Reversibility of Covalent, Broad-Spectrum Serine β-Lactamase Inhibition by the Diazabicyclooctenone ETX2514

Durlobactam, a Diazabicyclooctane β-Lactamase Inhibitor, Inhibits BlaC and Peptidoglycan Transpeptidases of Mycobacterium tuberculosis

Peptidoglycan synthesis is an underutilized drug target in Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb). Diazabicyclooctanes (DBOs) are a class of broad-spectrum β-lactamase inhibitors that also inhibit certain peptidoglycan transpeptidases that are important in mycobacterial cell wall synthesis. We evaluated the DBO durlobactam as an inhibitor of BlaC, the Mtb β-lactamase, and multiple Mtb peptidoglycan transpeptidases (PonA1, LdtMt1, LdtMt2, LdtMt3, and LdtMt5). Timed electrospray ionization mass spectrometry (ESI-MS) captured acyl-enzyme complexes with BlaC and all transpeptidases except LdtMt5. Inhibition kinetics demonstrated durlobactam was a potent and efficient DBO inhibitor of BlaC (KI app 9.2 ± 0.9 μM, k2/K 5600 ± 560 M-1 s-1) and similar to clavulanate (KI app 3.3 ± 0.6 μM, k2/K 8400 ± 840 M-1 s-1); however, durlobactam had a lower turnover number (tn = kcat/kinact) than clavulanate (1 and 8, respectively). KI app values with durlobactam and clavulanate were similar for peptidoglycan transpeptidases, but ESI-MS captured durlobactam complexes at more time points. Molecular docking and simulation demonstrated several productive interactions of durlobactam in the active sites of BlaC, PonA1, and LdtMt2. Antibiotic susceptibility testing was conducted on 11 Mtb isolates with amoxicillin, ceftriaxone, meropenem, imipenem, clavulanate, and durlobactam. Durlobactam had a minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) range of 0.5-16 μg/mL, similar to the ranges for meropenem (1-32 μg/mL) and imipenem (0.5-64 μg/mL). In β-lactam + durlobactam combinations (1:1 mass/volume), MICs were lowered 4- to 64-fold for all isolates except one with meropenem-durlobactam. This work supports further exploration of novel β-lactamase inhibitors that target BlaC and Mtb peptidoglycan transpeptidases.

Role of β-Lactamase Inhibitors as Potentiators in Antimicrobial Chemotherapy Targeting Gram-Negative Bacteria

Since the discovery of penicillin, β-lactam antibiotics have commonly been used to treat bacterial infections. Unfortunately, at the same time, pathogens can develop resistance to β-lactam antibiotics such as penicillins, cephalosporins, monobactams, and carbapenems by producing β-lactamases. Therefore, a combination of β-lactam antibiotics with β-lactamase inhibitors has been a promising approach to controlling β-lactam-resistant bacteria. The discovery of novel β-lactamase inhibitors (BLIs) is essential for effectively treating antibiotic-resistant bacterial infections. Therefore, this review discusses the development of innovative inhibitors meant to enhance the activity of β-lactam antibiotics. Specifically, this review describes the classification and characteristics of different classes of β-lactamases and the synergistic mechanisms of β-lactams and BLIs. In addition, we introduce potential sources of compounds for use as novel BLIs. This provides insights into overcoming current challenges in β-lactamase-producing bacteria and designing effective treatment options in combination with BLIs.

Sulbactam-durlobactam: a β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combination targeting Acinetobacter baumannii

Sulbactam-durlobactam is a pathogen-targeted β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combination that has been approved by the US FDA for the treatment of hospital-acquired and ventilator-associated bacterial pneumonia caused by susceptible isolates of Acinetobacter baumannii-calcoaceticus complex (ABC) in patients 18 years of age and older. Sulbactam is a penicillin derivative with antibacterial activity against Acinetobacter but is prone to hydrolysis by β-lactamases encoded by contemporary isolates. Durlobactam is a diazabicyclooctane β-lactamase inhibitor with activity against Ambler classes A, C and D serine β-lactamases that restores sulbactam activity both in vitro and in vivo against multidrug-resistant ABC. Sulbactam-durlobactam is a promising alternative therapy for the treatment of serious Acinetobacter infections, which can have high rates of mortality.

Sulbactam-durlobactam susceptibility test method development and quality control ranges for MIC and disk diffusion tests

Sulbactam-durlobactam is a β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combination developed to treat hospital-acquired and ventilator-associated bacterial pneumonia caused by Acinetobacter baumannii-calcoaceticus complex (ABC). Durlobactam is a diazabicyclooctane β-lactamase inhibitor with potent activity against Ambler classes A, C, and D serine β-lactamases and restores sulbactam activity against multidrug-resistant ABC. Studies were conducted to establish sulbactam-durlobactam antimicrobial susceptibility testing methods for both broth microdilution minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) and disk diffusion tests as well as quality control (QC) ranges. To establish the MIC test method, combinations of sulbactam and durlobactam were evaluated using a panel of genetically characterized A. baumannii isolates which were categorized as predicted to be susceptible or resistant based on the spectrum of β-lactamase inhibition by durlobactam. MIC testing with doubling dilutions of sulbactam with a fixed concentration of 4 µg/mL of durlobactam resulted in the greatest discrimination of the pre-defined susceptible and resistant strains. Similarly, the sulbactam/durlobactam 10/10 µg disk concentration showed the best discrimination as well as correlation with the MIC test. A. baumannii NCTC 13304 was selected for QC purposes because it assesses the activity of both sulbactam and durlobactam with clear endpoints. Multi-laboratory QC studies were conducted according to CLSI M23 Tier 2 criteria. A sulbactam-durlobactam broth MIC QC range of 0.5/4-2/4 µg/mL and a zone diameter QC range of 24-30 mm were determined for A. baumannii NCTC 13304 and have been approved by CLSI. These studies will enable clinical laboratories to perform susceptibility tests with accurate and reproducible methods.

Antibiotics in the clinical pipeline as of December 2022

The need for new antibacterial drugs to treat the increasing global prevalence of drug-resistant bacterial infections has clearly attracted global attention, with a range of existing and upcoming funding, policy, and legislative initiatives designed to revive antibacterial R&D. It is essential to assess whether these programs are having any real-world impact and this review continues our systematic analyses that began in 2011. Direct-acting antibacterials (47), non-traditional small molecule antibacterials (5), and β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations (10) under clinical development as of December 2022 are described, as are the three antibacterial drugs launched since 2020. Encouragingly, the increased number of early-stage clinical candidates observed in the 2019 review increased in 2022, although the number of first-time drug approvals from 2020 to 2022 was disappointingly low. It will be critical to monitor how many Phase-I and -II candidates move into Phase-III and beyond in the next few years. There was also an enhanced presence of novel antibacterial pharmacophores in early-stage trials, and at least 18 of the 26 phase-I candidates were targeted to treat Gram-negative bacteria infections. Despite the promising early-stage antibacterial pipeline, it is essential to maintain funding for antibacterial R&D and to ensure that plans to address late-stage pipeline issues succeed.

Sulbactam-durlobactam: A Step Forward in Treating Carbapenem-Resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (CRAB) Infections

Antimicrobial resistance in gram-negative pathogens, such as Acinetobacter baumannii, is a serious threat to human health. Sulbactam-durlobactam, a unique β-lactam and a β-lactamase inhibitor combination, is a novel agent targeted against carbapenem-resistant A. baumannii. This supplement provides a summary of the development of SUL-DUR, discussing its unique features and role in treating infections caused by CRAB pathogens.

