1
|
Stingl C, VanDuijn MM, Dejoie T, Sillevis Smitt PAE, Luider TM. Improved detection of tryptic immunoglobulin variable region peptides by chromatographic and gas-phase fractionation techniques. CELL REPORTS METHODS 2024; 4:100795. [PMID: 38861989 DOI: 10.1016/j.crmeth.2024.100795] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/03/2023] [Revised: 03/30/2024] [Accepted: 05/20/2024] [Indexed: 06/13/2024]
Abstract
The polyclonal repertoire of circulating antibodies potentially holds valuable information about an individual's humoral immune state. While bottom-up proteomics is well suited for serum proteomics, the vast number of antibodies and dynamic range of serum challenge this analysis. To acquire the serum proteome more comprehensively, we incorporated high-field asymmetric waveform ion-mobility spectrometry (FAIMS) or two-dimensional chromatography into standard trypsin-based bottom-up proteomics. Thereby, the number of variable region (VR)-related spectra increased 1.7-fold with FAIMS and 10-fold with chromatography fractionation. To match antibody VRs to spectra, we combined de novo searching and BLAST alignment. Validation of this approach showed that, as peptide length increased, the de novo accuracy decreased and BLAST performance increased. Through in silico calculations on antibody repository sequences, we determined the uniqueness of tryptic VR peptides and their suitability as antibody surrogate. Approximately one-third of these peptides were unique, and about one-third of all antibodies contained at least one unique peptide.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christoph Stingl
- Clinical and Cancer Proteomics, Department of Neurology, Erasmus MC, 3000 CA Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
| | - Martijn M VanDuijn
- Clinical and Cancer Proteomics, Department of Neurology, Erasmus MC, 3000 CA Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Thomas Dejoie
- Laboratoire de Biochimie, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU), 44000 Nantes, France
| | - Peter A E Sillevis Smitt
- Clinical and Cancer Proteomics, Department of Neurology, Erasmus MC, 3000 CA Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Theo M Luider
- Clinical and Cancer Proteomics, Department of Neurology, Erasmus MC, 3000 CA Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Wijnands C, Noori S, Donk NWCJVD, VanDuijn MM, Jacobs JFM. Advances in minimal residual disease monitoring in multiple myeloma. Crit Rev Clin Lab Sci 2023; 60:518-534. [PMID: 37232394 DOI: 10.1080/10408363.2023.2209652] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/12/2023] [Revised: 04/07/2023] [Accepted: 04/28/2023] [Indexed: 05/27/2023]
Abstract
Multiple myeloma (MM) is characterized by the clonal expansion of plasma cells and the excretion of a monoclonal immunoglobulin (M-protein), or fragments thereof. This biomarker plays a key role in the diagnosis and monitoring of MM. Although there is currently no cure for MM, novel treatment modalities such as bispecific antibodies and CAR T-cell therapies have led to substantial improvement in survival. With the introduction of several classes of effective drugs, an increasing percentage of patients achieve a complete response. This poses new challenges to traditional electrophoretic and immunochemical M-protein diagnostics because these methods lack sensitivity to monitor minimal residual disease (MRD). In 2016, the International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) expanded their disease response criteria with bone marrow-based MRD assessment using flow cytometry or next-generation sequencing in combination with imaging-based disease monitoring of extramedullary disease. MRD status is an important independent prognostic marker and its potential as a surrogate endpoint for progression-free survival is currently being studied. In addition, numerous clinical trials are investigating the added clinical value of MRD-guided therapy decisions in individual patients. Because of these novel clinical applications, repeated MRD evaluation is becoming common practice in clinical trials as well as in the management of patients outside clinical trials. In response to