C(sp3)–Cl Bond Activation Promoted by a POP-Pincer Rhodium(I) Complex

Competition between N,C,N-Pincer and N,N-Chelate Ligands in Platinum(II)

Replacement of the chloride ligand of PtCl{κ3-N,C,N-[py-C6HR2-py]} (R = H (1), Me (2)) and PtCl{κ3-N,C,N-[py-O-C6H3-O-py]} (3) by hydroxido gives Pt(OH){κ3-N,C,N-[py-C6HR2-py]} (R = H (4), Me (5)) and Pt(OH){κ3-N,C,N-[py-O-C6H3-O-py]} (6). These compounds promote deprotonation of 3-(2-pyridyl)pyrazole, 3-(2-pyridyl)-5-methylpyrazole, 3-(2-pyridyl)-5-trifluoromethylpyrazole, and 2-(2-pyridyl)-3,5-bis(trifluoromethyl)pyrrole. The coordination of the anions generates square-planar derivatives, which in solution exist as a unique species or equilibria between isomers. Reactions of 4 and 5 with 3-(2-pyridyl)pyrazole and 3-(2-pyridyl)-5-methylpyrazole provide Pt{κ3-N,C,N-[py-C6HR2-py]}{κ1-N1-[R'pz-py]} (R = H; R' = H (7), Me (8). R = Me; R' = H (9), Me (10)), displaying κ1-N1-pyridylpyrazolate coordination. A 5-trifluoromethyl substituent causes N1-to-N2 slide. Thus, 3-(2-pyridyl)-5-trifluoromethylpyrazole affords equilibria between Pt{κ3-N,C,N-[py-C6HR2-py]}{κ1-N1-[CF3pz-py]} (R = H (11a), Me (12a)) and Pt{κ3-N,C,N-[py-C6HR2-py]}{κ1-N2-[CF3pz-py]} (R = H (11b), Me (12b)). 1,3-Bis(2-pyridyloxy)phenyl allows the chelating coordination of the incoming anions. Deprotonations of 3-(2-pyridyl)pyrazole and its substituted 5-methyl counterpart promoted by 6 lead to equilibria between Pt{κ3-N,C,N-[pyO-C6H3-Opy]}{κ1-N1-[R'pz-py]} (R' = H (13a), Me (14a)) with a κ-N1-pyridylpyrazolate anion, keeping the pincer coordination of the di(pyridyloxy)aryl ligand, and Pt{κ2-N,C-[pyO-C6H3(Opy)]}{κ2-N,N-[R'pz-py]} (R' = H (13c), Me (14c)) with two chelates. Under the same conditions, 3-(2-pyridyl)-5-trifluoromethylpyrazole generates the three possible isomers: Pt{κ3-N,C,N-[pyO-C6H3-Opy]}{κ1-N1-[CF3pz-py]} (15a), Pt{κ3-N,C,N-[pyO-C6H3-Opy]}{κ1-N2-[CF3pz-py]} (15b), and Pt{κ2-N,C-[pyO-C6H3(Opy)]}{κ2-N,N-[CF3pz-py]} (15c). The N1-pyrazolate atom produces a remote stabilizing effect on the chelating form, pyridylpyrazolates being better chelate ligands than pyridylpyrrolates. Accordingly, reactions of 4-6 with 2-(2-pyridyl)-3,5-bis(trifluoromethyl)pyrrole yield Pt{κ3-N,C,N-[py-C6HR2-py]}{κ1-N1-[(CF3)2C4(py)HN]} (R = H (16), Me (17)) or Pt{κ3-N,C,N-[pyO-C6H3-Opy]}{κ1-N1-[(CF3)2C4(py)HN]} (18), displaying κ1-N1-pyrrolate coordination. Complexes 7-10 are efficient green phosphorescent emitters (488-576 nm). In poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) films and in dichloromethane, they experience self-quenching, due to molecular stacking. Aggregation occurs through aromatic π-π interactions, reinforced by weak platinum-platinum interactions.

