Neonatal Fc Receptor (FcRn) Enhances Tissue Distribution and Prevents Excretion of nab-Paclitaxel

Translational PK-PD/TD modeling of antitumor effects and peripheral neuropathy in gemcitabine and nab-paclitaxel chemotherapy from xenograft mice to patients for optimal dose and schedule

PURPOSE

Gemcitabine and nab-paclitaxel (GnP) treatment, the standard first-line chemotherapy for unresectable pancreatic cancer, often causes peripheral neuropathy (PN). To develop alternative dosing strategies to avoid severe PN, understanding the relationship between pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics/toxicodynamics (PD/TD) is necessary. We established a PK-PD/TD model of GnP treatment to develop an optimal dose schedule.

METHODS

A mouse xenograft model of human pancreatic cancer was generated to measure drug concentrations in the plasma and tumor, antitumor effects, and PN after GnP treatment. The Simeoni tumor growth inhibition model with tumor concentrations and empirical indirect response models were used for the PD and TD models, respectively. Clinical outcomes were predicted with reported population estimates of PK parameters in cancer patients.

RESULTS

The PK-PD/TD model simultaneously described the observed tumor volume and paw withdrawal frequency in the von Frey test. For the standard GnP regimen, the model predicted clinical overall response (75.1%), which was overestimated compared to that in a recent phase II study (42.1%) but lower than the observed disease control rate (96.5%). Model simulation showed that dose reduction to less than 40% GnP dose was not effective; a change of dose schedule from every week for 3 weeks to every 2 weeks was a more favorable approach than dose reduction to 60% every week.

CONCLUSION

The PK-PD/TD model-based translational approach provides a guide for optimal dose determination to avoid severe PN while maintaining antitumor effects during GnP chemotherapy. Further research is needed to enhance its applicability and potential for combination chemotherapy regimens.

Preparation and characterization of paclitaxel palmitate albumin nanoparticles with high loading efficacy: an in vitro and in vivo anti-tumor study in mouse models

BACKGROUND

Combination of the prodrug technique with an albumin nano drug-loaded system is a novel promising approach for cancer treatment. However, the long-lasting and far-reaching challenge for the treatment of cancers lies in how to construct the albumin nanometer drug delivery system with lead compounds and their derivatives.

METHODS

In this study, we reported the preparation of injectable albumin nanoparticles (NPs) with a high and quantitative drug loading system based on the Nab^TM technology of paclitaxel palmitate (PTX-PA).

RESULTS

Our experimental study on drug tissue distribution in vivo demonstrated that the paclitaxel palmitate albumin nanoparticles (Nab-PTX-PA) remained in the tumor for a longer time post-injection. Compared with saline and paclitaxel albumin nanoparticles (Abraxane^®), intravenous injection of Nab-PTX-PA not only reduced the toxicity of the drug in normal organs, and increased the body weight of the animals but maintained sustained release of paclitaxel (PTX) in the tumor, thereby displaying an excellent antitumor activity. Blood routine analysis showed that Nab-PTX-PA had fewer adverse effects or less toxicity to the normal organs, and it inhibited tumor cell proliferation more effectively as compared with commercial paclitaxel albumin nanoparticles.

CONCLUSIONS

This carrier strategy for small molecule drugs is based on naturally evolved interactions between long-chain fatty acids (LCFAs) and Human Serum Albumin (HSA), demonstrated here for PTX. Nab-PTX-PA shows higher antitumor efficacy in vivo in breast cancer models. On the whole, this novel injectable Nab-PTX-PA has great potential as an effective drug delivery system in the treatment of breast cancer.

Reappraisal of anticancer nanomedicine design criteria in three types of preclinical cancer models for better clinical translation

Anticancer nanomedicines are designed to improve anticancer efficacy by increasing drug accumulation in tumors through enhanced permeability retention (EPR) effect, and to reduce toxicity by decreasing drug accumulation in normal organs through long systemic circulation. However, the inconsistent efficacy/safety of nanomedicines in cancer patients versus preclinical cancer models have provoked debate for nanomedicine design criteria. In this study, we investigate nanomedicine design criteria in three types of preclinical cancer models using five clinically used nanomedicines, which identifies the factors for better clinical translations of their observed clinical efficacy/safety compared to free drug or clinical micelle formulation. When those nanomedicines were compared with drug solution or clinical micelle formulation in breast tumors, long and short-circulating nanomedicines did not enhance tumor accumulation by EPR effect in transgenic spontaneous breast cancer model regardless of their size or composition, although they improved tumor accumulations in subcutaneous and orthotopic breast cancer models. However, when tumors were compared to normal breast tissue, nanomedicines, drug solution and clinical micelle formulation showed enhanced tumor accumulation regardless of the breast cancer models. In addition, long-circulating nanomedicines did not further increase tumor accumulation in transgenic mouse spontaneous breast cancer nor universally decrease drug accumulations in normal organs; they decreased or increased accumulation in different organs, potentially changing the clinical efficacy/safety. In contrast, short-circulating nanomedicines decreased blood concentration and altered drug distribution in normal organs, which are correlated with their clinical efficacy/safety. A reappraisal of current nanomedicine design criteria is needed to ensure consistent clinical translation for improvement of their clinical efficacy/safety in cancer patients.