this, novel mass spectrometric methods that have been developed for blood-based MRD monitoring represent attractive minimally invasive alternatives to bone marrow-based MRD evaluation. This paves the way for dynamic MRD monitoring to allow the detection of early disease relapse, which may prove to be a crucial factor in facilitating future clinical implementation of MRD-guided therapy. This review provides an overview of state-of-the-art of MRD monitoring, describes new developments and applications of blood-based MRD monitoring, and suggests future directions for its successful integration into the clinical management of MM patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Charissa Wijnands
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Somayya Noori
- Department of Neurology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | | | - Martijn M VanDuijn
- Department of Neurology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Joannes F M Jacobs
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Teuwen JTJ, Ritzen LFL, Knapen-Portz YM, Ludwiczek PK, Damoiseaux JGMC, van Beers JJBC, de Boer D. Identifying therapeutic monoclonal antibodies using target protein collision electrophoresis reflex assay to separate the wheat from the chaff. J Immunol Methods 2023; 522:113552. [PMID: 37652294 DOI: 10.1016/j.jim.2023.113552] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/13/2023] [Revised: 08/24/2023] [Accepted: 08/28/2023] [Indexed: 09/02/2023]
Abstract
Monoclonal gammopathies are characterized by the presence of monoclonal immunoglobulins, also known as M-proteins. Therapeutic monoclonal antibodies (t-mAbs) can interfere in laboratory assays used to monitor the state of disease, such as serum protein electrophoresis (SPE) and immunofixation electrophoresis (IFE). To establish a correct interpretation of IFE, Target protein-Collision Immunofixation Electrophoresis Reflex Assay (T-CIERA) was developed to identify t-mAbs in IFE. Here we demonstrate that T-CIERA is applicable to a wide variety of t-mAbs for which the target protein is commercially available. Moreover, the shift observed was characteristic for each t-mAb, and T-CIERA enabled the identification of multiple t-mAbs sharing a common target protein. Additionally, the lower limit of detection (LLOD) was determined objectively, and T-CIERA demonstrated an adequate LLOD for all tested t-mAbs. Furthermore, T-CIERA was also successfully applied to serum samples obtained from patients receiving daratumumab, isatuximab, elotuzumab, and durvalumab treatment. In conclusion, T-CIERA is a suitable reflex assay for identifying a wide variety of t-mAbs, including those for which no commercial assay is available to deal with their interference. Moreover, CD38-CIERA could serve as an alternative or complementary test to the commercially available Hydrashift assay kits. T-CIERA would enable laboratories without mass spectrometry equipment and expertise in this area to distinguish between drug and disease to improve clinical response monitoring and diagnosis of monoclonal gammopathies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jules T J Teuwen
- Central Diagnostic Laboratory, section Protein Chemistry, Maastricht University Medical Center+, PO Box 5800, 6202 AZ Maastricht, the Netherlands.
| | - Lucas F L Ritzen
- Central Diagnostic Laboratory, section Protein Chemistry, Maastricht University Medical Center+, PO Box 5800, 6202 AZ Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Yvon M Knapen-Portz
- Central Diagnostic Laboratory, section Protein Chemistry, Maastricht University Medical Center+, PO Box 5800, 6202 AZ Maastricht, the Netherlands.
| | - Patricia K Ludwiczek
- Central Diagnostic Laboratory, section Protein Chemistry, Maastricht University Medical Center+, PO Box 5800, 6202 AZ Maastricht, the Netherlands.
| | - Jan G M C Damoiseaux
- Central Diagnostic Laboratory, section Protein Chemistry, Maastricht University Medical Center+, PO Box 5800, 6202 AZ Maastricht, the Netherlands.
| | - Joyce J B C van Beers
- Central Diagnostic Laboratory, section Protein Chemistry, Maastricht University Medical Center+, PO Box 5800, 6202 AZ Maastricht, the Netherlands.
