C(sp2)-H Borylation of Heterocycles by Well-Defined Bis(silylene)pyridine Cobalt(III) Precatalysts: Pincer Modification, C(sp2)-H Activation and Catalytically Relevant Intermediates

Polydentate Amidinato-Silylenes, -Germylenes and -Stannylenes

This review article focuses on amidinatotetrylenes that potentially can (or have already shown to) behave as bi- or tridentate ligands because they contain at least one amidinatotetrylene moiety (silylene, germylene or stannylene) and one (or more) additional coordinable fragment(s). Currently, they are being widely used as ligands in coordination chemistry, small molecule activation and catalysis. This review classifies those that have been isolated as transition metal-free compounds into five families that differ in the position(s) of the donor group(s) (D) on the amidinatotetrylene moiety, namely: ED{R1NC(R2)NR1}, EX{DNC(R2)NR1}, EX{R1NC(D)NR1}, EX{DNC(R2)ND} and E{R1NC(R2)ND}2 (E=Si, Ge or Sn). Those that do not exist as transition metal-free compounds but have been observed as ligands in transition metal complexes are cyclometallated and ring-opened amidinatotetrylene ligands. This article presents schematic descriptions of their structures, the approaches used for their syntheses and a quick overview of their involvement (as ligands) in transition metal-catalysed reactions. The literature is covered up to the end of 2023.

Amidinatotetrylenes Donor Functionalized on Both N Atoms: Structures and Coordination Chemistry

E(hmds)(bqfam) (E = Ge (1a), Sn (1b); hmds = N(SiMe3)2, bqfam = N,N'-bis(quinol-8-yl)formamidinate), which are amidinatotetrylenes equipped with quinol-8-yl fragments on the amidinate N atoms, have been synthesized from the formamidine Hbqfam and Ge(hmds)2 or SnCl(hmds). Both 1a and 1b are fluxional in solution at room temperature, as the E atom oscillates from being attached to the two amidinate N atoms to being chelated by an amidinate N atom and its closest quinolyl N atom (both situations are similarly stable according to density functional theory calculations). The hmds group of 1a and 1b is still reactive and the deprotonation of another equivalent of Hbqfam can be achieved, allowing the formation of the homoleptic derivatives E(bqfam)2 (E = Ge, Sn). The reactions of 1a and 1b with [AuCl(tht)] (tht = tetrahydrothiophene), [PdCl2(MeCN)2], [PtCl2(cod)] (cod = cycloocta-1,5-diene), [Ru3(CO)12] and [Co2(CO)8] have been investigated. The gold(I) complexes [AuCl{κE-E(hmds)(bqfam)}] (E = Ge, Sn) have a monodentate κE-tetrylene ligand and display fluxional behavior in solution the same as that of 1a and 1b. However, the palladium(II) and platinum(II) complexes [MCl{κ3E,N,N'-ECl(hmds)(bqfam)}] (M = Pd, Pt; E = Ge, Sn) contain a κ3E,N,N'-chloridotetryl ligand that arises from the insertion of the tetrylene E atom into an M-Cl bond and the coordination of an amidinate N atom and its closest quinolyl N atom to the metal center. Finally, the binuclear ruthenium(0) and cobalt(0) complexes [Ru2{μE-κ3E,N,N'-E(hmds)(bqfam)}(CO)6] and [Co2{μE-κ3E,N,N'-E(hmds)(bqfam)}(μ-CO)(CO)4] (E = Ge, Sn) have a related κ3E,N,N'-tetrylene ligand that bridges two metal atoms through the E atom. For the κ3E,N,N'-metal complexes, the quinolyl fragment not attached to the metal is pendant in all the germanium compounds but, for the tin derivatives, is attached to (in the Pd and Pt complexes) or may interact with (in the Ru2 and Co2 complexes) the tin atom.

Tandem manganese catalysis for the chemo-, regio-, and stereoselective hydroboration of terminal alkynes: in situ precatalyst activation as a key to enhanced chemoselectivity

The manganese(ii) complex [Mn(iPrPNP)Cl2] (iPrPNP = 2,6-bis(diisopropylphosphinomethyl)pyridine) was found to catalyze the stereo- and regioselective hydroboration of terminal alkynes employing HBPin (pinacolborane). In the absence of in situ activators, mixtures of alkynylboronate and E-alkenylboronate esters were formed, whereas when NaHBEt3 was employed as the in situ activator, E-alkenylboronate esters were exclusively accessed. Mechanistic studies revealed a tandem C-H borylation/semihydrogenation pathway accounting for the formation of the products. Stoichiometric reactions hint toward reaction of a Mn-H active species with the terminal alkyne as the catalyst entry pathway to the cycle, whereas reaction with HBPin led to catalyst deactivation.

