Petrie S, Terrett R, Stranger R, Pace RJ. Rationalizing the Geometries of the Water Oxidising Complex in the Atomic Resolution, Nominal S
3 State Crystal Structures of Photosystem II.
Chemphyschem 2020;
21:785-801. [PMID:
32133758 DOI:
10.1002/cphc.201901106]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/18/2019] [Revised: 01/14/2020] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
Three atomic resolution crystal structures of Photosystem II, in the double flashed, nominal S3 intermediate state of its Mn4 Ca Water Oxidising Complex (WOC), have now been presented, at 2.25, 2.35 and 2.08 Å resolution. Although very similar overall, the S3 structures differ within the WOC catalytic site. The 2.25 Å structure contains only one oxy species (O5) in the WOC cavity, weakly associated with Mn centres, similar to that in the earlier 1.95 Å S1 structure. The 2.35 Å structure shows two such species (O5, O6), with the Mn centres and O5 positioned as in the 2.25 Å structure and O5-O6 separation of ∼1.5 Å. In the latest S3 variant, two oxy species are also seen (O5, Ox), with the Ox group appearing only in S3 , closely ligating one Mn, with O5-Ox separation <2.1 Å. The O5 and O6/Ox groups were proposed to be substrate water derived species. Recently, Petrie et al. (Chem. Phys. Chem., 2017) presented large scale Quantum Chemical modelling of the 2.25 Å structure, quantitatively explaining all significant features within the WOC region. This, as in our earlier studies, assumed a 'low' Mn oxidation paradigm (mean S1 Mn oxidation level of +3.0, Petrie et al., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2015), rather than a 'high' oxidation model (mean S1 oxidation level of +3.5). In 2018 we showed (Chem. Phys. Chem., 2018) this oxidation state assumption predicted two energetically close S3 structural forms, one with the metal centres and O5 (as OH- ) positioned as in the 2.25 Å structure, and the other with the metals similarly placed, but with O5 (as H2 O) located in the O6 position of the 2.35 Å structure. The 2.35 Å two flashed structure was likely a crystal superposition of two such forms. Here we show, by similar computational analysis, that the latest 2.08 Å S3 structure is also a likely superposition of forms, but with O5 (as OH- ) occupying either the O5 or Ox positions in the WOC cavity. This highlights a remarkable structural 'lability' of the WOC centre in the S3 state, which is likely catalytically relevant to its water splitting function.
Collapse