The Pharmacokinetics/Pharmacodynamic Relationship of Durlobactam in Combination With Sulbactam in In Vitro and In Vivo Infection Model Systems Versus Acinetobacter baumannii-calcoaceticus Complex

Sulbactam-durlobactam is a β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combination currently in development for the treatment of infections caused by Acinetobacter, including multidrug-resistant (MDR) isolates. Although sulbactam is a β-lactamase inhibitor of a subset of Ambler class A enzymes, it also demonstrates intrinsic antibacterial activity against a limited number of bacterial species, including Acinetobacter, and has been used effectively in the treatment of susceptible Acinetobacter-associated infections. Increasing prevalence of β-lactamase-mediated resistance, however, has eroded the effectiveness of sulbactam in the treatment of this pathogen. Durlobactam is a rationally designed β-lactamase inhibitor within the diazabicyclooctane (DBO) class. The compound demonstrates a broad spectrum of inhibition of serine β-lactamase activity with particularly potent activity against class D enzymes, an attribute which differentiates it from other DBO inhibitors. When combined with sulbactam, durlobactam effectively restores the susceptibility of resistant isolates through β-lactamase inhibition. The present review describes the pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) relationship associated with the activity of sulbactam and durlobactam established in nonclinical infection models with MDR Acinetobacter baumannii isolates. This information aids in the determination of PK/PD targets for efficacy, which can be used to forecast efficacious dose regimens of the combination in humans.

Durlobactam, a Broad-Spectrum Serine β-lactamase Inhibitor, Restores Sulbactam Activity Against Acinetobacter Species

Sulbactam-durlobactam is a pathogen-targeted β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combination in late-stage development for the treatment of Acinetobacter infections, including those caused by multidrug-resistant strains. Durlobactam is a member of the diazabicyclooctane class of β-lactamase inhibitors with broad-spectrum serine β-lactamase activity. Sulbactam is a first-generation, narrow-spectrum β-lactamase inhibitor that also has intrinsic antibacterial activity against Acinetobacter spp. due to its ability to inhibit penicillin-binding proteins 1 and 3. The clinical utility of sulbactam for the treatment of contemporary Acinetobacter infections has been eroded over the last decades due to its susceptibility to cleavage by numerous β-lactamases present in this species. However, when combined with durlobactam, the activity of sulbactam is restored against this problematic pathogen. The following summary describes what is known about the molecular drivers of activity and resistance as well as results from surveillance and in vivo efficacy studies for this novel combination.

Biochemical exploration of β-lactamase inhibitors

The alarming rise of microbial resistance to antibiotics has severely limited the efficacy of current treatment options. The prevalence of β-lactamase enzymes is a significant contributor to the emergence of antibiotic resistance. There are four classes of β-lactamases: A, B, C, and D. Class B is the metallo-β-lactamase, while the rest are serine β-lactamases. The clinical use of β-lactamase inhibitors began as an attempt to combat β-lactamase-mediated resistance. Although β-lactamase inhibitors alone are ineffective against bacteria, research has shown that combining inhibitors with antibiotics is a safe and effective treatment that not only prevents β-lactamase formation but also broadens the range of activity. These inhibitors may cause either temporary or permanent inhibition. The development of new β-lactamase inhibitors will be a primary focus of future research. This study discusses recent advances in our knowledge of the biochemistry behind β-lactam breakdown, with special emphasis on the mechanism of inhibitors for β-lactam complexes with β-lactamase. The study also focuses on the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties of all inhibitors and then applies them in clinical settings. Our analysis and discussion of the challenges that exist in designing inhibitors might help pharmaceutical researchers address root issues and develop more effective inhibitors.

A rationale for the unlike potency of avibactam and ETX2514 against OXA-24 β-lactamase

Diazabicyclooctanone inhibitors such as ETX2514 and avibactam have shown enhanced inhibitory performance to fight the antibiotic resistance developed by pathogens. However, avibactam is ineffective against Acinetobacter baumannii infections, unlike ETX2514. The molecular basis for this difference has not been tackled from a molecular approach, precluding the knowledge of relevant information. In this article, the mechanisms involved in the inhibition of OXA-24 by ETX2514 and avibactam are studied theoretically by hybrid QM/MM calculations. The results show that both inhibitors share the same inhibition mechanisms, comprising acylation a deacylation stages. The involved mechanisms include the same number of steps, transition states and intermediates; although they differ in the involved activation barriers. This difference accounts for the dissimilar inhibitory ability of both inhibitors. The molecular reason for this is the endocyclic double bond in the piperidine ring of ETX2514 increasing the ring strain and chemical reactivity on the N6 and C7 atoms, besides the methyl substituent, which enhance the hydrophobic character of the ring. Furthermore, Lys218 and the carboxylated Lys84 of ETX2514, play a crucial role in the mechanism by coordinating their protonation states in an on/off (protonated/deprotonated) manner, favoring the proton transference between the residues and the inhibitor.

In Vitro Activity of Sulbactam-Durlobactam against Carbapenem-Resistant Acinetobacter baumannii Clinical Isolates: A Multicentre Report from Italy

In the present study, the in vitro activity of the sulbactam-durlobactam (SUL-DUR) combination was evaluated against 141 carbapenem-resistant A. baumannii (CRAb) clinical strains collected from six Italian laboratories. Over half (54.6%) of these isolates were resistant to colistin. The SUL-DUR combination was active against these CRAb isolates with MIC₅₀ and MIC₉₀ values of 0.5 mg/L and 4 mg/L, respectively. Only eleven isolates were resistant to SUL-DUR with MIC values ranging from 8 to 128 mg/L. The SUL-DUR resistant A. baumannii exhibited several antimicrobial resistance genes (ARGs) such as bla_OXA-20, bla_OXA-58, bla_OXA-66, bla_ADC-25, aac(6')-Ib3 and aac(6')-Ib-cr and mutations in gyrA (S81L) and parC (V104I, D105E). However, in these isolates, mutations Q488K and Y528H were found in PBP3. Different determinants were also identified in these CRAb isolates, including adeABC, adeFGH, adeIJK, abeS, abaQ and abaR, which encode multidrug efflux pumps associated with resistance to multiple antibacterial agents. This is the first report on the antimicrobial activity of SUL-DUR against carbapenem-resistant A. baumannii isolates selected from multiple regions in Italy.

Recent advances in β-lactamase inhibitor chemotypes and inhibition modes

The effectiveness of β-lactam antibiotics is increasingly influenced by serine β-lactamases (SBLs) and metallo-β-lactamases (MBLs), which can hydrolyze β-lactam antibiotics. The development of effective β-lactamase inhibitors is an important direction to extend use of β-lactam antibiotics. Although six SBL inhibitors have been approved for clinical use, but no MBL inhibitors or MBL/SBL dual-action inhibitors are available so far. Broad-spectrum targeting clinically relevant MBLs and SBLs is currently desirable, while it is not easy to achieve such a purpose owing to structural and mechanistic differences between MBLs and SBLs. In this review, we summarized recent advances of inhibitor chemotypes targeting MBLs and SBLs and their inhibition mechanisms, particularly including lead discovery and structural optimization strategies, with the aim to provide useful information for future efforts to develop new MBL and SBL inhibitors.

Durlobactam in the Treatment of Multidrug-Resistant Acinetobacter baumannii Infections: A Systematic Review

A. baumannii is a frequent cause of difficult-to-treat healthcare-associated infections. The use of a novel beta-lactamase inhibitor, durlobactam, has been proposed against multidrug-resistant A. baumannii. A systematic review of studies assessing the efficacy and safety of durlobactam in the treatment of multidrug-resistant A. baumannii infections was carried out. The study protocol was pre-registered on PROSPERO (CRD42022311723). Published articles on durlobactam were identified through computerized literature searches with the search terms "durlobactam" and "ETX2514" using PubMed. PubMed was searched until 15 February 2022. Articles providing data on the main characteristics of durlobactam and on the efficacy and safety of durlobactam in the treatment of A. baumannii infections were included in this systematic review. Attempt was made to obtain information about unpublished studies. English language restriction was applied. The risk of bias in the included studies was not assessed. Both quantitative and qualitative information were summarized by means of textual descriptions. Thirty studies on durlobactam were identified, published from June 2017 to November 2020. Sixteen studies met the inclusion criteria. Durlobactam is effective against A. baumannii when used in combination with sulbactam. Future clinical trials are needed to confirm the possibility to treat infections caused by multidrug-resistant A. baumannii with this combination.