Controlling selectivity for dechlorination of poly(vinyl chloride) with (xantphos)RhCl

Reaction of poly(vinyl chloride) (PVC) with 5 equiv. of triethyl silane in THF, in the presence of in situ generated (xantphos)RhCl catalyst, results in partial reduction of PVC via hydrodechlorination to yield poly(vinyl chloride-co-ethylene). Increasing catalyst loading or using N,N-dimethylacetamide (DMA) as a solvent both diminished selectivity for hydrodechlorination, promoting competitive dehydrochlorination reactions. Reaction of PVC with 2 equiv. of sodium formate in THF in the presence of (xantphos)RhCl affords excellent selectivity for hydrodechlorination along with complete PVC dechlorination, yielding polyethylene-like polymers. Higher catalyst loadings were necessary to activate PVC towards reduction in this case. In contrast, reaction of PVC with 1 equiv. of NaH in DMA, in the presence of (xantphos)RhCl, exhibited good selectivity for dehydrochlorination, as well as much higher reaction rates. These results combined shed light on the interplay between critical reaction parameters that control PVC's mode of reactivity.

Silyl-Osmium(IV)-Trihydride Complexes Stabilized by a Pincer Ether-Diphosphine: Formation and Reactions with Alkynes

Complex OsH₄{κ³-P,O,P-[xant(PⁱPr₂)₂]} (1) activates the Si-H bond of triethylsilane, triphenylsilane, and 1,1,1,3,5,5,5-heptamethyltrisiloxane to give the silyl-osmium(IV)-trihydride derivatives OsH₃(SiR₃){κ³-P,O,P-[xant(PⁱPr₂)₂]} [SiR₃ = SiEt₃ (2), SiPh₃ (3), SiMe(OSiMe₃)₂ (4)] and H₂. The activation takes place via an unsaturated tetrahydride intermediate, resulting from the dissociation of the oxygen atom of the pincer ligand 9,9-dimethyl-4,5-bis(diisopropylphosphino)xanthene (xant(PⁱPr₂)₂). This intermediate, which has been trapped to form OsH₄{κ²-P,P-[xant(PⁱPr₂)₂]}(PⁱPr₃) (5), coordinates the Si-H bond of the silanes to subsequently undergo a homolytic cleavage. Kinetics of the reaction along with the observed primary isotope effect demonstrates that the Si-H rupture is the rate-determining step of the activation. Complex 2 reacts with 1,1-diphenyl-2-propyn-1-ol and 1-phenyl-1-propyne. The reaction with the former affords Os{C≡CC(OH)Ph₂}₂{=C=CHC(OH)Ph₂}{κ³-P,O,P-[xant(PⁱPr₂)₂]} (6), which catalyzes the conversion of the propargylic alcohol into (E)-2-(5,5-diphenylfuran-2(5H)-ylidene)-1,1-diphenylethan-1-ol, via (Z)-enynediol. In methanol, the hydroxyvinylidene ligand of 6 dehydrates to allenylidene, generating Os{C≡CC(OH)Ph₂}₂{=C=C=CPh₂}{κ³-P,O,P-[xant(PⁱPr₂)₂]} (7). The reaction of 2 with 1-phenyl-1-propyne leads to OsH{κ¹-C,η²-[C₆H₄CH₂CH=CH₂]}{κ³-P,O,P-[xant(PⁱPr₂)₂]} (8) and PhCH₂CH=CH(SiEt₃).

C-Cl Oxidative Addition and C-C Reductive Elimination Reactions in the Context of the Rhodium-Promoted Direct Arylation

A cycle of stoichiometric elemental reactions defining the direct arylation promoted by a redox-pair Rh(I)-Rh(III) is reported. Starting from the rhodium(I)-aryl complex RhPh{κ3-P,O,P-[xant(PiPr2)2]} (xant(PiPr2)2 = 9,9-dimethyl-4,5-bis(diisopropylphosphino)xanthene), the reactions include C-Cl oxidative addition of organic chlorides, halide abstraction from the resulting six-coordinate rhodium(III) derivatives, C-C reductive coupling between the initial aryl ligand and the added organic group, oxidative addition of a C-H bond of a new arene, and deprotonation of the generated hydride-rhodium(III)-aryl species to form a new rhodium(I)-aryl derivative. In this context, the kinetics of the oxidative additions of 2-chloropyridine, chlorobenzene, benzyl chloride, and dichloromethane to RhPh{κ3-P,O,P-[xant(PiPr2)2]} and the C-C reductive eliminations of biphenyl and benzylbenzene from [RhPh2{κ3-P,O,P-[xant(PiPr2)2]}]BF4 and [RhPh(CH2Ph){κ3-P,O,P-[xant(PiPr2)2]}]BF4, respectively, have been studied. The oxidative additions generally involve the cis addition of the C-Cl bond of the organic chloride to the rhodium(I) complex, being kinetically controlled by the C-Cl bond dissociation energy; the weakest C-Cl bond is faster added. The C-C reductive elimination is kinetically governed by the dissociation energy of the formed bond. The C(sp3)-C(sp2) coupling to give benzylbenzene is faster than the C(sp2)-C(sp2) bond formation to afford biphenyl. In spite of that a most demanding orientation requirement is needed for the C(sp3)-C(sp2) coupling than for the C(sp2)-C(sp2) bond formation, the energetic effort for the pregeneration of the C(sp3)-C(sp2) bond is lower. As a result, the weakest C-C bond is formed faster.

