1
|
Duan Y, Wang J, Cieplak P, Luo R. Refinement of Atomic Polarizabilities for a Polarizable Gaussian Multipole Force Field with Simultaneous Considerations of Both Molecular Polarizability Tensors and In-Solution Electrostatic Potentials. J Chem Inf Model 2025; 65:1428-1440. [PMID: 39865620 DOI: 10.1021/acs.jcim.4c02175] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/28/2025]
Abstract
Atomic polarizabilities are considered to be fundamental parameters in polarizable molecular mechanical force fields that play pivotal roles in determining model transferability across different electrostatic environments. In an earlier work, the atomic polarizabilities were obtained by fitting them to the B3LYP/aug-cc-pvtz molecular polarizability tensors of mainly small molecules. Taking advantage of the recent PCMRESPPOL method, we refine the atomic polarizabilities for condensed-phase simulations using a polarizable Gaussian Multipole (pGM) force field. Departing from earlier works, in this work, we incorporated polarizability tensors of a large number of dimers and electrostatic potentials (ESPs) in multiple solvents. We calculated 1565 × 4 ESPs of small molecule monomers and dimers of noble gas and small molecules and 4742 × 4 ESPs of small molecule dimers in four solvents (diethyl ether, ε = 4.24, dichloroethane, ε = 10.13, acetone, ε = 20.49, and water, ε = 78.36). For the gas-phase polarizability tensors, we supplemented the molecule set that was used in our earlier work by adding both the 4252 monomer and dimer sets studied by Shaw and co-workers and the 7211 small molecule monomers listed in the QM7b database to a combined total of 13,523 molecular polarizability tensors of monomers and dimers. The QM7b polarizability set was obtained from quantum-machine.org and was calculated at the LR-CCSD/d-aug-cc-pVDZ level of theory. All other polarizability tensors and all ESPs were calculated at the ωB97X-D/aug-cc-pVTZ level of theory. The atomic polarizabilities were developed using all polarizability tensors and the 1565 × 4 ESPs of small molecule monomers and were then assessed by comparing them to the 4742 × 4 ab initio ESPs of small molecule dimers. The predicted dimer ESPs had an average relative root-mean-square error (RRMSE) of 9.30%, which was only slightly larger than the average fitting RRMSE of 9.15% of the monomer ESPs. The transferability of the polarizability set was further evaluated by comparing the ESPs calculated using parameters developed in another dielectric environment for both tetrapeptide and DES monomer data sets. It was observed that the polarizabilities of this work retained or slightly improved the transferability over the one discussed in earlier work even though the number of parameters in the present set is about half of that in the earlier set. Excluding the gas-phase data, for the DES monomer set, the average transfer RRMSEs were 16.25% and 10.83% for pGM-ind and pGM-perm methods, respectively, comparable to the average fitting RRMSEs of 16.03% and 10.54%; for tetrapeptides, the average transfer RRMSEs were 5.62% and 3.95% for pGM-ind and pGM-perm methods, respectively, slightly larger than 5.41% and 3.61% of the fitting RRMSEs. Therefore, we conclude that the pGM methods with updated polarizabilities achieved remarkable transferability from monomer to dimer and from one solvent to another.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yong Duan
- UC Davis Genome Center and Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of California, Davis, One Shields Avenue, Davis, California 95616, United States
| | - Junmei Wang
- Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Pittsburgh, 3501 Terrace Street, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15261, United States
| | - Piotr Cieplak
- SBP Medical Discovery Institute, 10901 North Torrey Pines Road, La Jolla, California 92037, United States
| | - Ray Luo
- Departments of Molecular Biology and Biochemistry, Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, Materials Science and Engineering, and Biomedical Engineering, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, California 92697, United States
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Huang Z, Wu Y, Duan Y, Luo R. Performance Tuning of Polarizable Gaussian Multipole Model in Molecular Dynamics Simulations. J Chem Theory Comput 2025; 21:847-858. [PMID: 39772516 DOI: 10.1021/acs.jctc.4c01368] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/11/2025]
Abstract