In-vitro activity of sulbactam-durlobactam against carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii and mechanisms of resistance

OBJECTIVES

Multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii, particularly strains producing OXA-type carbapenemases, have rapidly emerged in health care settings as a frequent cause of serious infections with limited treatment options. This study evaluated the in-vitro activity of sulbactam (SUL) combined with durlobactam (DUR), against a collection of carbapenemase-producing A. baumannii, and investigated the mechanisms of resistance.

METHODS

Susceptibility testing was performed on 100 isolates by either broth microdilution or by E-test. Isolates were screened for the insertion sequence ISAba1 upstream of the intrinsic chromosomal bla_ADC by PCR. Whole genome sequencing was performed on 25 SUL-DUR resistant isolates, and analyses were performed using the Center for Genomic Epidemiology platform. Target gene sequences were compared to A. baumannii ATCC 17978.

RESULTS

SUL-DUR exhibited excellent activity against A. baumannii isolates with susceptibility levels as follows: amikacin, 18%; colistin, 91%; cefepime, 5%; imipenem, 0%; minocycline, 46%; SUL, 3%; sulbactam-cefoperazone, 8%; SUL-DUR, 71% (based on a breakpoint at 4 mg/L). Twenty-five non-NDM-producing isolates had SUL-DUR MIC values >4 mg/L, among which 14 isolates showed substitutions in penicillin binding protein PBP3, previously shown to be associated with SUL-DUR resistance. Substitutions that have not previously been described were detected in SUL-DUR targets, namely PBP1a, PBP1b, PBP2, and PBP3. By contrast, there was no evidence of the involvement of permeability or efflux.

CONCLUSIONS

SUL-DUR exhibited excellent in-vitro antibacterial activity against these carbapenemase-producing A. baumannii isolates. Amongst the 25 resistant isolates we identified a number of mechanisms which may be contributing factors, in particular PBP substitutions and the production of some specific beta-lactamases.

β-Lactam Antibiotics and β-Lactamase Enzymes Inhibitors, Part 2: Our Limited Resources

β-lactam antibiotics (BLAs) are crucial molecules among antibacterial drugs, but the increasing emergence of resistance to them, developed by bacteria producing β-lactamase enzymes (BLEs), is becoming one of the major warnings to the global public health. Since only a small number of novel antibiotics are in development, a current clinical approach to limit this phenomenon consists of administering proper combinations of β-lactam antibiotics (BLAs) and β-lactamase inhibitors (BLEsIs). Unfortunately, while few clinically approved BLEsIs are capable of inhibiting most class-A and -C serine β-lactamases (SBLEs) and some carbapenemases of class D, they are unable to inhibit most part of the carbapenem hydrolyzing enzymes of class D and the worrying metallo-β-lactamases (MBLEs) of class B. Particularly, MBLEs are a set of enzymes that catalyzes the hydrolysis of a broad range of BLAs by a zinc-mediated mechanism, and currently no clinically available molecule capable of inhibiting MBLEs exists. Additionally, new types of alarming “superbugs”, were found to produce the New Delhi metallo-β-lactamases (NDMs) encoded by increasing variants of a plasmid-mediated gene capable of rapidly spreading among bacteria of the same species and even among different species. Particularly, NDM-1 possesses a flexible hydrolysis mechanism that inactivates all BLAs, except for aztreonam. The present review provides first an overview of existing BLAs and the most clinically relevant BLEs detected so far. Then, the BLEsIs and their most common associations with BLAs already clinically applied and those still in development are reviewed.

Recommendations to Synthetize Old and New β-Lactamases Inhibitors: A Review to Encourage Further Production

The increasing emergence of bacteria producing β-lactamases enzymes (BLEs), able to inactivate the available β-lactam antibiotics (BLAs), causing the hydrolytic opening of their β-lactam ring, is one of the global major warnings. According to Ambler classification, BLEs are grouped in serine-BLEs (SBLEs) of class A, C, and D, and metal-BLEs (MBLEs) of class B. A current strategy to restore no longer functioning BLAs consists of associating them to β-lactamase enzymes inhibitors (BLEsIs), which, interacting with BLEs, prevent them hydrolyzing to the associated antibiotic. Worryingly, the inhibitors that are clinically approved are very few and inhibit only most of class A and C SBLEs, leaving several class D and all MBLEs of class B untouched. Numerous non-clinically approved new molecules are in development, which have shown broad and ultra-broad spectrum of action, some of them also being active on the New Delhi metal-β-lactamase-1 (NDM-1), which can hydrolyze all available BLAs except for aztreonam. To not duplicate the existing review concerning this topic, we have herein examined BLEsIs by a chemistry approach. To this end, we have reviewed both the long-established synthesis adopted to prepare the old BLEsIs, those proposed to achieve the BLEsIs that are newly approved, and those recently reported to prepare the most relevant molecules yet in development, which have shown high potency, providing for each synthesis the related reaction scheme.

Durlobactam, a New Diazabicyclooctane β-Lactamase Inhibitor for the Treatment of Acinetobacter Infections in Combination With Sulbactam

Durlobactam is a new member of the diazabicyclooctane class of β-lactamase inhibitors with broad spectrum activity against Ambler class A, C, and D serine β-lactamases. Sulbactam is a first generation β-lactamase inhibitor with activity limited to a subset of class A enzymes that also has direct-acting antibacterial activity against Acinetobacter spp. The latter feature is due to sulbactam’s ability to inhibit certain penicillin-binding proteins, essential enzymes involved in bacterial cell wall synthesis in this pathogen. Because sulbactam is also susceptible to cleavage by numerous β-lactamases, its clinical utility for the treatment of contemporary Acinetobacter infections is quite limited. However, when combined with durlobactam, the activity of sulbactam is effectively restored against these notoriously multidrug-resistant strains. This sulbactam-durlobactam combination is currently in late-stage development for the treatment of Acinectobacter infections, including those caused by carbapenem-resistant isolates, for which there is a high unmet medical need. The following mini-review summarizes the molecular drivers of efficacy of this combination against this troublesome pathogen, with an emphasis on the biochemical features of each partner.

A randomized, double-blind, placebo- and positive-controlled crossover study of the effects of durlobactam on cardiac repolarization in healthy subjects

Durlobactam (formerly ETX2514) is a diazabicyclooctane β-lactamase inhibitor that inhibits class A, C, and D β-lactamases. Sulbactam combined with durlobactam has in vitro and in vivo activity against Acinetobacter baumannii including carbapenem- and colistin-resistant isolates and is being developed for treating serious infections due to A. baumannii. The effect of a single supratherapeutic dose of durlobactam on the heart rate corrected QT interval (QTc) was evaluated in healthy subjects in a placebo- and active-controlled, single-infusion, three-way crossover study. Subjects were randomized to 1 of 6 sequences that included a single 3-h i.v. infusion of durlobactam 4 g (supratherapeutic dose), a single 3-h i.v. infusion of placebo, and a single 3-h i.v. infusion of placebo plus a single oral dose of moxifloxacin 400 mg given open-label at the end of the i.v. infusion. In each treatment period, Holter electrocardiogram (ECG) measurements were obtained from predose through 24 h post-start of infusion. For the primary ECG end point, placebo-corrected change-from-baseline corrected QT Fridericia's formula (ΔΔQTcF), no significant change was observed with durlobactam. A concentration-QT analysis demonstrated no significant effect of durlobactam on ECG parameters, including QT interval prolongation. Thus, durlobactam has a low risk for prolonging the QT interval and is unlikely to produce any proarrhythmic effects.