| | - Douwe de Boer
- Central Diagnostic Laboratory, section Protein Chemistry, Maastricht University Medical Center+, PO Box 5800, 6202 AZ Maastricht, the Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Kubicki T, Derman BA, Dytfeld D, Jakubowiak AJ. Measurable residual disease in peripheral blood in myeloma: dream or reality. Curr Opin Oncol 2023; 35:574-580. [PMID: 37621165 DOI: 10.1097/cco.0000000000000987] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/26/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Therapeutic advancements in multiple myeloma have led to increasingly deeper and more durable responses, creating a need for highly sensitive and applicable techniques for measurable residual disease (MRD) assessment. Bone marrow assays can deeply assess for MRD, but it is not conducive to performing frequent and dynamic evaluations, which may be needed for MRD-adapted treatment approaches. Recently, numerous techniques for MRD assessment in peripheral blood have come under investigation, and their integration into routine clinical practice is eagerly anticipated. RECENT FINDINGS The identification of circulating tumor cells (CTCs), evaluation of cell-free DNA, and measuring monoclonal protein concentration with mass spectrometry are promising research areas for assessing myeloma in peripheral blood. CTCs assessment and cell-free DNA may carry prognostic significance, but they lack the sensitivity of bone marrow-based techniques. Mass spectrometry has already been implemented in clinical practice in certain centers, but its full potential has yet to be fully realized. This review focuses on recent developments in these fields, emphasizing the potential future roles of these assessments. SUMMARY MRD assessment in peripheral blood is still in the development stage but holds promise for not only complementing bone marrow based evaluations but also potential for improving sensitivity.
Collapse
|
5
|
Medina-Herrera A, Sarasquete ME, Jiménez C, Puig N, García-Sanz R. Minimal Residual Disease in Multiple Myeloma: Past, Present, and Future. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:3687. [PMID: 37509348 PMCID: PMC10377959 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15143687] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/26/2023] [Revised: 07/17/2023] [Accepted: 07/18/2023] [Indexed: 07/30/2023] Open
Abstract
Responses to treatment have improved over the last decades for patients with multiple myeloma. This is a consequence of the introduction of new drugs that have been successfully combined in different clinical contexts: newly diagnosed, transplant-eligible or ineligible patients, as well as in the relapsed/refractory setting. However, a great proportion of patients continue to relapse, even those achieving complete response, which underlines the need for updated response criteria. In 2014, the international myeloma working group established new levels of response, prompting the evaluation of minimal residual disease (MRD) for those patients already in complete or stringent complete response as defined by conventional serological assessments: the absence of tumor plasma cells in 100,000 total cells or more define molecular and immunophenotypic responses by next-generation sequencing and flow cytometry, respectively. In this review, we describe all the potential methods that may be used for MRD detection based on the evidence found in the literature, paying special attention to their advantages and pitfalls from a critical perspective.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alejandro Medina-Herrera
- Departament of Hematology, University Hospital of Salamanca (HUSA/IBSAL), CIBERONC, CIC-IBMCC (USAL-CSIC), 37007 Salamanca, Spain
| | - María Eugenia Sarasquete
- Departament of Hematology, University Hospital of Salamanca (HUSA/IBSAL), CIBERONC, CIC-IBMCC (USAL-CSIC), 37007 Salamanca, Spain
| | - Cristina Jiménez
- Departament of Hematology, University Hospital of Salamanca (HUSA/IBSAL), CIBERONC, CIC-IBMCC (USAL-CSIC), 37007 Salamanca, Spain
| | - Noemí Puig
- Departament of Hematology, University Hospital of Salamanca (HUSA/IBSAL), CIBERONC, CIC-IBMCC (USAL-CSIC), 37007 Salamanca, Spain
| | - Ramón García-Sanz
- Departament of Hematology, University Hospital of Salamanca (HUSA/IBSAL), CIBERONC, CIC-IBMCC (USAL-CSIC), 37007 Salamanca, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Li J, Xu A, Xie W, Li B, Yan C, Xia Y, Liang C, Ji L. MALDI-TOF-MS for rapid screening analysis of M-protein in serum. Front Oncol 2022; 12:1073479. [PMID: 36591514 PMCID: PMC9797962 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.1073479] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/18/2022] [Accepted: 11/29/2022] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Monoclonal immunoglobin (M-protein) is a serum biomarker for the diagnosis of plasma cell dyscrasias. Despite limitation of analytical sensitivity and resolution, serum protein electrophoresis and immunofixation electrophoresis are still the front-line tests for the detection of M-proteins. Herein, we developed a MALDI-TOF Mass spectrometry-based method for the screening test of M-proteins in human serum. Based on the unique mass signature of different immunoglobin isotypes, M-Proteins could be rapidly identified and typed. The method demonstrated with high analytical performance and throughput, rapid and simple, which could be a new choice for the diagnosis of plasma cell dyscrasias.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jie Li
