Assessing the Accuracy of Various Ab Initio Methods for Geometries and Excitation Energies of Retinal Chromophore Minimal Model by Comparison with CASPT3 Results

Benchmarking two-photon absorption strengths of rhodopsin chromophore models with CC3 and CCSD methodologies: An assessment of popular density functional approximations

This work presents the investigations of the impact of an increasing electron correlation in the hierarchy of coupled-cluster methods, i.e., CC2, CCSD, and CC3, on two-photon absorption (2PA) strengths for the lowest excited state of the minimal rhodopsin's chromophore model-cis-penta-2,4-dieniminium cation (PSB3). For a larger chromophore's model [4-cis-hepta-2,4,6-trieniminium cation (PSB4)], CC2 and CCSD calculations of 2PA strengths were performed. Additionally, 2PA strengths predicted by some popular density functional theory (DFT) functionals differing in HF exchange contribution were assessed against the reference CC3/CCSD data. For PSB3, the accuracy of 2PA strengths increases in the following order: CC2 < CCSD < CC3, with the CC2 deviation from both higher-level methods exceeding 10% at 6-31+G* basis sets and 2% at aug-cc-pVDZ basis set. However, for PSB4, this trend is reversed and CC2-based 2PA strength is larger than the corresponding CCSD value. Among the DFT functionals investigated, CAM-B3LYP and BHandHLYP provide 2PA strengths in best compliance with reference data, however, with the error approaching an order of magnitude.

Benchmarking CASPT3 Vertical Excitation Energies

Based on 280 reference vertical transition energies of various natures (singlet, triplet, valence, Rydberg, n → π∗, π → π∗, and double excitations) extracted from the QUEST database, we assess the accuracy of third-order multireference perturbation theory, CASPT3, in the context of molecular excited states. When one applies the disputable ionization- potential-electron-affinity (IPEA) shift, we show that CASPT3 provides a similar accuracy as its second-order counterpart, CASPT2, with the same mean absolute error of 0.11 eV. However, as already reported, we also observe that the accuracy of CASPT3 is almost insensitive to the IPEA shift, irrespective of the transition type and system size, with a small reduction of the mean absolute error to 0.09 eV when the IPEA shift is switched off.

Theoretical Calculation of Core-Excited States along Dissociative Pathways beyond Second-Order Perturbation Theory

We extend the multireference driven similarity renormalization (MR-DSRG) method to compute core-excited states by combining it with a GASSCF treatment of orbital relaxation and static electron correlation effects. We consider MR-DSRG treatments of dynamical correlation truncated at the level of perturbation theory (DSRG-MRPT2/3) and iterative linearized approximations with one- and two-body operators [MR-LDSRG(2)] in combination with a spin-free exact-two-component (X2C) one-electron treatment of scalar relativistic effects. This approach is calibrated and tested on a series of 16 core-excited states of five closed- and open-shell diatomic molecules containing first-row elements (C, N, and O). All GASSCF-MR-DSRG theories show excellent agreement with experimental adiabatic transitions energies, with mean absolute errors ranging between 0.17 and 0.35 eV, even for the challenging partially doubly excited states of the N₂⁺ molecule. The vibrational structure of all these transitions, obtained from using a full potential energy scan, shows a mean absolute error as low as 25 meV for DSRG-MRPT2 and 12/13 meV for DSRG-MRPT3 and MR-LDSRG(2). We generally find that a treatment of dynamical correlation that goes beyond the second-order level in perturbation theory improves the accuracy of the potential energy surface, especially in the bond-dissociation region.