A computational study of the mechanism of chloroalkane dechlorination with Rh(I) complexes

This work utilizes density functional theory and the energetic span model to determine steps constituting the catalytic cycle and turnover frequencies, respectively, for C(sp³)-Cl activation and dechlorination by model Rh(I) complexes containing POP-Pincer ligands with the aid of Na salts. The steps in the catalytic cycle with NaHCO₂ as the hydrogen carrier are (i) rotation of the Rh-Cl bond out of the ligand plane, (ii) metal insertion into the C-Cl bond, (iii) formate binding and removal of one Cl as NaCl, (iv) formation and removal of CO₂ from formate-bound Rh, and (v) hydrogenation of the alkyl bound to Rh to form an alkane, followed by Rh-Cl rotation to restore the catalyst resting state. We find that the the turnover-determining states and TOFs for monochloropropane (MCP) dechlorination depend strongly on the hydrogen carrier, with significantly higher TOF for NaH than NaHCO₂. Therefore, NaH may be a promising salt for alkylchloride dechlorination with Rh(I) complexes.

Repercussion of a 1,3-Hydrogen Shift in a Hydride-Osmium-Allenylidene Complex

An unusual 1,3-hydrogen shift from the metal center to the C_β atom of the C₃-chain of the allenylidene ligand in a hydride-osmium(II)-allenylidene complex is the beginning of several interesting transformations in the cumulene. The hydride-osmium(II)-allenylidene complex was prepared in two steps, starting from the tetrahydride dimer [(Os(H···H){κ³-P,O,P-[xant(PⁱPr₂)₂]})₂(μ-Cl)₂][BF₄]₂ (1). Complex 1 reacts with 1,1-diphenyl-2-propyn-1-ol to give the hydride-osmium(II)-alkenylcarbyne [OsHCl(≡CCH=CPh₂){κ³-P,O,P-[xant(PⁱPr₂)₂]}]BF₄ (2), which yields OsHCl(=C=C=CPh₂){κ³-P,O,P-[xant(PⁱPr₂)₂]} (3) by selective abstraction of the C_β–H hydrogen atom of the alkenylcarbyne ligand with K^tBuO. Complex 3 is metastable. According to results of DFT calculations, the migration of the hydride ligand to the C_β atom of the cumulene has an activation energy too high to occur in a concerted manner. However, the migration can be catalyzed by water, alcohols, and aldehydes. The resulting alkenylcarbyne-osmium(0) intermediate is unstable and evolves into a 7:3 mixture of the hydride-osmium(II)-indenylidene OsHCl(=C_IndPh){κ³-P,O,P-[xant(PⁱPr₂)₂]} (4) and the osmanaphthalene OsCl(C₉H₆Ph){κ³-P,O,P-[xant(PⁱPr₂)₂]} (5). Protonation of 4 with HBF₄ leads to the elongated dihydrogen complex [OsCl(η²-H₂)(=C_IndPh){κ³-P,O,P-[xant(PⁱPr₂)₂]}]BF₄ (6), while the protonation of 5 regenerates 2. In contrast to 4, complex 6 evolves to a half-sandwich indenyl derivative, [Os(η⁵-IndPh)H{κ³-P,O,P-[xant(PⁱPr₂)₂]}][BF₄]Cl (7). Phenylacetylene also provokes the 1,3-hydrogen shift in 3. However, it does not participate in the migration. In contrast to water, alcohols, and aldehydes, it stabilizes the resulting alkenylcarbyne to afford [Os(≡CCH=CPh₂)(η²-HC≡CPh){κ³-P,O,P-[xant(PⁱPr₂)₂]}]Cl (8).