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, Peking University Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen, China,*Correspondence: Jie Li, ; Chao Liang, ; Ling Ji,
| | - Anping Xu
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, Peking University Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen, China
| | - Weijie Xie
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, Peking University Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen, China
| | - Bowen Li
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, Peking University Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen, China
| | - Cunliang Yan
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, Peking University Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen, China
| | - Yong Xia
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, Peking University Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen, China
| | - Chao Liang
- Department of Biology, School of Life Sciences, Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen, China,Institute of Integrated Bioinfomedicine and Translational Science (IBTS), School of Chinese Medicine, Hong Kong Baptist University, Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China,State Key Laboratory of Proteomics, National Center for Protein Science (Beijing), Beijing Institute of Lifeomics, Beijing, China,*Correspondence: Jie Li, ; Chao Liang, ; Ling Ji,
| | - Ling Ji
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, Peking University Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen, China,*Correspondence: Jie Li, ; Chao Liang, ; Ling Ji,
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
The Effect of Molecular Mass of Hydroxyethyl Cellulose on the Performance of Capillary Electrophoretic Separation of Proteins. SEPARATIONS 2022. [DOI: 10.3390/separations9100284] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022] Open
Abstract
Capillary electrophoresis (CE) is a versatile analytical separation method in the field of biochemistry. Although it has been proved that the relative molecular mass (Mr) of the polymers determines the threshold concentration of the entangled polymer solution, which will affect the separation performance of DNA molecules, there is still no report on the effect of Mr on the separation performance of proteins. Herein, we have thoroughly performed the CE of proteins ranged from 14.3 kDa to 116 kDa in a mixed hydroxyethyl cellulose (HEC) solution. The mixed solution was obtained with various Mr including 90,000, 250,000, 720,000, and 1,300,000. Then, we found that the mixed polymer provided a high resolution for small protein molecules while increasing the efficiency of large ones. Results demonstrated that the migration time decreased if HEC (1,300,000) was mixed with the lower Mr one, and the mixed solution (1,300,000/250,000) offered the highest resolution. The resolution was negatively correlated with the electric field strength. Finally, we have employed the optimal electrophoretic conditions to separate proteins in human tears, and it showed that lysozyme, lipocalin, and lactoferrin from human tears were successfully resolved in the mixed HEC. Such work indicates that CE has the potential to be developed as a tool for the diagnosis of xerophthalmia, meibomian gland dysfunction, or other eye diseases.
Collapse
|
8
|
Retrospective Longitudinal Monitoring of Multiple Myeloma Patients by Mass Spectrometry Using Archived Serum Protein Electrophoresis Gels and De Novo Sequence Analysis. Hemasphere 2022; 6:e758. [PMID: 35935609 PMCID: PMC9348860 DOI: 10.1097/hs9.0000000000000758] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/31/2022] [Accepted: 07/03/2022] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
|
9
|
Muccio S, Tavernier A, Rouchon MC, Roccon A, Dai S, Finn G, Macé S, Boutet V, Fedeli O. Validated Method Based on Immunocapture and Liquid Chromatography Coupled to High-Resolution Mass Spectrometry to Eliminate Isatuximab Interference with M-Protein Measurement in Serum. Anal Chem 2021; 93:15236-15242. [PMID: 34762405 DOI: 10.1021/acs.analchem.1c03410] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
