Evidence that serine L223 is involved in the proton transfer pathway to QB in the photosynthetic reaction center of Rhodopseudomonas viridis

Mechanism of Asparagine-Mediated Proton Transfer in Photosynthetic Reaction Centers

In photosynthetic reaction centers from purple bacteria (PbRCs), light-induced charge separation leads to the reduction of the terminal electron acceptor quinone, QB. The reduction of QB to QB•- is followed by protonation via Asp-L213 and Ser-L223 in PbRC from Rhodobacter sphaeroides. However, Asp-L213 is replaced with nontitratable Asn-L222 and Asn-L213 in PbRCs from Thermochromatium tepidum and Blastochloris viridis, respectively. Here, we investigated the energetics of proton transfer along the asparagine-involved H-bond network using a quantum mechanical/molecular mechanical approach. The potential energy profile for the H-bond between H3O+ and the carbonyl O site of Asn-L222 shows that the proton is predominantly localized at the Asn-L222 moiety in the T. tepidum PbRC protein environment, easily forming the enol species. The release of the proton from the amide -NH2 site toward Ser-L232 via tautomerization suffers from the energy barrier. Upon reorientation of Asn-L222, the enol -OH site forms a short low-barrier H-bond with Ser-L232, facilitating protonation of QB•- in a Grotthuss-like mechanism. This is a basis of how asparagine or glutamine side chains function as acceptors/donors in proton transfer pathways.

The nonheme iron in photosystem II

Photosystem II (PSII), the light-driven water:plastoquinone (PQ) oxidoreductase of oxygenic photosynthesis, contains a nonheme iron (NHI) at its electron acceptor side. The NHI is situated between the two PQs QA and QB that serve as one-electron transmitter and substrate of the reductase part of PSII, respectively. Among the ligands of the NHI is a (bi)carbonate originating from CO2, the substrate of the dark reactions of oxygenic photosynthesis. Based on recent advances in the crystallography of PSII, we review the structure of the NHI in PSII and discuss ideas concerning its function and the role of bicarbonate along with a comparison to the reaction center of purple bacteria and other enzymes containing a mononuclear NHI site.

Proton transfer in the photosynthetic reaction center of Blastochloris viridis

Photosynthetic reaction centers of Blastochloris viridis require two quanta of light to catalyse a two-step reduction of their secondary ubiquinone Q(B) to ubiquinol. We employed capacitive potentiometry to follow the voltage changes that were caused by the accompanying transmembrane proton displacements. At pH 7.5 and 20 degrees C, the Q(B)-related voltage generation after the first flash was contributed by a fast, temperature-independent component with a time constant of approximately 30 micros and a slower component of approximately 200 micros with activation energy (E(a)) of 50 kJ/mol. The kinetics after the second flash featured temperature-independent components of 5 micros and 200 micros followed by a component of 600 micros with E(a) approximately 60 kJ/mol.

X-Ray Structure Determination of Three Mutants of the Bacterial Photosynthetic Reaction Centers from Rb. sphaeroides

In the photosynthetic reaction center (RC) from Rhodobacter sphaeroides, the reduction of a bound quinone molecule Q(B) is coupled with proton uptake. When Asp-L213 is replaced by Asn, proton transfer is inhibited. Proton transfer was restored by two second-site revertant mutations, Arg-M233-->Cys and Arg-H177-->His. Kinetic effects of Cd(2+) on proton transfer showed that the entry point in revertant RCs to be the same as in the native RC. The structures of the parental and two revertant RCs were determined at resolutions of 2.10, 1.80, and 2.75 A. From the structures, we were able to delineate alternate proton transfer pathways in the revertants. The main changes occur near Glu-H173, which allow it to substitute for the missing Asp-L213. The electrostatic changes near Glu-H173 cause it to be a good proton donor and acceptor, and the structural changes create a cavity which accommodates water molecules that connect Glu-H173 to other proton transfer components.

Proton and electron transfer in bacterial reaction centers

The bacterial reaction center couples light-induced electron transfer to proton pumping across the membrane by reactions of a quinone molecule Q(B) that binds two electrons and two protons at the active site. This article reviews recent experimental work on the mechanism of the proton-coupled electron transfer and the pathways for proton transfer to the Q(B) site. The mechanism of the first electron transfer, k((1))(AB), Q(-)(A)Q(B)-->Q(A)Q(-)(B), was shown to be rate limited by conformational gating. The mechanism of the second electron transfer, k((2))(AB), was shown to involve rapid reversible proton transfer to the semiquinone followed by rate-limiting electron transfer, H(+)+Q(-)(A)Q(-)(B) ifQ(-)(A)Q(B)H-->Q(A)(Q(B)H)(-). The pathways for transfer of the first and second protons were elucidated by high-resolution X-ray crystallography as well as kinetic studies showing changes in the rate of proton transfer due to site directed mutations and metal ion binding.

