Sandler I, Sharma S, Chan B, Ho J. Accurate Quantum Chemical Prediction of Gas-Phase Anion Binding Affinities and Their Structure-Binding Relationships.
J Phys Chem A 2021;
125:9838-9851. [PMID:
34739245 DOI:
10.1021/acs.jpca.1c06648]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
This paper systematically examines the performance of contemporary wavefunction and density functional theory methods to identify robust and cost-efficient methods for predicting gas-phase anion binding energies. This includes the local coupled cluster LNO-CCSD(T) and DLPNO-CCSD(T), as well as double-hybrid DSD-PBEP86-D3(BJ) and various hybrid functionals M06-2X, B3LYP-D3(BJ), ωB97M-V, and ωB97X-V. The focus is on dual-hydrogen-bonding anion receptors that are commonly found in supramolecular chemistry and organocatalysis, namely, (thio)ureas, deltamides, (thio)squaramides, and croconamides as well as the yet-to-be-explored rhodizonamides. Of the methods examined, M06-2X emerged as the overall best performing method as the other functionals including DSD-PBEP86-D3(BJ) and the local coupled cluster DLPNO-CCSD(T) method displayed systematic errors that increase with the degree of carbonylation of the receptors. Hybrid ONIOM models that employed semiempirical methods (PM7, GFN1-xTB, and GFN2-xTB) and "threefold"-corrected small-basis set potentials (HF-3c, B97-3c, and PBEh-3c) were explored, and the best models resulted in 50- to 500-fold reduction in CPU time compared to W1-local. These calculations provide important insight into the structure-binding relationships where there is a direct correlation between Brønsted acidity and anion binding affinity, though the strength of the correlation also depends on other factors such as hydrogen-bonding geometry and the geometrical distortion that the receptor needs to undergo to bind the anion.
Collapse