In multiple myeloma (MM) disease, malignant plasma cells produce excessive quantities of a monoclonal immunoglobulin (Ig), known as M-protein. M-protein levels are measured in the serum of patients with MM using electrophoresis techniques to determine the response to treatment. However, therapeutic monoclonal antibodies, such as isatuximab, may confound signals using electrophoresis assays. We developed a robust assay based on immunocapture and liquid chromatography coupled to high-resolution mass spectrometry (IC-HPLC-HRMS) in order to eliminate this interference. Following immunocapture of Ig and free light chains (LC) in serum, heavy chains (HC) and LC were dissociated using dithiothreitol, sorted by liquid chromatography and analyzed using HRMS (Q-Orbitrap). This method allowed the M-proteins to be characterized and the signals from isatuximab and M-proteins to be discriminated. As M-protein is specific to each patient, no standards were available for absolute quantification. We therefore used alemtuzumab (an IgG kappa mAb) as a surrogate analyte for the semiquantification of M-protein in serum. This assay was successfully validated in terms of selectivity/specificity, accuracy/precision, robustness, dilution linearity, and matrix variability from 10.0 to 200 μg/mL in human serum. This method was used for clinical assessment of samples and eliminated potential interference due to isatuximab when monitoring patients with MM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stéphane Muccio
- Sanofi R&D, 371 Rue du Professeur Blayac, 34184 Montpellier, France
| | | | | | - Alain Roccon
- Sanofi R&D, 371 Rue du Professeur Blayac, 34184 Montpellier, France
| | - Shujia Dai
- Sanofi Translational Sciences, 640 Memorial Drive, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139, United States
| | - Greg Finn
- Sanofi Oncology, 640 Memorial Drive, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139, United States
| | - Sandrine Macé
- Sanofi R&D, 1 Avenue Pierre Brossolette, 91385 Chilly-Mazarin, France
| | - Valérie Boutet
- Sanofi R&D, 1 Avenue Pierre Brossolette, 91385 Chilly-Mazarin, France
| | - Olivier Fedeli
- Sanofi R&D, 371 Rue du Professeur Blayac, 34184 Montpellier, France
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Noori S, Verkleij CPM, Zajec M, Langerhorst P, Bosman PWC, de Rijke YB, Zweegman S, VanDuijn M, Luider T, van de Donk NWCJ, Jacobs JFM. Monitoring the M-protein of multiple myeloma patients treated with a combination of monoclonal antibodies: the laboratory solution to eliminate interference. Clin Chem Lab Med 2021; 59:1963-1971. [PMID: 34392637 DOI: 10.1515/cclm-2021-0399] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/01/2021] [Accepted: 08/08/2021] [Indexed: 01/01/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The therapeutic monoclonal antibody (t-mAb) daratumumab, used to treat multiple myeloma (MM) patients, interferes with routine, electrophoretic based M-protein diagnostics. Electrophoretic response assessment becomes increasingly difficult when multiple t-mAbs are combined for use in a single patient. This is the first study to address the analytical challenges of M-protein monitoring when multiple t-mAbs are combined. METHODS In this proof-of-principle study we evaluate two different methods to monitor M-protein responses in three MM patients, who receive both daratumumab and nivolumab. The double hydrashift assay aims to resolve t-mAb interference on immunofixation. The MS-MRD (mass spectrometry minimal residual disease) assay measures clonotypic peptides to quantitate both M-protein and t-mAb concentrations. RESULTS After exposure to daratumumab and nivolumab, both t-mAbs become visible on immunofixation electrophoresis (IFE) as two IgG-kappa bands that migrate close to each other at the cathodal end of the γ-region. In case the M-protein co-migrates with these t-mAbs, the observed interference was completely abolished with the double IFE hydrashift assay. In all three patients the MS-MRD assay was also able to distinguish the M-protein from the t-mAbs. Additional advantage of the MS-MRD assay is that this multiplex assay is more sensitive and allows quantitative M-protein-, daratumumab- and nivolumab-monitoring. CONCLUSIONS Daratumumab and nivolumab interfere with electrophoretic M-protein diagnostics. However, the M-protein can be distinguished from both t-mAbs by use of a double hydrashift assay. The MS-MRD assay provides an alternative method that allows sensitive and simultaneous quantitative monitoring of both the M-protein and t-mAbs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Somayya Noori
- Department of Neurology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Christie P M Verkleij
- Department of Hematology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Marina Zajec
- Department of Neurology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.,Department of Clinical Chemistry, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Pieter Langerhorst