Reactions of POP-pincer rhodium(I)-aryl complexes with small molecules: coordination flexibility of the ether diphosphine

Reactions of the aryl complexes Rh(aryl){κ3-P,O,P-[xant(PiPr2)2]} (1; aryl = 3,5-Me2C6H3 (a), C6H5 (b), 3,5-Cl2C6H3 (c), 3-FC6H4 (d); xant(PiPr2)2 = 9,9-dimethyl-4,5-bis-(diisopropylphosphino)xanthene) with O2, CO, and MeO2CC≡CCO2Me have been performed. Under 1 atm of O2, the pentane solutions of complexes 1 afford the dinuclear peroxide derivatives [Rh(aryl){κ2-P,P-xant(PiPr2)2}]2(μ-O2)2 (2a–2d) as yellow solids. In solution, these species are unstable. In dichloromethane, at room temperature, they are transformed into the dioxygen adducts Rh(aryl)(η2-O2){κ3-P,O,P-[xant(PiPr2)2]} (3a–3d), as a result of the rupture of the double peroxide bridge and the reduction of the metal center. Complex 3b decomposes in benzene, at 50 °C, to give diphosphine oxide, phenol, and biphenyl. Complexes 1 react with CO to give the square-planar mono carbonyl derivatives Rh(aryl)(CO){κ2-P,P-[xant(PiPr2)2]} (4a–4d), which under carbon monoxide atmosphere evolve to benzoyl species Rh{C(O)aryl}(CO){κ2-P,P-[xant(PiPr2)2]} (5a–5d), resulting from the migratory insertion of CO into the Rh-aryl bond and the coordination of a second CO molecule. The transformation is reversible; under vacuum, complexes 5 regenerate the precursors 4. The addition of the activated alkyne to complexes 1b and 1d initially leads to the π-alkyne intermediates Rh(aryl){η2-C(CO2Me)≡C(CO2Me)}{κ3-P,O,P-[xant(PiPr2)2]} (6b, 6d), which evolve to the alkenyl derivatives Rh{(E)-C(CO2Me)=C(CO2Me)aryl}{κ3-P,O,P-[xant(PiPr2)2]} (7b, 7d). The diphosphine adapts its coordination mode to the stability requirements of the different complexes, coordinating cis-κ2-P,P in complexes 2, fac-κ3-P,O,P in compounds 3, trans-κ2-P,P in the mono carbonyl derivatives 4 and 5, and mer-κ3-P,O,P in products 6 and 7.

Direct C-H Borylation of Arenes Catalyzed by Saturated Hydride-Boryl-Iridium-POP Complexes: Kinetic Analysis of the Elemental Steps

The saturated trihydride IrH₃ {κ³ -P,O,P-[xant(PiPr₂ )₂ ]} (1; xant(PiPr₂ )₂ =9,9-dimethyl-4,5-bis(diisopropylphosphino)xanthene) activates the B-H bond of two molecules of pinacolborane (HBpin) to give H₂ , the hydride-boryl derivatives IrH₂ (Bpin){κ³ -P,O,P-[xant(PiPr₂ )₂ ]} (2) and IrH(Bpin)₂ {κ³ -P,O,P-[xant(PiPr₂ )₂ ]} (3) in a sequential manner. Complex 3 activates a C-H bond of two molecules of benzene to form PhBpin and regenerates 2 and 1, also in a sequential manner. Thus, complexes 1, 2, and 3 define two cycles for the catalytic direct C-H borylation of arenes with HBpin, which have dihydride 2 as a common intermediate. C-H bond activation of the arenes is the rate-determining step of both cycles, as the C-H oxidative addition to 3 is faster than to 2. The results from a kinetic study of the reactions of 1 and 2 with HBpin support a cooperative function of the hydride ligands in the B-H bond activation. The addition of the boron atom of the borane to a hydride facilitates the coordination of the B-H bond through the formation of κ¹ - and κ² -dihydrideborate intermediates.