Spin Label Scanning Reveals Likely Locations of β-Strands in the Amyloid Fibrils of the Ure2 Prion Domain

EPR Studies of Aβ42 Oligomers Indicate a Parallel In-Register β-Sheet Structure

Aβ aggregation leads to the formation of both insoluble amyloid fibrils and soluble oligomers. Understanding the structures of Aβ oligomers is important for delineating the mechanism of Aβ aggregation and developing effective therapeutics. Here, we use site-directed spin labeling and electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) spectroscopy to study Aβ42 oligomers prepared by using the protocol of Aβ-derived diffusible ligands. We obtained the EPR spectra of 37 Aβ42 oligomer samples, each spin-labeled at a unique residue position of the Aβ42 sequence. Analysis of the disordered EPR components shows that the N-terminal region has a lower local structural stability. Spin label mobility analysis reveals three structured segments at residues 9-11, 15-22, and 30-40. Intermolecular spin-spin interactions indicate a parallel in-register β-sheet structure, with residues 34-38 forming the structural core. Residues 16-21 also adopt the parallel in-register β-structure, albeit with weaker intermolecular packing. Our results suggest that there is a structural class of Aβ oligomers that adopt fibril-like conformations.

Prions in Microbes: The Least in the Most

Prions are infectious proteins that mostly replicate in self-propagating amyloid conformations (filamentous protein polymers) and consist of structurally altered normal soluble proteins. Prions can arise spontaneously in the cell without any clear reason and are generally considered fatal disease-causing agents that are only present in mammals. However, after the seminal discovery of two prions, [PSI+] and [URE3], in the eukaryotic model microorganism Saccharomyces cerevisiae, at least ten more prions have been discovered, and their biological and pathological effects on the host, molecular structure, and the relationship between prions and cellular components have been studied. In a filamentous fungus model, Podospora anserina, a vegetative incomparability-related [Het-s] prion that directly triggers cell death during anastomosis (hyphal fusion) was discovered. These prions in eukaryotic microbes have extended our understanding to overcome most fatal human prion/amyloid diseases. A prokaryotic microorganism (Clostridium botulinum) was reported to have a prion analog. The transcriptional regulators of C. botulinum-Rho can be converted into the self-replicating prion form ([RHO-X-C+]), which may affect global transcription. Here, we outline the major issues with prions in microbes and the lessons learned from the relatively uncovered microbial prion world.

Anti-Prion Systems in Saccharomyces cerevisiae Turn an Avalanche of Prions into a Flurry

Prions are infectious proteins, mostly having a self-propagating amyloid (filamentous protein polymer) structure consisting of an abnormal form of a normally soluble protein. These prions arise spontaneously in the cell without known reason, and their effects were generally considered to be fatal based on prion diseases in humans or mammals. However, the wide array of prion studies in yeast including filamentous fungi revealed that their effects can range widely, from lethal to very mild (even cryptic) or functional, depending on the nature of the prion protein and the specific prion variant (or strain) made by the same prion protein but with a different conformation. This prion biology is affected by an array of molecular chaperone systems, such as Hsp40, Hsp70, Hsp104, and combinations of them. In parallel with the systems required for prion propagation, yeast has multiple anti-prion systems, constantly working in the normal cell without overproduction of or a deficiency in any protein, which have negative effects on prions by blocking their formation, curing many prions after they arise, preventing prion infections, and reducing the cytotoxicity produced by prions. From the protectors of nascent polypeptides (Ssb1/2p, Zuo1p, and Ssz1p) to the protein sequesterase (Btn2p), the disaggregator (Hsp104), and the mysterious Cur1p, normal levels of each can cure the prion variants arising in its absence. The controllers of mRNA quality, nonsense-mediated mRNA decay proteins (Upf1, 2, 3), can cure newly formed prion variants by association with a prion-forming protein. The regulator of the inositol pyrophosphate metabolic pathway (Siw14p) cures certain prion variants by lowering the levels of certain organic compounds. Some of these proteins have other cellular functions (e.g., Btn2), while others produce an anti-prion effect through their primary role in the normal cell (e.g., ribosomal chaperones). Thus, these anti-prion actions are the innate defense strategy against prions. Here, we outline the anti-prion systems in yeast that produce innate immunity to prions by a multi-layered operation targeting each step of prion development.