Molecular dynamics (MD) simulations are essential for understanding molecular phenomena at the atomic level, with their accuracy largely dependent on both the employed force field and sampling. Polarizable force fields, which incorporate atomic polarization effects, represent a significant advancement in simulation technology. The polarizable Gaussian multipole (pGM) model has been noted for its accurate reproduction of ab initio electrostatic interactions. In this study, we document our effort to enhance the computational efficiency and scalability of the pGM simulations within the AMBER framework using MPI (message passing interface). Performance evaluations reveal that our MPI-based pGM model significantly reduces runtime and scales effectively while maintaining computational accuracy. Additionally, we investigated the stability and reliability of the MPI implementation under the NVE simulation ensemble. Optimal Ewald and induction parameters for the pGM model are also explored, and its statistical properties are assessed under various simulation ensembles. Our findings demonstrate that the MPI-implementation maintains enhanced stability and robustness during extended simulation times. We further evaluated the model performance under both NVT (constant number, volume, and temperature) and NPT (constant number, pressure, and temperature) ensembles and assessed the effects of varying timesteps and convergence tolerance on induced dipole calculations. The lessons learned from these exercises are expected to help the users to make informed decisions on simulation setup. The improved performance under these ensembles enables the study of larger molecular systems, thereby expanding the applicability of the pGM model in detailed MD simulations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhen Huang
- Chemical and Materials Physics Graduate Program, Departments of Molecular Biology and Biochemistry, Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, Materials Science and Engineering, and Biomedical Engineering, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, California 92697, United States
| | - Yongxian Wu
- Chemical and Materials Physics Graduate Program, Departments of Molecular Biology and Biochemistry, Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, Materials Science and Engineering, and Biomedical Engineering, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, California 92697, United States
| | - Yong Duan
- UC Davis Genome Center and Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of California, Davis, One Shields Avenue, Davis, California 95616, United States
| | - Ray Luo
- Chemical and Materials Physics Graduate Program, Departments of Molecular Biology and Biochemistry, Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, Materials Science and Engineering, and Biomedical Engineering, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, California 92697, United States
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Duan Y, Niu T, Wang J, Cieplak P, Luo R. PCMRESP: A Method for Polarizable Force Field Parameter Development and Transferability of the Polarizable Gaussian Multipole Models Across Multiple Solvents. J Chem Theory Comput 2024; 20:2820-2829. [PMID: 38502776 PMCID: PMC11008095 DOI: 10.1021/acs.jctc.4c00064] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/17/2024] [Revised: 02/27/2024] [Accepted: 03/01/2024] [Indexed: 03/21/2024]
Abstract
The transferability of force field parameters is a crucial aspect of high-quality force fields. Previous investigations have affirmed the transferability of electrostatic parameters derived from polarizable Gaussian multipole models (pGMs) when applied to water oligomer clusters, polypeptides across various conformations, and different sequences. In this study, we introduce PCMRESP, a novel method for electrostatic parametrization in solution, intended for the development of polarizable force fields. We utilized this method to assess the transferability of three models: a fixed charge model and two variants of pGM models. Our analysis involved testing these models on 377 small molecules and 100 tetra-peptides in five representative dielectric environments: gas, diethyl ether, dichloroethane, acetone, and water. Our findings reveal that the inclusion of atomic polarization significantly enhances transferability and the incorporation of permanent atomic dipoles, in the form of covalent bond dipoles, leads to further improvements. Moreover, our tests on dual-solvent strategies demonstrate consistent transferability for all three models, underscoring the robustness of the dual-solvent approach. In contrast, an evaluation of the traditional HF/6-31G* method indicates poor transferability for the pGM-ind and pGM-perm models, suggesting the limitations of this conventional approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yong Duan
