1
|
Prabantu VM, Tandon H, Sandhya S, Sowdhamini R, Srinivasan N. The alteration of structural network upon transient association between proteins studied using graph theory. Proteins 2025; 93:217-225. [PMID: 37902388 DOI: 10.1002/prot.26606] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/30/2023] [Revised: 08/31/2023] [Accepted: 09/14/2023] [Indexed: 10/31/2023]
Abstract
Proteins such as enzymes perform their function by predominant non-covalent bond interactions between transiently interacting units. There is an impact on the overall structural topology of the protein, albeit transient nature of such interactions, that enable proteins to deactivate or activate. This aspect of the alteration of the structural topology is studied by employing protein structural networks, which are node-edge representative models of protein structure, reported as a robust tool for capturing interactions between residues. Several methods have been optimized to collect meaningful, functionally relevant information by studying alteration of structural networks. In this article, different methods of comparing protein structural networks are employed, along with spectral decomposition of graphs to study the subtle impact of protein-protein interactions. A detailed analysis of the structural network of interacting partners is performed across a dataset of around 900 pairs of bound complexes and corresponding unbound protein structures. The variation in network parameters at, around, and far away from the interface are analyzed. Finally, we present interesting case studies, where an allosteric mechanism of structural impact is understood from communication-path detection methods. The results of this analysis are beneficial in understanding protein stability, for future engineering, and docking studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Himani Tandon
- Molecular Biophysics Unit, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore, India
- Structural Studies Division, MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Cambridge, UK
| | - Sankaran Sandhya
- Faculty of Life and Health Sciences, Department of Biotechnology, Ramaiah University of Applied Sciences, Bangalore, India
| | - Ramanathan Sowdhamini
- Molecular Biophysics Unit, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore, India
- National Centre for Biological Sciences (TIFR), Bangalore, India
- Institute of Bioinformatics and Applied Biotechnology, Bangalore, India
| | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Park S, Seok C. GalaxyWater-CNN: Prediction of Water Positions on the Protein Structure by a 3D-Convolutional Neural Network. J Chem Inf Model 2022; 62:3157-3168. [PMID: 35749367 DOI: 10.1021/acs.jcim.2c00306] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
Proteins interact with numerous water molecules to perform their physiological functions in biological organisms. Most water molecules act as solvent media; hence, their roles may be considered implicitly in theoretical treatments of protein structure and function. However, some water molecules interact intimately with proteins and require explicit treatment to understand their effects. Most physics-based computational methods are limited in their ability to accurately locate water molecules on protein surfaces because of inaccurate energy functions. Instead of relying on an energy function, this study attempts to learn the locations of water molecules from structural data. GalaxyWater-convolutional neural network (CNN) predicts water positions on protein chains, protein-protein interfaces, and protein-compound binding sites using a 3D-CNN model that is trained to generate a water score map on a given protein structure. The training data are compiled from high-resolution protein crystal structures resolved together with water molecules. GalaxyWater-CNN shows improved water prediction performance both in the coverage of crystal water molecules and in the accuracy of the predicted water positions when compared with previous energy-based methods. This method shows a superior performance in predicting water molecules that form hydrogen-bond networks precisely. The web service and the source code of this water prediction method are freely available at https://galaxy.seoklab.org/gwcnn and https://github.com/seoklab/GalaxyWater-CNN, respectively.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sangwoo Park
- Department of Chemistry, Seoul National University, Seoul 08826, Republic of Korea
| | - Chaok Seok
- Department of Chemistry, Seoul National University, Seoul 08826, Republic of Korea.,Galux Inc., Gwanak-gu, Seoul 08738, Republic of Korea
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Abstract
The biological significance of proteins attracted the scientific community in exploring their characteristics. The studies shed light on the interaction patterns and functions of proteins in a living body. Due to their practical difficulties, reliable experimental techniques pave the way for introducing computational methods in the interaction prediction. Automated methods reduced the difficulties but could not yet replace experimental studies as the field is still evolving. Interaction prediction problem being critical needs highly accurate results, but none of the existing methods could offer reliable performance that can parallel with experimental results yet. This article aims to assess the existing computational docking algorithms, their challenges, and future scope. Blind docking techniques are quite helpful when no information other than the individual structures are available. As more and more complex structures are being added to different databases, information-driven approaches can be a good alternative. Artificial intelligence, ruling over the major fields, is expected to take over this domain very shortly.