Anti-Prion Systems Block Prion Transmission, Attenuate Prion Generation, Cure Most Prions as They Arise and Limit Prion-Induced Pathology in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Simple Summary

Virus and bacterial infections are opposed by their hosts at many levels. Similarly, we find that infectious proteins (prions) are severely restricted by an array of host systems, acting independently to prevent infection, generation, propagation and the ill effects of yeast prions. These ‘anti-prion systems’ work in normal cells without the overproduction or deficiency of any components. DNA repair systems reverse the effects of DNA damage, with only a rare lesion propagated as a mutation. Similarly, the combined effects of several anti-prion systems cure and block the generation of all but 1 in about 5000 prions arising. We expect that application of our approach to mammalian cells will detect analogous or even homologous systems that will be useful in devising therapy for human amyloidoses, most of which are prions.

Abstract

All variants of the yeast prions [PSI+] and [URE3] are detrimental to their hosts, as shown by the dramatic slowing of growth (or even lethality) of a majority, by the rare occurrence in wild isolates of even the mildest variants and by the absence of reproducible benefits of these prions. To deal with the prion problem, the host has evolved an array of anti-prion systems, acting in normal cells (without overproduction or deficiency of any component) to block prion transmission from other cells, to lower the rates of spontaneous prion generation, to cure most prions as they arise and to limit the damage caused by those variants that manage to elude these (necessarily) imperfect defenses. Here we review the properties of prion protein sequence polymorphisms Btn2, Cur1, Hsp104, Upf1,2,3, ribosome-associated chaperones, inositol polyphosphates, Sis1 and Lug1, which are responsible for these anti-prion effects. We recently showed that the combined action of ribosome-associated chaperones, nonsense-mediated decay factors and the Hsp104 disaggregase lower the frequency of [PSI+] appearance as much as 5000-fold. Moreover, while Btn2 and Cur1 are anti-prion factors against [URE3] and an unrelated artificial prion, they promote [PSI+] prion generation and propagation.

Location of the cross-β structure in prion fibrils: A search by seeding and electron spin resonance spectroscopy

Prion diseases are transmissible fatal neurodegenerative disorders spreading between humans and other mammals. The pathogenic agent, prion, is a protease-resistant, β-sheet-rich protein aggregate, converted from a membrane protein called PrPC . PrPSc is the misfolded form of PrPC and undergoes self-propagation to form the infectious amyloids. Since the key hallmark of prion disease is amyloid formation, identifying and studying which segments are involved in the amyloid core can provide molecular details about prion diseases. It has been known that the prion protein could also form non-infectious fibrils in the presence of denaturants. In this study, we employed a combination of site-directed nitroxide spin-labeling, fibril seeding, and electron spin resonance (ESR) spectroscopy to identify the structure of the in vitro-prepared full-length mouse prion fibrils. It is shown that in the in vitro amyloidogenesis, the formation of the amyloid core is linked to an α-to-β structural transformation involving the segment 160-224, which contains strand 2, helix 2, and helix 3. This method is particularly suitable for examining the hetero-seeded amyloid fibril structure, as the unlabeled seeds are invisible by ESR spectroscopy. It can be applied to study the structures of different strains of infectious prions or other amyloid fibrils in the future.

Static and dynamic disorder in Aβ40 fibrils

Deposition of Aβ aggregates in the form of amyloid fibrils is a pathological hallmark of Alzheimer's disease. Understanding the structure and dynamics of Aβ fibrils is important for delineating the mechanism of Aβ aggregation and developing effective therapeutic strategies. Here we used site-directed spin labeling and EPR spectroscopy to study the Aβ40 fibril structure and dynamics. We obtained the EPR spectra of 40 spin-labeled Aβ40 fibril samples, with spin labeling coverage of the entire Aβ40 sequence. Analysis of the spin exchange interaction and spin label mobility using spectral simulations suggest that the strength of spin exchange interaction is primarily determined by static disorder in the Aβ40 fibrils. EPR data suggest that the entire Aβ40 sequence except residue D1 is highly ordered and the two hydrophobic regions at residues 17-20 and 31-36 show the lowest static disorder. Dynamic disorder is relatively constant across all reside positions, with residues 22 and 23 having the highest dynamic disorder. Comparison of the EPR data for Aβ40 and Aβ42 fibrils shows overall more ordered packing interactions in Aβ40 fibrils. Another noteworthy difference is the C-terminal residue, which has high static disorder in Aβ42 fibrils, but is ordered in Aβ40 fibrils. The higher static disorder in Aβ42 fibrils may lead to increased fragmentation, monomer dissociation, and structural defects, which may contribute to increased aggregation through secondary nucleation.