Initial excited-state relaxation of locked retinal protonated schiff base chromophore. An insight from coupled cluster and multireference perturbation theory calculations

The initial S₁ excited-state relaxation of retinal protonated Schiff base (RPSB) analog with central C11C12 double bond locked by eight-membered ring (locked-11.8) was investigated by means of multireference perturbation theory methods (XMCQDPT2, XMS-CASPT2, MS-CASPT2) as well as single-reference coupled-cluster CC2 method. The analysis of XMCQDPT2-based geometries reveals rather weak coupling between in-plane and out-of-plane structural evolution and minor energetical relaxation of three locked-11.8 conformers. Therefore, a strong coupling between bonds length inversion and backbone out-of-plane deformation resulting in a very steep S₁ energy profile predicted by CASSCF/CASPT2 calculations is in clear contradiction with the reference XMCQDPT2 results. Even though CC2 method predicts good quality ground-state structures, the excited-state structures display more advanced torsional deformation leading to ca. 0.2 eV exaggerated energy relaxation and significantly red shifted (0.4-0.7 eV) emission maxima. According to our findings, the initial photoisomerization process in locked-11.8, and possibly in other RPSB analogs, studied fully (both geometries and energies) by multireference perturbation theory may be somewhat slower than predicted by CASSCF/CASPT2 or CC2 methods. © 2018 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Is the choice of a standard zeroth-order hamiltonian in CASPT2 ansatz optimal in calculations of excitation energies in protonated and unprotonated schiff bases of retinal?

To account for systematic error of CASPT2 method empirical modification of the zeroth-order Hamiltonian with Ionization Potential-Electron Affinity (IPEA) shift was introduced. The optimized IPEA value (0.25 a.u.), called standard IPEA (S-IPEA), was recommended but due to its unsatisfactory performance in multiple metallic and organic compounds it has been questioned lately as a general parameter working properly for all molecules under CASPT2 study. As we are interested in Schiff bases of retinal, an important question emerging from this conflict of choice, to use or not to use S-IPEA, is whether the introduction of the modified zeroth-order Hamiltonian into CASPT2 ansatz does really improve their energetics. To achieve this goal, we assessed an impact of the IPEA shift value, in a range of 0-0.35 a.u., on vertical excitation energies to low-lying singlet states of two protonated (RPSBs) and two unprotonated (RSBs) Schiff bases of retinal for which experimental data in gas phase are available. In addition, an effect of geometry, basis set, and active space on computed VEEs is also reported. We find, that for these systems, the choice of S-IPEA significantly overestimates both S₀ →S₁ and S₀ →S₂ energies and the best theoretical estimate, in reference to the experimental data, is provided with either unmodified zeroth-order Hamiltonian or small value of the IPEA shift in a range of 0.05-0.15 a.u., depending on active space and basis set size, equilibrium geometry, and character of the excited state. © 2018 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Excited-state minima and emission energies of retinal chromophore analogues: Performance of CASSCF and CC2 methods as compared with CASPT2

This study provides gas-phase S₁ excited-state geometries along with emission and adiabatic energies for methylated/demethylated and ring-locked analogues of protonated Schiff base retinal models comprising system of five conjugated double bonds (PSB5), using second order multiconfiguration perturbation theory (CASPT2). CASPT2 results serve as reference data to assess the performance of CC2 (second-order approximate coupled cluster singles and doubles) and a commonly used CASSCF/CASPT2 protocol, that is, complete active space self-consistent field (CASSCF) geometry optimization followed by CASPT2 energy calculation. We find that the CASSCF methodology fails to locate planar S₁ minimum energy structures for four out of five investigated planar models in contrast to CC2 and CASPT2 methods. However, for those which were found: one planar and two twisted minima, there is an excellent agreement between CASSCF and CASPT2 results in terms of geometrical parameters, one-electron properties, as well as emission and adiabatic energies. CC2 performs well for in-plane S₁ minima and their spectroscopic and electronic properties. However, this picture deteriorates for twisted minima. As expected, the CC2 description of the S₂ electronic state, with strong multireference and significant double excitation character, is very poor, exhibiting errors in transition energies exceeding 1 eV. They may be substantially diminished by recalculating transition energies with CASPT2 method. Our work shows that CASSCF/CASPT2 and CC2 shortcomings may influence gas-phase retinal analogues' excited state description in a dramatic way. © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.