The coupling of light-induced electron transfer and proton uptake as derived from crystal structures of reaction centres from Rhodopseudomonas viridis modified at the binding site of the secondary quinone, QB

BACKGROUND

In a reaction of central importance to the energetics of photosynthetic bacteria, light-induced electron transfer in the reaction centre (RC) is coupled to the uptake of protons from the cytoplasm at the binding site of the secondary quinone (QB). In the original structure of the RC from Rhodopseudomonas viridis (PDB entry code 1PRC), the QB site was poorly defined because in the standard RC crystals it was only approximately 30% occupied with ubiquinone-9 (UQ9). We report here the structural characterization of the QB site by crystallographic refinement of UQ9-depleted RCs and of complexes of the RC either with ubiquinone-2 (UQ2) or the electron-transfer inhibitor stigmatellin in the QB site.

RESULTS

The structure of the RC complex with UQ2, refined at 2.45 A resolution, constitutes the first crystallographically reliably defined binding site for quinones from the bioenergetically important quinone pool of biological, energy-transducing membranes. In the UQ9-depleted QB site of the RC structure, refined at 2.4 A resolution, apparently five (and possibly six) water molecules are bound instead of the ubiquinone head group, and a detergent molecule binds in the region of the isoprenoid tail. All of the protein-cofactor interactions implicated in the binding of the ubiquinone head group are also implicated in the binding of the stigmatellin head group. In the structure of the stigmatellin-RC complex, refined at 2.4 A resolution, additional hydrogen bonds stabilize the binding of stigmatellin over that of ubiquinone. The tentative position of UQ9 in the QB site in the original data set (1PRC) was re-examined using the structure of the UQ9-depleted RC as a reference. A modified QB site model, which exhibits greater similarity to the distal ubiquinone-10 (UQ10) positioning in the structure of the RC from Rhodobacter sphaeroides (PDB entry code 1PCR), is suggested as the dominant binding site for native UQ9.

CONCLUSIONS

The structures reported here can provide models of quinone reduction cycle intermediates. The binding pattern observed for the stigmatellin complex, where the ligand donates a hydrogen bond to Ser L223 (where 'L' represents the L subunit of the RC), can be viewed as a model for the stabilization of a monoprotonated reduced intermediate (QBH or QBH-). The presence of Ser L223 in the QB site indicates that the QB site is not optimized for QB binding, but for QB reduction to the quinol.

Calculated coupling of electron and proton transfer in the photosynthetic reaction center of Rhodopseudomonas viridis

Based on new Rhodopseudomonas (Rp.) viridis reaction center (RC) coordinates with a reliable structure of the secondary acceptor quinone (QB) site, a continuum dielectric model and finite difference technique have been used to identify clusters of electrostatically interacting ionizable residues. Twenty-three residues within a distance of 25 A from QB (QB cluster) have been shown to be strongly electrostatically coupled to QB, either directly or indirectly. An analogous cluster of 24 residues is found to interact with QA (QA cluster). Both clusters extend to the cytoplasmic surface in at least two directions. However, the QB cluster differs from the QA cluster in that it has a surplus of acidic residues, more strong electrostatic interactions, is less solvated, and experiences a strong positive electrostatic field arising from the polypeptide backbone. Consequently, upon reduction of QA or QB, it is the QB cluster, and not the QA cluster, which is responsible for substoichiometric proton uptake at neutral pH. The bulk of the changes in the QB cluster are calculated to be due to the protonation of a tightly coupled cluster of the three Glu residues (L212, H177, and M234) within the QB cluster. If the lifetime of the doubly reduced state QB2- is long enough, Asp M43 and Ser L223 are predicted to also become protonated. The calculated complex titration behavior of the strongly interacting residues of the QB cluster and the resulting electrostatic response to electron transfer may be a common feature in proton-transferring membrane protein complexes.

Electron and proton transfer to the quinones in bacterial photosynthetic reaction centers: insight from combined approaches of molecular genetics and biophysics

We present here new results together with an overview of the current knowledge on the coupled processes of electron and proton transfer in bacterial reaction centers. The importance of a multidisciplinary approach associating molecular genetics, structural biology, biochemistry and spectroscopy is underlined. We emphasize the electrostatic role of the protein to maintain a negative electrostatic potential near the second quinone electron acceptor in order to: i) accelerate the overall rate of proton transfer from the cytoplasm to this acceptor by increasing the pKs of some groups involved in this process; ii) increase the local proton concentration near this acceptor. We also point out the possibility of long distance propagation of the electrostatic effects through the protein associated with relaxation processes triggered by the formation of the semiquinone anions on the first flash.