- UC
Davis Genome Center and Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of California, Davis, One Shields Avenue, Davis, California 95616, United States
| | - Taoyu Niu
- Department
of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Computational Chemical Genomics Screening
Center, School of Pharmacy, University of
Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15261, United States
| | - Junmei Wang
- Department
of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Computational Chemical Genomics Screening
Center, School of Pharmacy, University of
Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15261, United States
| | - Piotr Cieplak
- SBP
Medical Discovery Institute, 10901 North Torrey Pines Road, La Jolla, California 92037, United States
| | - Ray Luo
- Departments
of Molecular Biology and Biochemistry, Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering,
Materials Science and Engineering, and Biomedical Engineering, University of California, Irvine. Irvine, California 92697, United States
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Case D, Aktulga HM, Belfon K, Cerutti DS, Cisneros GA, Cruzeiro VD, Forouzesh N, Giese TJ, Götz AW, Gohlke H, Izadi S, Kasavajhala K, Kaymak MC, King E, Kurtzman T, Lee TS, Li P, Liu J, Luchko T, Luo R, Manathunga M, Machado MR, Nguyen HM, O’Hearn KA, Onufriev AV, Pan F, Pantano S, Qi R, Rahnamoun A, Risheh A, Schott-Verdugo S, Shajan A, Swails J, Wang J, Wei H, Wu X, Wu Y, Zhang S, Zhao S, Zhu Q, Cheatham TE, Roe DR, Roitberg A, Simmerling C, York DM, Nagan MC, Merz KM. AmberTools. J Chem Inf Model 2023; 63:6183-6191. [PMID: 37805934 PMCID: PMC10598796 DOI: 10.1021/acs.jcim.3c01153] [Citation(s) in RCA: 373] [Impact Index Per Article: 186.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/28/2023] [Indexed: 10/10/2023]
Abstract
AmberTools is a free and open-source collection of programs used to set up, run, and analyze molecular simulations. The newer features contained within AmberTools23 are briefly described in this Application note.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David
A. Case
- Department
of Chemistry and Chemical Biology, Rutgers
University, Piscataway 08854, New Jersey, United States
| | - Hasan Metin Aktulga
- Department
of Computer Science and Engineering, Michigan
State University, East Lansing 48824-1322, Michigan, United States
| | - Kellon Belfon
- FOG
Pharmaceuticals Inc., Cambridge 02140, Massachusetts, United States
| | - David S. Cerutti
- Psivant, 451 D Street, Suite 205, Boston 02210, Massachusetts, United States
| | - G. Andrés Cisneros
- Department
of Physics, Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson 75801, Texas, United States
| | - Vinícius
Wilian D. Cruzeiro
- Department
of Chemistry and The PULSE Institute, Stanford
University, Stanford 94305, California, United States
| | - Negin Forouzesh
- Department
of Computer Science, California State University, Los Angeles 90032, California, United States
| | - Timothy J. Giese
- Laboratory
for Biomolecular Simulation Research, Institute for Quantitative Biomedicine
and Department of Chemistry and Chemical Biology, Rutgers University, Piscataway 08854, New Jersey, United States
| | - Andreas W. Götz
- San
Diego Supercomputer Center, University of
California San Diego, La Jolla 92093-0505, California, United States
| | - Holger Gohlke
- Institute
for Pharmaceutical and Medicinal Chemistry, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf 40225, Germany
- Institute
of Bio- and Geosciences (IBG-4: Bioinformatics), Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, Jülich 52425, Germany
| | - Saeed Izadi
- Pharmaceutical
Development, Genentech, Inc., South San Francisco 94080, California, United
States
| | - Koushik Kasavajhala
- Laufer
Center for Physical and Quantitative Biology, Department of Chemistry, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook 11794, New York, United States
| | - Mehmet C. Kaymak
- Department
of Computer Science and Engineering, Michigan
State University, East Lansing 48824-1322, Michigan, United States
| | - Edward King
- Departments
of Molecular Biology and Biochemistry, Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering,
Materials Science and Engineering, and Biomedical Engineering, Graduate
Program in Chemical and Materials Physics, University of California, Irvine 92697, California, United States
| | - Tom Kurtzman
- Ph.D.
