Crystalline State Determines the Potency of Galectin-10 Protein Assembly to Induce Inflammation

The mucosal concept in chronic rhinosinusitis: Focus on the epithelial barrier

Chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) is a common chronic nasal cavity and sinus disease affecting a growing number of individuals worldwide. Recent advances have shifted our understanding of CRS pathophysiology from a physical obstruction model of ventilation and drainage to a mucosal concept that recognizes the complexities of mucosal immunologic variations and cellular aberrations. A growing number of studies have demonstrated the alteration of the epithelial barrier during inflammatory states. Therefore, the current review has focused on the crucial role of epithelial cells within this mucosal framework in CRS, detailing the perturbed epithelial homeostasis, impaired epithelial cell barrier, dysregulated epithelial cell repair processes, and enhanced interactions between epithelial cells and immune cells. Notably, the utilization of novel technologies, such as single-cell transcriptomics, has revealed the novel functions of epithelial barriers, such as inflammatory memory and neuroendocrine functions. Therefore, this review also emphasizes the importance of epithelial inflammatory memory and the necessity of further investigations into neuroendocrine epithelial cells and neurogenic inflammation in CRS. We conclude by contemplating the prospective benefits of epithelial cell-oriented biological treatments, which are currently under investigation in rigorous randomized, double-blind clinical trials in patients with CRS with nasal polyps.

Interaction of eosinophilic and neutrophilic inflammation in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

In the past year, the endotype of chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) has been studied from a new perspective. Eosinophilic and neutrophilic inflammation are not independent processes in the pathogenesis of CRS. In this review, we will focus on recent research on mixed eosinophilic-neutrophilic inflammation in CRS and discuss the mechanism and potential treatments.

RECENT FINDINGS

Traditionally, patients with eosinophilic CRS (ECRS) present with severe clinical manifestations, comorbidities, and a higher recurrence rate. Recent studies have found that approximately 40% of patients with ECRS present with neutrophilic infiltration, while patients with predominantly eosinophilic infiltration along with neutrophilic inflammation present with more complex inflammation, clinical manifestations and exhibit refractory characteristics.

SUMMARY

The complex inflammatory profile and refractory clinical characteristics of mixed eosinophilic-neutrophilic inflammation in CRS are current challenges for clinicians. We summarize the features of eosinophilic and neutrophilic inflammation and current studies on the mechanisms of mixed eosinophilic-neutrophilic inflammation and suggest potentially effective therapeutic methods. We hope that this review will help with determining precise treatment options for patients.

Precision medicine in chronic rhinosinusitis - using endotype and endotype-driven therapeutic options

INTRODUCTION

Chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) is a heterogeneous disease, and its complex pathophysiological characteristics pose a challenge to its clinical treatment. CRS is distinguished not only by clinical phenotype but also by endotype characteristics, which are divided into type 2 CRS and non-type 2 CRS.

AREAS COVERED

In this review, we summarize and discuss current studies that depict the mechanisms and endotypes of CRS. In particular, inflammatory cells and the microbiome play a role in the pathophysiology of CRS. We also listed some of the biomarkers described in recent studies that may serve as a theoretical foundation for additional investigations. We have summarized the advantages and disadvantages of existing treatments and listed the available biological treatments for CRS in detail.

EXPERT OPINION

Endotype-driven therapeutic options face many challenges because of the complexity of the disease. Glucocorticoids, nasal endoscopic surgery, and biological therapy are the main treatments used in clinical practice, but they have limitations. This review provides advice on the clinical management and treatment options for patients with different endotypes, which will be more conducive to improving the quality of life and reducing the financial burden on patients.

Charcot-Leyden crystals: An ancient but never so current discovery

From the first description of Charcot-Leyden crystals (CLCs) to the present, many steps have been taken to understand the mechanisms underlying their formation. In particular, to date not only eosinophils but also mast cells are known to be responsible for the production of CLCs, which represent the crystallized form of Galectin-10. Due to their characteristics, CLCs typically induce a crystallopathy and are responsible for an exacerbation of inflammation. Nasal cytology (NC) has allowed to better understand the correlation between the severity of several rhinopaties and the presence of CLCs in NC samples, which is strictly correlated with an eosinophiles and mast cells infiltration. As a matter of fact, rhinopaties with a mixed eosinophilic-mast cell inflammatory infiltrate, characterized by the presence of abundant CLCs, show a worse prognosis and a higher risk of relapse. This could have important therapeutic implications, since the treatments available today could be exploited to target both eosinophils and mast cells, to reduce the damage induced by CLCs.