1
|
Han Y, Zhang H, Zeng Z, Liu Z, Lu D, Liu Z. Descriptor-augmented machine learning for enzyme-chemical interaction predictions. Synth Syst Biotechnol 2024; 9:259-268. [PMID: 38450325 PMCID: PMC10915406 DOI: 10.1016/j.synbio.2024.02.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/01/2023] [Revised: 02/21/2024] [Accepted: 02/22/2024] [Indexed: 03/08/2024] Open
Abstract
Descriptors play a pivotal role in enzyme design for the greener synthesis of biochemicals, as they could characterize enzymes and chemicals from the physicochemical and evolutionary perspective. This study examined the effects of various descriptors on the performance of Random Forest model used for enzyme-chemical relationships prediction. We curated activity data of seven specific enzyme families from the literature and developed the pipeline for evaluation the machine learning model performance using 10-fold cross-validation. The influence of protein and chemical descriptors was assessed in three scenarios, which were predicting the activity of unknown relations between known enzymes and known chemicals (new relationship evaluation), predicting the activity of novel enzymes on known chemicals (new enzyme evaluation), and predicting the activity of new chemicals on known enzymes (new chemical evaluation). The results showed that protein descriptors significantly enhanced the classification performance of model on new enzyme evaluation in three out of the seven datasets with the greatest number of enzymes, whereas chemical descriptors appear no effect. A variety of sequence-based and structure-based protein descriptors were constructed, among which the esm-2 descriptor achieved the best results. Using enzyme families as labels showed that descriptors could cluster proteins well, which could explain the contributions of descriptors to the machine learning model. As a counterpart, in the new chemical evaluation, chemical descriptors made significant improvement in four out of the seven datasets, while protein descriptors appear no effect. We attempted to evaluate the generalization ability of the model by correlating the statistics of the datasets with the performance of the models. The results showed that datasets with higher sequence similarity were more likely to get better results in the new enzyme evaluation and datasets with more enzymes were more likely beneficial from the protein descriptor strategy. This work provides guidance for the development of machine learning models for specific enzyme families.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yilei Han
- Department of Chemical Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing, 100084, China
| | - Haoye Zhang
- Department of Computer Science and Technology, Tsinghua University, Beijing, 100084, China
| | - Zheni Zeng
- Department of Computer Science and Technology, Tsinghua University, Beijing, 100084, China
| | - Zhiyuan Liu
- Department of Computer Science and Technology, Tsinghua University, Beijing, 100084, China
| | - Diannan Lu
- Department of Chemical Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing, 100084, China
| | - Zheng Liu
- Department of Chemical Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing, 100084, China
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Wu J, Chen Y, Wu J, Zhao D, Huang J, Lin M, Wang L. Large-scale comparison of machine learning methods for profiling prediction of kinase inhibitors. J Cheminform 2024; 16:13. [PMID: 38291477 PMCID: PMC10829268 DOI: 10.1186/s13321-023-00799-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/30/2023] [Accepted: 12/22/2023] [Indexed: 02/01/2024] Open
Abstract
Conventional machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL) play a key role in the selectivity prediction of kinase inhibitors. A number of models based on available datasets can be used to predict the kinase profile of compounds, but there is still controversy about the advantages and disadvantages of ML and DL for such tasks. In this study, we constructed a comprehensive benchmark dataset of kinase inhibitors, involving in 141,086 unique compounds and 216,823 well-defined bioassay data points for 354 kinases. We then systematically compared the performance of 12 ML and DL methods on the kinase profiling prediction task. Extensive experimental results reveal that (1) Descriptor-based ML models generally slightly outperform fingerprint-based ML models in terms of predictive performance. RF as an ensemble learning approach displays the overall best predictive performance. (2) Single-task graph-based DL models are generally inferior to conventional descriptor- and fingerprint-based ML models, however, the corresponding multi-task models generally improves the average accuracy of kinase profile prediction. For example, the multi-task FP-GNN model outperforms the conventional descriptor- and fingerprint-based ML models with an average AUC of 0.807. (3) Fusion models based on voting and stacking methods can further improve the performance of the kinase profiling prediction task, specifically, RF::AtomPairs + FP2 + RDKitDes fusion model performs best with the highest average AUC value of 0.825 on the test sets. These findings provide useful information for guiding choices of the ML and DL methods for the kinase profiling prediction tasks. Finally, an online platform called KIPP ( https://kipp.idruglab.cn ) and python software are developed based on the best models to support the kinase profiling prediction, as well as various kinase inhibitor identification tasks including virtual screening, compound repositioning and target fishing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jiangxia Wu
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Fermentation and Enzyme Engineering, Joint International Research Laboratory of Synthetic Biology and Medicine, Guangdong Provincial Engineering and Technology Research Center of Biopharmaceuticals, School of Biology and Biological Engineering, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, 510006, China
| | - Yihao Chen
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Fermentation and Enzyme Engineering, Joint International Research Laboratory of Synthetic Biology and Medicine, Guangdong Provincial Engineering and Technology Research Center of Biopharmaceuticals, School of Biology and Biological Engineering, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, 510006, China
| | - Jingxing Wu
