1
|
Deo KA, Murali A, Tronolone JJ, Mandrona C, Lee HP, Rajput S, Hargett SE, Selahi A, Sun Y, Alge DL, Jain A, Gaharwar AK. Granular Biphasic Colloidal Hydrogels for 3D Bioprinting. Adv Healthc Mater 2024; 13:e2303810. [PMID: 38749006 DOI: 10.1002/adhm.202303810] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/01/2023] [Revised: 04/01/2024] [Indexed: 05/30/2024]
Abstract
Granular hydrogels composed of hydrogel microparticles are promising candidates for 3D bioprinting due to their ability to protect encapsulated cells. However, to achieve high print fidelity, hydrogel microparticles need to jam to exhibit shear-thinning characteristics, which is crucial for 3D printing. Unfortunately, this overpacking can significantly impact cell viability, thereby negating the primary advantage of using hydrogel microparticles to shield cells from shear forces. To overcome this challenge, a novel solution: a biphasic, granular colloidal bioink designed to optimize cell viability and printing fidelity is introduced. The biphasic ink consists of cell-laden polyethylene glycol (PEG) hydrogel microparticles embedded in a continuous gelatin methacryloyl (GelMA)-nanosilicate colloidal network. Here, it is demonstrated that this biphasic bioink offers outstanding rheological properties, print fidelity, and structural stability. Furthermore, its utility for engineering complex tissues with multiple cell types and heterogeneous microenvironments is demonstrated, by incorporating β-islet cells into the PEG microparticles and endothelial cells in the GelMA-nanosilicate colloidal network. Using this approach, it is possible to induce cell patterning, enhance vascularization, and direct cellular function. The proposed biphasic bioink holds significant potential for numerous emerging biomedical applications, including tissue engineering and disease modeling.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kaivalya A Deo
- Biomedical Engineering, College of Engineering, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, 77843, USA
| | - Aparna Murali
- Biomedical Engineering, College of Engineering, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, 77843, USA
| | - James J Tronolone
- Biomedical Engineering, College of Engineering, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, 77843, USA
| | - Cole Mandrona
- Biomedical Engineering, College of Engineering, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, 77843, USA
| | - Hung Pang Lee
- Biomedical Engineering, College of Engineering, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, 77843, USA
| | - Satyam Rajput
- Biomedical Engineering, College of Engineering, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, 77843, USA
| | - Sarah E Hargett
- Biomedical Engineering, College of Engineering, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, 77843, USA
| | - Amirali Selahi
- Biomedical Engineering, College of Engineering, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, 77843, USA
| | - Yuxiang Sun
- Nutrition, College of Agriculture, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, 77843, USA
| | - Daniel L Alge
- Biomedical Engineering, College of Engineering, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, 77843, USA
- Material Science and Engineering, College of Engineering, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, 77843, USA
| | - Abhishek Jain
- Biomedical Engineering, College of Engineering, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, 77843, USA
- Medical Physiology, School of Medicine, Texas A&M Health Science Center, Bryan, TX, USA
- Cardiovascular Sciences, Houston Methodist Research Institute, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Akhilesh K Gaharwar
- Biomedical Engineering, College of Engineering, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, 77843, USA
- Material Science and Engineering, College of Engineering, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, 77843, USA
- Cardiovascular Sciences, Houston Methodist Research Institute, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
- Interdisciplinary Graduate Program in Genetics & Genomics, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, 77843, USA
- Center for Remote Health Technologies and Systems, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, 77843, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Morrison N, Vogel BM. Factors That Influence Base-Catalyzed Thiol-Ene Hydrogel Synthesis. Gels 2023; 9:917. [PMID: 37999007 PMCID: PMC10671550 DOI: 10.3390/gels9110917] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/03/2023] [Revised: 11/17/2023] [Accepted: 11/18/2023] [Indexed: 11/25/2023] Open
Abstract
