The Acetate Proton Shuttle between Mutually Trans Ligands

Mechanistic Versatility at Ir(PSiP) Pincer Catalysts: Triflate Proton Shuttling from 2-Butyne to Diene and [3]Dendralene Motifs

The five-coordinate hydrido complex [IrH(OTf)(PSiP)] (1) catalytically transforms 2-butyne into a mixture of its isomer 1,3-butadiene, and [3]dendralene and linear hexatriene dimerization products: (E)-4-methyl-3-methylene-1,4-hexadiene and (3Z)-3,4-dimethyl-1,3,5-hexatriene, respectively. Under the conditions of the catalytic reaction, benzene, and 363 K, the hexatriene further undergoes thermal electrocyclization into 2,3-dimethyl-1,3-cyclohexadiene. The reactions between 1 and the alkyne substrate allow isolation or nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) observation of catalyst resting states and possible reaction intermediates, including complexes with the former PSiP pincer ligands disassembled into PSi and PC chelates, and species coordinating allyl or carbene fragments en route to products. The density functional theory (DFT) calculations guided by these experimental observations disclose competing mechanisms for C–H bond elaboration that move H atoms either classically, as hydrides, or as protons transported by the triflate. This latter role of triflate, previously recognized only for more basic anions such as carboxylates, is discussed to result from combining the unfavorable charge separation in the nonpolar solvent and the low electronic demand from the metal to the anion at coordination positions trans to silicon. Triflate deprotonation of methyl groups is key to release highly coordinating diene products from stable allyl intermediates, thus enabling catalytic cycling.

Interplay between the Directing Group and Multifunctional Acetate Ligand in Pd-Catalyzed anti-Acetoxylation of Unsymmetrical Dialkyl-Substituted Alkynes

The cooperative action of the acetate ligand, the 2-pyridyl sulfonyl (SO₂Py) directing group on the alkyne substrate, and the palladium catalyst has been shown to be crucial for controlling reactivity, regioselectivity, and stereoselectivity in the acetoxylation of unsymmetrical internal alkynes under mild reaction conditions. The corresponding alkenyl acetates were obtained in good yields with complete levels of β-regioselectivity and anti-acetoxypalladation stereocontrol. Experimental and computational analyses provide insight into the reasons behind this delicate interplay between the ligand, directing group, and the metal in the reaction mechanism. In fact, these studies unveil the multiple important roles of the acetate ligand in the coordination sphere at the Pd center: (i) it brings the acetic acid reagent into close proximity to the metal to allow the simultaneous activation of the alkyne and the acetic acid, (ii) it serves as an inner-sphere base while enhancing the nucleophilicity of the acid, and (iii) it acts as an intramolecular acid to facilitate protodemetalation and regeneration of the catalyst. Further insight into the origin of the observed regiocontrol is provided by the mapping of potential energy profiles and distortion–interaction analysis.

Computational insights into Ir(iii)-catalyzed allylic C-H amination of terminal alkenes: mechanism, regioselectivity, and catalytic activity

Computational studies on Ir(iii)-catalyzed intermolecular branch-selective allylic C–H amination of terminal olefins with methyl dioxazolone have been carried out to investigate the mechanism, including the origins of regioselectivity and catalytic activity difference. The result suggests that the reaction proceeds through generation of active species, alkene coordination, allylic C–H activation, decarboxylation, migratory insertion, and protodemetalation. The presence of AgNTf₂ could thermodynamically promote the formation of catalytically active species [Cp*Ir(OAc)]⁺. Both the weaker Ir–C(internal) bond and the closer interatomic distance of N⋯C(internal) in the key allyl-Ir(v)-nitrenoid intermediate make the migratory insertion into Ir–C(internal) bond easier than into the Ir–C(terminal) bond, leading to branch-selective allylic C–H amidation. The high energy barrier for allylic C–H activation in the Co system could account for the observed sluggishness, which is mainly ascribed to the weaker coordination capacity of alkenes to the triplet Cp*Co(OAc)⁺ and the deficient metal⋯H interaction to assist hydrogen transfer.

DFT studies on Ir(iii)-catalyzed branch-selective allylic C–H amination of terminal olefins with methyl dioxazolone have been carried out to investigate the mechanism, including the origins of regioselectivity and catalytic activity difference.

Five-Membered Ruthenacycles: Ligand-Assisted Alkyne Insertion into 1,3-N,S-Chelated Ruthenium Borate Species

Building upon previous work, the chemistry of [(η⁶ -p-cymene)Ru{P(OMe)₂ OR}Cl₂ ], (R=H or Me) has been extended with [H₂ B(mbz)₂ ]^- (mbz=2-mercaptobenzothiazolyl) using different Ru precursors and borate ligands. As a result, a series of 1,3-N,S-chelated ruthenium borate complexes, for example, [(κ² -N,S-L)PR₃ Ru{κ³ -H,S,S'-H₂ B(L)₂ }], (2 a-d and 2 a'-d'; R=Ph, Cy, OMe or OPh and L=C₅ H₄ NS or C₇ H₄ NS₂ ) and [Ru{κ³ -H,S,S'-H₂ B(L)₂ }₂ ], (3: L=C₅ H₄ NS, 3': L=C₇ H₄ NS₂ ) were isolated upon treatment of [(η⁶ -p-cymene)RuCl₂ PR₃ ], 1 a-d (R=Ph, Cy, OMe or OPh) with [H₂ B(mp)₂ ]^- or [H₂ B(mbz)₂ ]^- ligands (mp=2-mercaptopyridyl). All the Ru borate complexes, 2 a-d and 2 a'-d' are stabilized by phosphine/phosphite and hemilabile N,S-chelating ligands. Treatment of these Ru borate species, 2 a'-c' with various terminal alkynes yielded two different types of five-membered ruthenacycle species, namely [PR₃ {C₇ H₄ S₂ -(E)-N-C=CH(R')}Ru{κ³ -H,S,S'-H₂ B(L)₂ }], (4-4'; R=Ph and R'=CO₂ Me or C₆ H₄ NO₂ ; L=C₇ H₄ NS₂ ) and [PR₃ {C₇ H₄ NS-(E)-S-C=CH(R')}Ru{κ³ -H,S,S'-H₂ B(L)₂ }], (5-5', 6 and 7; R=Ph, Cy or OMe and R'=CO₂ Me or C₆ H₄ NO₂ ; L=C₇ H₄ NS₂ ). All these five-membered ruthenacycle species contain an exocyclic C=C moiety, presumably formed by the insertion of a terminal alkyne into the Ru-N and Ru-S bonds. The new species have been characterized spectroscopically and the structures were further confirmed by single-crystal X-ray diffraction analysis. Theoretical studies and chemical-bonding analyses established that charge transfer occurs from phosphorus to ruthenium center following the trend PCy₃ <PPh₃ <P(OPh)₃ <P(OMe)₃ .