Data-Driven Derivation of an "Informer Compound Set" for Improved Selection of Active Compounds in High-Throughput Screening

The Use of Informer Sets in Screening: Perspectives on an Efficient Strategy to Identify New Probes

Small-molecule discovery typically involves large-scale screening campaigns, spanning multiple compound collections. However, such activities can be cost- or time-prohibitive, especially when using complex assay systems, limiting the number of compounds tested. Further, low hit rates can make the process inefficient. Sparse coverage of chemical structure or biological activity space can lead to limited success in a primary screen and represents a missed opportunity by virtue of selecting the "wrong" compounds to test. Thus, the choice of screening collections becomes of paramount importance. In this perspective, we discuss the utility of generating "informer sets" for small-molecule discovery, and how this strategy can be leveraged to prioritize probe candidates. While many researchers may assume that informer sets are focused on particular targets (e.g., kinases) or processes (e.g., autophagy), efforts to assemble informer sets based on historical bioactivity or successful human exposure (e.g., repurposing collections) have shown promise as well. Another method for generating informer sets is based on chemical structure, particularly when the compounds have unknown activities and targets. We describe our efforts to screen an informer set representing a collection of 100,000 small molecules synthesized through diversity-oriented synthesis (DOS). This process enables researchers to identify activity early and more extensively screen only a few chemical scaffolds, rather than the entire collection. This elegant and economic outcome is a goal of the informer set approach. Here, we aim not only to shed light on this process, but also to promote the use of informer sets more widely in small-molecule discovery projects.

The right tools for the job: the central role for next generation chemical probes and chemistry-based target deconvolution methods in phenotypic drug discovery

The reconnection of the scientific community with phenotypic drug discovery has created exciting new possibilities to develop therapies for diseases with highly complex biology. It promises to revolutionise fields such as neurodegenerative disease and regenerative medicine, where the development of new drugs has consistently proved elusive. Arguably, the greatest challenge in readopting the phenotypic drug discovery approach exists in establishing a crucial chain of translatability between phenotype and benefit to patients in the clinic. This remains a key stumbling block for the field which needs to be overcome in order to fully realise the potential of phenotypic drug discovery. Excellent quality chemical probes and chemistry-based target deconvolution techniques will be a crucial part of this process. In this review, we discuss the current capabilities of chemical probes and chemistry-based target deconvolution methods and evaluate the next advances necessary in order to fully support phenotypic screening approaches in drug discovery.

Predicting kinase inhibitors using bioactivity matrix derived informer sets

Prediction of compounds that are active against a desired biological target is a common step in drug discovery efforts. Virtual screening methods seek some active-enriched fraction of a library for experimental testing. Where data are too scarce to train supervised learning models for compound prioritization, initial screening must provide the necessary data. Commonly, such an initial library is selected on the basis of chemical diversity by some pseudo-random process (for example, the first few plates of a larger library) or by selecting an entire smaller library. These approaches may not produce a sufficient number or diversity of actives. An alternative approach is to select an informer set of screening compounds on the basis of chemogenomic information from previous testing of compounds against a large number of targets. We compare different ways of using chemogenomic data to choose a small informer set of compounds based on previously measured bioactivity data. We develop this Informer-Based-Ranking (IBR) approach using the Published Kinase Inhibitor Sets (PKIS) as the chemogenomic data to select the informer sets. We test the informer compounds on a target that is not part of the chemogenomic data, then predict the activity of the remaining compounds based on the experimental informer data and the chemogenomic data. Through new chemical screening experiments, we demonstrate the utility of IBR strategies in a prospective test on three kinase targets not included in the PKIS.

In the early stages of drug discovery efforts, computational models are used to predict activity and prioritize compounds for experimental testing. New targets commonly lack the data necessary to build effective models, and the screening needed to generate that experimental data can be costly. We seek to improve the efficiency of the initial screening phase, and of the process of prioritizing compounds for subsequent screening.