Injectable, localized drug delivery using hydrogels made from ethoxylated trimethylolpropane tri-3-mercaptopropionate (ETTMP) and poly(ethylene glycol) diacrylate (PEGDA) has shown great potential due to these hydrogels' ability to exhibit non-swelling behavior and tunable drug release properties. However, current synthesis methods in the literature suffer from poor ETTMP solubility in water, slow gelation times exceeding 20 min, and a lack of reproducibility. To address these limitations, we have developed a reliable synthesis procedure and conducted a sensitivity analysis of key variables. This has enabled us to synthesize ETTMP-PEGDA hydrogels in a polymer concentration range of 15 to 90 wt% with gelation times of less than 2 min and moduli ranging from 3.5 to 190 kPa. We overcame two synthesis limitations by identifying the impact of residual mercaptopropionic acid and alumina purification column height on gelation time and by premixing ETTMP and PEGDA to overcome low ETTMP solubility in water. Our ETTMP-PEGDA mixture can be stored at -20 °C for up to 2 months without crosslinking, allowing easy storage and shipment. These and previous results demonstrate the potential of ETTMP-PEGDA hydrogels as promising candidates for injectable, localized drug delivery with tunable drug release properties.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Brandon M. Vogel
- Department of Chemical Engineering, Bucknell University, Lewisburg, PA 17837, USA;
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Hakim Khalili M, Panchal V, Dulebo A, Hawi S, Zhang R, Wilson S, Dossi E, Goel S, Impey SA, Aria AI. Mechanical Behavior of 3D Printed Poly(ethylene glycol) Diacrylate Hydrogels in Hydrated Conditions Investigated Using Atomic Force Microscopy. ACS APPLIED POLYMER MATERIALS 2023; 5:3034-3042. [PMID: 37090424 PMCID: PMC10111335 DOI: 10.1021/acsapm.3c00197] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2023] [Accepted: 03/20/2023] [Indexed: 05/03/2023]
Abstract
Three-dimensional (3D) printed hydrogels fabricated using light processing techniques are poised to replace conventional processing methods used in tissue engineering and organ-on-chip devices. An intrinsic potential problem remains related to structural heterogeneity translated in the degree of cross-linking of the printed layers. Poly(ethylene glycol) diacrylate (PEGDA) hydrogels were used to fabricate both 3D printed multilayer and control monolithic samples, which were then analyzed using atomic force microscopy (AFM) to assess their nanomechanical properties. The fabrication of the hydrogel samples involved layer-by-layer (LbL) projection lithography and bulk cross-linking processes. We evaluated the nanomechanical properties of both hydrogel types in a hydrated environment using the elastic modulus (E) as a measure to gain insight into their mechanical properties. We observed that E increases by 4-fold from 2.8 to 11.9 kPa transitioning from bottom to the top of a single printed layer in a multilayer sample. Such variations could not be seen in control monolithic sample. The variation within the printed layers is ascribed to heterogeneities caused by the photo-cross-linking process. This behavior was rationalized by spatial variation of the polymer cross-link density related to variations of light absorption within the layers attributed to spatial decay of light intensity during the photo-cross-linking process. More importantly, we observed a significant 44% increase in E, from 9.1 to 13.1 kPa, as the indentation advanced from the bottom to the top of the multilayer sample. This finding implies that mechanical heterogeneity is present throughout the entire structure, rather than being limited to each layer individually. These findings are critical for design, fabrication, and application engineers intending to use 3D printed multilayer PEGDA hydrogels for in vitro tissue engineering and organ-on-chip devices.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mohammad Hakim Khalili
- Surface
Engineering and Precision Centre, School of Aerospace, Transport and
Manufacturing, Cranfield University, Cranfield MK43 0AL, United Kingdom
| | - Vishal Panchal
- Bruker
UK Ltd., Banner Lane, Coventry CV4 9GH, United Kingdom
| | | | - Sara Hawi
- Surface
Engineering and Precision Centre, School of Aerospace, Transport and
Manufacturing, Cranfield University, Cranfield MK43 0AL, United Kingdom
| | - Rujing Zhang
- Sophion
Bioscience A/S, Baltorpvej 154, 2750 Ballerup, Denmark
| | - Sandra Wilson
- Sophion
Bioscience A/S, Baltorpvej 154, 2750 Ballerup, Denmark
| | - Eleftheria Dossi
- Centre
for Defence Chemistry, Cranfield University, Shrivenham, Swindon SN6
8LA, United Kingdom
| | - Saurav Goel
- London
South Bank University, 103 Borough Road, London SE1 0AA, United Kingdom
- University
of Petroleum and Energy Studies, Dehradun 248007, India
| | - Susan A. Impey
- Surface
Engineering and Precision Centre, School of Aerospace, Transport and
Manufacturing, Cranfield University, Cranfield MK43 0AL, United Kingdom
| | - Adrianus Indrat Aria
- Surface
Engineering and Precision Centre, School of Aerospace, Transport and
Manufacturing, Cranfield University, Cranfield MK43 0AL, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|