Collapse
|
4
|
Tandon H, de Brevern AG, Srinivasan N. Transient association between proteins elicits alteration of dynamics at sites far away from interfaces. Structure 2020; 29:371-384.e3. [PMID: 33306961 DOI: 10.1016/j.str.2020.11.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/08/2020] [Revised: 10/01/2020] [Accepted: 11/17/2020] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
Proteins are known to undergo structural changes upon binding to partner proteins. However, the prevalence, extent, location, and function of change in protein dynamics due to transient protein-protein interactions is not well documented. Here, we have analyzed a dataset of 58 protein-protein complexes of known three-dimensional structure and structures of their corresponding unbound forms to evaluate dynamics changes induced by binding. Fifty-five percent of cases showed significant dynamics change away from the interfaces. This change is not always accompanied by an observed structural change. Binding of protein partner is found to alter inter-residue communication within the tertiary structure in about 90% of cases. Also, residue motions accessible to proteins in unbound form were not always maintained in the bound form. Further analyses revealed functional roles for the distant site where dynamics change was observed. Overall, the results presented here strongly suggest that alteration of protein dynamics due to binding of a partner protein commonly occurs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Himani Tandon
- Molecular Biophysics Unit, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore, India
| | - Alexandre G de Brevern
- INSERM, U 1134, DSIMB, 75739 Paris, France; Univ Paris, UMR_S 1134, 75739 Paris, France; Institut National de la Transfusion Sanguine (INTS), 75739 Paris, France; Laboratoire d'Excellence GR-Ex, 75739 Paris, France
| | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Saikia S, Bordoloi M. Molecular Docking: Challenges, Advances and its Use in Drug Discovery Perspective. Curr Drug Targets 2020; 20:501-521. [PMID: 30360733 DOI: 10.2174/1389450119666181022153016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 246] [Impact Index Per Article: 49.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/25/2018] [Revised: 06/08/2018] [Accepted: 08/28/2018] [Indexed: 01/21/2023]
Abstract
Molecular docking is a process through which small molecules are docked into the macromolecular structures for scoring its complementary values at the binding sites. It is a vibrant research area with dynamic utility in structure-based drug-designing, lead optimization, biochemical pathway and for drug designing being the most attractive tools. Two pillars for a successful docking experiment are correct pose and affinity prediction. Each program has its own advantages and drawbacks with respect to their docking accuracy, ranking accuracy and time consumption so a general conclusion cannot be drawn. Moreover, users don't always consider sufficient diversity in their test sets which results in certain programs to outperform others. In this review, the prime focus has been laid on the challenges of docking and troubleshooters in existing programs, underlying algorithmic background of docking, preferences regarding the use of docking programs for best results illustrated with examples, comparison of performance for existing tools and algorithms, state of art in docking, recent trends of diseases and current drug industries, evidence from clinical trials and post-marketing surveillance are discussed. These aspects of the molecular drug designing paradigm are quite controversial and challenging and this review would be an asset to the bioinformatics and drug designing communities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Surovi Saikia
- Natural Products Chemistry Group, CSIR North East Institute of Science & Technology, Jorhat-785006, Assam, India
| | - Manobjyoti Bordoloi
- Natural Products Chemistry Group, CSIR North East Institute of Science & Technology, Jorhat-785006, Assam, India
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Kundrotas PJ, Kotthoff I, Choi SW, Copeland MM, Vakser IA. Dockground Tool for Development and Benchmarking of Protein Docking Procedures. Methods Mol Biol 2020; 2165:289-300. [PMID: 32621232 DOI: 10.1007/978-1-0716-0708-4_17] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/11/2023]
Abstract
Databases of protein-protein complexes are essential for the development of protein modeling/docking techniques. Such databases provide a knowledge base for docking algorithms, intermolecular potentials, search procedures, scoring functions, and refinement protocols. Development of docking techniques requires systematic validation of the modeling protocols on carefully curated benchmark sets of complexes. We present a description and a guide to the DOCKGROUND resource ( http://dockground.compbio.ku.edu ) for structural modeling of protein interactions. The resource integrates various datasets of protein complexes and other data for the development and testing of protein docking techniques. The sets include bound complexes, experimentally determined unbound, simulated unbound, model-model complexes, and docking decoys. The datasets are available to the user community through a Web interface.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Petras J Kundrotas
- Computational Biology Program and Department of Molecular Biosciences, The University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS, USA.