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Fermentation and Enzyme Engineering, Joint International Research Laboratory of Synthetic Biology and Medicine, Guangdong Provincial Engineering and Technology Research Center of Biopharmaceuticals, School of Biology and Biological Engineering, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, 510006, China
| | - Duancheng Zhao
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Fermentation and Enzyme Engineering, Joint International Research Laboratory of Synthetic Biology and Medicine, Guangdong Provincial Engineering and Technology Research Center of Biopharmaceuticals, School of Biology and Biological Engineering, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, 510006, China
| | - Jindi Huang
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Fermentation and Enzyme Engineering, Joint International Research Laboratory of Synthetic Biology and Medicine, Guangdong Provincial Engineering and Technology Research Center of Biopharmaceuticals, School of Biology and Biological Engineering, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, 510006, China
| | - MuJie Lin
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Fermentation and Enzyme Engineering, Joint International Research Laboratory of Synthetic Biology and Medicine, Guangdong Provincial Engineering and Technology Research Center of Biopharmaceuticals, School of Biology and Biological Engineering, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, 510006, China
| | - Ling Wang
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Fermentation and Enzyme Engineering, Joint International Research Laboratory of Synthetic Biology and Medicine, Guangdong Provincial Engineering and Technology Research Center of Biopharmaceuticals, School of Biology and Biological Engineering, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, 510006, China.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Gu S, Liu H, Liu L, Hou T, Kang Y. Artificial intelligence methods in kinase target profiling: Advances and challenges. Drug Discov Today 2023; 28:103796. [PMID: 37805065 DOI: 10.1016/j.drudis.2023.103796] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/12/2023] [Revised: 09/29/2023] [Accepted: 10/03/2023] [Indexed: 10/09/2023]
Abstract
Kinases have a crucial role in regulating almost the full range of cellular processes, making them essential targets for therapeutic interventions against various diseases. Accurate kinase-profiling prediction is vital for addressing the selectivity/specificity challenges in kinase drug discovery, which is closely related to lead optimization, drug repurposing, and the understanding of potential drug side effects. In this review, we provide an overview of the latest advancements in machine learning (ML)-based and deep learning (DL)-based quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) models for kinase profiling. We highlight current trends in this rapidly evolving field and discuss the existing challenges and future directions regarding experimental data set construction and model architecture design. Our aim is to offer practical insights and guidance for the development and utilization of these approaches.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shukai Gu
- College of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, Zhejiang, China
| | - Huanxiang Liu
- Faculty of Applied Science, Macao Polytechnic University, Macao 999078
| | - Liwei Liu
- Advanced Computing and Storage Laboratory, Central Research Institute, 2012 Laboratories, Huawei Technologies Co. Ltd, Nanjing 210000, Jiangsu, China
| | - Tingjun Hou
- College of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, Zhejiang, China.
| | - Yu Kang
- College of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, Zhejiang, China.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Ong WJG, Kirubakaran P, Karanicolas J. Poor Generalization by Current Deep Learning Models for Predicting Binding Affinities of Kinase Inhibitors. BIORXIV : THE PREPRINT SERVER FOR BIOLOGY 2023:2023.09.04.556234. [PMID: 37732243 PMCID: PMC10508770 DOI: 10.1101/2023.09.04.556234] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/22/2023]
Abstract
The extreme surge of interest over the past decade surrounding the use of neural networks has inspired many groups to deploy them for predicting binding affinities of drug-like molecules to their receptors. A model that can accurately make such predictions has the potential to screen large chemical libraries and help streamline the drug discovery process. However, despite reports of models that accurately predict quantitative inhibition using protein kinase sequences and inhibitors' SMILES strings, it is still unclear whether these models can generalize to previously unseen data. Here, we build a Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) analogous to those previously reported and evaluate the model over four datasets commonly used for inhibitor/kinase predictions. We find that the model performs comparably to those previously reported, provided that the individual data points are randomly split between the training set and the test set. However, model performance is dramatically deteriorated when all data for a given inhibitor is placed together in the same training/testing fold, implying that information leakage underlies the models' performance. Through comparison to simple models in which the SMILES strings are tokenized, or in which test set predictions are simply copied from the closest training set data points, we demonstrate that there is essentially no generalization whatsoever in this model. In other words, the model has not learned anything about molecular interactions, and does not provide any benefit over much simpler and more transparent models. These observations strongly point to the need for richer structure-based encodings, to obtain useful prospective predictions of not-yet-synthesized candidate inhibitors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wern Juin Gabriel Ong
- Cancer Signaling & Microenvironment Program, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA 19111
- Bowdoin College, Brunswick, ME 04011
| | - Palani Kirubakaran
- Cancer Signaling & Microenvironment Program, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA 19111
| | - John Karanicolas
- Cancer Signaling & Microenvironment Program, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA 19111
| |
Collapse
|