Nickel boryl complexes and nickel-catalyzed alkyne borylation

The first nickel bis-boryl complexes cis-[Ni( ⁱ Pr₂Im^Me)₂(Bcat)₂], cis-[Ni( ⁱ Pr₂Im^Me)₂(Bpin)₂] and cis-[Ni( ⁱ Pr₂Im^Me)₂(Beg)₂] are reported, which were prepared via the reaction of a source of [Ni( ⁱ Pr₂Im^Me)₂] with the diboron(4) compounds B₂cat₂, B₂pin₂ and B₂eg₂ ( ⁱ Pr₂Im^Me = 1,3-di-iso-propyl-4,5-dimethylimidazolin-2-ylidene; B₂cat₂ = bis(catecholato)diboron; B₂pin₂ = bis(pinacolato)diboron; B₂eg₂ = bis(ethylene glycolato)diboron). X-ray diffraction and DFT calculations strongly suggest that a delocalized, multicenter bonding scheme dictates the bonding situation of the NiB₂ moiety in these square planar complexes, reminiscent of the bonding situation of "non-classical" H₂ complexes. [Ni( ⁱ Pr₂Im^Me)₂] also efficiently catalyzes the diboration of alkynes using B₂cat₂ as the boron source under mild conditions. In contrast to the known platinum-catalyzed diboration, the nickel system follows a different mechanistic pathway, which not only provides the 1,2-borylation product in excellent yields, but also provides an efficient approach to other products such as C-C coupled borylation products or rare tetra-borylated compounds. The mechanism of the nickel-catalyzed alkyne borylation was examined by means of stoichiometric reactions and DFT calculations. Oxidative addition of the diboron reagent to nickel is not dominant; the first steps of the catalytic cycle are coordination of the alkyne to [Ni( ⁱ Pr₂Im^Me)₂] and subsequent borylation at the coordinated and, thus, activated alkyne to yield complexes of the type [Ni(NHC)₂(η²-cis-(Bcat)(R)C[double bond, length as m-dash]C(R)(Bcat))], exemplified by the isolation and structural characterization of [Ni( ⁱ Pr₂Im^Me)₂(η²-cis-(Bcat)(Me)C[double bond, length as m-dash]C(Me)(Bcat))] and [Ni( ⁱ Pr₂Im^Me)₂(η²-cis-(Bcat)(H₇C₃)C[double bond, length as m-dash]C(C₃H₇)(Bcat))].

Control over Selectivity in Alkene Hydrosilylation Catalyzed by Cobalt(III) Hydride Complexes

Two new bisphosphine [PCP] pincer cobalt(III) hydrides, [(L¹)Co(PMe₃)(H)(Cl)] (^L11, L¹ = 2,6-((Ph₂P)(Et)N)₂C₆H₃) and [(L²)Co(PMe₃)(H)(Cl)] (^L21, L² = 2,6-((ⁱPr₂P)(Et)N)₂C₆H₃), as well as one new bissilylene [SiCSi] pincer cobalt(III) hydride, [(L³)Co(PMe₃)(H)(Cl)] (^L31, L³ = 1,3-((PhC(^tBuN)₂Si)(Et)N)₂C₆H₃), were synthesized by reaction of the corresponding protic [PCP] or [SiCSi] pincer ligands L¹H, L²H, and L³H with CoCl(PMe₃)₃. Despite the similarities in the ligand scaffolds, the three cobalt(III) hydrides show remarkably different performance as catalysts in alkene hydrosilylation. Among the PCP pincer complexes, ^L11 has higher catalytic activity than complex ^L21, and both catalysts afford anti-Markovnikov selectivity for both aliphatic and aromatic alkenes. In contrast, the catalytic activity for alkene hydrosilylation of silylene complex ^L31 is comparable to phosphine complex ^L11, but a dependence of regioselectivity on the substrates was observed: While aliphatic alkenes are converted in an anti-Markovnikov fashion, the hydrosilylation of aromatic alkenes affords Markovnikov products. The substrate scope was explored with 28 examples. Additional experiments were conducted to elucidate these mechanisms of hydrosilylation. The synthesis of cobalt(I) complex (L¹)Co(PMe₃)₂ (^L17) and its catalytic properties for alkene hydrosilylation allowed for the proposal of the mechanistic variations that occur in dependence of reaction conditions and substrates.