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Patricia W C Bosman
- Department of Hematology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Yolanda B de Rijke
- Department of Clinical Chemistry, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Sonja Zweegman
- Department of Hematology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Martijn VanDuijn
- Department of Neurology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Theo Luider
- Department of Neurology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Niels W C J van de Donk
- Department of Hematology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Joannes F M Jacobs
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
O'Brien A, O'Halloran F, Mykytiv V. Minimal Residual Disease in Multiple Myeloma: Potential for Blood-Based Methods to Monitor Disease. CLINICAL LYMPHOMA MYELOMA & LEUKEMIA 2021; 22:e34-e40. [PMID: 34470720 DOI: 10.1016/j.clml.2021.07.032] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/31/2021] [Revised: 07/25/2021] [Accepted: 07/29/2021] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
In recent years, the life expectancy of Multiple Myeloma (MM) patients has substantially improved, but this cancer remains incurable with increasing incidence in the developed world. Most MM patients will eventually relapse due to residual drug-resistant cancerous cells that survive treatment, commonly referred to as minimal residual disease (MRD). Methods to improve MRD detection in MM patients are generating considerable interest as a means of monitoring patients' response to treatment. In clinical laboratories, these methods currently require bone marrow aspirates which are invasive and frequently miss detection of localised disease due to the spatial heterogeneity of disease infiltration. By simplifying serial sampling and allowing for the detection of extramedullary disease, a blood-based method could significantly impact treatment duration and intensity and minimise chemotherapy-induced toxicity. This review will describe the current blood-based techniques available to detect MRD in MM and compare their potential to evaluate patient prognosis and drive therapeutic decisions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aisling O'Brien
- Dept. of Biological Sciences, Munster Technological University, Cork, Ireland; Dept. of Immunology, Cork University Hospital, Cork, Ireland.
| | - Fiona O'Halloran
- Dept. of Biological Sciences, Munster Technological University, Cork, Ireland
| | - Vitaliy Mykytiv
- Dept. of Haematology, Cork University Hospital, Cork, Ireland; Dept. of Medicine, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Howard BM, Kuh A, Rezavi L, Caturegli P. A Comparison of gel (Hydragel 30) and capillary (Capillarys III Tera) electrophoresis for the characterization of human serum proteins. Pract Lab Med 2021; 25:e00233. [PMID: 34095418 PMCID: PMC8145771 DOI: 10.1016/j.plabm.2021.e00233] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/24/2020] [Accepted: 04/23/2021] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
Abstract
Objectives To compare gel (Hydrasys 2 from Sebia) and capillary (Capillarys III Tera, Sebia) electrophoresis for the characterization of human serum proteins. Design and methods 304 sera tested by gel electrophoresis during 8 routine laboratory days were concurrently tested by capillary electrophoresis. Gels were read by an experienced medical technologist while capillary profiles by a Sebia representative and the same technologist. Most sera (214 of 304, 70%) were also analyzed by immunofixation electrophoresis, used here as the gold standard to calculate sensitivity and specificity of the gel and capillary systems. Results Gel and capillary estimated the concentration of albumin, gamma region, and M-spikes nearly perfectly, and that of beta, alpha-2, and alpha-1 regions with excellent correlation. The two systems classified concordantly 268 of 304 sera (88% agreement) as having no, one, or two M-spikes, but differed in the remaining 36 sera (12%). Gel electrophoresis correctly identified M-spikes in 82 of 112 sera that were shown to have monoclonal band(s) by immunofixation (73% sensitivity), and correctly did not reveal M-spikes in 97 of the 102 sera that had no immunofixation bands (95% specificity). Capillary achieved slightly higher sensitivity (85 of 112, 76%) and slightly lower specificity (94 of 102, 92%), but the two areas under the ROC curves were nearly identical at 0.84. Conclusions Gel and capillary electrophoresis systems perform similarly to estimate the concentration of serum protein fractions and detect M-spikes. Capillary and gel electrophoresis demonstrate 88% agreement in reporting the number of M-spikes. Capillary electrophoresis has a sensitivity of 76% and specificity of 92%. Gel electrophoresis has a sensitivity of 74% and specificity of 95%.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brittney M Howard