Pharmacokinetics of Non-β-Lactam β-Lactamase Inhibitors

The growing emergence of drug-resistant bacterial strains is an issue to treat severe infections, and many efforts have identified new pharmacological agents. The inhibitors of β-lactamases (BLI) have gained a prominent role in the safeguard of beta-lactams. In the last years, new β-lactam–BLI combinations have been registered or are still under clinical evaluation, demonstrating their effectiveness to treat complicated infections. It is also noteworthy that the pharmacokinetics of BLIs partly matches that of β-lactams companions, meaning that some clinical situations, as well as renal impairment and renal replacement therapies, may alter the disposition of both drugs. Common pharmacokinetic characteristics, linear pharmacokinetics across a wide range of doses, and known pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic parameters may guide modifications of dosing regimens for both β-lactams and BLIs. However, comorbidities (i.e., burns, diabetes, cancer) and severe changes in individual pathological conditions (i.e., acute renal impairment, sepsis) could make dose adaptation difficult, because the impact of those factors on BLI pharmacokinetics is partly known. Therapeutic drug monitoring protocols may overcome those issues and offer strategies to personalize drug doses in the intensive care setting. Further prospective clinical trials are warranted to improve the use of BLIs and their β-lactam companions in severe and complicated infections.

In Crystallo Time-Resolved Interaction of the Clostridioides difficile CDD-1 enzyme with Avibactam Provides New Insights into the Catalytic Mechanism of Class D β-lactamases

Class D β-lactamases have risen to notoriety due to their wide spread in bacterial pathogens, propensity to inactivate clinically important β-lactam antibiotics, and ability to withstand inhibition by the majority of classical β-lactamase inhibitors. Understanding the catalytic mechanism of these enzymes is thus vitally important for the development of novel antibiotics and inhibitors active against infections caused by antibiotic-resistant bacteria. Here we report an in crystallo time-resolved study of the interaction of the class D β-lactamase CDD-1 from Clostridioides difficile with the diazobicyclooctane inhibitor, avibactam. We show that the catalytic carboxylated lysine, a residue that is essential for both acylation and deacylation of β-lactams, is sequestered within an internal sealed pocket of the enzyme. Time-resolved snapshots generated in this study allowed us to observe decarboxylation of the lysine and movement of CO2 and water molecules through a transient channel formed between the lysine pocket and the substrate binding site facilitated by rotation of the side chain of a conserved leucine residue. These studies provide novel insights on avibactam binding to CDD-1 and into the catalytic mechanism of class D β-lactamases in general.

Antimicrobial Resistance Conferred by OXA-48 β-Lactamases: Towards a Detailed Mechanistic Understanding

OXA-48-type β-lactamases are now routinely encountered in bacterial infections caused by carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales These enzymes are of high and growing clinical significance due to the importance of carbapenems in treatment of health care-associated infections by Gram-negative bacteria, the wide and increasing dissemination of OXA-48 enzymes on plasmids, and the challenges posed by their detection. OXA-48 confers resistance to penicillin (which is efficiently hydrolyzed) and carbapenem antibiotics (which is more slowly broken down). In addition to the parent enzyme, a growing array of variants of OXA-48 is now emerging. The spectrum of activity of these variants varies, with some hydrolyzing expanded-spectrum oxyimino-cephalosporins. The growth in importance and diversity of the OXA-48 group has motivated increasing numbers of studies that aim to elucidate the relationship between structure and specificity and establish the mechanistic basis for β-lactam turnover in this enzyme family. In this review, we collate recently published structural, kinetic, and mechanistic information on the interactions between clinically relevant β-lactam antibiotics and inhibitors and OXA-48 β-lactamases. Collectively, these studies are starting to form a detailed picture of the underlying bases for the differences in β-lactam specificity between OXA-48 variants and the consequent differences in resistance phenotype. We focus specifically on aspects of carbapenemase and cephalosporinase activities of OXA-48 β-lactamases and discuss β-lactamase inhibitor development in this context. Throughout the review, we also outline key open research questions for future investigation.

Activity of Imipenem, Meropenem, Cefepime, and Sulbactam in Combination with the β-Lactamase Inhibitor LN-1-255 against Acinetobacter spp

Treatment of infections caused by Acinetobacter spp., particularly A. baumannii, is a major clinical problem due to its high rates of antibiotic resistance. New strategies must be developed; therefore, restoration of β-lactam efficacy through the use of β-lactamase inhibitors is paramount. Activities of the antibiotics imipenem, meropenem, cefepime, and sulbactam in combination with the penicillin-sulfone inhibitor LN-1-255 were tested by microdilution against 148 isolates of Acinetobacter spp. collected in 14 hospitals in Spain in 2020. Relevantly, the MIC90 (i.e., minimum concentration at which 90% of isolates were inhibited) of antibiotics in combination with LN-1-255 decreased 4- to 8-fold for all of the Acinetobacter isolates. Considering only the carbapenem-resistant A. baumannii isolates, which produce carbapenem-hydrolyzing class D β-lactamases, the addition of LN-1-255 decreased the resistance rates from 95.1% to 0% for imipenem, from 100% to 9.8% for meropenem, from 70.7% to 7.3% for cefepime, and sulbactam resistance rates from 9.8% to 0% and intermediate susceptibility rates from 53.7% to 2.4%. The inhibitor also decreased the minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) when tested against non-carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter spp. isolates. In conclusion, combining LN-1-255 with imipenem, meropenem, cefepime, and sulbactam to target A. baumannii, and especially carbapenem-resistant isolates, represents an attractive option that should be developed for the treatment of infections caused by this pathogen.

In Vitro Antibacterial Activity and In Vivo Efficacy of Sulbactam-Durlobactam against Pathogenic Burkholderia Species

The Gram-negative bacterial genus Burkholderia includes several hard-to-treat human pathogens: two biothreat species, Burkholderia mallei (causing glanders) and B. pseudomallei (causing melioidosis), and the B. cepacia complex (BCC) and B. gladioli, which cause chronic lung infections in persons with cystic fibrosis. All Burkholderia spp. possess an Ambler class A Pen β-lactamase, which confers resistance to β-lactams. The β-lactam-β-lactamase inhibitor combination sulbactam-durlobactam (SUL-DUR) is in clinical development for the treatment of Acinetobacter infections. In this study, we evaluated SUL-DUR for in vitro and in vivo activity against Burkholderia clinical isolates. We measured MICs of SUL-DUR against BCC and B. gladioli (n = 150), B. mallei (n = 30), and B. pseudomallei (n = 28), studied the kinetics of inhibition of the PenA1 β-lactamase from B. multivorans and the PenI β-lactamase from B. pseudomallei by durlobactam, tested for bla _PenA1 induction by SUL-DUR, and evaluated in vivo efficacy in a mouse model of melioidosis. SUL-DUR inhibited growth of 87.3% of the BCC and B. gladioli strains and 100% of the B. mallei and B. pseudomallei strains at 4/4 μg/ml. Durlobactam potently inhibited PenA1 and PenI with second-order rate constant for inactivation (k ₂ /K) values of 3.9 × 10⁶ M^-1 s^-1 and 2.6 × 10³ M^-1 s^-1 and apparent K_i (K_{i app}) of 15 nM and 241 nM, respectively, by forming highly stable covalent complexes. Neither sulbactam, durlobactam, nor SUL-DUR increased production of PenA1. SUL-DUR demonstrated activity in vivo in a murine melioidosis model. Taken together, these data suggest that SUL-DUR may be useful as a treatment for Burkholderia infections.

