Beware of Simple Methods for Structure-Based Virtual Screening: The Critical Importance of Broader Comparisons

A Robust Induced Fit Docking Approach with the Combination of the Hybrid All-Atom/United-Atom/Coarse-Grained Model and Simulated Annealing

Molecular docking remains an indispensable tool in computational biology and structure-based drug discovery. However, the correct prediction of binding poses remains a major challenge for molecular docking, especially for target proteins where a substrate binding induces significant reorganization of the active site. Here, we introduce an Induced Fit Docking (IFD) approach named AA/UA/CG-SA-IFD, which combines a hybrid All-Atom/United-Atom/Coarse-Grained model with Simulated Annealing. In this approach, the core region is represented by the All-Atom(AA) model, while the protein environment beyond the core region and the solvent are treated with either the United-Atom (UA) or the Coarse-Grained (CG) model. By combining the Elastic Network Model (ENM) for the CG region, the hybrid model ensures a reasonable description of ligand binding and the environmental effects of the protein, facilitating highly efficient and reliable sampling of ligand binding through Simulated Annealing (SA) at a high temperature. Upon validation with two testing sets, the AA/UA/CG-SA-IFD approach demonstrates remarkable accuracy and efficiency in induced fit docking, even for challenging cases where the docked poses significantly deviate from crystal structures.

Advances in machine intelligence-driven virtual screening approaches for big-data

Virtual screening (VS) is an integral and ever-evolving domain of drug discovery framework. The VS is traditionally classified into ligand-based (LB) and structure-based (SB) approaches. Machine intelligence or artificial intelligence has wide applications in the drug discovery domain to reduce time and resource consumption. In combination with machine intelligence algorithms, VS has emerged into revolutionarily progressive technology that learns within robust decision orders for data curation and hit molecule screening from large VS libraries in minutes or hours. The exponential growth of chemical and biological data has evolved as "big-data" in the public domain demands modern and advanced machine intelligence-driven VS approaches to screen hit molecules from ultra-large VS libraries. VS has evolved from an individual approach (LB and SB) to integrated LB and SB techniques to explore various ligand and target protein aspects for the enhanced rate of appropriate hit molecule prediction. Current trends demand advanced and intelligent solutions to handle enormous data in drug discovery domain for screening and optimizing hits or lead with fewer or no false positive hits. Following the big-data drift and tremendous growth in computational architecture, we presented this review. Here, the article categorized and emphasized individual VS techniques, detailed literature presented for machine learning implementation, modern machine intelligence approaches, and limitations and deliberated the future prospects.

Comprehensive machine learning boosts structure-based virtual screening for PARP1 inhibitors

Poly ADP-ribose polymerase 1 (PARP1) is an attractive therapeutic target for cancer treatment. Machine-learning scoring functions constitute a promising approach to discovering novel PARP1 inhibitors. Cutting-edge PARP1-specific machine-learning scoring functions were investigated using semi-synthetic training data from docking activity-labelled molecules: known PARP1 inhibitors, hard-to-discriminate decoys property-matched to them with generative graph neural networks and confirmed inactives. We further made test sets harder by including only molecules dissimilar to those in the training set. Comprehensive analysis of these datasets using five supervised learning algorithms, and protein-ligand fingerprints extracted from docking poses and ligand only features revealed one highly predictive scoring function. This is the PARP1-specific support vector machine-based regressor, when employing PLEC fingerprints, which achieved a high Normalized Enrichment Factor at the top 1% on the hardest test set (NEF1% = 0.588, median of 10 repetitions), and was more predictive than any other investigated scoring function, especially the classical scoring function employed as baseline.

Inactive-enriched machine-learning models exploiting patent data improve structure-based virtual screening for PDL1 dimerizers

INTRODUCTION

Small-molecule Programmable Cell Death Protein 1/Programmable Death-Ligand 1 (PD1/PDL1) inhibition via PDL1 dimerization has the potential to lead to inexpensive drugs with better cancer patient outcomes and milder side effects. However, this therapeutic approach has proven challenging, with only one PDL1 dimerizer reaching early clinical trials so far. There is hence a need for fast and accurate methods to develop alternative PDL1 dimerizers.

OBJECTIVES

We aim to show that structure-based virtual screening (SBVS) based on PDL1-specific machine-learning (ML) scoring functions (SFs) is a powerful drug design tool for detecting PD1/PDL1 inhibitors via PDL1 dimerization.