- Division of Immunology, Department of Pathology, The Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Ross Building-Room 656, 720 Rutland Avenue, Baltimore, MD, 21205, USA
| | - Annie Kuh
- Division of Immunology, Department of Pathology, The Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Ross Building-Room 656, 720 Rutland Avenue, Baltimore, MD, 21205, USA
| | - LuAnn Rezavi
- Division of Immunology, Department of Pathology, The Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Ross Building-Room 656, 720 Rutland Avenue, Baltimore, MD, 21205, USA
| | - Patrizio Caturegli
- Division of Immunology, Department of Pathology, The Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Ross Building-Room 656, 720 Rutland Avenue, Baltimore, MD, 21205, USA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Abstract
The diagnosis of myeloma and other plasma cell disorders has traditionally been done with the aid of electrophoretic methods, whereas amyloidosis has been characterized by immunohistochemistry. Mass spectrometry has recently been established as an alternative to these traditional methods and has been proved to bring added benefit for patient care. These newer mass spectrometry-based methods highlight some of the key advantages of modern proteomic methods and how they can be applied to the routine care of patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David L Murray
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
| | - Surendra Dasari
- Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Murray DL, Puig N, Kristinsson S, Usmani SZ, Dispenzieri A, Bianchi G, Kumar S, Chng WJ, Hajek R, Paiva B, Waage A, Rajkumar SV, Durie B. Mass spectrometry for the evaluation of monoclonal proteins in multiple myeloma and related disorders: an International Myeloma Working Group Mass Spectrometry Committee Report. Blood Cancer J 2021; 11:24. [PMID: 33563895 PMCID: PMC7873248 DOI: 10.1038/s41408-021-00408-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 65] [Impact Index Per Article: 21.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/24/2020] [Revised: 11/10/2020] [Accepted: 12/01/2020] [Indexed: 01/30/2023] Open
Abstract
Plasma cell disorders (PCDs) are identified in the clinical lab by detecting the monoclonal immunoglobulin (M-protein) which they produce. Traditionally, serum protein electrophoresis methods have been utilized to detect and isotype M-proteins. Increasing demands to detect low-level disease and new therapeutic monoclonal immunoglobulin treatments have stretched the electrophoretic methods to their analytical limits. Newer techniques based on mass spectrometry (MS) are emerging which have improved clinical and analytical performance. MS is gaining traction into clinical laboratories, and has replaced immunofixation electrophoresis (IFE) in routine practice at one institution. The International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) Mass Spectrometry Committee reviewed the literature in order to summarize current data and to make recommendations regarding the role of mass spectrometric methods in diagnosing and monitoring patients with myeloma and related disorders. Current literature demonstrates that immune-enrichment of immunoglobulins coupled to intact light chain MALDI-TOF MS has clinical characteristics equivalent in performance to IFE with added benefits of detecting additional risk factors for PCDs, differentiating M-protein from therapeutic antibodies, and is a suitable replacement for IFE for diagnosing and monitoring multiple myeloma and related PCDs. In this paper we discuss the IMWG recommendations for the use of MS in PCDs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David L Murray
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
| | - Noemi Puig
- Hospital Universitario de Salamanca, Instituto de Investigación Biomédica de Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain
| | | | - Saad Z Usmani
- Department of Hematologic Oncology & Blood Disorders, Levine Cancer Institute/Atrium Health, Charlotte, NC, USA
| | - Angela Dispenzieri
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
- Department of Hematology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Giada Bianchi
- Division of Hematology, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Shaji Kumar
- Department of Hematology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Wee Joo Chng
- Cancer Science Institute of Singapore, NUS, Singapore, Singapore
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, NUS, Singapore, Singapore
- National University Cancer Institute, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Roman Hajek
- Department of Hematooncology, University Hospital Ostrava and Faculty of Medicine, University of Ostrava, Ostrava, Czech Republic
| | - Bruno Paiva