Programs in Chemistry, Biochemistry, and Biology, The Graduate Center of the City University of New York, 365 Fifth Avenue, New York 10016, New York, United States
- Department
of Chemistry, Lehman College, 250 Bedford Park Blvd West, Bronx 10468, New York, United States
| | - Tai-Sung Lee
- Laboratory
for Biomolecular Simulation Research, Institute for Quantitative Biomedicine
and Department of Chemistry and Chemical Biology, Rutgers University, Piscataway 08854, New Jersey, United States
| | - Pengfei Li
- Department
of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Loyola University
Chicago, Chicago 60660, Illinois, United States
| | - Jian Liu
- Beijing
National Laboratory for Molecular Sciences, Institute of Theoretical
and Computational Chemistry, College of Chemistry and Molecular Engineering, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China
| | - Tyler Luchko
- Department
of Physics and Astronomy, California State
University, Northridge, Northridge 91330, California, United States
| | - Ray Luo
- Departments
of Molecular Biology and Biochemistry, Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering,
Materials Science and Engineering, and Biomedical Engineering, Graduate
Program in Chemical and Materials Physics, University of California, Irvine 92697, California, United States
| | - Madushanka Manathunga
- Department
of Chemistry and Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Michigan State University, East Lansing 48824-1322, Michigan, United States
| | | | - Hai Minh Nguyen
- Department
of Chemistry and Chemical Biology, Rutgers
University, Piscataway 08854, New Jersey, United States
| | - Kurt A. O’Hearn
- Department
of Computer Science and Engineering, Michigan
State University, East Lansing 48824-1322, Michigan, United States
| | - Alexey V. Onufriev
- Departments
of Computer Science and Physics, Virginia
Tech, Blacksburg 24061, Virginia, United
States
| | - Feng Pan
- Department
of Statistics, Florida State University, Tallahassee 32304, Florida, United States
| | - Sergio Pantano
- Institut Pasteur de Montevideo, Montevideo 11400, Uruguay
| | - Ruxi Qi
- Cryo-EM
Center, Southern University of Science and
Technology, Shenzhen 518055, China
| | - Ali Rahnamoun
- Department
of Computer Science and Engineering, Michigan
State University, East Lansing 48824-1322, Michigan, United States
| | - Ali Risheh
- Department
of Computer Science, California State University, Los Angeles 90032, California, United States
| | - Stephan Schott-Verdugo
- Institute
of Bio- and Geosciences (IBG-4: Bioinformatics), Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, Jülich 52425, Germany
| | - Akhil Shajan
- Department
of Chemistry and Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Michigan State University, East Lansing 48824-1322, Michigan, United States
| | - Jason Swails
- Entos, 4470 W Sunset
Blvd, Suite 107, Los Angeles 90027, California, United States
| | - Junmei Wang
- Department
of Pharmaceutical Sciences, School of Pharmacy, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh 15261, Pennsylvania, United States
| | - Haixin Wei
- Departments
of Molecular Biology and Biochemistry, Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering,
Materials Science and Engineering, and Biomedical Engineering, Graduate
Program in Chemical and Materials Physics, University of California, Irvine 92697, California, United States
| | - Xiongwu Wu
- Laboratory
of Computational Biology, NHLBI, NIH, Bethesda 20892, Maryland, United States
| | - Yongxian Wu
- Departments
of Molecular Biology and Biochemistry, Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering,
Materials Science and Engineering, and Biomedical Engineering, Graduate
Program in Chemical and Materials Physics, University of California, Irvine 92697, California, United States
| | - Shi Zhang
- Laboratory
for Biomolecular Simulation Research, Institute for Quantitative Biomedicine
and Department of Chemistry and Chemical Biology, Rutgers University, Piscataway 08854, New Jersey, United States
| | - Shiji Zhao
- Departments
of Molecular Biology and Biochemistry, Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering,
Materials Science and Engineering, and Biomedical Engineering, Graduate
Program in Chemical and Materials Physics, University of California, Irvine 92697, California, United States
- Nurix Therapeutics, Inc., San Francisco 94158, California, United States
| | - Qiang Zhu
- Departments
of Molecular Biology and Biochemistry, Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering,
Materials Science and Engineering, and Biomedical Engineering, Graduate
Program in Chemical and Materials Physics, University of California, Irvine 92697, California, United States
| | - Thomas E. Cheatham
- Department