Dipyrromethane‐Based PGeP Pincer Germyl Rhodium Complexes

A family of germyl rhodium complexes derived from the PGeP germylene 2,2’‐bis(di‐isopropylphosphanylmethyl)‐5,5’‐dimethyldipyrromethane‐1,1’‐diylgermanium(II), Ge(pyrmPⁱPr₂)₂CMe₂ (1), has been prepared. Germylene 1 reacted readily with [RhCl(PPh₃)₃] and [RhCl(cod)(PPh₃)] (cod=1,5‐cyclooctadiene) to give, in both cases, the PGeP‐pincer chloridogermyl rhodium(I) derivative [Rh{κ³P,Ge,P‐GeCl(pyrmPⁱPr₂)₂CMe₂}(PPh₃)] (2). Similarly, the reaction of 1 with [RhCl(cod)(MeCN)] afforded [Rh{κ³P,Ge,P‐GeCl(pyrmPⁱPr₂)₂CMe₂}(MeCN)] (3). The methoxidogermyl and methylgermyl rhodium(I) complexes [Rh{κ³P,Ge,P‐GeR(pyrmPⁱPr₂)₂CMe₂}(PPh₃)] (R=OMe, 4; Me, 5) were prepared by treating complex 2 with LiOMe and LiMe, respectively. Complex 5 readily reacted with CO to give the carbonyl rhodium(I) derivative [Rh{κ³P,Ge,P‐GeR(pyrmPⁱPr₂)₂CMe₂}(CO)] (6), with HCl, HSnPh₃ and Ph₂S₂ rendering the pentacoordinate methylgermyl rhodium(III) complexes [RhHX{κ³P,Ge,P‐GeMe(pyrmPⁱPr₂)₂CMe₂}] (X=Cl, 7; SnPh₃, 8) and [Rh(SPh)₂{κ³P,Ge,P‐GeMe(pyrmPⁱPr₂)₂CMe₂}] (9), respectively, and with H₂ to give the hexacoordinate derivative [RhH₂{κ³P,Ge,P‐GeMe(pyrmPⁱPr₂)₂CMe₂}(PPh₃)] (10). Complexes 3 and 5 are catalyst precursors for the hydroboration of styrene, 4‐vinyltoluene and 4‐vinylfluorobenzene with catecholborane under mild conditions.

Transition-Metal-Free Heterocyclic Carbon-Boron Bond Formation

Heteroaryl boronic acids and esters are extremely important and valuable intermediates because of their wide application in the synthesis of marketed drugs and bioactive compounds. Over the last couple of decades, the construction of highly important heteroaryl carbon-boron bonds has created huge attention. The transition-metal-free protocols are more green, less sensitive to air and moisture, and also economically advantageous over the transition-metal-based protocols. The transition-metal-free C-H borylation of heteroarenes and C-X (X=halogen) borylation of heteroaryl halides represents an excellent approach for their synthesis. Also, various cyclization and alkyne activation protocols have been recently established for their synthesis. The goal of this review article is to summarize the existing literature and the current state of the art for transition-metal-free synthesis of heteroaryl boronic acid and esters.

C(sp2)–H Activation with Bis(silylene)pyridine Cobalt(III) Complexes: Catalytic Hydrogen Isotope Exchange of Sterically Hindered C–H Bonds

The bis(silylene)pyridine cobalt(III) dihydride boryl, trans-[ ptol SiNSi]Co(H)2BPin (ptolSiNSi = 2,6-[EtNSi(NtBu)2CAr]2 C5H3N, where Ar = C6H5CH3, and Pin =pinacolato) has been used as a precatalyst for the hydrogen isotope exchange (HIE) of arenes and heteroarenes using benzene-d 6 as the deuterium source. Use of D2 as the source of the isotope produced modest levels of deuterium incorporation and stoichiometric studies established modification of the pincer ligand through irreversible addition of H2 across the silylene leading to catalyst deactivation. High levels of deuterium incorporation were observed with benzene-d 6 as the isotope source and enabled low (0.5 - 5 mol%) loadings of the cobalt precursor. The resulting high activity for C-H activation enabled deuterium incorporation at sterically encumbered sites previously inaccessible with first-row metal HIE catalysts. The cobalt-catalyzed method was also compatible with aryl halides, demonstrating a kinetic preference for chemoselective C(sp2)-H activation over C(sp2)-X (X = Cl, Br) bonds. Monitoring the catalytic reaction by NMR spectroscopy established cobalt(III) resting states at both low and high conversions of substrate and the overall performance was inhibited by the addition of HBPin. Studies on precatalyst activation with cis-[ ptol SiNSi]Co(Bf)2H and cis-[ ptol SiNSi]Co(H)2Bf (where Bf = 2-benzofuranyl), support the intermediacy of bis(hydride)aryl cobalt intermediates as opposed to bis(aryl)hydride cobalt complexes in the catalytic HIE method. Mechanistic insights resulted in an improved protocol using [ ptol SiNSi]Co(H)3 NaBHEt3 as the precatalyst, ultimately translating onto higher levels of isotopic incorporation.

