1
|
Shah SS, Al-Naseri A, Rouch D, Bowman JP, Wilson R, Baker AL, Britz ML. Properties of an acid-tolerant, persistent Cheddar cheese isolate, Lacticaseibacillus paracasei GCRL163. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol 2021; 48:kuab070. [PMID: 34555172 PMCID: PMC8788758 DOI: 10.1093/jimb/kuab070] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/13/2021] [Accepted: 09/11/2021] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
The distinctive flavours in hard cheeses are attributed largely to the activity of nonstarter lactic acid bacteria (NSLAB) which dominate the cheese matrix during maturation after lactose is consumed. Understanding how different strains of NSLAB survive, compete, and scavenge available nutrients is fundamental to selecting strains as potential adjunct starters which may influence product traits. Three Lacticaseibacillus paracasei isolates which dominated at different stages over 63-week maturation periods of Australian Cheddar cheeses had the same molecular biotype. They shared many phenotypic traits, including salt tolerance, optimum growth temperature, growth on N-acetylglucosamine and N-acetylgalactosamine plus delayed growth on D-ribose, carbon sources likely present in cheese due to bacterial autolysis. However, strains 124 and 163 (later named GCRL163) survived longer at low pH and grew on D-tagatose and D-mannitol, differentiating this phenotype from strain 122. When cultured on growth-limiting lactose (0.2%, wt/vol) in the presence of high concentrations of L-leucine and other amino acids, GCRL163 produced, and subsequently consumed lactate, forming acetic and formic acids, and demonstrated temporal accumulation of intermediates in pyruvate metabolism in long-term cultures. Strain GCRL163 grew in Tween 80-tryptone broths, a trait not shared by all L. casei-group dairy isolates screened in this study. Including citrate in this medium stimulated growth of GCRL163 above citrate alone, suggesting cometabolism of citrate and Tween 80. Proteomic analysis of cytosolic proteins indicated that growth in Tween 80 produced a higher stress state and increased relative abundance of three cell envelope proteinases (CEPs) (including PrtP and Dumpy), amongst over 230 differentially expressed proteins.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Syed S Shah
- Food Safety and Innovation Centre, Tasmanian Institute of Agriculture, University of Tasmania, Hobart 7005, Australia
| | - Ali Al-Naseri
- Food Safety and Innovation Centre, Tasmanian Institute of Agriculture, University of Tasmania, Hobart 7005, Australia
| | - Duncan Rouch
- Clarendon Policy and Strategy Group, Melbourne 3000, Australia
| | - John P Bowman
- Food Safety and Innovation Centre, Tasmanian Institute of Agriculture, University of Tasmania, Hobart 7005, Australia
| | - Richard Wilson
- Central Science Laboratory, University of Tasmania, Hobart 7005, Australia
| | - Anthony L Baker
- Food Safety and Innovation Centre, Tasmanian Institute of Agriculture, University of Tasmania, Hobart 7005, Australia
| | - Margaret L Britz
- Food Safety and Innovation Centre, Tasmanian Institute of Agriculture, University of Tasmania, Hobart 7005, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Qi W, Li XX, Guo YH, Bao YZ, Wang N, Luo XG, Yu CD, Zhang TC. Integrated metabonomic-proteomic analysis reveals the effect of glucose stress on metabolic adaptation of Lactococcus lactis ssp. lactis CICC23200. J Dairy Sci 2020; 103:7834-7850. [PMID: 32684472 DOI: 10.3168/jds.2019-17810] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/29/2019] [Accepted: 04/14/2020] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
A combined proteomic and metabonomic approach was used to investigate the metabolism of Lactococcus lactis ssp. lactis subjected to glucose stress treatment. A proteomic method was used to determine 1,427 altered proteins, including 278 proteins with increased expression and 255 proteins with decreased expression. A metabonomic approach was adopted to identify 98 altered metabolites, including 62 metabolites with increased expression and 26 metabolites with decreased expression. The integrated analysis indicated that the RNA and DNA mismatch repair process and energy metabolism were enhanced in response to high-glucose stress in L. lactis. Lactococcus lactis responded to glucose stress by up-regulating oxidoreductase activity, which acted on glycosyl bonds, hydrolase activity, and organic acid