| | - Ian Kotthoff
- Computational Biology Program and Department of Molecular Biosciences, The University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS, USA
| | - Sherman W Choi
- Computational Biology Program and Department of Molecular Biosciences, The University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS, USA
| | - Matthew M Copeland
- Computational Biology Program and Department of Molecular Biosciences, The University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS, USA
| | - Ilya A Vakser
- Computational Biology Program and Department of Molecular Biosciences, The University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Guo F, Zou Q, Yang G, Wang D, Tang J, Xu J. Identifying protein-protein interface via a novel multi-scale local sequence and structural representation. BMC Bioinformatics 2019; 20:483. [PMID: 31874604 PMCID: PMC6929278 DOI: 10.1186/s12859-019-3048-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/14/2019] [Accepted: 08/21/2019] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Protein-protein interaction plays a key role in a multitude of biological processes, such as signal transduction, de novo drug design, immune responses, and enzymatic activities. Gaining insights of various binding abilities can deepen our understanding of the interaction. It is of great interest to understand how proteins in a complex interact with each other. Many efficient methods have been developed for identifying protein-protein interface. Results In this paper, we obtain the local information on protein-protein interface, through multi-scale local average block and hexagon structure construction. Given a pair of proteins, we use a trained support vector regression (SVR) model to select best configurations. On Benchmark v4.0, our method achieves average Irmsd value of 3.28Å and overall Fnat value of 63%, which improves upon Irmsd of 3.89Å and Fnat of 49% for ZRANK, and Irmsd of 3.99Å and Fnat of 46% for ClusPro. On CAPRI targets, our method achieves average Irmsd value of 3.45Å and overall Fnat value of 46%, which improves upon Irmsd of 4.18Å and Fnat of 40% for ZRANK, and Irmsd of 5.12Å and Fnat of 32% for ClusPro. The success rates by our method, FRODOCK 2.0, InterEvDock and SnapDock on Benchmark v4.0 are 41.5%, 29.0%, 29.4% and 37.0%, respectively. Conclusion Experiments show that our method performs better than some state-of-the-art methods, based on the prediction quality improved in terms of CAPRI evaluation criteria. All these results demonstrate that our method is a valuable technological tool for identifying protein-protein interface.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fei Guo
- College of Intelligence and Computing, Tianjin University, Tianjin, People's Republic of China.
| | - Quan Zou
- Institute of Fundamental and Frontier Sciences, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, People's Republic of China
| | - Guang Yang
- School of Economics, Nankai University, Tianjin, People's Republic of China
| | - Dan Wang
- Department of Computer Science, City University of Hong Kong, Kowloon Tong, Hong Kong
| | - Jijun Tang
- College of Intelligence and Computing, Tianjin University, Tianjin, People's Republic of China.,Department of Computer Science and Engineering, University of South Carolina, Columbia, USA
| | - Junhai Xu
- College of Intelligence and Computing, Tianjin University, Tianjin, People's Republic of China
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Anishchenko I, Kundrotas PJ, Vakser IA. Contact Potential for Structure Prediction of Proteins and Protein Complexes from Potts Model. Biophys J 2018; 115:809-821. [PMID: 30122295 DOI: 10.1016/j.bpj.2018.07.035] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/07/2018] [Revised: 07/16/2018] [Accepted: 07/31/2018] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
The energy function is the key component of protein modeling methodology. This work presents a semianalytical approach to the development of contact potentials for protein structure modeling. Residue-residue and atom-atom contact energies were derived by maximizing the probability of observing native sequences in a nonredundant set of protein structures. The optimization task was formulated as an inverse statistical mechanics problem applied to the Potts model. Its solution by pseudolikelihood maximization provides consistent estimates of coupling constants at atomic and residue levels. The best performance was achieved when interacting atoms were grouped according to their physicochemical properties. For individual protein structures, the performance of the contact potentials in distinguishing near-native structures from the decoys is similar to the top-performing scoring functions. The potentials also yielded significant improvement in the protein docking success rates. The potentials recapitulated experimentally determined protein stability changes upon point mutations and protein-protein binding affinities. The approach offers a different perspective on knowledge-based potentials and may serve as the basis for their further development.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ivan Anishchenko
- Computational Biology Program and Department of Molecular Biosciences, The University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas
| | - Petras J Kundrotas
- Computational Biology Program and Department of Molecular Biosciences, The University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas.
