Repair of Alkylation Damage in Eukaryotic Chromatin Depends on Searching Ability of Alkyladenine DNA Glycosylase

Ionic strength modulates excision of uracil by SMUG1 from nucleosome core particles

Ionic strength affects many cellular processes including the packaging of genetic material in eukaryotes. For example, chromatin fibers are compacted in high ionic strength environments as are the minimal unit of packaging in chromatin, nucleosome core particles (NCPs). Furthermore, ionic strength is known to modulate several aspects of NCP dynamics including transient unwrapping of DNA from the histone protein core, nucleosome gaping, and intra- and internucleosomal interactions of the N-terminal histone tails. Changes in NCP structure may also impact interactions of transcriptional, repair, and other cellular machinery with nucleosomal DNA. One repair process, base excision repair (BER), is impacted by NCP structure and may be further influenced by changes in ionic strength. Here we examine the effects of ionic strength on the initiation of BER using biochemical assays. Using a population of NCPs containing uracil (U) at dozens of geometric locations, excision of U by single-strand selective monofunctional uracil DNA glycosylase (SMUG1) is assessed at higher and lower ionic strengths. SMUG1 has increased excision activity in the lower ionic strength conditions. On duplex DNA, however, SMUG1 activity is largely unaffected by ionic strength except at short incubation times, suggesting that changes in SMUG1 activity are likely due to alterations in NCP structure and dynamics. These results allow us to further understand the cellular role of SMUG1 in a changing ionic environment and broadly contribute to the understanding of BER on chromatin and genomic stability.

Distinct Mechanisms of Target Search by Endonuclease VIII-like DNA Glycosylases

Proteins that recognize specific DNA sequences or structural elements often find their cognate DNA lesions in a processive mode, in which an enzyme binds DNA non-specifically and then slides along the DNA contour by one-dimensional diffusion. Opposite to the processive mechanism is distributive search, when an enzyme binds, samples and releases DNA without significant lateral movement. Many DNA glycosylases, the repair enzymes that excise damaged bases from DNA, use processive search to find their cognate lesions. Here, using a method based on correlated cleavage of multiply damaged oligonucleotide substrates we investigate the mechanism of lesion search by three structurally related DNA glycosylases—bacterial endonuclease VIII (Nei) and its mammalian homologs NEIL1 and NEIL2. Similarly to another homologous enzyme, bacterial formamidopyrimidine–DNA glycosylase, NEIL1 seems to use a processive mode to locate its targets. However, the processivity of Nei was notably lower, and NEIL2 exhibited almost fully distributive action on all types of substrates. Although one-dimensional diffusion is often regarded as a universal search mechanism, our results indicate that even proteins sharing a common fold may be quite different in the ways they locate their targets in DNA.

Computational investigations on target-site searching and recognition mechanisms by thymine DNA glycosylase during DNA repair process

DNA glycosylase, as one member of DNA repair machineries, plays an essential role in correcting mismatched/damaged DNA nucleotides by cleaving the N-glycosidic bond between the sugar and target nucleobase through the base excision repair (BER) pathways. Efficient corrections of these DNA lesions are critical for maintaining genome integrity and preventing premature aging and cancers. The target-site searching/recognition mechanisms and the subsequent conformational dynamics of DNA glycosylase, however, remain challenging to be characterized using experimental techniques. In this review, we summarize our recent studies of sequential structural changes of thymine DNA glycosylase (TDG) during the DNA repair process, achieved mostly by molecular dynamics (MD) simulations. Computational simulations allow us to reveal atomic-level structural dynamics of TDG as it approaches the target-site, and pinpoint the key structural elements responsible for regulating the translocation of TDG along DNA. Subsequently, upon locating the lesions, TDG adopts a base-flipping mechanism to extrude the mispaired nucleobase into the enzyme active-site. The constructed kinetic network model elucidates six metastable states during the base-extrusion process and suggests an active role of TDG in flipping the intrahelical nucleobase. Finally, the molecular mechanism of product release dynamics after catalysis is also summarized. Taken together, we highlight to what extent the computational simulations advance our knowledge and understanding of the molecular mechanism underlying the conformational dynamics of TDG, as well as the limitations of current theoretical work.

Genetic and chemotherapeutic influences on germline hypermutation

Mutations in the germline generates all evolutionary genetic variation and is a cause of genetic disease. Parental age is the primary determinant of the number of new germline mutations in an individual's genome1,2. Here we analysed the genome-wide sequences of 21,879 families with rare genetic diseases and identified 12 individuals with a hypermutated genome with between two and seven times more de novo single-nucleotide variants than expected. In most families (9 out of 12), the excess mutations came from the father. Two families had genetic drivers of germline hypermutation, with fathers carrying damaging genetic variation in DNA-repair genes. For five of the families, paternal exposure to chemotherapeutic agents before conception was probably a key driver of hypermutation. Our results suggest that the germline is well protected from mutagenic effects, hypermutation is rare, the number of excess mutations is relatively modest and most individuals with a hypermutated genome will not have a genetic disease.

