Reversibly Sampling Conformations and Binding Modes Using Molecular Darting

An overview of the SAMPL8 host-guest binding challenge

The SAMPL series of challenges aim to focus the community on specific modeling challenges, while testing and hopefully driving progress of computational methods to help guide pharmaceutical drug discovery. In this study, we report on the results of the SAMPL8 host–guest blind challenge for predicting absolute binding affinities. SAMPL8 focused on two host–guest datasets, one involving the cucurbituril CB8 (with a series of common drugs of abuse) and another involving two different Gibb deep-cavity cavitands. The latter dataset involved a previously featured deep cavity cavitand (TEMOA) as well as a new variant (TEETOA), both binding to a series of relatively rigid fragment-like guests. Challenge participants employed a reasonably wide variety of methods, though many of these were based on molecular simulations, and predictive accuracy was mixed. As in some previous SAMPL iterations (SAMPL6 and SAMPL7), we found that one approach to achieve greater accuracy was to apply empirical corrections to the binding free energy predictions, taking advantage of prior data on binding to these hosts. Another approach which performed well was a hybrid MD-based approach with reweighting to a force matched QM potential. In the cavitand challenge, an alchemical method using the AMOEBA-polarizable force field achieved the best success with RMSE less than 1 kcal/mol, while another alchemical approach (ATM/GAFF2-AM1BCC/TIP3P/HREM) had RMSE less than 1.75 kcal/mol. The work discussed here also highlights several important lessons; for example, retrospective studies of reference calculations demonstrate the sensitivity of predicted binding free energies to ethyl group sampling and/or guest starting pose, providing guidance to help improve future studies on these systems.

Enhancing Sampling of Water Rehydration on Ligand Binding: A Comparison of Techniques

Water often plays a key role in protein structure, molecular recognition, and mediating protein-ligand interactions. Thus, free energy calculations must adequately sample water motions, which often proves challenging in typical MD simulation time scales. Thus, the accuracy of methods relying on MD simulations ends up limited by slow water sampling. Particularly, as a ligand is removed or modified, bulk water may not have time to fill or rearrange in the binding site. In this work, we focus on several molecular dynamics (MD) simulation-based methods attempting to help rehydrate buried water sites: BLUES, using nonequilibrium candidate Monte Carlo (NCMC); grand, using grand canonical Monte Carlo (GCMC); and normal MD. We assess the accuracy and efficiency of these methods in rehydrating target water sites. We selected a range of systems with varying numbers of waters in the binding site, as well as those where water occupancy is coupled to the identity or binding mode of the ligand. We analyzed the rehydration of buried water sites in binding pockets using both clustering of trajectories and direct analysis of electron density maps. Our results suggest both BLUES and grand enhance water sampling relative to normal MD and grand is more robust than BLUES, but also that water sampling remains a major challenge for all of the methods tested. The lessons we learned for these methods and systems are discussed.

How much can physics do for protein design?

Physics and physical chemistry are an important thread in computational protein design, complementary to knowledge-based tools. They provide molecular mechanics scoring functions that need little or no ad hoc parameter readjustment, methods to thoroughly sample equilibrium ensembles, and different levels of approximation for conformational flexibility. They led recently to the successful redesign of a small protein using a physics-based folded state energy. Adaptive Monte Carlo or molecular dynamics schemes were discovered where protein variants are populated as per their ligand-binding free energy or catalytic efficiency. Molecular dynamics have been used for backbone flexibility. Implicit solvent models have been refined, polarizable force fields applied, and many physical insights obtained.