Innate immunity to prions: anti-prion systems turn a tsunami of prions into a slow drip

The yeast prions (infectious proteins) [URE3] and [PSI+] are essentially non-functional (or even toxic) amyloid forms of Ure2p and Sup35p, whose normal function is in nitrogen catabolite repression and translation termination, respectively. Yeast has an array of systems working in normal cells that largely block infection with prions, block most prion formation, cure most nascent prions and mitigate the toxic effects of those prions that escape the first three types of systems. Here we review recent progress in defining these anti-prion systems, how they work and how they are regulated. Polymorphisms of the prion domains partially block infection with prions. Ribosome-associated chaperones ensure proper folding of nascent proteins, thus reducing [PSI+] prion formation and curing many [PSI+] variants that do form. Btn2p is a sequestering protein which gathers [URE3] amyloid filaments to one place in the cells so that the prion is often lost by progeny cells. Proteasome impairment produces massive overexpression of Btn2p and paralog Cur1p, resulting in [URE3] curing. Inversely, increased proteasome activity, by derepression of proteasome component gene transcription or by 60S ribosomal subunit gene mutation, prevents prion curing by Btn2p or Cur1p. The nonsense-mediated decay proteins (Upf1,2,3) cure many nascent [PSI+] variants by associating with Sup35p directly. Normal levels of the disaggregating chaperone Hsp104 can also cure many [PSI+] prion variants. By keeping the cellular levels of certain inositol polyphosphates / pyrophosphates low, Siw14p cures certain [PSI+] variants. It is hoped that exploration of the yeast innate immunity to prions will lead to discovery of similar systems in humans.

Lipid membranes induce structural conversion from amyloid oligomers to fibrils

Formation of amyloid oligomers and fibrils underlies the pathogenesis of a number of neurodegenerative diseases such as Alzheimer's. One mechanism of action by which Aβ aggregates cause neuronal toxicity is through interactions with cellular membranes. Aβ aggregates have been shown to disrupt membrane integrity via pore formation, membrane thinning, or lipid extraction. At the same time, lipid membranes also affect the rate of Aβ aggregation and remodel pre-formed Aβ fibrils. Here we show that Aβ42 globulomers, a type of well-characterized and stable Aβ oligomers, convert to amyloid fibrils in the presence of DOPC liposomes. Electron paramagnetic resonance studies show that the fibrils converted from Aβ42 globulomers adopt the same structure as fibrils formed directly from monomers. Our results suggest that the interactions between Aβ oligomers and cellular membranes are dynamic. By converting Aβ oligomers to fibrils, the lipid membrane can reduce the membrane-disrupting activities caused by these oligomers. Modulation of Aβ-membrane interactions as a therapeutic strategy should take into account the dynamic nature of these interactions.

Effect of spin labelling on the aggregation kinetics of yeast prion protein Ure2

Amyloid formation is involved in a wide range of neurodegenerative diseases including Alzheimer's and prion diseases. Structural understanding of the amyloid is critical to delineate the mechanism of aggregation and its pathological spreading. Site-directed spin labelling has emerged as a powerful structural tool in the studies of amyloid structures and provided structural evidence for the parallel in-register β-sheet structure for a wide range of amyloid proteins. It is generally accepted that spin labelling does not disrupt the structure of the amyloid fibrils, the end product of protein aggregation. The effect on the rate of protein aggregation, however, has not been well characterized. Here, we employed a scanning mutagenesis approach to study the effect of spin labelling on the aggregation rate of 79 spin-labelled variants of the Ure2 prion domain. The aggregation of Ure2 protein is the basis of yeast prion [URE3]. We found that all spin-labelled Ure2 mutants aggregated within the experimental timeframe of 15 to 40 h. Among the 79 spin-labelled positions, only five residue sites (N23, N27, S33, I35 and G42) showed a dramatic delay in the aggregation rate as a result of spin labelling. These positions may be important for fibril nucleation, a rate-limiting step in aggregation. Importantly, spin labelling at most of the sites had a muted effect on Ure2 aggregation kinetics, showing a general tolerance of spin labelling in protein aggregation studies.