1,N6-Ethenoadenine: From Molecular to Biological Consequences†

Genomic DNA is chemically reactive and therefore susceptible to damage by many exogenous and endogenous sources. Lesions produced from these damaging events can have various mutagenic and genotoxic consequences. This Perspective follows the journey of one particular lesion, 1,N⁶-ethenoadenine (εA), from its formation to replication and repair, and its role in cancerous tissues and inflammatory diseases. εA is generated by the reaction of adenine (A) with vinyl chloride or lipid peroxidation products. We present the miscoding properties of εA with an emphasis on how bacterial and mammalian cells can process lesions differently, leading to varied mutational spectra. But with information from these assays, we can better understand how the miscoding properties of εA lead to biological consequences and how genomic stability can be maintained via DNA repair mechanisms. We discuss how base excision repair (BER) and direct reversal repair (DRR) can minimize the biological consequences of εA lesions. Kinetic parameters of glycosylases and AlkB family enzymes are described, along with a discussion of the relative contributions of the BER and DRR pathways in the repair of εA. Because eukaryotic DNA is packaged in chromatin, we also discuss the impact of this packaging on BER and DRR, specifically in regards to repair of εA. Studying DNA lesions like εA in this context, from origin to biological implications, can provide crucial information to better understand prevention of mutagenesis and cancer.

Target search and recognition mechanisms of glycosylase AlkD revealed by scanning FRET-FCS and Markov state models

DNA glycosylase repairs DNA damage to maintain the genome integrity, and thus it is essential for the survival of all organisms. However, it remains a long-standing puzzle how glycosylase diffuses along the genomic DNA to locate the sparse and aberrant lesion sites efficiently and accurately in the genome containing numerous base pairs. Previously, only the high-speed–low-accuracy search mode has been characterized experimentally, while the low-speed–high-accuracy mode is undetectable. Here, we observed the low-speed mode of glycosylase AlkD translocating, and further dissected its molecular mechanisms. To achieve this, we developed an integrated platform by combining scanning FRET-FCS with Markov state model. We expect that this platform can be widely applied to investigate other glycosylases and DNA-binding proteins.

DNA glycosylase is responsible for repairing DNA damage to maintain the genome stability and integrity. However, how glycosylase can efficiently and accurately recognize DNA lesions across the enormous DNA genome remains elusive. It has been hypothesized that glycosylase translocates along the DNA by alternating between a fast but low-accuracy diffusion mode and a slow but high-accuracy mode when searching for DNA lesions. However, the slow mode has not been successfully characterized due to the limitation in the spatial and temporal resolutions of current experimental techniques. Using a newly developed scanning fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET)–fluorescence correlation spectroscopy (FCS) platform, we were able to observe both slow and fast modes of glycosylase AlkD translocating on double-stranded DNA (dsDNA), reaching the temporal resolution of microsecond and spatial resolution of subnanometer. The underlying molecular mechanism of the slow mode was further elucidated by Markov state model built from extensive all-atom molecular dynamics simulations. We found that in the slow mode, AlkD follows an asymmetric diffusion pathway, i.e., rotation followed by translation. Furthermore, the essential role of Y27 in AlkD diffusion dynamics was identified both experimentally and computationally. Our results provided mechanistic insights on how conformational dynamics of AlkD–dsDNA complex coordinate different diffusion modes to accomplish the search for DNA lesions with high efficiency and accuracy. We anticipate that the mechanism adopted by AlkD to search for DNA lesions could be a general one utilized by other glycosylases and DNA binding proteins.

DNA scanning by base excision repair enzymes and implications for pathway coordination

Site-specific DNA binding proteins must search the genome to locate their target sites, and many DNA modifying enzymes have the ability to scan along DNA in search of their substrates. This process is termed processive searching, and it serves to decrease the search time by effectively increasing the DNA binding footprint of a protein. The repertoire of proteins capable of processive searching is expanding, highlighting the need to understand the governing principles behind this fundamental process. Many of the enzymes in the base excision DNA repair pathway are capable of processive searching. Here, we briefly summarize methodology for determining if a protein can scan DNA and highlight the discovery that the base excision repair DNA polymerase β performs a processive search. Elucidation of physical models for DNA searching has also provided a plausible mechanism for pathway coordination during repair. The ability of BER enzymes to transiently sample adjacent DNA sites while bound to their product confers accessibility to downstream enzymes and does not require protein-protein interactions for coordination.