Structure of the photosynthetic reaction centre from Rhodobacter sphaeroides at 2.65 A resolution: cofactors and protein-cofactor interactions

BACKGROUND

Photosynthetic reaction centres (RCs) catalyze light-driven electron, transport across photosynthetic membranes. The photosynthetic bacterium Rhodobacter, sphaeroides is often used for studies of RCs, and three groups have determined the structure of its reaction centre. There are discrepancies between these structures, however, and to resolve these we have determined the structure to higher resolution than before, using a new crystal form.

RESULTS

The new structure provides a more detailed description of the Rb. sphaeroides RC, and allows us to compare it with the structure of the RC from Rhodopseudomonas viridis. We find no evidence to support most of the published differences in cofactor binding between the RCs from Rps. viridis and Rb. sphaeroides. Generally, the mode of cofactor binding is conserved, particularly along the electron transfer pathway. Substantial differences are only found at ring V of one bacteriochlorophyll of the 'special pair' and for the secondary quinone, QB. A water chain with a length of about 23 A including 14 water molecules extends from the QB to the cytoplasmic side of the RC.

CONCLUSIONS

The cofactor arrangement and the mode of binding to the protein seem to be very similar among the non-sulphur bacterial photosynthetic RCs. The functional role of the displaced QB molecule, which might be present as quinol, rather than quinone, is not yet clear. The newly discovered water chain to the QB binding site suggests a pathway for the protonation of the secondary quinone QB.

Flash-induced electrogenic reactions in the SA(L223) reaction center mutant in Rhodobacter sphaeroides chromatophores

The charge transfer events in the SA(L223) reaction center mutant Rhodobacter sphaeroides chromatophores were investigated by direct electrometry. Besides the primary charge separation, the small stigmatellin-sensitive electrogenic reaction due to the electron transfer from the primary to the secondary quinone acceptor in the reaction center complex was observed after the first flash. The second flash-induced electrogenic phase of the secondary quinone protonation and subsequent electrogenic reactions of the cytochrome bc1 complex were much slower than those in chromatophores of the wild type. It is suggested that replacement of Ser-L223 by Ala impairs both specific proton-conducting pathways leading to the secondary quinone QB.

Structure and function of the photosynthetic reaction center from Rhodobacter sphaeroides

The three-dimensional structure of the photosynthetic reaction center from Rhodobacter sphaeroides is described. The reaction center is a transmembrane protein that converts light into chemical energy. The protein has three subunits: L, M, and H. The mostly helical L and M subunits provide the scaffolding and the finely tuned environment in which the chromophores carry out electron transfer. The details of the protein-chromophore interactions are from studies of a trigonal crystal form that diffracted to 2.65-A resolution. Functional studies of the multi-subunit complex by site-specific replacement of key amino acid residues are summarized in the context of the molecular structure.

Pathway of proton transfer in bacterial reaction centers: role of aspartate-L213 in proton transfers associated with reduction of quinoneto dihydroquinone

The role of Asp-L213 in proton transfer to reduced quinone QB in the reaction center (RC) from Rhodobacter sphaeroides was studied by site-directed replacement of Asp with residues having different proton donor properties. Reaction centers (RCs) with Asn, Leu, Thr, and Ser at L213 had greatly reduced (approximately 6000-fold) proton-coupled electron transfer [kAB(2)] and proton uptake rates associated with the second electron reduction of QB (QA- QB- + 2H(+)-->QAQBH2) compared to native RCs. RCs containing Glu at L213 showed faster (approximately 90-fold) electron and proton transfer rates than the other mutant RCs but were still reduced (approximately 70-fold) compared with native RCs. These results show that kAB(2) is larger when a carboxylic acid occupies the L213 site, consistent with the proposal that Asp-L213 is a component of a proton transfer chain. The reduced kAB(2) observed with Glu versus Asp at L213 suggests that Asp at L213 is important for proton transfer for some other reason in addition to its proton transfer capabilities. Glu-L213 is estimated to have a higher apparent pKa (pKa > or = 7) than Asp-L213 (pKa < or = 4), as indicated by the slower rate of charge recombination (D+QAQB(-)-->DQAQB) in the mutant RCs. The importance of the pKa and charge of the residue at L213 for proton transfer are discussed. Based on these studies, a model for proton transfer is proposed in which Asp-L213 contributes to proton transfer in native RCs in two ways: (1) it is a component of a proton transfer chain connecting the buried QB molecule with the solvent and/or (2) it provides a negative charge that stabilizes a proton on or near QB.