Interactions of the Diazabicyclooctane Serine β-Lactamase Inhibitor ETX1317 with Target Enzymes

ETX0282 is an orally bioavailable prodrug of the diazabicyclooctane serine β-lactamase inhibitor ETX1317. The combination of ETX0282 with cefpodoxime proxetil is in clinical trials as an oral therapy for complicated urinary tract infections caused by Enterobacterales. Earlier diazabicyclooctane β-lactamase inhibitors, such as avibactam and durlobactam, contain a sulfate moiety as the essential anionic group and are administered intravenously. In contrast, ETX1317 contains a fluoroacetate moiety, which is esterified with an isopropyl group in ETX0282 to provide high oral bioavailability. Previous studies of avibactam and durlobactam showed that covalent inhibition of certain β-lactamases is reversible due to the ability of the ring-opened inhibitors to recyclize and dissociate in their original form. We investigated the interaction of ETX1317 with several β-lactamases commonly found in relevant bacterial pathogens, including CTX-M-15, KPC-2, SHV-5, and TEM-1 from Ambler Class A; Pseudomonas aeruginosa AmpC and Enterobacter cloacae P99 from Class C, and OXA-48 from Class D. The second-order rate constants for inhibition (k_inact/K_i) of these enzymes show that ETX1317 is intermediate in potency between durlobactam and avibactam. The partition ratios were all approximately 1, indicating that the inhibitor is not also a substrate of these enzymes. The rate constants for dissociation of the covalent complex (k_off) were similar to those for durlobactam and avibactam. Acylation exchange experiments demonstrated that ETX1317 dissociated in its original form. No loss of mass from the inhibitor was observed in the covalent inhibitor-enzyme complexes.

Ceftazidime-Avibactam Resistance Mutations V240G, D179Y, and D179Y/T243M in KPC-3 β-Lactamase Do Not Alter Cefpodoxime-ETX1317 Susceptibility

Mutations in KPC-2 and KPC-3 β-lactamase can confer resistance to the β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor antibacterial intravenous drug combination ceftazidime-avibactam, introduced in 2015. Avibactam was the first of the diazabicyclooctane class of non-β-lactam β-lactamase inhibitors to be approved for clinical use. The orally bioavailable prodrug ETX0282 of the diazabicyclooctane β-lactamase inhibitor ETX1317 is in clinical development in combination with the oral β-lactam prodrug cefpodoxime proxetil for use against complicated urinary tract infections. We investigated the effects of 3 ceftazidime-avibactam resistance mutations in KPC-3 (V240G, D179Y, and D179Y/T243M) on the ability of ETX1317 to overcome KPC-3-induced cefpodoxime resistance. Isogenic Escherichia coli strains, each expressing the wild-type or a mutant KPC-3 at similar levels, retained susceptibility to cefpodoxime-ETX1317 (1:2) with essentially identical minimal inhibitory concentrations of 0.125-0.25 μg/mL cefpodoxime. The KPC-3 mutations had little or no effect on the kinact/Ki values for inhibition by each of 3 diazabicyclooctanes: avibactam, durlobactam (ETX2514), and ETX1317. The KM values for hydrolysis of cefpodoxime were similar for all 4 variants, but the kcat values of the D179Y and D179Y/T243M variants were much lower than those of the wild-type and V240G mutant enzymes. All 4 KPC-3 variants formed stable, reversibly covalent complexes with ETX1317, but dissociation of ETX1317 was much slower from the D179Y and D179Y/T243M mutants than from the wild-type and V240G mutant enzymes. Thus, the KPC-3 variants examined here that cause resistance to ceftazidime-avibactam do not cause resistance to cefpodoxime-ETX1317.

New Carbapenemase Inhibitors: Clearing the Way for the β-Lactams

Carbapenem resistance is a major global health problem that seriously compromises the treatment of infections caused by nosocomial pathogens. Resistance to carbapenems mainly occurs via the production of carbapenemases, such as VIM, IMP, NDM, KPC and OXA, among others. Preclinical and clinical trials are currently underway to test a new generation of promising inhibitors, together with the recently approved avibactam, relebactam and vaborbactam. This review summarizes the main, most promising carbapenemase inhibitors synthesized to date, as well as their spectrum of activity and current stage of development. We particularly focus on β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations that could potentially be used to treat infections caused by carbapenemase-producer pathogens of critical priority. The emergence of these new combinations represents a step forward in the fight against antimicrobial resistance, especially in regard to metallo-β-lactamases and carbapenem-hydrolysing class D β-lactamases, not currently inhibited by any clinically approved inhibitor.

A comprehensive and contemporary "snapshot" of β-lactamases in carbapenem resistant Acinetobacter baumannii

Successful treatment of Acinetobacter baumannii infections require early and appropriate antimicrobial therapy. One of the first steps in this process is understanding which β-lactamase (bla) alleles are present and in what combinations. Thus, we performed WGS on 98 carbapenem-resistant A. baumannii (CR Ab). In most isolates, an acquired bla_OXA carbapenemase was found in addition to the intrinsic bla_OXA allele. The most commonly found allele was bla_OXA-23 (n = 78/98). In some isolates, bla_OXA-23 was found in addition to other carbapenemase alleles: bla_OXA-82 (n = 12/78), bla_OXA-72 (n = 2/78) and bla_OXA-24/40 (n = 1/78). Surprisingly, 20% of isolates carried carbapenemases not routinely assayed for by rapid molecular diagnostic platforms, i.e., bla_OXA-82 and bla_OXA-172; all had ISAba1 elements. In 8 CR Ab, bla_OXA-82 or bla_OXA-172 was the only carbapenemase. Both bla_OXA-24/40 and its variant bla_OXA-72 were each found in 6/98 isolates. The most prevalent ADC variants were bla_ADC-30 (21%), bla_ADC-162 (21%), and bla_ADC-212 (26%). Complete combinations are reported.

Antibiotic resistance breakers: current approaches and future directions

Infections of antibiotic-resistant pathogens pose an ever-increasing threat to mankind. The investigation of novel approaches for tackling the antimicrobial resistance crisis must be part of any global response to this problem if an untimely reversion to the pre-penicillin era of medicine is to be avoided. One such promising avenue of research involves so-called antibiotic resistance breakers (ARBs), capable of re-sensitising resistant bacteria to antibiotics. Although some ARBs have previously been employed in the clinical setting, such as the β-lactam inhibitors, we posit that the broader field of ARB research can yet yield a greater diversity of more effective therapeutic agents than have been previously achieved. This review introduces the area of ARB research, summarises the current state of ARB development with emphasis on the various major classes of ARBs currently being investigated and their modes of action, and offers a perspective on the future direction of the field.

Safety, Pharmacokinetics, and Drug-Drug Interaction Potential of Intravenous Durlobactam, a β-Lactamase Inhibitor, in Healthy Subjects

Durlobactam (DUR; also known as ETX2514) is a novel β-lactamase inhibitor with broad activity against Ambler class A, C, and D β-lactamases. Addition of DUR to sulbactam (SUL) in vitro restores SUL activity against clinical isolates of Acinetobacter baumannii. The safety and pharmacokinetics (PK) of DUR alone and with SUL and/or imipenem-cilastatin (IMI-CIL) were evaluated in healthy subjects. This was a randomized, placebo-controlled study. In part A, subjects, including a cohort of elderly subjects (which received DUR at 1 g), received single ascending doses of DUR ranging from 0.

