pKa Calculations with the Polarizable Drude Force Field and Poisson-Boltzmann Solvation Model

A Comprehensive Study of Factors Affecting the Prediction of the pKa Shift of Asp26 in Thioredoxin Protein

The stable protonation state of ionizable amino acids in a protein can be predicted by computing the pKa shift of that residue within the protein environment. Thermodynamic Integration (TI) is an ideal molecular dynamics-based approach for predicting the pKa shift of ionizable protein residues. Here, we probe TI-based simulation protocols for their ability to accurately predict the pKa shift of Asp26 in thioredoxin. While implicit solvent models can predict the pKa shift accurately, explicit solvent models result in substantial errors. To understand the underlying reason for this surprising discrepancy, we investigate the role of various factors such as solvent models, conformational sampling, background charges, and polarization.

Accurately Predicting Protein pKa Values Using Nonequilibrium Alchemy

The stability, solubility, and function of a protein depend on both its net charge and the protonation states of its individual residues. pKa is a measure of the tendency for a given residue to (de)protonate at a specific pH. Although pKa values can be resolved experimentally, theory and computation provide a compelling alternative. To this end, we assess the applicability of a nonequilibrium (NEQ) alchemical free energy method to the problem of pKa prediction. On a data set of 144 residues that span 13 proteins, we report an average unsigned error of 0.77 ± 0.09, 0.69 ± 0.09, and 0.52 ± 0.04 pK for aspartate, glutamate, and lysine, respectively. This is comparable to current state-of-the-art predictors and the accuracy recently reached using free energy perturbation methods (e.g., FEP+). Moreover, we demonstrate that our open-source, pmx-based approach can accurately resolve the pKa values of coupled residues and observe a substantial performance disparity associated with the lysine partial charges in Amber14SB/Amber99SB*-ILDN, for which an underused fix already exists.

Assessment of an Electrostatic Energy-Based Charge Model for Modeling the Electrostatic Interactions in Water Solvent

The protein force field based on the restrained electrostatic potential (RESP) charges has limitations in accurately describing hydrogen bonding interactions in proteins. To address this issue, we propose an alternative approach called the electrostatic energy-based charges (EEC) model, which shows improved performance in describing electrostatic interactions (EIs) of hydrogen bonds in proteins. In this study, we further investigate the performance of the EEC model in modeling EIs in water solvent. Our findings demonstrate that the fixed EEC model can effectively reproduce the quantum mechanics/molecular mechanics (QM/MM)-calculated EIs between a water molecule and various water solvent environments. However, to achieve the same level of computational accuracy, the electrostatic potential (ESP) charge model needs to fluctuate according to the electrostatic environment. Our analysis indicates that the requirement for charge adjustments depends on the specific mathematical and physical representation of EIs as a function of the environment for deriving charges. By comparing with widely used empirical water models calibrated to reproduce experimental properties, we confirm that the performance of the EEC model in reproducing QM/MM EIs is similar to that of general purpose TIP4P-like water models such as TIP4P-Ew and TIP4P/2005. When comparing the computed 10,000 distinct EI values within the range of -40 to 0 kcal/mol with the QM/MM results calculated at the MP2/aug-cc-pVQZ/TIP3P level, we noticed that the mean unsigned error (MUE) for the EEC model is merely 0.487 kcal/mol, which is remarkably similar to the MUE values of the TIP4P-Ew (0.63 kcal/mol) and TIP4P/2005 (0.579 kcal/mol) models. However, both the RESP method and the TIP3P model exhibit a tendency to overestimate the EIs, as evidenced by their higher MUE values of 1.761 and 1.293 kcal/mol, respectively. EEC-based molecular dynamics simulations have demonstrated that, when combined with appropriate van der Waals parameters, the EEC model can closely reproduce oxygen-oxygen radial distribution function and density of water, showing a remarkable similarity to the well-established TIP4P-like empirical water models. Our results demonstrate that the EEC model has the potential to build force fields with comparable accuracy to more sophisticated empirical TIP4P-like water models.

AMOEBA Force Field Trajectories Improve Predictions of Accurate pKa Values of the GFP Fluorophore: The Importance of Polarizability and Water Interactions

Precisely quantifying the magnitude, direction, and biological functions of electric fields in proteins has long been an outstanding challenge in the field. The most widely implemented experimental method to measure such electric fields at a particular residue in a protein has been through changes in pKa of titratable residues. While many computational strategies exist to predict these values, it has been difficult to do this accurately or connect predicted results to key structural or mechanistic features of the molecule. Here, we used experimentally determined pKa values of the fluorophore in superfolder green fluorescent protein (GFP) with amino acid mutations made at position Thr 203 to evaluate the pKa prediction ability of molecular dynamics (MD) simulations using a polarizable force field, AMOEBA. Structure ensembles from AMOEBA were used to calculate pKa values of the GFP fluorophore. The calculated pKa values were then compared to trajectories using a conventional fixed charge force field (Amber03 ff). We found that the position of water molecules included in the pKa calculation had opposite effects on the pKa values between the trajectories from AMOEBA and Amber03 force fields. In AMOEBA trajectories, the inclusion of water molecules within 35 Å of the fluorophore decreased the difference between the predicted and experimental values, resulting in calculated pKa values that were within an average of 0.8 pKa unit from the experimental results. On the other hand, in Amber03 trajectories, including water molecules that were more than 5 Å from the fluorophore increased the differences between the calculated and experimental pKa values. The inaccuracy of pKa predictions determined from Amber03 trajectories was caused by a significant stabilization of the deprotonated chromophore's free energy compared to the result in AMOEBA. We rationalize the cutoffs for explicit water molecules when calculating pKa to better predict the electrostatic environment surrounding the fluorophore buried in GFP. We discuss how the results from this work will assist the prospective prediction of pKa values or other electrostatic effects in a wide variety of folded proteins.