We choose a small informer set of compounds based on publicly available prior screening data on distinct targets. We then collect experimental data on these informer compounds and use that data to predict the activity of other compounds in the set for the target of interest. Computational and statistical tools are needed to identify informer compounds and to prioritize other compounds for subsequent phases of screening. We find that selection of informer compounds on the basis of bioactivity data from previous screening efforts is superior to the traditional approach of selection of a chemically diverse subset of compounds. We demonstrate the success of this approach in retrospective tests on the Published Kinase Inhibitor Sets (PKIS) chemogenomic data and in prospective experimental screens against three additional non-human kinase targets.

Accurate Hit Estimation for Iterative Screening Using Venn-ABERS Predictors

Iterative screening has emerged as a promising approach to increase the efficiency of high-throughput screening (HTS) campaigns in drug discovery. By learning from a subset of the compound library, inferences on what compounds to screen next can be made by predictive models. One of the challenges of iterative screening is to decide how many iterations to perform. This is mainly related to difficulties in estimating the prospective hit rate in any given iteration. In this article, a novel method based on Venn-ABERS predictors is proposed. The method provides accurate estimates of the number of hits retrieved in any given iteration during an HTS campaign. The estimates provide the necessary information to support the decision on the number of iterations needed to maximize the screening outcome. Thus, this method offers a prospective screening strategy for early-stage drug discovery.

Data-driven approaches used for compound library design, hit triage and bioactivity modeling in high-throughput screening

High-throughput screening (HTS) campaigns are routinely performed in pharmaceutical companies to explore activity profiles of chemical libraries for the identification of promising candidates for further investigation. With the aim of improving hit rates in these campaigns, data-driven approaches have been used to design relevant compound screening collections, enable effective hit triage and perform activity modeling for compound prioritization. Remarkable progress has been made in the activity modeling area since the recent introduction of large-scale bioactivity-based compound similarity metrics. This is evidenced by increased hit rates in iterative screening strategies and novel insights into compound mode of action obtained through activity modeling. Here, we provide an overview of the developments in data-driven approaches, elaborate on novel activity modeling techniques and screening paradigms explored and outline their significance in HTS.

Selection of Informative Examples in Chemogenomic Datasets

High-throughput and high-content screening campaigns have resulted in the creation of large chemogenomic matrices. These matrices form the training data which is used to build ligand-target interaction models for pharmacological and chemical biology research. While academic, government, and industrial efforts continuously add to the ligand-target data pairs available for modeling, major research efforts are devoted to improving machine learning techniques to cope with the sparseness, heterogeneity, and size of available datasets as well as inherent noise and bias. This "race of arms" has led to the creation of algorithms to generate highly complex models with high prediction performance at the cost of training efficiency as well as interpretability.In contrast, recent studies have challenged the necessity for "big data" in chemogenomic modeling and found that models built on larger numbers of examples do not necessarily result in better predictive abilities. Automated adaptive selection of the training data (ligand-target instances) used for model creation can result in considerably smaller training sets that retain prediction performance on par with training using hundreds of thousands of data points. In this chapter, we describe the protocols used for one such iterative chemogenomic selection technique, including model construction and update as well as possible techniques for evaluations of constructed models and analysis of the iterative model construction.

Prospective Assessment of Virtual Screening Heuristics Derived Using a Novel Fusion Score

High-throughput screening (HTS) is a widespread method in early drug discovery for identifying promising chemical matter that modulates a target or phenotype of interest. Because HTS campaigns involve screening millions of compounds, it is often desirable to initiate screening with a subset of the full collection. Subsequently, virtual screening methods prioritize likely active compounds in the remaining collection in an iterative process. With this approach, orthogonal virtual screening methods are often applied, necessitating the prioritization of hits from different approaches. Here, we introduce a novel method of fusing these prioritizations and benchmark it prospectively on 17 screening campaigns using virtual screening methods in three descriptor spaces. We found that the fusion approach retrieves 15% to 65% more active chemical series than any single machine-learning method and that appropriately weighting contributions of similarity and machine-learning scoring techniques can increase enrichment by 1% to 19%. We also use fusion scoring to evaluate the tradeoff between screening more chemical matter initially in lieu of replicate samples to prevent false-positives and find that the former option leads to the retrieval of more active chemical series. These results represent guidelines that can increase the rate of identification of promising active compounds in future iterative screens.