Opportunities and delusions regarding drug delivery targeting pancreatic cancer-associated fibroblasts

A dense desmoplastic stroma formed by abundant extracellular matrix and stromal cells, including cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs) and immune cells, is a feature of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), one of the most lethal cancer types. As the dominant cellular component of the PDAC stroma, CAFs orchestrate intensive and biologically diverse crosstalk with pancreatic cancer cells and immune cells and contribute to a unique PDAC tumor microenvironment promoting cancer proliferation, metastasis, and resistance against both chemo- and immunotherapies. Therefore, CAFs and CAF-related mechanisms have emerged as promising targets for PDAC therapy. However, several clinical setbacks and accumulating knowledge of the PDAC stroma have revealed the heterogeneity and multifaceted biological roles of CAFs, and concerns regarding "what to deliver" and "how to deliver" have arisen when designing CAF-targeted drug delivery systems to specifically inhibit tumor-supporting CAFs without impairing tumor-restricting CAFs. In this review, we will discuss the complexity of CAFs in the PDAC stroma as well as the potential opportunities and common misconceptions regarding drug delivery efforts targeting PDAC CAFs.

What Went Wrong with Anticancer Nanomedicine Design and How to Make It Right

The three design criteria of anticancer nanomedicines to improve anticancer efficacy and to reduce toxicity have been debated for decades: (1) Nanomedicines increase drug accumulation through enhanced permeability and retention (EPR) in tumors to improve anticancer efficacy. (2) Long systemic circulation of nanomedicines with high plasma concentration reduces reticuloendothelial system (RES) clearance and decreases drug accumulation in the normal organs to reduce toxicity, and to enhance the EPR effect. (3) A universal nanodelivery platform based on EPR and long systemic circulation can be developed to deliver different anticancer drugs. Although these criteria have repeatedly been confirmed in preclinical xenograft cancers, the majority of anticancer nanomedicines have failed to improve clinical efficacy, while the clinical efficacies/safety of successful nanomedicines are inconsistent with these design criteria. First, the debate over tumor EPR may have mixed two different questions and missed more clinically relevant comparisons for nanomedicines versus free drugs. When tumors are compared with normal tissues, tumor EPR has been confirmed in both mouse xenograft tumors and human cancers. However, nanomedicines may not enhance drug accumulation in human tumors compared with free drugs, despite outstanding improvement in preclinical cancers. Heterogeneity of enhanced permeability and retention in human cancers occurs for small/large molecules and nanomedicines, which cannot fully explain the poor translation of nanomedicines' efficacy from preclinical cancer models to cancer patients. Second, long-circulation nanomedicine should not be used as a universal design criterion because it does not further improve tumor accumulation by tumor EPR in human patients nor universally reduce distribution in normal organs. In contrast, nanomedicines change the drug tissue distribution to alter anticancer efficacy/safety. Third, a universal nanodelivery platform that uses the same design criteria for different drugs is not feasible. Rather, drug-specific nanodelivery systems are required to overcome the intrinsic shortcomings of delivered drugs, which are determined by the physicochemical, pharmacokinetic, and pharmacodynamic properties of the delivered drugs and nanocarriers to improve their efficacy/safety.

Population Pharmacokinetics and Exposure-Response Analysis of nab-Paclitaxel in Pediatric Patients With Recurrent or Refractory Solid Tumors

Pediatric malignancies are most commonly of primary central nervous system or hematopoietic origin. The main reason for cancer death in pediatrics is refractory and relapsed disease, and improved therapeutic options are needed in the pediatric population. Nanoparticle albumin-bound (nab)-paclitaxel (Abraxane) is a human albumin-stabilized formulation of paclitaxel and was designed to improve the chemotherapeutic effects of paclitaxel and to reduce toxicities. Although nab-paclitaxel pharmacokinetics (PK) has been extensively studied in adults, no information is available on its PK in children. ABI-007-PST-001 was the first nab-paclitaxel clinical trial conducted in pediatrics, and the current analysis is the first study of nab-paclitaxel PK in pediatrics. Our analyses suggested that ontogeny and maturation play a role in nab-paclitaxel PK disposition, as demonstrated by the finding that both blood clearance and volume of distribution increased from younger to older pediatric age groups and from pediatrics to adults. A 3-compartment population PK (PPK) model with saturable elimination was developed to describe the paclitaxel whole blood concentrations in pediatrics. The PPK model was customized by estimating the allometric function on PK parameters to take into account the ontogeny/maturation of patients. PPK estimates are consistent with the fast and deep distribution of paclitaxel that was previously observed in adults. Finally, the exposure-safety analysis showed an increased probability of drug-related adverse events (>grade 2) in cycle 1 and the first cycle of neutropenia (>grade 2) associated with higher doses. However, there is no statistically significant association between exposures (measured by area under the concentration-time curve) and the probabilities of either safety event.