METHODS

By incorporating the latest MLSF advances, we generated and evaluated PDL1-specific MLSFs (classifiers and inactive-enriched regressors) on two demanding test sets.

RESULTS

60 PDL1-specific MLSFs (30 classifiers and 30 regressors) were generated. Our large-scale analysis provides highly predictive PDL1-specific MLSFs that benefitted from training with large volumes of docked inactives and enabling inactive-enriched regression.

CONCLUSION

PDL1-specific MLSFs strongly outperformed generic SFs of various types on this target and are released here without restrictions.

A practical guide to machine-learning scoring for structure-based virtual screening

Structure-based virtual screening (SBVS) via docking has been used to discover active molecules for a range of therapeutic targets. Chemical and protein data sets that contain integrated bioactivity information have increased both in number and in size. Artificial intelligence and, more concretely, its machine-learning (ML) branch, including deep learning, have effectively exploited these data sets to build scoring functions (SFs) for SBVS against targets with an atomic-resolution 3D model (e.g., generated by X-ray crystallography or predicted by AlphaFold2). Often outperforming their generic and non-ML counterparts, target-specific ML-based SFs represent the state of the art for SBVS. Here, we present a comprehensive and user-friendly protocol to build and rigorously evaluate these new SFs for SBVS. This protocol is organized into four sections: (i) using a public benchmark of a given target to evaluate an existing generic SF; (ii) preparing experimental data for a target from public repositories; (iii) partitioning data into a training set and a test set for subsequent target-specific ML modeling; and (iv) generating and evaluating target-specific ML SFs by using the prepared training-test partitions. All necessary code and input/output data related to three example targets (acetylcholinesterase, HMG-CoA reductase, and peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-α) are available at https://github.com/vktrannguyen/MLSF-protocol , can be run by using a single computer within 1 week and make use of easily accessible software/programs (e.g., Smina, CNN-Score, RF-Score-VS and DeepCoy) and web resources. Our aim is to provide practical guidance on how to augment training data to enhance SBVS performance, how to identify the most suitable supervised learning algorithm for a data set, and how to build an SF with the highest likelihood of discovering target-active molecules within a given compound library.

A generalized protein-ligand scoring framework with balanced scoring, docking, ranking and screening powers

Applying machine learning algorithms to protein-ligand scoring functions has aroused widespread attention in recent years due to the high predictive accuracy and affordable computational cost. Nevertheless, most machine learning-based scoring functions are only applicable to a specific task, e.g., binding affinity prediction, binding pose prediction or virtual screening, suggesting that the development of a scoring function with balanced performance in all critical tasks remains a grand challenge. To this end, we propose a novel parameterization strategy by introducing an adjustable binding affinity term that represents the correlation between the predicted outcomes and experimental data into the training of mixture density network. The resulting residue-atom distance likelihood potential not only retains the superior docking and screening power over all the other state-of-the-art approaches, but also achieves a remarkable improvement in scoring and ranking performance. We emphatically explore the impacts of several key elements on prediction accuracy as well as the task preference, and demonstrate that the performance of scoring/ranking and docking/screening tasks of a certain model could be well balanced through an appropriate manner. Overall, our study highlights the potential utility of our innovative parameterization strategy as well as the resulting scoring framework in future structure-based drug design.

On the Best Way to Cluster NCI-60 Molecules

Machine learning-based models have been widely used in the early drug-design pipeline. To validate these models, cross-validation strategies have been employed, including those using clustering of molecules in terms of their chemical structures. However, the poor clustering of compounds will compromise such validation, especially on test molecules dissimilar to those in the training set. This study aims at finding the best way to cluster the molecules screened by the National Cancer Institute (NCI)-60 project by comparing hierarchical, Taylor-Butina, and uniform manifold approximation and projection (UMAP) clustering methods. The best-performing algorithm can then be used to generate clusters for model validation strategies. This study also aims at measuring the impact of removing outlier molecules prior to the clustering step. Clustering results are evaluated using three well-known clustering quality metrics. In addition, we compute an average similarity matrix to assess the quality of each cluster. The results show variation in clustering quality from method to method. The clusters obtained by the hierarchical and Taylor-Butina methods are more computationally expensive to use in cross-validation strategies, and both cluster the molecules poorly. In contrast, the UMAP method provides the best quality, and therefore we recommend it to analyze this highly valuable dataset.