Durlobactam (DUR; also known as ETX2514) is a novel β-lactamase inhibitor with broad activity against Ambler class A, C, and D β-lactamases. Addition of DUR to sulbactam (SUL) in vitro restores SUL activity against clinical isolates of Acinetobacter baumannii. The safety and pharmacokinetics (PK) of DUR alone and with SUL and/or imipenem-cilastatin (IMI-CIL) were evaluated in healthy subjects. This was a randomized, placebo-controlled study. In part A, subjects, including a cohort of elderly subjects (which received DUR at 1 g), received single ascending doses of DUR ranging from 0.25 to 8 g. In part B, multiple ascending doses of DUR ranging from 0.25 to 2 g were administered every 6 h (q6h) for 29 doses. In parts C and D, the drug-drug interaction (DDI) potential, including the safety, of DUR (1 g) with SUL (1 g) and/or IMI-CIL (0.5/0.5 g) was investigated after single and multiple doses. Plasma and urine concentrations of DUR, SUL, and IMI-CIL were determined. Among 124 subjects, DUR was generally safe and well tolerated when it was administered either alone or in combination with SUL and/or IMI-CIL. After single and multiple doses, DUR demonstrated linear dose-proportional exposure across the studied dose ranges. Renal excretion was a predominant clearance mechanism. No drug-drug interaction potential between DUR and SUL and/or IMI-CIL was identified. SUL-DUR at 1 g (of each component) administered q6h with a 3-h intravenous (i.v.) infusion is under development for the treatment of serious infections due to A. baumannii. (This study has been registered at ClinicalTrials.gov under identifier NCT02971423.)

Biochemical Characterization of QPX7728, a New Ultrabroad-Spectrum Beta-Lactamase Inhibitor of Serine and Metallo-Beta-Lactamases

QPX7728 is a new ultrabroad-spectrum inhibitor of serine and metallo-beta-lactamases (MBLs) from a class of cyclic boronates that gave rise to vaborbactam. The spectrum and mechanism of beta-lactamase inhibition by QPX7728 were assessed using purified enzymes from all molecular classes. QPX7728 inhibits class A extended-spectrum beta-lactamases (ESBLs) (50% inhibitory concentration [IC50] range, 1 to 3 nM) and carbapenemases such as KPC (IC50, 2.9 ± 0.4 nM) as well as class C P99 (IC50 of 22 ± 8 nM) with a potency that is comparable to or higher than recently FDA-approved beta-lactamase inhibitors (BLIs) avibactam, relebactam, and vaborbactam. Unlike those other BLIs, QPX7728 is also a potent inhibitor of class D carbapenemases such as OXA-48 from Enterobacteriaceae and OXA enzymes from Acinetobacter baumannii (OXA-23/24/58, IC50 range, 1 to 2 nM) as well as MBLs such as NDM-1 (IC50, 55 ± 25 nM), VIM-1 (IC50, 14 ± 4 nM), and IMP-1 (IC50, 610 ± 70 nM). Inhibition of serine enzymes by QPX7728 is associated with progressive inactivation with a high-efficiency k2/K ranging from 6.3 × 104 (for P99) to 9.9 × 105 M-1 s-1 (for OXA-23). This inhibition is reversible with variable stability of the QPX7728-beta-lactamase complexes with target residence time ranging from minutes to several hours: 5 to 20 min for OXA carbapenemases from A. baumannii, ∼50 min for OXA-48, and 2 to 3 h for KPC and CTX-M-15. QPX7728 inhibited all tested serine enzymes at a 1:1 molar ratio. Metallo-beta-lactamases NDM, VIM, and IMP were inhibited by a competitive mechanism with fast-on-fast-off kinetics, with Ki s of 7.5 ± 2.1 nM, 32 ± 14 nM, and 240 ± 30 nM for VIM-1, NDM-1, and IMP-1, respectively. QPX7728's ultrabroad spectrum of BLI inhibition combined with its high potency enables combinations with multiple different beta-lactam antibiotics.

In vitro activity of sulbactam/durlobactam against clinical isolates of Acinetobacter baumannii collected in China

Background

Durlobactam is a broad-spectrum inhibitor of class A, C and D β-lactamases. Sulbactam is a generic β-lactam most commonly used as a β-lactamase inhibitor in combination with ampicillin; however, it has a unique property in that it has selective intrinsic activity against Acinetobacter baumannii. Currently, there is widespread resistance caused by multiple β-lactamases including class A carbapenemases and class C and class D enzymes. The addition of durlobactam to sulbactam restores in vitro activity against MDR A. baumannii that possess multiple β-lactamases.

Objectives

Previously, susceptibility data for sulbactam/durlobactam were limited to isolates from patients in Western countries. This study was undertaken to determine the activity of sulbactam/durlobactam against A. baumannii isolated from patients in mainland China.

Methods

Nine hundred and eighty-two recent A. baumannii clinical isolates were collected from 22 sites across mainland China during 2016–18. The isolates were collected from lower respiratory tract, intra-abdominal, urinary tract and skin and skin structure infections. The in vitro activities of sulbactam/durlobactam and comparators were determined by broth microdilution.

Results

The addition of durlobactam restored the activity of sulbactam against the majority of the strains tested. The MIC90 of sulbactam/durlobactam was 2 mg/L for all A. baumannii, compared with 64 mg/L for sulbactam alone. The MIC90 of sulbactam/durlobactam of 2 mg/L remained unchanged for 831 carbapenem-resistant isolates. Colistin was the only comparator with comparable activity (MIC90 = 1 mg/L).

Conclusions

This study demonstrated the potential utility of sulbactam/durlobactam for the treatment of infections caused by A. baumannii in China.

Antibiotics in the clinical pipeline in October 2019

The development of new and effective antibacterial drugs to treat multi-drug resistant (MDR) bacteria, especially Gram-negative (G−ve) pathogens, is acknowledged as one of the world’s most pressing health issues; however, the discovery and development of new, nontoxic antibacterials is not a straightforward scientific task, which is compounded by a challenging economic model. This review lists the antibacterials, β-lactamase/β-lactam inhibitor (BLI) combinations, and monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) first launched around the world since 2009 and details the seven new antibiotics and two new β-lactam/BLI combinations launched since 2016. The development status, mode of action, spectra of activity, lead source, and administration route for the 44 small molecule antibacterials, eight β-lactamase/BLI combinations, and one antibody drug conjugate (ADC) being evaluated in worldwide clinical trials at the end of October 2019 are described. Compounds discontinued from clinical development since 2016 and new antibacterial pharmacophores are also reviewed. There has been an increase in the number of early stage clinical candidates, which has been fueled by antibiotic-focused funding agencies; however, there is still a significant gap in the pipeline for the development of new antibacterials with activity against β-metallolactamases, orally administered with broad spectrum G−ve activity, and new treatments for MDR Acinetobacter and gonorrhea.

Pharmacokinetics and Tolerability of Intravenous Sulbactam-Durlobactam with Imipenem-Cilastatin in Hospitalized Adults with Complicated Urinary Tract Infections, Including Acute Pyelonephritis

Durlobactam (DUR; ETX2514) is a novel β-lactamase inhibitor with broad-spectrum activity against Ambler class A, C, and D β-lactamases. Durlobactam restores the in vitro activity of sulbactam (SUL) against members of the Acinetobacter baumannii-A. calcoaceticus complex (ABC). Sulbactam (SUL)-durlobactam (SUL-DUR) is under development for the treatment of ABC infections.