of Medicinal Chemistry, The University of
Utah, 30 South 2000 East, Salt Lake City 84112, Utah, United
States
| | - Daniel R. Roe
- Laboratory
of Computational Biology, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda 20892, Maryland, United States
| | - Adrian Roitberg
- Department
of Chemistry, The University of Florida, 440 Leigh Hall, Gainesville 32611-7200, Florida, United States
| | - Carlos Simmerling
- Laufer
Center for Physical and Quantitative Biology, Department of Chemistry, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook 11794, New York, United States
| | - Darrin M. York
- Laboratory
for Biomolecular Simulation Research, Institute for Quantitative Biomedicine
and Department of Chemistry and Chemical Biology, Rutgers University, Piscataway 08854, New Jersey, United States
| | - Maria C. Nagan
- Department
of Chemistry, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook 11794, New York, United States
| | - Kenneth M. Merz
- Department
of Chemistry and Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Michigan State University, East Lansing 48824-1322, Michigan, United States
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Zhu Q, Wu Y, Zhao S, Cieplak P, Duan Y, Luo R. Streamlining and Optimizing Strategies of Electrostatic Parameterization. J Chem Theory Comput 2023; 19:6353-6365. [PMID: 37676646 PMCID: PMC10530599 DOI: 10.1021/acs.jctc.3c00659] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/08/2023]
Abstract
Accurate characterization of electrostatic interactions is crucial in molecular simulation. Various methods and programs have been developed to obtain electrostatic parameters for additive or polarizable models to replicate electrostatic properties obtained from experimental measurements or theoretical calculations. Electrostatic potentials (ESPs), a set of physically well-defined observables from quantum mechanical (QM) calculations, are well suited for optimization efforts due to the ease of collecting a large amount of conformation-dependent data. However, a reliable set of QM ESP computed at an appropriate level of theory and atomic basis set is necessary. In addition, despite the recent development of the PyRESP program for electrostatic parameterizations of induced dipole-polarizable models, the time-consuming and error-prone input file preparation process has limited the widespread use of these protocols. This work aims to comprehensively evaluate the quality of QM ESPs derived by eight methods, including wave function methods such as Hartree-Fock (HF), second-order Møller-Plesset (MP2), and coupled cluster-singles and doubles (CCSD), as well as five hybrid density functional theory (DFT) methods, used in conjunction with 13 different basis sets. The highest theory levels CCSD/aug-cc-pV5Z (a5z) and MP2/aug-cc-pV5Z (a5z) were selected as benchmark data over two homemade data sets. The results show that the hybrid DFT method, ωB97X-D, combined with the aug-cc-pVTZ (a3z) basis set, performs well in reproducing ESPs while taking both accuracy and efficiency into consideration. Moreover, a flexible and user-friendly program called PyRESP_GEN was developed to streamline input file preparation. The restraining strengths, along with strategies for polarizable Gaussian multipole (pGM) model parameterizations, were also optimized. These findings and the program presented in this work facilitate the development and application of induced dipole-polarizable models, such as pGM models, for molecular simulations of both chemical and biological significance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Qiang Zhu
- Department of Molecular Biology and Biochemistry, Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, Materials Science and Engineering, and Biomedical Engineering, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, California 92697, United States
| | - Yongxian Wu
- Department of Molecular Biology and Biochemistry, Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, Materials Science and Engineering, and Biomedical Engineering, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, California 92697, United States
| | - Shiji Zhao
- Nurix Therapeutics, Inc., 1700 Owens St, Suite 205, San Francisco, California 94158, United States
| | - Piotr Cieplak
- SBP Medical Discovery Institute, La Jolla, California 92037, United States
| | - Yong Duan
- UC Davis Genome Center and Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of California, Davis, Davis, California 95616, United States
| | - Ray Luo
- Department of Molecular Biology and Biochemistry, Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, Materials Science and Engineering, and Biomedical Engineering, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, California 92697, United States
| |
Collapse
|