transmembrane transporter activity. This led to an improvement in the metabolic flux from glucose to pyruvate, lactate, acetate, and maltose. Down-regulation of amino acid transmembrane transporter, aminoacyl-transfer RNA ligase, hydroxymethyl-, formyl-, and related transferase activities resulted in a decrease in the nitrogen metabolism-associated metabolic pathway, which might be related to inhibition of the production of biogenic amines. Overall, we highlight the response of metabolism to glucose stress and provide potential possibilities for the reduced formation of biogenic amines in improved level of sugar in the dairy fermentation industry. Moreover, according to the demand for industrial production, sugar concentration in fermented foods should be higher, or lower, than a set value that is dependent on bacterial strain and biogenic amine yield.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wei Qi
- State Key Laboratory of Food Nutrition and Safety, Tianjin University of Science & Technology, Tianjin 300457, P.R. China; Key Laboratory of Industrial Fermentation Microbiology, Tianjin University of Science & Technology, Ministry of Education, Tianjin 300457, P.R. China; National Engineering Laboratory for Industrial Enzymes, Tianjin University of Science & Technology, Tianjin 300457, P.R. China; Tianjin Key Laboratory of Industrial Microbiology, Tianjin University of Science & Technology, Tianjin 300457, P.R. China; College of Biotechnology, Tianjin University of Science & Technology, Tianjin 300457, P.R. China.
| | - Xiao-Xue Li
- State Key Laboratory of Food Nutrition and Safety, Tianjin University of Science & Technology, Tianjin 300457, P.R. China; Key Laboratory of Industrial Fermentation Microbiology, Tianjin University of Science & Technology, Ministry of Education, Tianjin 300457, P.R. China; National Engineering Laboratory for Industrial Enzymes, Tianjin University of Science & Technology, Tianjin 300457, P.R. China; Tianjin Key Laboratory of Industrial Microbiology, Tianjin University of Science & Technology, Tianjin 300457, P.R. China; College of Biotechnology, Tianjin University of Science & Technology, Tianjin 300457, P.R. China
| | - Yao-Hua Guo
- State Key Laboratory of Food Nutrition and Safety, Tianjin University of Science & Technology, Tianjin 300457, P.R. China; Key Laboratory of Industrial Fermentation Microbiology, Tianjin University of Science & Technology, Ministry of Education, Tianjin 300457, P.R. China; National Engineering Laboratory for Industrial Enzymes, Tianjin University of Science & Technology, Tianjin 300457, P.R. China; Tianjin Key Laboratory of Industrial Microbiology, Tianjin University of Science & Technology, Tianjin 300457, P.R. China; College of Biotechnology, Tianjin University of Science & Technology, Tianjin 300457, P.R. China
| | - Yan-Zhou Bao
- State Key Laboratory of Food Nutrition and Safety, Tianjin University of Science & Technology, Tianjin 300457, P.R. China; Key Laboratory of Industrial Fermentation Microbiology, Tianjin University of Science & Technology, Ministry of Education, Tianjin 300457, P.R. China; National Engineering Laboratory for Industrial Enzymes, Tianjin University of Science & Technology, Tianjin 300457, P.R. China; Tianjin Key Laboratory of Industrial Microbiology, Tianjin University of Science & Technology, Tianjin 300457, P.R. China; College of Biotechnology, Tianjin University of Science & Technology, Tianjin 300457, P.R. China
| | - Nan Wang
- State Key Laboratory of Food Nutrition and Safety, Tianjin University of Science & Technology, Tianjin 300457, P.R. China; Key Laboratory of Industrial Fermentation Microbiology, Tianjin University of Science & Technology, Ministry of Education, Tianjin 300457, P.R. China; National Engineering Laboratory for Industrial Enzymes, Tianjin University of Science & Technology, Tianjin 300457, P.R. China; Tianjin Key Laboratory of Industrial Microbiology, Tianjin University of Science & Technology, Tianjin 300457, P.R. China; College of Biotechnology, Tianjin University of Science & Technology, Tianjin 300457, P.R. China
| | - Xue-Gang Luo
- State Key Laboratory of Food Nutrition and Safety, Tianjin University of Science & Technology, Tianjin 300457, P.R. China; Key Laboratory of Industrial Fermentation Microbiology, Tianjin University of Science & Technology, Ministry of Education, Tianjin 300457, P.R. China; National Engineering Laboratory for Industrial Enzymes, Tianjin University of Science & Technology, Tianjin 300457, P.R. China; Tianjin Key Laboratory of Industrial Microbiology, Tianjin University of Science & Technology, Tianjin 300457, P.R. China; College of Biotechnology, Tianjin University of Science & Technology, Tianjin 300457, P.R. China