Durlobactam (DUR; ETX2514) is a novel β-lactamase inhibitor with broad-spectrum activity against Ambler class A, C, and D β-lactamases. Durlobactam restores the in vitro activity of sulbactam (SUL) against members of the Acinetobacter baumannii-A. calcoaceticus complex (ABC). Sulbactam (SUL)-durlobactam (SUL-DUR) is under development for the treatment of ABC infections. Eighty patients with complicated urinary tract infection (cUTI), including acute pyelonephritis (AP), were randomized 2:1 to receive SUL-DUR at 1 g/1 g intravenously (i.v.) or placebo every 6 h (q6h) for 7 days and background therapy with imipenem-cilastatin (IMI) at 500 mg i.v. q6h to evaluate the tolerability of SUL-DUR in hospitalized patients. Patients with bacteremia could receive up to 14 days of therapy. SUL-DUR tolerability and the values of various pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters were determined. Efficacy was recorded at the test-of-cure (TOC) visit. SUL-DUR was well tolerated, with no serious adverse events (AEs) being reported. Headache (5.7%), nausea (3.8%), diarrhea (3.8%), and vascular pain (3.8%) were the most common drug-related AEs with SUL-DUR and were mostly of mild or moderate severity. The PK profile of DUR and SUL in hospitalized patients was consistent with observations in healthy volunteers. Overall success in the microbiological modified intent-to-treat (m-MITT) population was similar between the groups, as would be expected with IMI background therapy in all patients (overall success at the TOC visit, 76.6% [n = 36] with SUL-DUR and 81.0% [n = 17] with placebo). SUL-DUR in combination with IMI was well tolerated in patients with cUTIs. The pharmacokinetics of SUL-DUR observed in hospitalized patients was similar to that observed in healthy volunteers. (This study has been registered at ClinicalTrials.gov under identifier NCT03445195.)

Interplay between β-lactamases and new β-lactamase inhibitors

Resistance to β-lactam antibiotics in Gram-negative bacteria is commonly associated with production of β-lactamases, including extended-spectrum β-lactamases (ESBLs) and carbapenemases belonging to different molecular classes: those with a catalytically active serine and those with at least one active-site Zn²⁺ to facilitate hydrolysis. To counteract the hydrolytic activity of these enzymes, combinations of a β-lactam with a β-lactamase inhibitor (BLI) have been clinically successful. However, some β-lactam-BLI combinations have lost their effectiveness against prevalent Gram-negative pathogens that produce ESBLs, carbapenemases or multiple β-lactamases in the same organism. In this Review, descriptions are provided for medically relevant β-lactamase families and various BLI combinations that have been developed or are under development. Recently approved inhibitor combinations include the inhibitors avibactam and vaborbactam of the diazabicyclooctanone and boronic acid inhibitor classes, respectively, as new scaffolds for future inhibitor design.

β-Lactamase Inhibitors To Restore the Efficacy of Antibiotics against Superbugs

Infections caused by resistant bacteria are nowadays too common, and some pathogens have even become resistant to multiple types of antibiotics, in which case few or even no treatments are available. In recent years, the most successful strategy in anti-infective drug discovery for the treatment of such problematic infections is the combination therapy "antibiotic + inhibitor of resistance". These inhibitors allow the repurposing of antibiotics that have already proven to be safe and effective for clinical use. Three main types of compounds have been developed to block the principal bacterial resistance mechanisms: (i) β-lactamase inhibitors; (ii) outer membrane permeabilizers; (iii) efflux pump inhibitors. This Perspective is focused on β-lactamase inhibitors that disable the most prevalent cause of antibiotic resistance in Gram-negative bacteria, i.e., the deactivation of the most widely used antibiotics, β-lactams (penicillins, cephalosporines, carbapenems, and monobactams), by the production of β-lactamases. An overview of the most recently identified β-lactamase inhibitors and of combination therapy is provided. The article also covers the mechanism of action of the different types of β-lactamase enzymes as a basis for inhibitor design and target inactivation.

Molecular Basis of Class A β-Lactamase Inhibition by Relebactam

β-Lactamase production is the major β-lactam resistance mechanism in Gram-negative bacteria. β-Lactamase inhibitors (BLIs) efficacious against serine β-lactamase (SBL) producers, especially strains carrying the widely disseminated class A enzymes, are required. Relebactam, a diazabicyclooctane (DBO) BLI, is in phase 3 clinical trials in combination with imipenem for the treatment of infections by multidrug-resistant Enterobacteriaceae We show that relebactam inhibits five clinically important class A SBLs (despite their differing spectra of activity), representing both chromosomal and plasmid-borne enzymes, i.e., the extended-spectrum β-lactamases L2 (inhibition constant 3 μM) and CTX-M-15 (21 μM) and the carbapenemases KPC-2, -3, and -4 (1 to 5 μM). Against purified class A SBLs, relebactam is an inferior inhibitor compared with the clinically approved DBO avibactam (9- to 120-fold differences in half maximal inhibitory concentration [IC₅₀]). MIC assays indicate relebactam potentiates β-lactam (imipenem) activity against KPC-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae, with similar potency to avibactam (with ceftazidime). Relebactam is less effective than avibactam in combination with aztreonam against Stenotrophomonas maltophilia K279a. X-ray crystal structures of relebactam bound to CTX-M-15, L2, KPC-2, KPC-3, and KPC-4 reveal its C2-linked piperidine ring can sterically clash with Asn104 (CTX-M-15) or His/Trp105 (L2 and KPCs), rationalizing its poorer inhibition activity than that of avibactam, which has a smaller C2 carboxyamide group. Mass spectrometry and crystallographic data show slow, pH-dependent relebactam desulfation by KPC-2, -3, and -4. This comprehensive comparison of relebactam binding across five clinically important class A SBLs will inform the design of future DBOs, with the aim of improving clinical efficacy of BLI-β-lactam combinations.

Pharmacokinetics, Safety, and Tolerability of Intravenous Durlobactam and Sulbactam in Subjects with Renal Impairment and Healthy Matched Control Subjects

Sulbactam-durlobactam is being developed for the treatment of infections caused by Acinetobacter baumannii, including those caused by multidrug- and carbapenem-resistant isolates. This was a phase 1 study to evaluate the effects of various degrees of renal impairment, including subjects with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) on hemodialysis (HD), on the pharmacokinetics and safety profile of durlobactam (also known as ETX2514) and sulbactam after single intravenous (i.v.) dose administration.

Sulbactam-durlobactam is being developed for the treatment of infections caused by Acinetobacter baumannii, including those caused by multidrug- and carbapenem-resistant isolates. This was a phase 1 study to evaluate the effects of various degrees of renal impairment, including subjects with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) on hemodialysis (HD), on the pharmacokinetics and safety profile of durlobactam (also known as ETX2514) and sulbactam after single intravenous (i.v.) dose administration. For healthy subjects and those with mild or moderate renal impairment (RI), single 1,000-mg doses each of durlobactam and sulbactam via a 3-h i.v. infusion were administered, and for severe renal impairment, 500-mg doses were administered. For subjects with ESRD and HD, 500-mg i.v. doses each of durlobactam and sulbactam were administered post-HD and pre-HD, with a 1-week washout between doses. Among 34 subjects, decreasing renal function increased systemic exposure (peak plasma concentration [C_max] and area under the concentration-time curve [AUC]) to durlobactam and sulbactam in a generally linear manner. In healthy subjects and in those with mild or moderate renal impairment, the majority of durlobactam and sulbactam was excreted in the urine, while approximately 40% or less was excreted in urine in subjects with severe renal impairment or ESRD. In subjects with ESRD, hemodialysis was effective at removing both durlobactam and sulbactam from plasma. Renal impairment had no effect of the safety/tolerability profile of durlobactam and sulbactam. In summary, RI and ESRD had a predictable effect on the pharmacokinetic (PK) profile of durlobactam and sulbactam with no adverse effects on the safety/tolerability profile. Durlobactam and sulbactam are cleared to a similar extent by renal elimination and are impacted similarly by renal impairment. The results from this study have been used with population PK modeling and nonclinically derived PK/PD (pharmacodynamic) exposure targets to establish dosage recommendations for durlobactam and sulbactam in patients with various degrees of RI. The dosing regimen of durlobactam-sulbactam will require adjustment in patients with severe renal insufficiency and in those with ESRD.