Stannylenes based on pyrrole-phosphane and dipyrromethane-diphosphane scaffolds: syntheses and behavior as precursors to PSnP pincer palladium(II), palladium(0) and gold(I) complexes

2-Ditertbutylphosphanylmethylpyrrole (H₂pyrmP^tBu₂) and 2,2'-bis(diisopropylphosphanylmethyl)-5,5'-dimethyldipyrromethane ((HpyrmPⁱPr₂)₂CMe₂) have been used to synthesize new P-donor-stabilized stannylenes in which the Sn atom is attached to one, SnCl(HpyrmP^tBu₂) (1) and Sn{N(SiMe₃)₂}(HpyrmP^tBu₂) (2), or two pyrrolyl-phosphane scaffolds, Sn(HpyrmP^tBu₂)₂ (3), or to a dipyrromethane-diphosphane scaffold, Sn(pyrmPⁱPr₂)₂CMe₂ (4). It has been found that stannylenes 3 and 4 are excellent precursors to transition metal complexes containing PSnP pincer-type ligands. Their reactions with chlorido transition metal complexes have afforded [PdCl{κ³P,Sn,P-SnCl(HpyrmP^tBu₂)₂}] (6), [PdCl{κ³P,Sn,P-SnCl(pyrmPⁱPr₂)₂CMe₂}] (7) and [Au{κ³P,Sn,P-SnCl(HpyrmP^tBu₂)₂}] (8), which contain a PSnP pincer-type chloridostannyl ligand. While complexes 6 and 7 are square-planar palladium(II) complexes, compound 8 is an uncommon gold(I) complex having a T-shaped coordination geometry with a very long Sn-Au bond (3.120 Å). The T-shaped palladium(0) complex [Pd{κ³P,Sn,P-Sn(pyrmPⁱPr₂)₂CMe₂}] (9), which contains an unprecedented PSnP pincer-type stannylene that behaves as a Z-type (σ-acceptor) ligand, has been prepared from 4 and [Pd(η³-C₃H₅)(η⁵-C₅H₅)].

First-Row d-Block Element-Catalyzed Carbon-Boron Bond Formation and Related Processes

Organoboron reagents represent a unique class of compounds because of their utility in modern synthetic organic chemistry, often affording unprecedented reactivity. The transformation of the carbon-boron bond into a carbon-X (X = C, N, and O) bond in a stereocontrolled fashion has become invaluable in medicinal chemistry, agrochemistry, and natural products chemistry as well as materials science. Over the past decade, first-row d-block transition metals have become increasingly widely used as catalysts for the formation of a carbon-boron bond, a transformation traditionally catalyzed by expensive precious metals. This recent focus on alternative transition metals has enabled growth in fundamental methods in organoboron chemistry. This review surveys the current state-of-the-art in the use of first-row d-block element-based catalysts for the formation of carbon-boron bonds.

Progress in the preparation and characterization of silylene iron, cobalt and nickel complexes

The synthesis and characterization of Fe, Co and Ni complexes supported by silylene ligands in the past ten years are summarized. Due to the decrease of the electron cloud density on the Si atom after coordination, the downfield shift of the 29Si chemical shift is accompanied by the coordination between the free silylene ligand and metal. The strong electron-donating ability of silylene makes the metal center more electron-rich, which is conducive to the oxidative addition reaction in the metal center. In some cases, the coordination ability of silylene is stronger than those of phosphine and carbene ligands. Therefore, silylene transition metal complexes have better catalytic activity. The further challenges in this field are to develop new polydentate silylene ligands, synthesize chelate silylene-phosphine and silylene-carbene ligands, and design new silylene transition metal complexes for more catalytic research.