| | - Ilya A Vakser
- Computational Biology Program and Department of Molecular Biosciences, The University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Kundrotas PJ, Anishchenko I, Dauzhenka T, Kotthoff I, Mnevets D, Copeland MM, Vakser IA. Dockground: A comprehensive data resource for modeling of protein complexes. Protein Sci 2017; 27:172-181. [PMID: 28891124 DOI: 10.1002/pro.3295] [Citation(s) in RCA: 54] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2017] [Revised: 09/06/2017] [Accepted: 09/07/2017] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
Abstract
Characterization of life processes at the molecular level requires structural details of protein interactions. The number of experimentally determined structures of protein-protein complexes accounts only for a fraction of known protein interactions. This gap in structural description of the interactome has to be bridged by modeling. An essential part of the development of structural modeling/docking techniques for protein interactions is databases of protein-protein complexes. They are necessary for studying protein interfaces, providing a knowledge base for docking algorithms, and developing intermolecular potentials, search procedures, and scoring functions. Development of protein-protein docking techniques requires thorough benchmarking of different parts of the docking protocols on carefully curated sets of protein-protein complexes. We present a comprehensive description of the Dockground resource (http://dockground.compbio.ku.edu) for structural modeling of protein interactions, including previously unpublished unbound docking benchmark set 4, and the X-ray docking decoy set 2. The resource offers a variety of interconnected datasets of protein-protein complexes and other data for the development and testing of different aspects of protein docking methodologies. Based on protein-protein complexes extracted from the PDB biounit files, Dockground offers sets of X-ray unbound, simulated unbound, model, and docking decoy structures. All datasets are freely available for download, as a whole or selecting specific structures, through a user-friendly interface on one integrated website.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Petras J Kundrotas
- Center for Computational Biology, The University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas, 66045
| | - Ivan Anishchenko
- Center for Computational Biology, The University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas, 66045
| | - Taras Dauzhenka
- Center for Computational Biology, The University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas, 66045
| | - Ian Kotthoff
- Center for Computational Biology, The University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas, 66045
| | - Daniil Mnevets
- Center for Computational Biology, The University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas, 66045
| | - Matthew M Copeland
- Center for Computational Biology, The University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas, 66045
| | - Ilya A Vakser
- Center for Computational Biology, The University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas, 66045.,Department of Molecular Biosciences, The University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas, 66045
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Wichapong K, Alard JE, Ortega-Gomez A, Weber C, Hackeng TM, Soehnlein O, Nicolaes GAF. Structure-Based Design of Peptidic Inhibitors of the Interaction between CC Chemokine Ligand 5 (CCL5) and Human Neutrophil Peptides 1 (HNP1). J Med Chem 2016; 59:4289-301. [PMID: 26871718 DOI: 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.5b01952] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/01/2023]
Abstract
Protein-protein interactions (PPIs) are receiving increasing interest, much sparked by the realization that they represent druggable targets. Recently, we successfully developed a peptidic inhibitor, RRYGTSKYQ ("SKY" peptide), that shows high potential in vitro and in vivo to interrupt a PPI between the platelet-borne chemokine CCL5 and the neutrophil-derived granule protein HNP1. This PPI plays a vital role in monocyte adhesion, representing a key mechanism in acute and chronic inflammatory diseases. Here, we present extensive and detailed computational methods applied to develop the SKY peptide. We combined experimentally determined binding affinities (KD) of several orthologs of CCL5 with HNP1 with in silico studies to identify the most likely heterodimeric CCL5-HNP1 complex which was subsequently used as a starting structure to rationally design peptidic inhibitors. Our method represents a fast and simple approach that can be widely applied to determine other protein-protein complexes and moreover to design inhibitors or stabilizers of protein-protein interaction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kanin Wichapong
- Department of Biochemistry, Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht (CARIM), Maastricht University , 6200 MD Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Jean-Eric Alard
- Institute for Cardiovascular Prevention, Ludwig Maximilians University Munich , 80336 Munich, Germany
| | - Almudena Ortega-Gomez
- Institute for Cardiovascular Prevention, Ludwig Maximilians University Munich , 80336 Munich, Germany
| | - Christian Weber
- Department of Biochemistry, Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht (CARIM), Maastricht University , 6200 MD Maastricht, The Netherlands.,Institute for Cardiovascular Prevention, Ludwig Maximilians University Munich , 80336 Munich, Germany.,German Centre for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), Partner Site Munich Heart Alliance, 80336 Munich, Germany
| | - Tilman M Hackeng
- Department of Biochemistry, Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht (CARIM), Maastricht University , 6200 MD Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Oliver Soehnlein
- Institute for Cardiovascular Prevention, Ludwig Maximilians University Munich , 80336 Munich, Germany.,German Centre for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), Partner Site Munich Heart Alliance, 80336 Munich, Germany.,Department of Pathology, Academic Medical Center (AMC), University of Amsterdam , 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Gerry A F Nicolaes
- Department of Biochemistry, Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht (CARIM), Maastricht University , 6200 MD Maastricht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|