Near-Ergodic CsPbBr3 Perovskite Nanocrystal with Minimal Statistical Aging

Probing the Structural Degradation of CsPbBr3 Perovskite Nanocrystals in the Presence of H2O and H2S: How Weak Interactions and HSAB Matter

Structural degradation of all inorganic CsPbBr3 in the presence of moisture is considered as one of its major limitations to use as an active component in various light-harvesting and light-emitting devices. Herein, we used two similar molecules, H2O and H2S, with similar structures, to follow the decomposition mechanism of CsPbBr3 perovskite nanocrystals. Interestingly, H2O acts as a catalyst for the decomposition of CsPbBr3, which is in contrast to H2S. Our experimental observations followed by density functional theory (DFT) calculations showed that the water molecule is intercalated in the CsPbBr3 perovskite whereas H2S is adsorbed in the (100) planes of CsPbBr3 by a weak electrostatic interaction. According to Pearson's hard-soft acid-base theory, both cations present in CsPbBr3 prefer soft/intermediate bases. In the case of the water molecule, it lacks a soft base and thus it is not directly involved in the reaction whereas H2S can provide a soft base and thus it gets involved in the reaction. Understanding the mechanistic aspects of decomposition can give different methodologies for preventing such unwanted reactions.

Transforming exciton dynamics in perovskite nanocrystal through Mn doping

Zn-alloyed CsPb(Cl/Br)₃ perovskite nanocrystals (PNCs) have been synthesized and used as a model system for Mn doping in order to understand the effect of Mn doping on exciton dynamics. While keeping the PL emission maximum and PLQY of both PNC samples nearly the same, the radiative decay rate of the host band decreases ∼6.5 times and the non-radiative decay rate increases ∼2.5 times upon Mn doping. Unlike reports in the literature in which the dopant emission decreases to near-zero, in the present case we observe ∼5.5-fold enhancement of the integrated PL intensity of the dopant emission when the temperature decreases from 290 K to 190 K. Interestingly, the FWHM of the host PL emission band increases with a decrease in temperature from 290 K to 190 K. A higher value of phonon energy in PNC2 (58 ± 2 meV) in comparison to CsPbBr₃ has been noted. The low magnitude of the Huang-Rhys factor indicates less electron phonon coupling for the Mn-doped PNC system. Temperature-dependent dopant PL decay exhibits biexponential decay behaviour with time constants τ₁ = 450-540 μs and τ₂ = 1.1-1.2 ms. With a decrease in temperature from 290 K to 190 K, the amplitude of the faster component decreases from 80% to 60%; concomitantly, the amplitude of the slower component increases from 20% to 40%. Ultrasensitive single-particle spectroscopic analyses reveal that, although the probability density distributions (PDDs) of the durations of both ON and OFF events of PNC1 could be fitted with a truncated inverse power law (TIPL), however, for PNC2, both PDDs could be fitted with an inverse power law (IPL). A comparatively lower value of the power law exponent m_ON indicates a higher probability of longer ON events for PNC1 than for PNC2. Truncation in the PDDs of both ON and OFF events has been observed for PNC1, but not in the PDDs of either ON or OFF events for PNC2. The presence of shallow trap states is responsible for the truncation for PNC1, whereas the presence of deep dopant states does not allow truncation in the host PL emission of PNC2. All these observations clearly demonstrate that Mn doping transforms the host PL exciton dynamics for Zn-alloyed Mn-doped CsPb(Cl/Br)₃ PNCs very significantly.

