To Design Scalable Free Energy Perturbation Networks, Optimal Is Not Enough

Current State of Open Source Force Fields in Protein-Ligand Binding Affinity Predictions

In drug discovery, the in silico prediction of binding affinity is one of the major means to prioritize compounds for synthesis. Alchemical relative binding free energy (RBFE) calculations based on molecular dynamics (MD) simulations are nowadays a popular approach for the accurate affinity ranking of compounds. MD simulations rely on empirical force field parameters, which strongly influence the accuracy of the predicted affinities. Here, we evaluate the ability of six different small-molecule force fields to predict experimental protein-ligand binding affinities in RBFE calculations on a set of 598 ligands and 22 protein targets. The public force fields OpenFF Parsley and Sage, GAFF, and CGenFF show comparable accuracy, while OPLS3e is significantly more accurate. However, a consensus approach using Sage, GAFF, and CGenFF leads to accuracy comparable to OPLS3e. While Parsley and Sage are performing comparably based on aggregated statistics across the whole dataset, there are differences in terms of outliers. Analysis of the force field reveals that improved parameters lead to significant improvement in the accuracy of affinity predictions on subsets of the dataset involving those parameters. Lower accuracy can not only be attributed to the force field parameters but is also dependent on input preparation and sampling convergence of the calculations. Especially large perturbations and nonconverged simulations lead to less accurate predictions. The input structures, Gromacs force field files, as well as the analysis Python notebooks are available on GitHub.

Multistate Method to Efficiently Account for Tautomerism and Protonation in Alchemical Free-Energy Calculations

The majority of drug-like molecules contain at least one ionizable group, and many common drug scaffolds are subject to tautomeric equilibria. Thus, these compounds are found in a mixture of protonation and/or tautomeric states at physiological pH. Intrinsically, standard classical molecular dynamics (MD) simulations cannot describe such equilibria between states, which negatively impacts the prediction of key molecular properties in silico. Following the formalism described by de Oliveira and co-workers (J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2019, 15, 424-435) to consider the influence of all states on the binding process based on alchemical free-energy calculations, we demonstrate in this work that the multistate method replica-exchange enveloping distribution sampling (RE-EDS) is well suited to describe molecules with multiple protonation and/or tautomeric states in a single simulation. We apply our methodology to a series of eight inhibitors of factor Xa with two protonation states and a series of eight inhibitors of glycogen synthase kinase 3β (GSK3β) with two tautomeric states. In particular, we show that given a sufficient phase-space overlap between the states, RE-EDS is computationally more efficient than standard pairwise free-energy methods.

Kartograf: A Geometrically Accurate Atom Mapper for Hybrid-Topology Relative Free Energy Calculations

Relative binding free energy (RBFE) calculations have emerged as a powerful tool that supports ligand optimization in drug discovery. Despite many successes, the use of RBFEs can often be limited by automation problems, in particular, the setup of such calculations. Atom mapping algorithms are an essential component in setting up automatic large-scale hybrid-topology RBFE calculation campaigns. Traditional algorithms typically employ a 2D subgraph isomorphism solver (SIS) in order to estimate the maximum common substructure. SIS-based approaches can be limited by time-intensive operations and issues with capturing geometry-linked chemical properties, potentially leading to suboptimal solutions. To overcome these limitations, we have developed Kartograf, a geometric-graph-based algorithm that uses primarily the 3D coordinates of atoms to find a mapping between two ligands. In free energy approaches, the ligand conformations are usually derived from docking or other previous modeling approaches, giving the coordinates a certain importance. By considering the spatial relationships between atoms related to the molecule coordinates, our algorithm bypasses the computationally complex subgraph matching of SIS-based approaches and reduces the problem to a much simpler bipartite graph matching problem. Moreover, Kartograf effectively circumvents typical mapping issues induced by molecule symmetry and stereoisomerism, making it a more robust approach for atom mapping from a geometric perspective. To validate our method, we calculated mappings with our novel approach using a diverse set of small molecules and used the mappings in relative hydration and binding free energy calculations. The comparison with two SIS-based algorithms showed that Kartograf offers a fast alternative approach. The code for Kartograf is freely available on GitHub (https://github.com/OpenFreeEnergy/kartograf). While developed for the OpenFE ecosystem, Kartograf can also be utilized as a standalone Python package.

Accelerating Alchemical Free Energy Prediction Using a Multistate Method: Application to Multiple Kinases

Alchemical free-energy methods based on molecular dynamics (MD) simulations have become important tools to identify modifications of small organic molecules that improve their protein binding affinity during lead optimization. The routine application of pairwise free-energy methods to rank potential binders from best to worst is impacted by the combinatorial increase in calculations to perform when the number of molecules to assess grows. To address this fundamental limitation, our group has developed replica-exchange enveloping distribution sampling (RE-EDS), a pathway-independent multistate method, enabling the calculation of alchemical free-energy differences between multiple ligands (N > 2) from a single MD simulation. In this work, we apply the method to a set of four kinases with diverse binding pockets and their corresponding inhibitors (42 in total), chosen to showcase the general applicability of RE-EDS in prospective drug design campaigns. We show that for the targets studied, RE-EDS is able to model up to 13 ligands simultaneously with high sampling efficiency, leading to a substantial decrease in computational cost when compared to pairwise methods.

Modern Alchemical Free Energy Methods for Drug Discovery Explained

This Perspective provides a contextual explanation of the current state-of-the-art alchemical free energy methods and their role in drug discovery as well as highlights select emerging technologies. The narrative attempts to answer basic questions about what goes on "under the hood" in free energy simulations and provide general guidelines for how to run simulations and analyze the results. It is the hope that this work will provide a valuable introduction to students and scientists in the field.

Landscape of In Silico Tools for Modeling Covalent Modification of Proteins: A Review on Computational Covalent Drug Discovery

Covalent drug discovery has been a challenging research area given the struggle of finding a sweet balance between selectivity and reactivity for these drugs, the lack of which often leads to off-target activities and hence undesirable side effects. However, there has been a resurgence in covalent drug design following the success of several covalent drugs such as boceprevir (2011), ibrutinib (2013), neratinib (2017), dacomitinib (2018), zanubrutinib (2019), and many others. Design of covalent drugs includes many crucial factors, where "evaluation of the binding affinity" and "a detailed mechanistic understanding on covalent inhibition" are at the top of the list. Well-defined experimental techniques are available to elucidate these factors; however, often they are expensive and/or time-consuming and hence not suitable for high throughput screens. Recent developments in in silico methods provide promise in this direction. In this report, we review a set of recent publications that focused on developing and/or implementing novel in silico techniques in "Computational Covalent Drug Discovery (CCDD)". We also discuss the advantages and disadvantages of these approaches along with what improvements are required to make it a great tool in medicinal chemistry in the near future.