open source software along with a web portal (https://ccs-ties.org) that enables users to perform such calculations correctly and rapidly.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mateusz
K. Bieniek
- Centre
for Computational Science, Department of Chemistry, University College London, London WC1H 0AJ, United Kingdom,School
of Natural and Environmental Sciences, Newcastle
University, Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 7RU, United
Kingdom
| | - Alexander D. Wade
- Centre
for Computational Science, Department of Chemistry, University College London, London WC1H 0AJ, United Kingdom
| | - Agastya P. Bhati
- Centre
for Computational Science, Department of Chemistry, University College London, London WC1H 0AJ, United Kingdom
| | - Shunzhou Wan
- Centre
for Computational Science, Department of Chemistry, University College London, London WC1H 0AJ, United Kingdom
| | - Peter V. Coveney
- Centre
for Computational Science, Department of Chemistry, University College London, London WC1H 0AJ, United Kingdom,Advanced
Research Computing Centre, University College
London, London WC1H 0AJ, United
Kingdom,Institute
for Informatics, Faculty of Science, University
of Amsterdam, 1098XH Amsterdam, The Netherlands,E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Combining machine‐learning and molecular‐modeling methods for drug‐target affinity predictions. WIRES COMPUTATIONAL MOLECULAR SCIENCE 2022. [DOI: 10.1002/wcms.1653] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
|
4
|
Wang Y, Fass J, Kaminow B, Herr JE, Rufa D, Zhang I, Pulido I, Henry M, Bruce Macdonald HE, Takaba K, Chodera JD. End-to-end differentiable construction of molecular mechanics force fields. Chem Sci 2022; 13:12016-12033. [PMID: 36349096 PMCID: PMC9600499 DOI: 10.1039/d2sc02739a] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/16/2022] [Accepted: 09/05/2022] [Indexed: 01/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Molecular mechanics (MM) potentials have long been a workhorse of computational chemistry. Leveraging accuracy and speed, these functional forms find use in a wide variety of applications in biomolecular modeling and drug discovery, from rapid virtual screening to detailed free energy calculations. Traditionally, MM potentials have relied on human-curated, inflexible, and poorly extensible discrete chemical perception rules (atom types) for applying parameters to small molecules or biopolymers, making it difficult to optimize both types and parameters to fit quantum chemical or physical property data. Here, we propose an alternative approach that uses graph neural networks to perceive chemical environments, producing continuous atom embeddings from which valence and nonbonded parameters can be predicted using invariance-preserving layers. Since all stages are built from smooth neural functions, the entire process-spanning chemical perception to parameter assignment-is modular and end-to-end differentiable with respect to model parameters, allowing new force fields to be easily constructed, extended, and applied to arbitrary molecules. We show that this approach is not only sufficiently expressive to reproduce legacy atom types, but that it can learn to accurately reproduce and extend existing molecular mechanics force fields. Trained with arbitrary loss functions, it can construct entirely new force fields self-consistently applicable to both biopolymers and small molecules directly from quantum chemical calculations, with superior fidelity than traditional atom or parameter typing schemes. When adapted to simultaneously fit partial charge models, espaloma delivers high-quality partial atomic charges orders of magnitude faster than current best-practices with low inaccuracy. When trained on the same quantum chemical small molecule dataset used to parameterize the Open Force Field ("Parsley") openff-1.2.0 small molecule force field augmented with a peptide dataset, the resulting espaloma model shows superior accuracy vis-á-vis experiments in computing relative alchemical free energy calculations for a popular benchmark. This approach is implemented in the free and open source package espaloma, available at https://github.com/choderalab/espaloma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuanqing Wang
- Computational and Systems Biology Program, Sloan Kettering Institute, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer CenterNew York 10065NYUSA,Physiology, Biophysics and System Biology PhD Program, Weill Cornell Medical College, Cornell UniversityNew York 10065NYUSA,MFA Program in Creative Writing, Division of Humanities and Arts, City College of New York, City University of New YorkNew York 10031NYUSA
| | - Josh Fass
- Computational and Systems Biology Program, Sloan Kettering Institute, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer CenterNew York 10065NYUSA,Tri-Institutional PhD Program in Computational Biology and Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, Cornell UniversityNew York 10065NYUSA
| | - Benjamin Kaminow
- Computational and Systems Biology Program, Sloan Kettering Institute, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer CenterNew York 10065NYUSA,Tri-Institutional PhD Program in Computational Biology and Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, Cornell UniversityNew York 10065NYUSA
| | - John E. Herr
- Computational and Systems Biology Program, Sloan Kettering Institute, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer CenterNew York 10065NYUSA
| | - Dominic Rufa
- Computational and Systems Biology Program, Sloan Kettering Institute, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer CenterNew York 10065NYUSA,Tri-Institutional PhD Program in Chemical Biology, Weill Cornell Medical College, Cornell UniversityNew York 10065NYUSA
| | - Ivy Zhang
- Computational and Systems Biology Program, Sloan Kettering Institute, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer CenterNew York 10065NYUSA,Tri-Institutional PhD Program in Computational Biology and Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, Cornell UniversityNew York 10065NYUSA
| | - Iván Pulido
- Computational and Systems Biology Program, Sloan Kettering Institute, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer CenterNew York 10065NYUSA
| | - Mike Henry
- Computational and Systems Biology Program, Sloan Kettering Institute, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer CenterNew York 10065NYUSA
| | - Hannah E. Bruce Macdonald
- Computational and Systems Biology Program, Sloan Kettering Institute, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer CenterNew York 10065NYUSA
| | - Kenichiro Takaba
- Computational and Systems Biology Program, Sloan Kettering Institute, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer CenterNew York 10065NYUSA,Pharmaceutical Research Center, Advanced Drug Discovery, Asahi Kasei Pharma CorporationShizuoka 410-2321Japan
| | - John D. Chodera
- Computational and Systems Biology Program, Sloan Kettering Institute, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer CenterNew York 10065NYUSA
| |
Collapse
|