| | - Chun-Di Yu
- College of Food Science and Engineering, Qingdao Agricultural University, Qingdao 266109, P.R. China
| | - Tong-Cun Zhang
- State Key Laboratory of Food Nutrition and Safety, Tianjin University of Science & Technology, Tianjin 300457, P.R. China; Key Laboratory of Industrial Fermentation Microbiology, Tianjin University of Science & Technology, Ministry of Education, Tianjin 300457, P.R. China; National Engineering Laboratory for Industrial Enzymes, Tianjin University of Science & Technology, Tianjin 300457, P.R. China; Tianjin Key Laboratory of Industrial Microbiology, Tianjin University of Science & Technology, Tianjin 300457, P.R. China; College of Biotechnology, Tianjin University of Science & Technology, Tianjin 300457, P.R. China.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Mbye M, Baig MA, AbuQamar SF, El-Tarabily KA, Obaid RS, Osaili TM, Al-Nabulsi AA, Turner MS, Shah NP, Ayyash MM. Updates on understanding of probiotic lactic acid bacteria responses to environmental stresses and highlights on proteomic analyses. Compr Rev Food Sci Food Saf 2020; 19:1110-1124. [PMID: 33331686 DOI: 10.1111/1541-4337.12554] [Citation(s) in RCA: 57] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/21/2019] [Revised: 02/22/2020] [Accepted: 02/25/2020] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
Probiotics are defined as live microorganisms that improve the health of the host when administered in adequate quantities. Nonetheless, probiotics encounter extreme environmental conditions during food processing or along the gastrointestinal tract. This review discusses different environmental stresses that affect probiotics during food preparation, storage, and along the alimentary canal, including high temperature, low temperature, low and alkaline pH, oxidative stress, high hydrostatic pressure, osmotic pressure, and starvation. The understanding of how probiotics deal with environmental stress and thrive provides useful information to guide the selection of the strains with enhanced performance in specific situations, in food processing or during gastrointestinal transit. In most cases, multiple biological functions are affected upon exposure of the cell to environmental stress. Sensing of sublethal environmental stress can allow for adaptation processes to occur, which can include alterations in the expression of specific proteins.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mustapha Mbye
- Department of Food, Nutrition and Health, College of Food and Agriculture, United Arab Emirates University (UAEU), Al Ain, 15551, UAE
| | - Mohd Affan Baig
- Department of Food, Nutrition and Health, College of Food and Agriculture, United Arab Emirates University (UAEU), Al Ain, 15551, UAE
| | - Synan F AbuQamar
- Department of Biology, College of Science, United Arab Emirates University (UAEU), Al Ain, UAE
| | - Khaled A El-Tarabily
- Department of Biology, College of Science, United Arab Emirates University (UAEU), Al Ain, UAE.,Khalifa Center for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology, United Arab Emirates University (UAEU), Al-Ain, UAE.,College of Science, Health, Engineering and Education, Murdoch University, Murdoch, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Reyad S Obaid
- Department of Clinical Nutrition and Dietetics, College of Health Sciences, University of Sharjah, Sharjah, UAE
| | - Tareq M Osaili
- Department of Clinical Nutrition and Dietetics, College of Health Sciences, University of Sharjah, Sharjah, UAE.,Department of Nutrition and Food Technology, Jordan University of Science and Technology, Irbid, Jordan
| | - Anas A Al-Nabulsi
- Department of Nutrition and Food Technology, Jordan University of Science and Technology, Irbid, Jordan
| | - Mark S Turner
- School of Agriculture and Food Sciences, the University of Queensland (UQ), Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Nagendra P Shah
- Food and Nutritional Science, School of Biological Sciences, the University of Hong Kong, Pok Fu Lam, Hong Kong
| | - Mutamed M Ayyash
- Department of Food, Nutrition and Health, College of Food and Agriculture, United Arab Emirates University (UAEU), Al Ain, 15551, UAE
| |
Collapse
|