Facilitated Diffusion Mechanisms in DNA Base Excision Repair and Transcriptional Activation

Preservation of the coding potential of the genome and highly regulated gene expression over the life span of a human are two fundamental requirements of life. These processes require the action of repair enzymes or transcription factors that efficiently recognize specific sites of DNA damage or transcriptional regulation within a restricted time frame of the cell cycle or metabolism. A failure of these systems to act results in accumulated mutations, metabolic dysfunction, and disease. Despite the multifactorial complexity of cellular DNA repair and transcriptional regulation, both processes share a fundamental physical requirement that the proteins must rapidly diffuse to their specific DNA-binding sites that are embedded within the context of a vastly greater number of nonspecific DNA-binding sites. Superimposed on the needle-in-the-haystack problem is the complex nature of the cellular environment, which contains such high concentrations of macromolecules that the time frame for diffusion is expected to be severely extended as compared to dilute solution. Here we critically review the mechanisms for how these proteins solve the needle-in-the-haystack problem and how the effects of cellular macromolecular crowding can enhance facilitated diffusion processes. We restrict the review to human proteins that use stochastic, thermally driven site-recognition mechanisms, and we specifically exclude systems involving energy cofactors or circular DNA clamps. Our scope includes ensemble and single-molecule studies of the past decade or so, with an emphasis on connecting experimental observations to biological function.

Distinguishing Specific and Nonspecific Complexes of Alkyladenine DNA Glycosylase

Human alkyladenine DNA glycosylase (AAG) recognizes many alkylated and deaminated purine lesions and excises them to initiate the base excision DNA repair pathway. AAG employs facilitated diffusion to rapidly scan nonspecific sites and locate rare sites of damage. Nonspecific DNA binding interactions are critical to the efficiency of this search for damage, but little is known about the binding footprint or the affinity of AAG for nonspecific sites. We used biochemical and biophysical approaches to characterize the binding of AAG to both undamaged and damaged DNA. Although fluorescence anisotropy is routinely used to study DNA binding, we found unexpected complexities in the data for binding of AAG to DNA. Systematic comparison of different fluorescent labels and different lengths of DNA allowed binding models to be distinguished and demonstrated that AAG can bind with high affinity and high density to nonspecific DNA. Fluorescein-labeled DNA gave the most complex behavior but also showed the greatest potential to distinguish specific and nonspecific binding modes. We suggest a unified model that is expected to apply to many DNA binding proteins that exhibit affinity for nonspecific DNA. Although AAG strongly prefers to excise lesions from duplex DNA, nonspecific binding is comparable for single- and double-stranded nonspecific sites. The electrostatically driven binding of AAG to small DNA sites (∼5 nucleotides of single-stranded and ∼6 base pairs of duplex) facilitates the search for DNA damage in chromosomal DNA, which is bound by nucleosomes and other proteins.

Disordered N-Terminal Domain of Human Uracil DNA Glycosylase (hUNG2) Enhances DNA Translocation

Nuclear human uracil-DNA glycosylase (hUNG2) initiates base excision repair (BER) of genomic uracils generated through misincorporation of dUMP or through deamination of cytosines. Like many human DNA glycosylases, hUNG2 contains an unstructured N-terminal domain that encodes a nuclear localization signal, protein binding motifs, and sites for post-translational modifications. Although the N-terminal domain has minimal effects on DNA binding and uracil excision kinetics, we report that this domain enhances the ability of hUNG2 to translocate on DNA chains as compared to the catalytic domain alone. The enhancement is most pronounced when physiological ion concentrations and macromolecular crowding agents are used. These data suggest that crowded conditions in the human cell nucleus promote the interaction of the N-terminus with duplex DNA during translocation. The increased contact time with the DNA chain likely contributes to the ability of hUNG2 to locate densely spaced uracils that arise during somatic hypermutation and during fluoropyrimidine chemotherapy.

Processive searching ability varies among members of the gap-filling DNA polymerase X family

DNA repair proteins must locate rare damaged sites within the genome. DNA polymerase β (Pol β), a member of the DNA polymerase X family that is involved in base excision repair, uses a processive hopping search mechanism to locate substrates. This effectively enhances its search footprint on DNA, increasing the probability of locating damaged sites. Processive searching has been reported or proposed for many DNA-binding proteins, raising the question of how widespread or specific to certain enzymes the ability to perform this function is. To provide insight into this question, we compared the ability of three homologous DNA Pol X family members to perform a processive search for 1-nucleotide gaps in DNA using a previously developed biochemical assay. We found that at near-predicted physiological ionic strengths, the intramolecular searching ability of Pol β is at least 4-fold higher than that of Pol μ and ∼2-fold higher than that of Pol λ. Pol β also was able to perform intersegmental transfer with the intersegmental searching ability of Pol β being at least 6- and ∼2-fold higher than that of Pols μ and λ, respectively. Mutational analysis suggested that differences in the N-terminal domains of these polymerases are responsible for the varying degrees of searching competence. Of note, the differences in processive searching ability observed among the DNA Pol X family members correlated with their proposed biological functions in base excision repair and nonhomologous end joining.