IID572: A New Potentially Best-In-Class β-Lactamase Inhibitor

Resistance in Gram-negative bacteria to β-lactam drugs is mediated primarily by the expression of β-lactamases, and co-dosing of β-lactams with a β-lactamase inhibitor (BLI) is a clinically proven strategy to address resistance. New β-lactamases that are not impacted by existing BLIs are spreading and creating the need for development of novel broader spectrum BLIs. IID572 is a novel broad spectrum BLI of the diazabicyclooctane (DBO) class that is able to restore the antibacterial activity of piperacillin against piperacillin/tazobactam-resistant clinical isolates. IID572 is differentiated from other DBOs by its broad inhibition of β-lactamases and the lack of intrinsic antibacterial activity.

Targeting Multidrug-Resistant Acinetobacter spp.: Sulbactam and the Diazabicyclooctenone β-Lactamase Inhibitor ETX2514 as a Novel Therapeutic Agent

Multidrug-resistant (MDR) Acinetobacter spp. poses a significant therapeutic challenge in part due to the presence of chromosomally encoded β-lactamases, including class C Acinetobacter-derived cephalosporinases (ADC) and class D oxacillinases (OXA), as well as plasmid-mediated class A β-lactamases. Importantly, OXA-like β-lactamases represent a gap in the spectrum of inhibition by recently approved β-lactamase inhibitors such as avibactam and vaborbactam. ETX2514 is a novel, rationally designed, diazabicyclooctenone inhibitor that effectively targets class A, C, and D β-lactamases. We show that addition of ETX2514 significantly increased the susceptibility of clinical Acinetobacter baumannii isolates to sulbactam. AdeB and AdeJ were identified to be key efflux constituents for ETX2514 in A. baumannii The combination of sulbactam and ETX2514 was efficacious against A. baumannii carrying bla _TEM-1, bla _ADC-82, bla _OXA-23, and bla _OXA-66 in a neutropenic murine thigh infection model. We also show that, in vitro, ETX2514 inhibited ADC-7 (k ₂/K_i 1.0 ± 0.1 × 10⁶ M^-1 s^-1) and OXA-58 (k ₂/K_i 2.5 ± 0.3 × 10⁵ M^-1 s^-1). Cocrystallization of ETX2514 with OXA-24/40 revealed hydrogen bonding interactions between ETX2514 and residues R261, S219, and S128 of OXA-24/40 in addition to a chloride ion occupied in the active site. Further, the C3 methyl group of ETX2514 shifts the position of M223. In conclusion, the sulbactam-ETX2514 combination possesses a broadened inhibitory range to include class D β-lactamases as well as class A and C β-lactamases and is a promising therapeutic candidate for infections caused by MDR Acinetobacter spp.IMPORTANCE The number and diversity of β-lactamases are steadily increasing. The emergence of β-lactamases that hydrolyze carbapenems poses a significant threat to our antibiotic armamentarium. The explosion of OXA enzymes that are carbapenem hydrolyzers is a major challenge (carbapenem-hydrolyzing class D [CHD]). An urgent need exists to discover β-lactamase inhibitors with class D activity. The sulbactam-ETX2514 combination demonstrates the potential to become a treatment regimen of choice for Acinetobacter spp. producing class D β-lactamases.

Plasma and Intrapulmonary Concentrations of ETX2514 and Sulbactam following Intravenous Administration of ETX2514SUL to Healthy Adult Subjects

ETX2514 is a novel β-lactamase inhibitor that broadly inhibits Ambler class A, C, and D β-lactamases. ETX2514 combined with sulbactam (SUL) in vitro restores sulbactam activity against Acinetobacter baumannii ETX2514-sulbactam (ETX2514SUL) is under development for the treatment of A. baumannii infections. The objective of this study was to determine and compare plasma, epithelial lining fluid (ELF), and alveolar macrophage (AM) concentrations following intravenous (i.v.) ETX2514 and sulbactam. Plasma, ELF, and AM concentrations of ETX2514 and sulbactam were measured by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) in 30 healthy adult subjects following repeated dosing (ETX2514 [1 g] and sulbactam [1 g] every 6 h [q6h], as a 3-h i.v. infusion, for a total of 3 doses). A bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) was performed once in each subject at either 1, 2.5, 3.25, 4, or 6 h after the start of the last infusion. Penetration ratios were calculated from area under the concentration-time curve from 0 to 6 h (AUC_0-6) values for total plasma and ELF using mean and median concentrations at the BAL fluid sampling times. Respective ELF AUC_0-6 values, based on mean and median concentrations, were 40.1 and 39.4 mg · h/liter for ETX2514 and 34.7 and 34.5 mg · h/liter for sulbactam. Respective penetration ratios of ELF to total/unbound plasma concentrations, based on mean and median AUC_0-6 values, of ETX2514 were 0.37/0.41 and 0.36/0.40, whereas these same ratio values were 0.50/0.81 and 0.50/0.80 for sulbactam. ETX2514 and sulbactam concentrations in AM were measurable and fairly constant throughout the dosing interval (median values of 1.31 and 1.01 mg/liter, respectively). These data support further study of ETX2514SUL for the treatment of pneumonia caused by multidrug-resistant A. baumannii (This study has been registered at ClinicalTrials.gov under identifier NCT03303924.).

β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations: an update

Antibiotic resistance caused by β-lactamase production continues to present a growing challenge to the efficacy of β-lactams and their role as the most important class of clinically used antibiotics. In response to this threat however, only a handful of β-lactamase inhibitors have been introduced to the market over the past thirty years. The first-generation β-lactamase inhibitors (clavulanic acid, sulbactam and tazobactam) are all β-lactam derivatives and work primarily by inactivating class A and some class C serine β-lactamases. The newer generations of β-lactamase inhibitors including avibactam and vaborbactam are based on non-β-lactam structures and their spectrum of inhibition is extended to KPC as an important class A carbapenemase. Despite these advances several class D and virtually all important class B β-lactamases are resistant to existing inhibitors. The present review provides an overview of recent FDA-approved β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations as well as an update on research efforts aimed at the discovery and development of novel β-lactamase inhibitors.

Exploring Additional Dimensions of Complexity in Inhibitor Design for Serine β-Lactamases: Mechanistic and Intra- and Inter-molecular Chemistry Approaches

As a bacterial resistance strategy, serine β-lactamases have evolved from cell wall synthesizing enzymes known as penicillin-binding proteins (PBP), by not only covalently binding β-lactam antibiotics but, also acquiring mechanisms of deacylating these antibiotics. This critical deacylation step leads to release of hydrolyzed and inactivated β-lactams, thereby providing resistance for the bacteria against these antibiotics targeting the cell wall. To combat β-lactamase-mediated antibiotic resistance, numerous β-lactamase inhibitors were developed that utilize various strategies to inactivate the β-lactamase. Most of these compounds are “mechanism-based” inhibitors that in some manner mimic the β-lactam substrate, having a carbonyl moiety and a negatively charged carboxyl or sulfate group. These compounds form a covalent adduct with the catalytic serine via an initial acylation step. To increase the life-time of the inhibitory covalent adduct intermediates, a remarkable array of different strategies was employed to improve inhibition potency. Such approaches include post-acylation intra- and intermolecular chemical rearrangements as well as affecting the deacylation water. These approaches transform the inhibitor design process from a 3-dimensional problem (i.e., XYZ coordinates) to one with additional dimensions of complexity as the reaction coordinate and time spent at each chemical state need to be taken into consideration. This review highlights the mechanistic intricacies of the design efforts of the β-lactamase inhibitors which so far have resulted in the development of “two generations” and 5 clinically available inhibitors.