Beneficial Intrinsic Hole Trapping and Its Amplitude Variation in a Highly Photoluminescent Toxic-Metal-Free Quantum Dot

Intrinsic hole trapping as well as hole detrapping have not been observed for any quantum dot (QD) or perovskite nanocrystal (PNC) system. Moreover, amplitude variation of intrinsic hole trapping (or detrapping) has not been reported at all for any QD or PNC system. However, for a CuInS₂-based core/alloy-shell (CAS) QD system, (a) both intrinsic hole trapping and detrapping have been observed and (b) very significant amplitude variations of hole trapping (∼16 to ∼42%) and hole detrapping (∼44 to 23%) have been observed. Unlike detrimental electron trapping, hole trapping has been shown to be beneficial, having a direct correlation toward increasing PLQY to 96%. Simultaneous electron and hole trapping has been shown to be quite beneficial for the CuInS₂-based CAS QD system leading to the longest ON time (∼130 s) for which a nontoxic metal-based QD remains only in the ON-state without blinking.

Ultrafast dynamics and ultrasensitive single particle spectroscopy of optically robust core/alloy shell semiconductor quantum dots

A "one-pot one-step" synthesis method of Core/Alloy Shell (CAS) quantum dots (QDs) offers the scope of large scale synthesis in a less time consuming, more economical, highly reproducible and high-throughput manner in comparison to "multi-pot multi-step" synthesis for Core/Shell (CS) QDs. Rapid initial nucleation, and smooth & uniform shell growth lead to the formation of a compositionally-gradient alloyed hetero-structure with very significantly reduced interfacial trap density in CAS QDs. Thus, interfacial strain gets reduced in a much smoother manner leading to enhanced confinement for the photo-generated charge carriers in CAS QDs. Convincing proof of alloy-shelling for a CAS QD has been provided from HRTEM images at the single particle level. The band gap could be tuned as a function of composition, temperature, reactivity difference of precursors, etc. and a high PLQY and improved photochemical stability could be achieved for a small sized CAS QD. From the ultrafast exciton dynamics in CdSe and InP CAS QDs, it has been shown that (a) the hot exciton thermalization/relaxation happens in <500 fs, (b) hot electron trapping dynamics occurs within a ∼1 ps time scale, (c) band edge exciton trapping occurs within a 10-25 ps timescale and (d) for CdSe CAS QDs the hot hole gets trapped in about 35 ps. From fast PL decay dynamics, it has been shown that the amplitude of the intermediate time constant can be correlated with the PLQY. A model has been provided to understand these ultrafast to fast exciton dynamical processes. At the ultrasensitive single particle level, unlike CS QDs, CdSe CAS QDs have been shown to exhibit (a) constancy of PL_max (i.e. no bluing) and (b) constancy of PL intensity (i.e. no bleaching) of the single CAS QDs for continuous irradiation for one hour under an air atmosphere. Thus, CAS QDs hold the promise of being a superior optical probe in comparison to CS QDs both at the ensemble and at the single particle level, leading to enhanced flexibility of the CAS QDs towards designing and developing next generation application devices.

Excitation-Energy-Dependent Photoluminescence Quantum Yield is Inherent to Optically Robust Core/Alloy-Shell Quantum Dots in a Vast Energy Landscape

The importance of alloy-shelling in optically robust Core/Alloy-Shell (CAS) QDs has been described from structural and energetic aspects. Unlike fluorescent dyes, both Core/Shell (CS) and CAS QDs exhibit excitation-energy-dependent photoluminescence quantum yield (PLQY). For both CdSe and InP CAS QDs (with metal- and nonmetal-based alloy-shelling, respectively), with increasing excitation energy, (a) the ultrafast rise-time or relaxation-time to the band-edge increases and (b) the magnitude of the normalized bleach signal decreases. Ultrasensitive single-particle spectroscopic investigation results showed that with decreasing excitation energy, (a) the fraction of ON events increases, (b) the ratio of exciton-detrapping rate/trapping rate increases, and (c) the extent of beneficial hole trapping increases. A relative decrease in PLQY with increasing excitation energy is much less pronounced in CAS QDs than in CS QDs. Unless trap states are removed completely especially in the higher-energy landscape, PLQY will remain inherently dependent on excitation energy for QDs in the vast energy landscape. When reporting the PLQY of QDs, the magnitude of the excitation energy must be mentioned.