Transient Kinetic Methods for Mechanistic Characterization of DNA Binding and Nucleotide Flipping

Enzymes that modify nucleobases in double-stranded genomic DNA, either as part of a DNA repair pathway or as an epigenetic modifying pathway, adopt a multistep pathway to locate target sites and reconfigure the DNA to gain access. Work on several different enzymes has shown that in almost all cases base flipping, also known as nucleotide flipping, is a key feature of specific site recognition. In this chapter, we discuss some of the strategies that can be used to perform a kinetic characterization for DNA binding and nucleotide flipping. The resulting kinetic and thermodynamic framework provides a platform for understanding substrate specificity, mechanisms of inhibition, and the roles of important amino acids. We use a human DNA repair glycosylase called alkyladenine DNA glycosylase as a case study, because this is one of the best-characterized nucleotide-flipping enzymes. However, the approaches that are described can be readily adapted to study other enzymes, and future studies are needed to understand the mechanism of substrate recognition in each individual case. As more enzymes are characterized, we can hope to uncover which features of DNA searching and nucleotide flipping are fundamental features shared by many different families of DNA modifying enzymes, and which features are specific to a particular enzyme. Such an understanding provides reasonable models for less characterized enzymes that are important for epigenetic DNA modification and DNA repair pathways.

Mechanisms of glycosylase induced genomic instability

Human alkyladenine DNA glycosylase (AAG) initiates base excision repair (BER) to guard against mutations by excising alkylated and deaminated purines. Counterintuitively, increased expression of AAG has been implicated in increased rates of spontaneous mutation in microsatellite repeats. This microsatellite mutator phenotype is consistent with a model in which AAG excises bulged (unpaired) bases, altering repeat length. To directly test the role of base excision in AAG-induced mutagenesis, we conducted mutation accumulation experiments in yeast overexpressing different variants of AAG and detected mutations via high-depth genome resequencing. We also developed a new software tool, hp_caller, to perform accurate genotyping at homopolymeric repeat loci. Overexpression of wild-type AAG elevated indel mutations in homopolymeric sequences distributed throughout the genome. However, catalytically inactive variants (E125Q/E125A) caused equal or greater increases in frameshift mutations. These results disprove the hypothesis that base excision is the key step in mutagenesis by overexpressed wild-type AAG. Instead, our results provide additional support for the previously published model wherein overexpressed AAG interferes with the mismatch repair (MMR) pathway. In addition to the above results, we observed a dramatic mutator phenotype for N169S AAG, which has increased rates of excision of undamaged purines. This mutant caused a 10-fold increase in point mutations at G:C base pairs and a 50-fold increase in frameshifts in A:T homopolymers. These results demonstrate that it is necessary to consider the relative activities and abundance of many DNA replication and repair proteins when considering mutator phenotypes, as they are relevant to the development of cancer and its resistance to treatment.

Dispensability of the [4Fe-4S] cluster in novel homologues of adenine glycosylase MutY

7,8-Dihydro-8-deoxyguanine (8oG) is one of the most common oxidative lesions in DNA. DNA polymerases misincorporate an adenine across from this lesion. Thus, 8oG is a highly mutagenic lesion responsible for G:C→T:A transversions. MutY is an adenine glycosylase, part of the base excision repair pathway that removes adenines, when mispaired with 8oG or guanine. Its catalytic domain includes a [4Fe-4S] cluster motif coordinated by cysteinyl ligands. When this cluster is absent, MutY activity is depleted and several studies concluded that the [4Fe-4S] cluster motif is an indispensable component for DNA binding, substrate recognition and enzymatic activity. In the present study, we identified 46 MutY homologues that lack the canonical cysteinyl ligands, suggesting an absence of the [4Fe-4S] cluster. A phylogenetic analysis groups these novel MutYs into two different clades. One clade is exclusive of the order Lactobacillales and another clade has a mixed composition of anaerobic and microaerophilic bacteria and species from the protozoan genus Entamoeba. Structural modeling and sequence analysis suggests that the loss of the [4Fe-4S] cluster is compensated by a convergent solution in which bulky amino acids substitute the [4Fe-4S] cluster. We functionally characterized MutYs from Lactobacillus brevis and Entamoeba histolytica as representative members from each clade and found that both enzymes are active adenine glycosylases. Furthermore, chimeric glycosylases, in which the [4Fe-4S] cluster of Escherichia coli MutY is replaced by the corresponding amino acids of LbY and EhY, are also active. Our data indicates that the [4Fe-4S] cluster plays a structural role in MutYs and evidences the existence of alternative functional solutions in nature.