- Clinica Universidad de Navarra, Centro de Investigacion Medica Aplicada (CIMA), IDISNA, Pamplona, Spain
| | - Anders Waage
- Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway
- Department of Hematology, St. Olav's University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway
| | | | - Brian Durie
- Department of Hematology, Cedars-Sinai Outpatient Cancer Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Sidana S, Murray DL, Dasari S, Go RS, Muchtar E, Willrich MA, Snyder M, Kohlhagen M, Lust JA, Kourelis TV, Kumar SK, Dispenzieri A, Gertz MA. Glycosylation of immunoglobulin light chains is highly prevalent in cold agglutinin disease. Am J Hematol 2020; 95:E222-E225. [PMID: 32356376 DOI: 10.1002/ajh.25843] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/30/2020] [Revised: 04/15/2020] [Accepted: 04/21/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Surbhi Sidana
- Department of Medicine Stanford University Stanford California USA
- Division of Hematology Mayo Clinic Rochester Minnesota USA
| | - David L. Murray
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology Mayo Clinic Rochester Minnesota USA
| | - Surendra Dasari
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology Mayo Clinic Rochester Minnesota USA
| | - Ronald S. Go
- Division of Hematology Mayo Clinic Rochester Minnesota USA
| | - Eli Muchtar
- Division of Hematology Mayo Clinic Rochester Minnesota USA
| | - Maria A. Willrich
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology Mayo Clinic Rochester Minnesota USA
| | - Melissa Snyder
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology Mayo Clinic Rochester Minnesota USA
| | - Mindy Kohlhagen
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology Mayo Clinic Rochester Minnesota USA
| | - John A. Lust
- Division of Hematology Mayo Clinic Rochester Minnesota USA
| | | | - Shaji K. Kumar
- Division of Hematology Mayo Clinic Rochester Minnesota USA
| | | | - Morie A. Gertz
- Division of Hematology Mayo Clinic Rochester Minnesota USA
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Kohlhagen M, Dasari S, Willrich M, Hetrick M, Netzel B, Dispenzieri A, Murray DL. Automation and validation of a MALDI-TOF MS (Mass-Fix) replacement of immunofixation electrophoresis in the clinical lab. Clin Chem Lab Med 2020; 59:155-163. [PMID: 32745067 DOI: 10.1515/cclm-2020-0581] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/24/2020] [Accepted: 07/03/2020] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
Objectives A matrix assisted laser desorption ionization time of flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) method (Mass-Fix) as a replacement for gel-based immunofixation (IFE) has been recently described. To utilize Mass-Fix clinically, a validated automated method was required. Our aim was to automate the pre-analytical processing, improve positive specimen identification and ergonomics, reduce paper data storage and increase resource utilization without increasing turnaround time. Methods Serum samples were batched and loaded onto a liquid handler along with reagents and a barcoded sample plate. The pre-analytical steps included: (1) Plating immunopurification beads. (2) Adding 10 μl of serum. (3) Bead washing. (4) Eluting the immunoglobulins (Igs), and reducing to separate the heavy and light Ig chains. The resulting plate was transferred to a second low-volume liquid handler for MALDI plate spotting. MALDI-TOF mass spectra were collected. Integrated in-house developed software was utilized for sample tracking, driving data acquisition, data analysis, history tracking, and result reporting. A total of 1,029 residual serum samples were run using the automated system and results were compared to prior electrophoretic results. Results The automated Mass-Fix method was capable of meeting the validation requirements of concordance with IFE, limit of detection (LOD), sample stability and reproducibility with a low repeat rate. Automation and integrated software allowed a single user to process 320 samples in an 8 h shift. Software display facilitated identification of monoclonal proteins. Additionally, the process maintains positive specimen identification, reduces manual pipetting, allows for paper free tracking, and does not significantly impact turnaround time (TAT). Conclusions Mass-Fix is ready for implementation in a high-throughput clinical laboratory.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mindy Kohlhagen
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Surendra Dasari
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Maria Willrich
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - MeLea Hetrick
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Brian Netzel
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Angela Dispenzieri
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - David L Murray
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| |
Collapse
|