Characterizing Protein Protonation Microstates Using Monte Carlo Sampling

Proteins are polyelectrolytes with acidic and basic amino acids Asp, Glu, Arg, Lys, and His, making up ≈25% of the residues. The protonation state of residues, cofactors, and ligands defines a "protonation microstate". In an ensemble of proteins some residues will be ionized and others neutral, leading to a mixture of protonation microstates rather than in a single one as is often assumed. The microstate distribution changes with pH. The protein environment also modifies residue proton affinity so microstate distributions change in different reaction intermediates or as ligands are bound. Particular protonation microstates may be required for function, while others exist simply because there are many states with similar energy. Here, the protonation microstates generated in Monte Carlo sampling in MCCE are characterized in HEW lysozyme as a function of pH and bacterial photosynthetic reaction centers (RCs) in different reaction intermediates. The lowest energy and highest probability microstates are compared. The ΔG, ΔH, and ΔS between the four protonation states of Glu35 and Asp52 in lysozyme are shown to be calculated with reasonable precision. At pH 7 the lysozyme charge ranges from 6 to 10, with 24 accepted protonation microstates, while RCs have ≈50,000. A weighted Pearson correlation analysis shows coupling between residue protonation states in RCs and how they change when the quinone in the Q_B site is reduced. Protonation microstates can be used to define input MD parameters and provide insight into the motion of protons coupled to reactions.

How much can physics do for protein design?

Physics and physical chemistry are an important thread in computational protein design, complementary to knowledge-based tools. They provide molecular mechanics scoring functions that need little or no ad hoc parameter readjustment, methods to thoroughly sample equilibrium ensembles, and different levels of approximation for conformational flexibility. They led recently to the successful redesign of a small protein using a physics-based folded state energy. Adaptive Monte Carlo or molecular dynamics schemes were discovered where protein variants are populated as per their ligand-binding free energy or catalytic efficiency. Molecular dynamics have been used for backbone flexibility. Implicit solvent models have been refined, polarizable force fields applied, and many physical insights obtained.

Recent Developments in Free Energy Calculations for Drug Discovery

The grand challenge in structure-based drug design is achieving accurate prediction of binding free energies. Molecular dynamics (MD) simulations enable modeling of conformational changes critical to the binding process, leading to calculation of thermodynamic quantities involved in estimation of binding affinities. With recent advancements in computing capability and predictive accuracy, MD based virtual screening has progressed from the domain of theoretical attempts to real application in drug development. Approaches including the Molecular Mechanics Poisson Boltzmann Surface Area (MM-PBSA), Linear Interaction Energy (LIE), and alchemical methods have been broadly applied to model molecular recognition for drug discovery and lead optimization. Here we review the varied methodology of these approaches, developments enhancing simulation efficiency and reliability, remaining challenges hindering predictive performance, and applications to problems in the fields of medicine and biochemistry.

Implicit Solvents for the Polarizable Atomic Multipole AMOEBA Force Field

Computational protein design, ab initio protein/RNA folding, and protein-ligand screening can be too computationally demanding for explicit treatment of solvent. For these applications, implicit solvent offers a compelling alternative, which we describe here for the polarizable atomic multipole AMOEBA force field based on three treatments of continuum electrostatics: numerical solutions to the nonlinear and linearized versions of the Poisson-Boltzmann equation (PBE), the domain-decomposition conductor-like screening model (ddCOSMO) approximation to the PBE, and the analytic generalized Kirkwood (GK) approximation. The continuum electrostatics models are combined with a nonpolar estimator based on novel cavitation and dispersion terms. Electrostatic model parameters are numerically optimized using a least-squares style target function based on a library of 103 small-molecule solvation free energy differences. Mean signed errors for the adaptive Poisson-Boltzmann solver (APBS), ddCOSMO, and GK models are 0.05, 0.00, and 0.00 kcal/mol, respectively, while the mean unsigned errors are 0.70, 0.63, and 0.58 kcal/mol, respectively. Validation of the electrostatic response of the resulting implicit solvents, which are available in the Tinker (or Tinker-HP), OpenMM, and Force Field X software packages, is based on comparisons to explicit solvent simulations for a series of proteins and nucleic acids. Overall, the emergence of performative implicit solvent models for polarizable force fields opens the door to their use for folding and design applications.